Maria Antonietta Macciocchi – Althusser, Gramsci, Maoism, Fascism and Pasolini

Maria Antonietta Macciocchi (1922-2007) was a journalist, politician and academic. She is known for works including Daily Life in Revolutionary China (Italian and French in 1971; English in 1972). Her work on China was heavily criticised, and one example would be a roundtable organised by Esprit published in the journal to which she replied in November 1972.

This book was, however, important for the Tel Quel group, especially Philippe Sollers, and it was through Macciocchi that the Tel Quel group were invited to make their 1974 trip to China, which I write about here. That story intrigued me, and I was led from her obituary by John Francis Lane to pieces by Jadwiga Tedeschi and Robyn Marasco. There are periodic statements of her importance, but little of her work is translated and she seems to be rarely cited. This is a shame, since her work, especially on fascism, is particularly relevant today.

Macciocchi edited the Noi Donne magazine of the Italian Community Party, and later Vie Nuove, as well as writing for Unità, the paper founded by Antonio Gramsci. She studied in Paris, and later taught at the experimental University of Vincennes which was founded after May 1968.

She stood as the Italian Communist Party (PCI) candidate in a district in Naples in 1968, perhaps most interesting today because during her campaign she corresponded with Louis Althusser, about how to translate his theories and her political perspectives into a practical election campaign. Her letters about the campaign were published in Italian in 1969, in French in 1972, and translated as Letters from Inside the Italian Communist Party to Louis Althusser in 1973. The original Italian included some letters from Althusser, which are translated in the English edition, but he requested they were not included in the French edition. Macciocchi said that the letters “provided guidance and suggestions of approach [il y a donnait des indications et des suggestions de méthode]” but he believed, for reasons she did not want to judge, that “his letters would add nothing to the work [ses letteres n’ajouteraient rien à l’ouvrage]” (“Avant-propos pour l’édition française”, p. 8). Some contributions to the subsequent debate within the party were included in the second Italian edition and the translations. She was not selected to run again in 1972, in part because of her criticisms of the party in the Letters book. Her interest in China seems to have developed into a full turn to Maoism and she was eventually expelled from the PCI.

Her Pour Gramsci was published in the Tel Quel book series with Éditions du Seuil in 1974. A wide-ranging study of his work, it was important in the re-introduction of his work to French readers. Although some of his prison writings were translated in 1953, and his Oeuvres choisies in 1959, his Écrits politiques only began to be published in French in 1974. Cold War politics and internal divisions within French Marxism were behind some of the delays in his work becoming available in French. (The story of the early reception of his work in France has recently been told by Marco di Maggio, Camilla Sclocco and Anthony Crézégut. Crézégut’s article mentions a forthcoming book on Gramsci in France, but I have found no other trace of this.) The original edition of Pour Gramsci included texts by Gramsci in annexes; these were removed in the later reprints.

Macciocchi and Pasolini in Vincennes in 1974

Macciocchi taught a seminar at the University of Vincennes in 1974-75, Éléments pour une analyse du fascisme, the proceedings of which were published in two volumes in 1976. It included contributions from François Châtelet, Jean-Toussaint Desanti, Jean-Michel Palmier and Nikos Poulantzas. Poulantzas’s book on Fascism and Dictatorship had been published in 1970, and in this seminar he presented on the popular impact of fascism. Macciocchi presented on Gramsci’s theory of fascism, and fascism and women. The seminar was also interesting because it screened a lot of films with discussion. One of these was Nico Naldini’s 1974 film Fascista, with a discussion between Naldini and Pier Paolo Pasolini. The seminar is discussed by Alberto Toscano in Late Fascism (pp. 143-44) and briefly mentioned in an interview about the book. Macciocchi insists that the analysis had a political urgency, rather than just a historical interest (Vol I, 7).

