Top posts on Progressive Geographies this week

A quiet week on the blog – I was in Paris most of the week doing work in the BNF (see no 4 below), which doesn’t have internet in the manuscripts room, so no distractions…

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Geopoliticus Child: Drone Workshop in Neuchatel

stuartelden:

A report on the recent drones conference in Neuchâtel.

Originally posted on rhulgeopolitics:

from thedali.org/

I’m on my way back from a fantastic if sweltering conference hosted by Francisco Klauser and Silvano Pedrozo in Neuchatel, yards from the beautiful Lake Geneva. The workshop was titled ‘Power and Space in the Drone Age’ and opened to a wonderful start with a keynote from Jeremy Crampton on drone assemblages, algorithmic lives, and their economies. I really enjoyed talks from a session I chaired on the making of the drone by Anna Jackman (Exeter, UK) who gave some fascinating insights into drone trade shows, and Ciara Bracken-Roche (Queens, Ontario) on the relationship between the drone industry in Canada, which is highly involved in the formation of new regulation, and the wider public perception of the drone. Other talks included keynotes from Ian Shaw, Ole Jensen and papers from Silvano Pedrozo, Synne Tolerud Bull, Irendra Radjavali and Neil Waghorn. As I left Kyle Grayson was starting to discuss…

View original 322 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Spatial Justice and the Irish Crisis reviewed

stuartelden:

Spatial Justice and the Irish Crisis, edited by Gerry Kearns, David Meredith and John Morrissey, reviewed at the Society and Space open site.

Originally posted on Society and space:

9781908996367Denis Linehan reviewsSpatial Justice and the Irish Crisis, a volume edited by Gerry Kearns, David Meredith and John Morrissey and published by the Royal Irish Academy in 2014.

Spatial Justice and the Irish Crisis is an important collection of geographical essays which provides a coherent and sustained critique of the 2008 crisis and its impacts on Ireland. Building on research projects by its main contributors, the volume aims at identifying the injustices found in the underlying spatial structure of Irish social life. The collection also opens a debate on the application and use of the phrase ‘spatial justice’, offering throughout reflections on its merits, potential and applications. Continue reading Denis’ review here.

View original

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

“Future Fossils” Exhibition by Beth Greenhough, Jamie Lorimer and Kathryn Yusoff

stuartelden:

A Society and Space open site forum on the notion of ‘Future Fossils’.

Originally posted on Society and space:

(Image: Helen Prichard and Kathryn Yusoff 2014) (Image: Helen Pritchard and Kathryn Yusoff 2014)

Future Fossils? Specimens from the 5th millennium ‘Return to Earth’ expedition

One of the key challenges posed by the Anthropocene concept is that it forces us to engage with both an entangled present and its uncertain futures. While seemingly anthropocentric (in its claim that the influence of humanity is all pervasive), the idea of an Anthropocene highlights how the non-human and inhuman world is firmly embedded within and through us. How will future generations of lively entities differentiate between human and other species, their forms of knowledge-making, space-marking and relations to broader geomorphological, biological, socio-economic processes?

The Anthropocene provides a provocation to think life differently and to make prominent the geo-politics of an epochal event, whose present and future telling offers opportunities for alternative ways of writing the Earth.

So, imagine it is the year 5000AD. A group of future earth-writers convene an…

View original 341 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

A copy of Michel Foucault’s Folie et déraison: Histoire de la folie à l’âge classique

HFIt’s fairly well known that there are various editions of Foucault’s first major work – Histoire de la folie à l’âge classique.

There is the original 1961 edition: Folie et déraison: Histoire de la folie à l’âge classique, published by Plon and based on his thesis.

An abridged edition was published in the Union générale d’éditions 10/18 series in 1964 as Histoire de la folie à l’âge classique. This was later translated into English, along with an additional chapter of the original, as Madness and Civilisation: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason.

In 1972, Foucault reissued almost the full book, with Gallimard. The original preface was missing, a new one was in its place, and there were two appendices – ‘Mon corps, ce papier, ce feu’ and ‘La folie, l’absence d’œuvre’. That was the version translated as History of Madness in 2006, which also includes the original preface.

inside coverIn 1976, the 1972 version (i.e. with the new preface and without the original one) but without the appendices was reissued in Gallimard’s cheaper Tel series. This is the version that is still in print today. The 1961 preface and the 1972 appendices all appear in Dits et écrits. The book will be included in the forthcoming Oeuvres in the Pléiade series, which is supposed to be a critical edition, so I’d assume both prefaces at least will be in there.

What I hadn’t realised is that the 1961 edition was reprinted by Plon in 1964 – possibly also in other years. And it’s a copy of that 1964 reprint that I found for a reasonable price from a Parisian bookstore. Copies of the 1961 original are very expensive – hundreds of pounds or more, depending on condition.

The copy I bought is in almost perfect condition. The pages are still uncut, and it’s in a plastic wrapper so the cover is well-preserved. It’s not a first edition of course, but it is a reprint of the first edition. I had copies of all the other above editions – 1964 10/18 abridgement, the 1972, the 1976 and both translations – before, so this was a nice discovery.

Posted in Michel Foucault, Publishing | 1 Comment

The revised order of Agamben’s Homo Sacer series

Adam Kotsko has the details here. Now complete in Italian, and nearly in English:

1. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life

2.1. State of Exception
2.2. Stasis: Civil War as a Political Paradigm
2.3. The Sacrament of Language: An Archeology of the Oath
2.4. The Kingdom and the Glory: For a Theological Genealogy of Economy and Glory
2.5. Opus Dei: An Archeology of Duty

3. Remnants of Auschwitz: The Witness and the Archive

4.1. The Highest Poverty: Monastic Rules and Form-of-Life
4.2. The Use of Bodies

This replaces the order Nicholas Dahmann put into visual form for this blog.

Posted in Giorgio Agamben | 1 Comment

The Sociological Imagination – 40 reasons why you should blog about your research

40 reasons why you should blog about your research at The Sociological Imagination

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

The Times Higher Education on ’10 steps to PhD failure’

The Times Higher Education on ‘10 steps to PhD failure‘. Some of these are rather US-specific, especially concerning the advice on funding, but generally these are worth thinking about. On the issue of staying in the same place, I don’t think that’s as clear-cut as it’s implied here: I did my BSc and PhD at the same place, without an MA in-between, and I didn’t feel it disadvantaged me. 4, 6, 7 and 9 are especially worth taking seriously.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Foucault: The Birth of Power Update 2 – work on early period at the Collège de France and another visit to the Bibliothèque Nationale

Foucault’s Last Decade is now being copy-edited, with a view to proofs in the autumn and hopefully publication in April. I worked with the same copy-editor for Sloterdijk Now. It’s always good to hear that the text I submitted is seen as ‘well-written and polished’, since it decreases the work for everyone involved.

With the book on the earlier period, I’ve mainly been working on the Introduction and Chapter One over the past couple of weeks, along with another visit to the Bibliothèque Nationale (BnF).

In terms of writing, one of the tasks was developing a longer reading of Foucault’s inaugural lecture, ‘The Order of Discourse’. It’s not clear from this short text what was actually delivered in the lecture on 2 December 1970, and what was added from the manuscript at a later date. But it’s a fascinating text. I also returned to “Titres et travaux”, his 1969 presentation of his previous work and future agenda for the post at the Collège de France. The most recent French edition of Didier Eribon’s biography has some other documents relating to this process. All very interesting, and while the 1970-71 course Lectures on the Will to Know delivers on some of what is promised, from Théories et institutions pénales onwards Foucault took his work in really quite distinct directions.

BNFI have also spent five days in Paris, again working at the BnF. There is a lot of material now available. Because I am concentrating on the 1969-75 period, this gives me a focus for what material I’m looking at. The manuscripts for some of the Collège de France courses are available, but I’ve decided that, for the moment at least, I will not be comparing the published versions with the manuscripts. In any case, for two of the courses from the period, the published course is based directly on the manuscript, and for one other it is based on a transcript made at the time that Foucault corrected. There are no tapes for any of the first three courses. Unless I thought there were errors of transcription, there would be little to gain, aside from the interest in seeing the manuscript itself. But I’ve now read a few thousand pages of Foucault’s handwriting, and the appeal is wearing off… For Psychiatric Power it might be worth looking at the manuscript, since that text was edited on the basis of transcribed recordings, and quite early in the process – before such extensive quotation from the manuscript became the editorial norm.

What I did instead was spend several days looking at Foucault’s preliminary reading notes for his early Collège de France lecture courses, and at several boxes of notes towards Surveiller et punir. I found some interesting things in all these, and plan to say a bit more about them when I talk on the 1971-72 course in Nottingham in just a couple of weeks. For Surveiller et punir the best way I can describe it is like taking the back off a clock…

I also worked through what are filed as his notes for a 1969 course at Vincennes, with the fascinating title ‘Freud, sexualité, Folie’ but the notes are non-systematic and there is no sign of the manuscript of the course in the available files. Filed here, though not necessary part of the same project, are some quite detailed notes on heredity. This was a potential project mentioned by Foucault several times around 1969-70, but which he abandons, suggesting that François Jacob had already done the work (see my earlier comments on this here). I’d written a bit about this before, but I’m glad I held it back for this book as this new material really helps with how it can be discussed.

The filing system for the materials is unclear: notes for books appear in boxes 1-5, 31, 34-36; for courses in boxes 32, 6-10; and then there are thematic notes in boxes 11-23, 27-28. 17 is missing from the catalogue. Early notes from the 1950s are in boxes 33 and 37-38. Material relating to seminars and related publications is in boxes 24-26. Boxes 40ff are not listed, though I may know what is in box 58. The categories ‘Cours au Collège de France’ and for ‘Correspondence’ appear in the catalogue, but their contents and box numbers are not listed, with the exception of the file for Théories et institutions pénales.

More importantly, the headings for each box are sometimes vague and at times misleading. I found notes from the late 1960s/early 1970s in with notes from the 1950s, and thematic ordering fits better with how Foucault organised his files. It would be difficult to date precisely any single note, since Foucault used roughly the same style of note taking from early to late, though he seems to switch size of paper from A5 to A4 in the early 1970s. We can sometimes be sure of an approximate date from the relation of notes to published materials or datable lectures; but I would ideally like to work the other way round – use the notes to help indicate when the preparatory work for lectures or publications was undertaken.

The notes are sometimes enclosed in a folded sheet of paper, to make thematic subdivisions, and those papers are often recycled from something else. These are generally not marked, but can be interesting – draft pages of his own manuscripts; several pages from a prospectus for a complete works on Bataille, a flyer for a demonstration in support of a student facing disciplinary action, the programme of a cultural event in Sweden, etc. In the notes relating to Surveiller et punir there are some manuscript pages, sometimes double-sided, which appear to be drafts of lectures and in part of the book itself. Given that the book ms. itself does not seemingly exist anymore, these are quite interesting. I’ve said a bit about the way Foucault wrote manuscripts before. There is nothing quite of the quality of a lost Cicero text hidden in an Augustine manuscript, but intriguing nonetheless. I did find an entire early unpublished short text, but it is outside the date range of the planned study and I doubt I will do anything with this. It’s not quite juvenilia, but would fit the description of ‘Foucault before Foucault’. A few pieces of correspondence are in the files, seemingly by chance; occasionally Foucault uses a piece of scrap paper for notes, and once uses a page of Collège de France headed notepaper. That page can at least be given a definite earliest date.

I need to return to work through more materials, so I’ll be planning future visits in the autumn as time allows. It’s quite tiring work, because Foucault’s handwriting is very difficult, and this week I’ve been in the manuscripts room all the time it’s open with only a brief break for lunch for five days straight. When Foucault is writing it can be possible to work out what he means by the context, but proper names can be hard, because it’s difficult to guess their correct spelling. He frequently misses accents, or joins them into the next letter. The bibliography in Discipline and Punish was invaluable in working out what text and which author was meant. Internet searching and online catalogues helped complete most of the rest. He has some shorthand symbols that I’ve worked out – Δ for Dieu; φ for Philosophy, for example – and tends to abbreviate the end of some words by missing some characters and putting the last letters in superscript and underlining it. Usually I get there in the end, but it is time-consuming. And there is a lot of material to work through…

The next thing to work on chronologically would be Lectures on the Will to Know, for which I have detailed notes already, but after the weekend I’m going to have to move to Théories et insitutions pénales, which will be my focus for the lecture in Nottingham in September. I’m only planning on talking about the second part of the course there, rather than the material on the Nu-pieds, and I hope to have a chance to talk about that part at some other point soon.

You can read more about these books, along with links to previous updates, here. And, as a reminder, a lot of resources I produced while writing Foucault’s Last Decade are available here. It includes a list of audio files, a bibliography of collaborative projects, a list of short pieces which did not appear in Dits et écrits, comparison of variant forms of texts, a few short translations, and so on.

Posted in Foucault's Last Decade, Foucault: The Birth of Power, Michel Foucault | 1 Comment

Books received – Sloterdijk, Foucault, Shakespeare, Saquet

books received 24 Aug 2015

The latest translation from Sloterdijk – In the Shadow of Mount Sinai, the NRF editions of three of Foucault’s books, the New Cambridge Shakespeare edition of Romeo and Juliet, and some publications from Marcos Aurelio Saquet.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments