There are some interesting comments on last week’s thoughts on the Foucault and Neoliberalism debate – here. In particular the points made by Stephen Shapiro and Michael Behrent are worth reading – both are situating the discussion within a wider knowledge of French politics at the time, which is a very important move, although they draw different conclusions. Behrent’s comments are drawing upon, and justifying, a piece he published in Modern Intellectual History in 2009 (open access), which is translated in the Zamora collection.
Discover more from Progressive Geographies
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Pingback: Mini-Series on Foucault and Neoliberalism: Responses to Zamora | An und für sich
Pingback: Top posts this week on Progressive Geographies | Progressive Geographies
Reblogged this on Foucault News and commented:
Editor’s note: For ease of reference all the posts relevant to the current debate concerning Foucault and neoliberalism are now categorised under ‘debates’ on Foucault News.
Pingback: Foucault and Neoliberalism AUFS Event: Verena Erlenbusch – Neoliberalism and the Genealogy of Biopolitics (2014) | Foucault News
Reblogged this on Neoliberal Times.
Pingback: Liberalism without humanism: Michel Foucault and the free-market creed, 1976–1979 | Foucault News