Macciocchi’s 1976 book La Donna “Nera”: Consenso Femminile e fascismo [The ‘Black’ Woman: Female Consent and Fascism] has not been translated and is long out of print. It develops some themes of her teaching in Paris, arguing that an account of fascism also needs to discuss patriarchy. The “black” of the title refers not to race but to the Blackshirts, the squadristi or paramilitary squadrons of Fascist Italy. A shorter version of some of her arguments appeared in Tel Quel in 1976 and this was translated in Feminist Review in 1979, with an introduction by Jane Caplan. In the article, she describes Mussolini’s invention of the “female death squadron (widows, and mothers in mourning or semi-mourning)” for soldiers lost in the First World War, and his design for their “female dress, a dismal black uniform with a skull on the breast, for the women squadron members who attack ‘the Reds’ with daggers and hatpins” (p. 29/p. 70). The article was based on a 1975 conference paper in Milan, the proceedings of which were published as Sexualité et politique. That volume also contains papers by Sollers, Robert Castel, Luce Irigaray, Marcelin Pleynet and others. 

A few days after the 1 November 1975 kidnap, torture and murder of Pasolini, she wrote a piece in Le Monde. She said that the crime was political, and she accuses Italian society as a whole, rather than just the actual murderers, because they “could not bear his defiance (of sexual, political, and artistic prohibitions)”. She continued to speak about the case, including a November 1977 piece in La Repubblica. The French version was read at a February 1978 conference in Paris and appeared in Tel Quel later that year and then in English in October. She led a seminar 10-12 May 1979 at the Italian Cultural Institute in Paris and at Vincennes about him, with contributions by Italo Calvino, Sollers, Pleynet, Christine Buci-Glucksmann, Alain Finkielkraut and others, which was published as an edited book in 1980. 

Much of her work could be seen as Freudian-Marxist, with an influence particularly from Wilheim Reich, alongside Althusser and Gramsci. This was condemned by other parts of the left, and her seminar was disrupted by protests. This was not at all uncommon at Vincennes. Some of the pamphlets against her are reproduced in the book from the fascism seminar (Vol II, 427-38). She ran seminars on fascism and women, feminine and feminist struggles and Marxism and feminism at Vincennes between 1975 and 1978, parts of which were edited as Les femmes et leurs maîtres in 1978.

She was a member of the European parliament between 1979 and 1984 for the Radical party. I don’t know much about her later work, but she seems to have turned from Maoism to Catholicism, writing an admiring book about Pope John Paul II.

References

Marianne Bastid et. al. “Comment connaissons-nous la Chine? Table Ronde”, Esprit 418, 1972, 579-608.

Jane Caplan, “Introduction to ‘Female Sexuality in Fascist Ideology’”, Feminist Review 1, 1979, 59-66.

Anthony Crézégut, “Gramsci’s Imaginary Prisons: Genealogy of a First French Edition (1947–1959)”, trans/ Sandrine Sanos and Sylvia Schafer, History of the Present: A Journal of Critical History 15 (2), 2025, 143-69.

Marco di Maggio, “‘Misunderstandings of hegemony’: Gramsci in the French Communist Party (1953–1983)”, Actuel Marx 62 (2), 2017, 154-69.

John Francis Lane, “Obituary: Maria Macciocchi”, The Guardian, 21 May 2007, https://www.theguardian.com/news/2007/may/21/guardianobituaries.italy

Maria Antonietta Macciocchi, Lettere dall’interno del PCI a Louis Althusser, Milano: Feltrinelli, 1969; Lettres de l’intérieur du parti: le Parti communiste, les masses et les forces révolutionnaires pendant la campagne électorale à Naples en mai 1968, Paris: François Maspero, 1970; Letters from Inside the Italian Communist Party to Louis Althusser, trans. Stephen M. Hellman, London: NLB, 1973.

Maria Antonietta Macciocchi, Daily Life in Revolutionary China, London and New York: Monthly Review, 1972.

Maria Antonietta Macciocchi, Pour Gramsci, Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1974; Paris: Seuil/Points, 1975.

Maria-Antonietta Macciocchi, “Le Crime est politique”, Le Monde, 13 November 1975, 19.

Maria Antonietta Macciocchi, Éléments pour une analyse du fascisme: séminaire Paris VIII-Vincennes, 1974-1975, Paris: Union Générale d’Éditions, two volumes, 1976.

Maria Antonietta Macciocchi, La Donna “Nera”: Consenso Femminile e fascismo, Milano: Feltrinelli, 1976.

Maria Antonietta Macciocchi, “La sexualité féminine dans l’idéologie fasciste”, Tel Quel 66, 1976, 26-42; reprinted in Sexualité et politique: actes du colloque de Milan, 1975, Paris: UGE 10/18, 1977, 239-73; “Female Sexuality in Fascist Ideology”, Feminist Review 1, 1979, 67-82.

Maria Antonietta Macciocchi, Les femmes et leurs maîtres: Séminaire Paris VIII-Vincennes, ed. Jacqueline Aubenas-Bastié, Bourgois, 1978. 

Maria-Antonietta Macciocchi, “Pasolini: assassinat d’un dissident”, Tel Quel 76, 1978, 27-39; “Pasolini: Murder of a Dissident”, trans. Thomas Repensek, October 13, 1980, 11-21.

Maria-Antonietta Macciocchi ed., Pasolini: séminaire, Paris: Bernard Grasset, 1980.

Robyn Marasco, “Reconsidering the Sexual Politics of Fascism”, Historical Materialism, 2021,https://www.historicalmaterialism.org/reconsidering-the-sexual-politics-of-fascism/

Nicos Poulantzas, Fascisme et Dictature: La IIIe Internationale face au fascisme, Paris: Seuil/Maspéro, 1974 [1970];Fascism and Dictatorship: The Third International and the Problem of Fascism, trans. Judith White, London: NLB, 1974.

Nikos Poulantzas, “À propos de l’impact populaire du fascisme”, in Maria Antonietta Macciocchi, Éléments pour une analyse du fascisme: séminaire Paris VIII-Vincennes, 1974-1975, Paris: Union Générale d’Éditions, two volumes, 1976, Vol I, 88-107; “On the Popular Impact of Fascism”, The Poulantzas Reader, ed. James Martin, London: Verso, 2008, 258-69.

Camilla Sclocco, “Gramsci’s France and Gramsci in France”, International Gramsci Journal 5 (1), 2023, 109-23.

Jadwiga Tedeschi, “Maria Antonietta Macciocchi”, Woman is a Rational Animal, 8 December 2020, https://womanisrational.uchicago.edu/2020/12/08/maria-antonietta-macciocchi/

Alberto Toscano, Late Fascism: Race, Capitalism and the Politics of Crisis, London: Verso, 2023.

Alberto Toscano and Evan Calder Williams, “A Conversation on Late Fascism”, e-flux, 15 March 2024, https://www.e-flux.com/notes/596103/a-conversation-on-late-fascism

Armando Verdiglione ed. Sexualité et politique: Documents du congrès international de psychanalyse, Milan 25-28 novembre 1975, Paris: U.G.E., 1977. 


This is the 71st post of a weekly series, posted every Sunday throughout 2025, and continuing into a second year. The posts are short essays with indications of further reading and sources. They are not as formal as something I’d try to publish more conventionally, but are hopefully worthwhile as short sketches of histories and ideas. They are usually tangential to my main writing focus, a home for spare parts, asides, dead-ends and possible futures. I hope there is some interest in them. They are provisional and suggestions are welcome. A few, usually shorter, pieces in a similar style have been posted mid-week. I’m not sure I’ll keep to a weekly rhythm throughout 2026, but there will be at least a few more pieces.

The full chronological list of ‘Sunday histories’ is here, with a thematic organisation here.

Posted in Alberto Toscano, Antonio Gramsci, Italo Calvino, Louis Althusser, Luce Irigaray, Nicos Poulantzas, Sunday Histories | 1 Comment

Books received – Simon, Macciocchi, Spinney, Kristeva, Leray, Mallory

John K. Simon, Modern French Criticism; Maria-Antoinetta Macciocchi, Les femmes et leurs maîtres; Laura Spinney, Proto; Julia Kristeva, Dostoyevsky in the Face of Death; a special issue on Jean Leray; Ryan L. Allen, Adventures in the Archaic and J.P. Mallory, The Indo-Europeans Rediscovered.

Simon was Foucault’s host in Buffalo in the early 1970s (on which, see here); Macciocchi will be the subject of this week’s Sunday History. The other books relate to ongoing work on Indo-European thought or the new project on French academic prisoners of war.

Posted in Julia Kristeva, Mapping Indo-European Thought in Twentieth Century France, Michel Foucault | Leave a comment

Peter Schöttler, Marc Bloch, une biographie intellectuelle – Gallimard, May 2026

Peter Schöttler, Marc Bloch, une biographie intellectuelle – Gallimard, May 2026

Spécialiste du Moyen Âge européen, fondateur des Annales d’histoire économique et sociale — une revue devenue le porte-étendard du renouveau de la pratique historienne au XXᵉ siècle —, combattant de la Première Guerre mondiale, engagé volontaire dans l’armée en 1939, figure de la Résistance, mort en martyr sous les balles de la Gestapo en juin 1944 : Marc Bloch, l’un des historiens les plus connus et les plus cités au monde, est un symbole d’intelligence et de probité autant que d’engagement. Un « grand homme », dans toute la plénitude de l’expression.
Celui dont le propre fils, Étienne Bloch, disait la biographie « impossible » demeure néanmoins, à bien des égards, un mystère. À distance de toutes les tentatives visant à l’accaparer ou à le mettre au goût du jour, ce portrait intellectuel complet, riche et nuancé, s’attache à reconstituer et à replacer dans leur contexte le parcours, le style et la pensée d’un savant chez lequel théorie et pratique ont été, jusqu’à la dernière heure, étroitement unies.

Posted in Marc Bloch | Leave a comment

Eyal Weizman, Ungrounding: The Architecture of Genocide – Fern Press, May 2026

Eyal Weizman, Ungrounding: The Architecture of Genocide – Fern Press, May 2026

Eyal Weizman is one of the world’s leading experts on the relationship between violence, conflict and the environment, both built and natural. As director of the organisation Forensic Architecture, he and his team of interdisciplinary researchers document acts of state crimes and human rights violations around the world. Since 2023, the group has worked to produce evidence for the International Court of Justice’s genocide case against Israel.

In this revelatory new project, Weizman draws on that research to bring us on an eye-opening journey across time and into the ‘deep cartography’ of the area extending from Gaza’s subterranean tunnels through to its militarised topography, its unique soil, settlements and barriers. He catalogues, in unflinching and forensic detail, the Israeli campaigns of violence and displacement that have reshaped the region in an effort to make Gaza and its surrounding areas unliveable. Taking us through the broader geographic and historical context, from the Nakba in 1948 to the present day, Ungrounding establishes that architectural and territorial analysis is key to understanding the relationship between coloniser and colonised – and how Israel’s actions after 7 October escalated into violence so extreme and so far-reaching as to, Weizman argues, meet the definition of genocide.

Deeply informative and profoundly affecting in its scope and precision, and illustrated with dozens of original images, maps and diagrams, Ungrounding is an essential document of atrocity in our time.

Posted in Eyal Weizman, terrain, Territory, urban/urbanisation | Leave a comment

Laurie Parsons, Climate Hegemony: Confronting the Politics of Environmental Impasse – LSE Press/RGS-IBG series, May 2026 (print and open access)

Laurie Parsons, Climate Hegemony: Confronting the Politics of Environmental Impasse – LSE Press/RGS-IBG series, May 2026 (print and open access)

Climate action is at an impasse. Its political opponents are stronger than ever, its advocates powerless. Almost every major government and corporation expresses their commitment to tackling climate change, yet decades of discussion, governance, and action have failed to stop carbon emissions advancing to record annual levels. How has so little been achieved for so long on such an urgent issue?

In Climate Hegemony: Confronting the Politics of Environmental Impasse, Laurie Parsons shows how the architecture of environmental thinking has been locked into ineffective pathways. We don’t need to be coerced into inaction on climate, because our understanding is constrained by metaphors, rhetoric and assumptions so embedded we have long since ceased to see them. To confront this, Climate Hegemony brings us a human’s-eye view of the climate crisis, building up from lived experience to reveal the interests and politics that underpin the impasse. Drawing on almost two decades’ research at the frontline of global development in Cambodia, Parsons reveals the chasm between how climate change appears in a newspaper, or a policy bulletin, and how it appears to those immersed in the places it affects. From this perspective, the limitations of current environmental thinking become clear, but so too do a great many alternatives.

In this powerfully argued work, Parsons set out how, if we were to rethink the perspective from which we understand climate change, we can build knowledge from and for marginalised communities, from the ground upwards, challenging the impasse and creating new pathways to address and adapt to the social impacts of climate breakdown.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Steven Lukes, The Diversity of Morals, Princeton University Press, 2025 and NDPR review

Steven Lukes, The Diversity of Morals, Princeton University Press, 2025

NDPR review by Jussi Suikkanen

When we speak of morals, what are we speaking of? Is morality singular (as many philosophers tend to assume, even if they don’t agree on what it is) or are there multiple moralities (which social scientists, notably anthropologists, study)? In The Diversity of Morals, Steven Lukes brings together these differing perspectives. Drawing on philosophy, sociology, social anthropology, psychology, and political theory, Lukes considers what the moral domain includes and what it excludes; how what is moral differs from what is conventional or customary in different contexts; whether morality is unified or a series of fragments; and, if there is a diversity of morals, what that diversity consists of.

Lukes looks both ways—toward philosophers’ quest for a single best answer to the question of morality and toward sociologists’ and anthropologists’ assumption that there are several, even many, even very many, answers—to make sense of their divergence. He traces the two approaches back to their beginnings, linking them to the differences between the ideas of David Hume, Johann Gottfried Herder, and Adam Smith. Lukes examines how we went from viewing the social world as “us” versus “them” to thinking of morality as universal, envisioning shared humanity and the sacredness of the human person, and what prevents this vision from being realized. Considering the breakdown of moral constraints in the perpetration of mass atrocities, Lukes asks if there are phenomena that are beyond moral justification. And he raises this crucial question: in light of the vast variation that history and the ethnographic record display, how wide and how deep is the diversity of morals?

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

David Womersley, Thinking Through Shakespeare – Princeton University Press, March 2026 and New Books discussion

David Womersley, Thinking Through Shakespeare – Princeton University Press, March 2026

New Books discussion with Morteza Hajizadeh – thanks to dmf for the link

In the eighteenth century, Samuel Johnson famously argued that Shakespeare is enduringly popular because he “is above all writers, at least above all modern writers, the poet of nature; the poet that holds up to his readers a faithful mirror of manners and of life.” Johnson’s view largely prevailed until the late twentieth century, when it was challenged by a growing scepticism about the existence of a general human nature. In Thinking Through Shakespeare, eminent literary critic David Womersley pushes back against this change by exploring how Shakespeare’s plays think through—and invite us to think through—deep human questions of lasting importance.

Thinking Through Shakespeare explores four perennial human problems: personal identity, the distinction between civilization and barbarism, the relation between political power and religious authority and the tension between means and ends. It examines the history of these problems, from antiquity to today, and traces how Shakespeare engages with them in the great tragedies—OthelloHamletMacbeth and King Lear—but also in his other plays. Without arguing that human nature is universal or unchanging, or that Shakespeare has some special access to timeless wisdom, the book makes the case that his drama is powerful because it serves as a forensic tool, probing rival perspectives on questions that have preoccupied many people in many societies over many centuries.

By revealing in new ways how Shakespeare’s plays are animated and driven by central human problems, and why he should again be viewed as the great poet of human nature, Thinking Through Shakespeare opens up a richer understanding and appreciation of his work.

Posted in Uncategorized, William Shakespeare | 1 Comment

Lucien Gerschel bibliography (and other research resources)

I’ve written about Lucien Gerschel in two posts in my ‘Sunday Histories‘ series – Lucien Gerschel, Georges Dumézil, William Shakespeare and the history of Coriolanus and The Tragic Death of Lucien Gerschel and his Posthumous Text on the Finnish Sampo. He was a student of Georges Dumézil and Émile Benveniste, who died in mysterious circumstances quite young in 1970. Dumézil says that there was a plan to collect his essays in a volume, edited by Georges Charachidzé, but this never appeared.

On this page I’ve made a list of his articles and contributions to books, with links to those which are available open access online. I’m sure I will have missed things, so additions and corrections welcome.

There are some other research resources related to my Indo-European thought project here, on Émile Benveniste, Georges Dumézil and Ferdinand de Saussure, and a lot more – especially on Foucault, Bataille, Lefebvre, Ebola, Boko Haram, writing and publishing, and other thinkers and themes here.


This note is a supplement to recent pieces in the ‘Sunday histories‘ series, posted every Sunday throughout 2025, and now in a second year. The posts are short essays with indications of further reading and sources. A few, usually shorter, pieces in a similar style have been posted mid-week.

The full chronological list of ‘Sunday histories’ is here, with a thematic ordering here.

Posted in Georges Dumézil, Lucien Gerschel, Mapping Indo-European Thought in Twentieth Century France, Sunday Histories | Leave a comment

Gabriella Soto, Border Afterlives: Migrant Deaths, Forensic Investigations, and the Politics of Haunting – University of Arizona Press, March 2026

Gabriella Soto, Border Afterlives: Migrant Deaths, Forensic Investigations, and the Politics of Haunting – University of Ariona Press, March 2026

Border Afterlives begins with the undocumented individuals who die crossing the U.S.-Mexico border—deaths that are both preventable and politically produced.
 
Drawing on over a decade of ethnographic, participatory, and community-engaged research, author Gabriella Soto examines the postmortem journeys of these migrants through the fragmented infrastructure of medicolegal death investigation in the U.S. Southwest. She reveals how the state’s deterrence-based border policies not only generate death but also fail to provide adequate care for the dead. Soto argues that these deaths should be understood as structural homicides and that the forensic neglect they face is a form of ongoing violence.
 
Moving between the practical and the philosophical, Soto asks what it means to care for the dead and what society owes to those who die in its name. Through the lens of haunting, she explores how the dead continue to shape the living, not as objects of horror but as moral agents whose presence demands justice. Border Afterlives offers a border-scale comparative account of forensic practices, critiques the limits of “best practices” in under-resourced systems, and calls for a reimagining of forensic humanitarianism grounded in reciprocity and dignity, beyond human rights. This is a book that insists on remembering the dead.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Mattie Fitch, The People, the Workers, and the Citizens: Antifascist Cultures and the Popular Front in France, 1934–1939 – Routledge, December 2025 and New Books discussion with Keith Rathbone

Mattie Fitch, The People, the Workers, and the Citizens: Antifascist Cultures and the Popular Front in France, 1934–1939 – Routledge, December 2025

Very expensive hardback and e-book only at the moment.

In the 1930s, activists with France’s Popular Front mobilized culture against fascism. Examining music, theater, film, art, and festivals in Paris, Marseille, and Rouen, this book analyses approaches to antifascism and how they varied and interacted across different regions and left-wing traditions.

By combining revolutionary, republican, and working-class heritage, antifascists aimed to foster unifying identities to mobilize the French people. Simultaneously, the distinct outlooks of Communists, Radicals, and Socialists, in addition to the different visions among national figures in Paris and local activists, produced divergent understandings of antifascist culture, ultimately weakening the coalition. This study explains the political, social, and cultural context of the 1930s that generated these movements to break down barriers between ordinary citizens and French culture. It also explores how antifascists constructed the “French people,” an ambiguous concept that carried both social and civic connotations.

Aimed at a scholarly audience, this volume engages with historians of modern France and the interwar period in Europe and will interest researchers in antifascist and fascist studies, as well as the fields of cultural politics, republicanism, communism, socialism, and national and regional identity.

New Books discussion with Keith Rathbone – thanks to dmf for the link

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment