Blog Stats
- 3,645,733 hits
-
Join 11.8K other subscribers
-
Recent Posts
- Zygmunt Bauman’s ‘living bibliography’ and Dave Beer’s thoughts on his book reviews
- Dror Yinon, Deleuze and the Problem of Experience: Transcendental Empiricism – Bloomsbury, July 2025 and NDPR review
- The limited copies of the 1940 edition of Georges Dumézil’s Mitra-Varuna
- Teresa M. Bejan, First Among Equals: Visions of Equality before Egalitarianism — Harvard University Press, October 2026
- Joseph Tonda, Postcolonial Imperialism: Critique of the Society of Dazzlements – trans. Cheryl Smeall, Duke University Press, April 2026
Archives
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
Categories
- Achille Mbembe
- Adam David Morton
- Adrian Johnston
- Adriana Cavarero
- Alain Badiou
- Albert Camus
- Alberto Toscano
- Alexander B. Murphy
- Alexandre Kojève
- Alexandre Koyré
- Allen Scott
- Alphonso Lingis
- André Leroi-Gourhan
- Andreas Knichen
- Andrew Barry
- Andy Merrifield
- Ann Laura Stoler
- Anthony Giddens
- Antoine Meillet
- Antonio Gramsci
- Antonio Negri
- Arlette Farge
- arundhati roy
- Ash Amin
- Aurel Stein
- Axel Honneth
- Étienne Wolff
- Babette Babich
- Baldus de Ubaldis
- Bartolus of Sassoferrato
- Baruch Spinoza
- Bernard E. Harcourt
- Bernard Stiegler
- Bill Martin
- Bob Jessop
- Bogislaw Philipp von Chemnitz
- Books
- Boris Porshnev
- Boundaries
- Bradley Garrett
- Bruno Latour
- C.L.R. James
- Canguilhem (book)
- Caren Kaplan
- Carl Schmitt
- Carlo Ginzburg
- Catherine Malabou
- China Mieville
- Chris Philo
- Christian Parenti
- Clarence J. Glacken
- Claude Lévi-Strauss
- Claude Raffestin
- Clémence Ramnoux
- Colin Gordon
- Conferences
- Cornel West
- Couze Venn
- Cricket
- Cycling
- Daniel Defert
- Daniel Heller-Roazen
- David Byrne
- David Campbell
- David Farrell Krell
- David Harvey
- David Lachterman
- David N. Livingstone
- Deborah Cowen
- Derek Gregory
- Derek Parfit
- Don Mitchell
- Doreen Massey
- E. P. Thompson
- Ebola
- Edgar Allan Poe
- Edmund Husserl
- Eduardo Mendieta
- Edward Casey
- Edward Gibbon
- Edward Said
- Edward Soja
- Elizabeth Grosz
- Ellen Meiksins Wood
- Emile Benveniste
- Emmanuel Levinas
- Engin Isin
- Enrique Dussel
- Eric Hobsbawm
- Ernesto Laclau
- Ernst Cassirer
- Ernst Kantorowicz
- Erwin Panofsky
- Etienne Balibar
- Eugen Fink
- Events
- Eyal Weizman
- Felix Guattari
- Ferdinand de Saussure
- Fernand Braudel
- Football
- Fossils
- Foucault's Last Decade
- Foucault: The Birth of Power
- François Delaporte
- François Ellenberger
- Francisco de Vitoria
- Franco Moretti
- Frantz Fanon
- Franz Kafka
- Fredric Jameson
- Friedrich Engels
- Friedrich Nietzsche
- Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schelling
- Gaston Bachelard
- Gaston Gordillo
- Geographica Helvetica
- Georg Lukács
- Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel
- George Lawson
- Georges Bataille
- Georges Canguilhem
- Georges Dumézil
- Giacomo Marramao
- Gilles Deleuze
- Gillian Rose
- Giorgio Agamben
- Giovanni Botero
- Gottfried Leibniz
- Graham Harman
- Grégoire Chamayou
- Gunnar Olsson
- Guy Debord
- H.P. Lovecraft
- Haim Yacobi
- Hannah Arendt
- Henri de Boulainviller
- Henri Lefebvre
- Herbert Marcuse
- Hugo Grotius
- Ian Bogost
- Ian Hacking
- Immanuel Kant
- Institute of Advanced Study
- Irnerius
- Isaac Newton
- Isabelle Stengers
- Italo Calvino
- J.G.A. Pocock
- Jacob Klein
- Jacob Taubes
- Jacques Derrida
- Jacques Lacan
- Jacques Rancière
- Jakob von Uexküll
- James Harrington
- Jane Bennett
- Jürgen Habermas
- jean baudrillard
- Jean Bodin
- Jean Cavaillès
- Jean Gottmann
- Jean Hyppolite
- Jean Jacques Rousseau
- Jean-Luc Nancy
- Jean-Paul Sartre
- Jeff Malpas
- Jeffrey Jerome Cohen
- Jenny Edkins
- Jeremy Bamber
- Jeremy Bentham
- Jeremy Crampton
- Jodi Dean
- Johannes Althusius
- Johannes Hertius
- John Agnew
- John Locke
- John Protevi
- John Rawls
- John Sallis
- John Urry
- Jonathan Simon
- Journal of Urban Cultural Studies
- Judith Butler
- Julia Kristeva
- Juliet Fall
- Karl Jaspers
- Karl Marx
- Klaus Theweleit
- Kostas Axelos
- Lauren Berlant
- Léopold Lambert
- Lee Braver
- Levi Bryant
- Louis Althusser
- Louise Amoore
- Luce Irigaray
- Lucien Febvre
- Ludwig Binswanger
- Luiza Bialasiewicz
- Maja Zehfuss
- Manuel deLanda
- Mapping Indo-European Thought in Twentieth Century France
- Mapping the Present
- Marc Bloch
- Marc Crépon
- Marcel Detienne
- Marcel Mauss
- Marie-Eve Morin
- Marie-Madeleine Davy
- Mark Neocleous
- Martin Heidegger
- Martin Luther
- Mary Beard
- Massimo Cacciari
- Matthew Hannah
- Matthias Stephani
- Maurice Blanchot
- Maurice Merleau-Ponty
- Maximilien Robespierre
- Medieval Studies
- Mehdi Belhaj Kacem
- Michael Dillon
- Michael Hardt
- Michael Mann
- Michael Watts
- Michel Foucault
- Michel Serres
- Mircea Eliade
- Music
- My Publications
- Naomi Klein
- Nathan Widder
- Neil Brenner
- Neil Smith
- Niccolò Machiavelli
- Nicholas Blomley
- Nicholas of Cusa
- Nicos Poulantzas
- Nigel Thrift
- Nina Power
- Noam Chomsky
- Novels read
- Paolo Virno
- Paul Veyne
- Paul Virilio
- People
- Peter Brown
- Peter Gratton
- Peter Hallward
- Peter Sloterdijk
- Philip Steinberg
- Philipp Melanchthon
- Pierre Bourdieu
- Pierre Hadot
- Pierre Klossowski
- Pierre Macherey
- Politics
- Publishing
- Quentin Meillassoux
- Quentin Skinnner
- Ralph Miliband
- Ray Brassier
- Raymond Ruyer
- Raymond Williams
- Reinhart Koselleck
- Remarkable Research
- René Descartes
- René Girard
- Revista Urban
- Robert Filmer
- Roberto Esposito
- Roger Caillois
- Roland Barthes
- Roman Jakobson
- Samuel Pufendorf
- Sara Ahmed
- Saskia Sassen
- Setha Low
- Shakespearean Territories
- Sigmund Freud
- Simon Critchley
- Simon Schama
- Simone de Beauvoir
- Simone Weil
- Slavoj Zizek
- Society and Space
- Speaking Against Number
- Stanley Cavell
- Stefanos Geroulanos
- Stephen Graham
- Stephen Greenblatt
- Stuart Hall
- Sunday Histories
- Tariq Ali
- teaching
- terrain
- Territory
- Terror and Territory
- Terry Eagleton
- The Archaeology of Foucault
- The Birth of Territory
- The Early Foucault
- The Space of the World
- Theodor Reinking
- Theory
- Theory, Culture and Society
- Thomas Hobbes
- Thomas Pynchon
- Timothy Morton
- Travel
- Trevor Paglen
- Tristan Garcia
- Troy Davis
- Udalricus Zasius
- Umberto Eco
- Uncategorized
- Understanding Henri Lefebvre
- Universities
- urban/urbanisation
- Vladimir Nabokov
- Walter Benjamin
- Walter Ralegh
- Wendy Brown
- William E Connolly
- William Shakespeare
- Writing
- Wu Ming
Meta
Zygmunt Bauman’s ‘living bibliography’ and Dave Beer’s thoughts on his book reviews
Posted in Uncategorized
1 Comment
Dror Yinon, Deleuze and the Problem of Experience: Transcendental Empiricism – Bloomsbury, July 2025 and NDPR review
Dror Yinon, Deleuze and the Problem of Experience: Transcendental Empiricism – Bloomsbury, July 2025
This comprehensive reframing of Gilles Deleuze as a transcendental empiricist delves into his seminal Difference and Repetition to unearth a system that inverts the Kantian worldview. By focusing on Deleuze’s theory of the faculties, we can see how he builds a transcendental system of thought that defies the predictability of empirical experience.
The place of experience in the way we understand our relation to the world, to others and to ourselves, is a central theme of modern philosophy. Deleuze’s transcendental empiricism points to an unexplored direction in this major philosophical preoccupation. It is a road not taken that, against the tide of his times, rejected the possibility of an immediate contact with being and embraced the possibility of reaching a ‘real’ that lay beneath many layers of mediation. Unlike many of his contemporaries, Deleuze neither subscribed to a specific philosophical school nor did he try to establish one. This new understanding of him as a transcendental empiricist not only helps to situate his work in the constellation of twentieth century French philosophers but also helps us to understand a philosopher for whom difference and heterogeneity were central to his own philosophical corpus.
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
The limited copies of the 1940 edition of Georges Dumézil’s Mitra-Varuna
In 1943, the American librarian and Sanskrit scholar Horace Poleman wrote a review of Georges Dumézil’s 1940 book Mitra-Varuna: Essai sur deux représentations indo-européennes de la souveraineté for the Journal of the American Oriental Society. Interestingly, given the accusations made of Dumézil’s politics, Poleman sees the book as a “political diatribe against Nazism” (p. 80), particularly focusing on the discussion of “Totalitarian and Distributive Economies” in Chapter VIII.
That is not my concern here. I discuss these political issues in my introduction to the recent re-edition of the translation of Mitra-Varuna (open access), and in much more detail in my developing book manuscript on Émile Benveniste, Dumézil and Indo-European thought in twentieth century France. But Poleman links the political sense he perceives to the difficulty, even in 1943, of finding copies of the book.
The author sent this review copy, which he stated was one of the few copies he had been able to get out of Paris before the German occupation, to the Library of Congress via an attaché of the French Embassy at the Turkish capital. He fears that all but six copies rescued by himself have been destroyed by the Nazi Kultur purgers (p. 80).
The Gallimard website says the first edition was published in May 1940 – the very month France was invaded. After the war, Dumézil reedited the book, making several small changes and some more major ones. The original 1940 edition appeared with Presses Universitaires de France, under the Leroux imprint, and the revised 1948 edition was published by Gallimard. The original English translation by Derek Coltman for Zone books was of the second edition, and the recent reissue for Hau books adds an apparatus comparing the two editions and translating the parts of the 1940 text which were not in the 1948 version.
Dumézil says in the 1948 preface that the original “printing was a very small one and soon exhausted” (p. 9; translation p. xxxiii). Publication at the time of the invasion would not have helped distribution, but the book does not appear in the 1940 Liste Otto of prohibited books (named about Hitler’s ambassador to Vichy, Otto Abetz), or the longer Ouvrages Littéraires non désirables en France of 1943. (I write about Henri Lefebvre’s books and this list here.)
What happened to the copies which did survive?
There are at least four copies in UK libraries. I have seen the ones held by the Warburg Institute, the Institute of Classical Studies, and the Bodleian library in Oxford. Cambridge University library also has a copy. The Oxford copy has a date stamp of 27 September 1945, suggesting it reached them after the liberation. The Bibliothèque nationale de France has a copy, and possibly two at different sites, but since they have also microfilmed and digitised the text, it is not available to order into a reading room. I’m sure there are other copies in other libraries, but sometimes library catalogues say they have the original edition but actually have the second edition, so remote searching is not always reliable as an indication. Hervé Coutau-Bégarie’s bibliography of Dumézil indicates that there were ten reviews of the original (p. 29), and in a pre-digital age I think it’s a reasonable assumption those reviewers had seen a physical copy of the book. These reviews appeared in issues of journals dated between 1941 and 1948, but many journal publishing schedules were disrupted by the war. Benveniste’s brief book note was written after his return from exile in Switzerland, as it also mentions the other books Dumézil had published in the war years.
Nonetheless copies of the 1940 edition are hard to find. To do the textual comparison of the 1940 and 1948 editions for my editorial work I took photographs of all the pages of the Warburg Institute copy, printed them, and annotated it by hand, though most of my markup was on a copy of the 1948 text. I had searched repeatedly on bookfinder.com and had a ‘want’ on abebooks.co.uk for years before I finally tracked down a copy. That copy isn’t in great shape, but it is at least complete.
Even Dumézil didn’t have copies to spare. In 1947 he wrote to the Uppsala professor Henrik Samuel Nyberg to say that he had located one other copy, which he sent to him. He was in the process of revising the text and was hoping for comments from Nyberg. Mircea Eliade sent Dumézil some detailed comments around this time, though I’m not sure if these were based on the original edition or a manuscript.
So, it’s a difficult book to find, even if Dumézil is too pessimistic in what he told Poleman. For this reason, in the new edition I provided the French text for all the 1940 passages which were not in the 1948 version, as well as a translation. This means that a French reader could use the new edition alongside the 1948 text to reconstruct what is in the original version.
References
Émile Benveniste, “Georges Dumézil. – Mitra-Varuna…”, Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 42 (2), 1942-45, 45-46.
Hervé Coutau-Bégarie, L’œuvre de Georges Dumézil: Catalogue raisonné, Paris: Economica, 1998.
Georges Dumézil, Mitra-Varuna: Essai sur deux représentations indo-européennes de la souveraineté, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1940.
Georges Dumézil, Mitra-Varuna: Essai sur deux représentations indo-européennes de la souveraineté, Paris: Gallimard, 1948.
Georges Dumézil, Mitra-Varuna: An Essay on Two Indo-European Representations of Sovereignty, trans. Derek Coltman, ed. Stuart Elden, Chicago: Hau, 2023, vii-xxvi (open access).
Horace I. Poleman, “Mitra-Varuna”, Journal of the American Oriental Society 63 (1), 1943, 79-80.
Liste Bernhard and Liste Otto versions
All reproduced in Pascal Fouché, L’Édition française sous l’Occupation 1940-1944, Paris: Bibliothèque de Littérature française contemporaine, two volumes, 1987, Vol I, 287-340.
- Liste Bernhard, http://rlfsoa.wikidot.com/liste-bernhard
- Liste Otto, Ouvrages retirés de la vente par les éditeurs ou interdits par les autorités allemands, September 1940 Gallica; with two page supplement
- Unerwuenschte franzoesische Literatur/Ouvrages Littéraires Français non désirables, July 1942 Gallica
- Unerwuenschte Literatur in Frankreich/Ouvrages littéraires non désirables en France, 10 May 1943 Gallica; Wikisource
- Index par auteurs Gallica
Archives
Fonds Georges Dumézil, Collège de France
Henrik Samuel Nyberg archives, Carolina Rediviva library, Uppsala University
This is the 64th post of a weekly series, posted every Sunday throughout 2025, and continuing so far this year. The posts are short essays with indications of further reading and sources. They are not as formal as something I’d try to publish more conventionally, but are hopefully worthwhile as short sketches of histories and ideas. They are usually tangential to my main writing focus, a home for spare parts, asides, dead-ends and possible futures. I hope there is some interest in them. They are provisional and suggestions are welcome. A few, usually shorter, pieces in a similar style have been posted mid-week. I’m not sure manage one every week in 2026, but there will be at least a few more pieces.
The full chronological list of ‘Sunday histories’ is here, with a thematic organisation here.
Teresa M. Bejan, First Among Equals: Visions of Equality before Egalitarianism — Harvard University Press, October 2026
Teresa M. Bejan, First Among Equals: Visions of Equality before Egalitarianism — Harvard University Press, October 2026
An incisive account of how equality transformed from an abstract ideal into a concrete social and political vision, thanks to seventeenth-century English dissidents like the Levellers and the political philosophers they inspired.
Today, political theorists and philosophers treat as axiomatic the claim that all persons are equal. Dig deeper, however, and what we mean by equality—and what it demands from us, politically and otherwise—is far from obvious. Does it mean that we are all the same, and so the same standards should apply indifferently to everyone? Or does it mean that we are all different in ways similarly deserving of respect? These questions, and many more, reflect the profound ambiguities and contradictions that have riddled the history of the idea of equality.
First Among Equals examines a radical turning point in that history. Since antiquity, influential legal and philosophical traditions have held that all humans are fundamentally equal. Yet these claims proved surprisingly at home in a world defined by social hierarchy, political exclusion, and enslavement. In seventeenth-century England, the meaning—and practical circumstances—of equality began to change. Political philosopher Teresa Bejan traces this transformation, revealing how equality finally became a concrete and actionable political ideal.
Crucially, Bejan shows that influential early modern theorists of equality—chief among them Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and the early feminist Mary Astell—were responding to the increasingly radical visions proffered by contemporary social movements like the Levellers, Diggers, and Quakers. Inspired by the Leveller leader John Lilburne, these movements insisted that equality must be a basis on which ordinary men and women could demand to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with elites. These early modern activists and philosophers can still enchant us today, Bejan argues, while also helping us to restore the power of equality as a political ideal.
Posted in Uncategorized
1 Comment
Joseph Tonda, Postcolonial Imperialism: Critique of the Society of Dazzlements – trans. Cheryl Smeall, Duke University Press, April 2026
Joseph Tonda, Postcolonial Imperialism: Critique of the Society of Dazzlements – trans. Cheryl Smeall, Duke University Press, April 2026
Introduction available open access
Postcolonial Imperialism considers the inability to distinguish between reality and fiction as a key condition of contemporary life. If postcolonial theory has highlighted how white colonizers created images of racialized Others which project their own self-hatred or disavowal, Joseph Tonda here shows how these images have in turn colonized Western imaginaries. He argues that the Global North’s obsession with its own phantoms takes a newly powerful form in the dazzling images of postcolonial screens. With examples ranging from Nicki Minaj to Osama Bin Laden and child soldier Johnny Mad Dog, Tonda reflects on power by analyzing the dazzlements of both Central Africa and the West, showing how African life prefigures Western experiences. Translated from its original French, Postcolonial Imperialism is a prescient critique of authoritarian attempts to enforce alternate realities, and of the many ways screens can distort our vision.
Posted in Uncategorized
1 Comment
Joseph Acquisto, Baudelaire’s Objects – Bloomsbury, May 2026
Joseph Acquisto, Baudelaire’s Objects – Bloomsbury, May 2026
Examines Baudelaire’s multifaceted use of natural, domestic, urban, and esthetic objects in his verse and prose poetry, as well as the ways his poems reshape our understanding of objects and how those objects destabilize, yet preserve, the subject-object relation.
Charles Baudelaire’s representation of objects in the natural world establishes a relation that is neither one of identity between human subject and nature nor a relation of domination; he reveals both the natural world and the human subject to be characterized by an irreducible doubleness and nonidentity to itself. Likewise, everyday domestic objects in his poems overflow their boundaries as simple metaphors; their often uncanny aspect highlights their quasi-agency as they define and shape the subject who interacts with them.
Baudelaire’s poems-as-objects also take on this kind of agency, acting upon readers in ways that both require and surpass attempts to grasp the poems conceptually as art objects for analysis. This reshaping of subjectivity and objectivity acquires increased intensity in his urban poetry, where city objects are at the intersection of the mythic, the historical, the esthetic, and the commercial.
Baudelaire’s Objects shows how paying attention to objects differently, as Baudelaire’s poems impel readers to do, is to reorient ourselves in the world by giving objects their due, recognizing the mediating qualities both of objects and of the language with which we represent or create them. We can thus reinvent our understanding of the limits and potential of human subjectivity as it is inextricably intertwined with the world around us.
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
Neil Gray, Take Over the City: Spatial Composition in Italian Autonomy – Common Notions, August 2026
Neil Gray, Take Over the City: Spatial Composition in Italian Autonomy – Common Notions, August 2026
Take Over the City provides the first comprehensive spatial analysis of Italian operaismo and the extraordinary urban struggles of 1970s Italy.
Take Over the City is the first systemic spatial account of Italian operaismo. Drawing on the Marxist urban theory of Henri Lefebvre and others, the book situates the struggles of operaismo, especially in the 1970s, within an incipient-yet-tendential phase of global urbanization. In doing so, the book draws attention to previously neglected urban struggles in the wider social factory, recognizing these as immanent to the new spatial composition of capital in Italy.
The book argues that these innovative urban struggles carry important lessons for contemporary forms of organization and social conflict in the sphere of social reproduction. They drew attention to, and acted within, a tendency that has only become more entrenched since the 1970s: the centrality of urbanization and real estate to national political economies. If urbanization has become increasingly central for capital accumulation processes, it follows that urban struggle must become increasingly central to anti capitalist struggle. The struggles to ‘Take Over the City’ in 1970s Italy provide an important marker of how this might be done in the current era.
By excavating the urban struggles of 1970s Italy with a spatialized understanding of operaismo’s signature theoretical contribution—class composition—the book provides both an important contribution to radical urban history and a window into how current urban struggles might be theorized. It seeks to both spatialize readings of operaismo through the concept of spatial composition and to radicalize urban theory with Italian autonomist Marxist thought and practice. This should be of interest to those interested in autonomist praxis more generally, and those interested in radical urban history, contemporary urban struggles and social reproduction.
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
William Carruthers, Flooded Pasts: UNESCO, Nubia and the Recolonization of Archaeology – Cornell University Press, December 2022; paperback March 2026
William Carruthers, Flooded Pasts: UNESCO, Nubia and the Recolonization of Archaeology – Cornell University Press, December 2022; paperback March 2026
Flooded Pasts examines a world famous yet critically underexamined event—UNESCO’s International Campaign to Save the Monuments of Nubia (1960–80)—to show how the project, its genealogy, and its aftermath not only propelled archaeology into the postwar world but also helped to “recolonize” it. In this book, William Carruthers asks how postwar decolonization took shape and what role a colonial discipline like archaeology—forged in the crucible of imperialism—played as the “new nations” asserted themselves in the face of the global Cold War.
As the Aswan High Dam became the centerpiece of Gamal Abdel Nasser’s Egyptian revolution, the Nubian campaign sought to salvage and preserve ancient temples and archaeological sites from the new barrage’s floodwaters. Conducted in the neighboring regions of Egyptian and Sudanese Nubia, the project built on years of Nubian archaeological work conducted under British occupation and influence. During that process, the campaign drew on the scientific racism that guided those earlier surveys, helping to consign Nubians themselves to state-led resettlement and modernization programs, even as UNESCO created a picturesque archaeological landscape fit for global media and tourist consumption.
Flooded Pasts describes how colonial archaeological and anthropological practices—and particularly their archival and documentary manifestations—created an ancient Nubia severed from the region’s population. As a result, the Nubian campaign not only became fundamental to the creation of UNESCO’s 1972 World Heritage Convention but also exposed questions about the goals of archaeology and heritage and whether the colonial origins of these fields will ever be overcome.
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
Catherine Boland Erkkila, Spaces of Immigration: American Ports, Railways, and Settlements – University of Pittsburgh Press, April 2025 and New Books discussion
Catherine Boland Erkkila, Spaces of Immigration: American Ports, Railways, and Settlements – University of Pittsburgh Press, April 2025
New Books discussion with Matt Wells – thanks to dmf for the link
By transporting waves of newly arrived immigrants along rail lines from both coasts, railway companies played an active role in repopulating the interior of the country. Spaces of Immigration follows the travel routes of immigrants during a foundational period of American infrastructure—from ports of arrival to train cars and depots to settlements—showing how the built environment of the railways fostered segregation through physical isolation and reinforced hierarchies according to race, ethnicity, and class. Catherine Boland Erkkila highlights the magnitude of this forced separation: how spatial design and the experiences within it reflected prejudices of contemporary middle-class Americans who viewed immigrants as poor, diseased, and dangerous. Spaces of Immigration draws attention to the control wielded by railroad companies and government officials, who dispatched European immigrants to ethnic enclaves across the Midwest, some of which still exist. These colonization efforts, Boland Erkkila argues, were motivated by profit through exploitation: the promise of cheap labor and the purchase of land along designated routes. At the same time, Asian immigrants were detained like prisoners on the West Coast. This book ultimately offers a greater understanding of the immigrant experience in America through the lens of spatial history, revealing deeply embedded conflicts still pervasive in our society today.
Posted in Uncategorized
1 Comment
The Books on Territory I Didn’t Write, and the Related Articles I Did
At various points over the last twenty-five years or so, I’ve debated writing different books on territory. Many of the articles I’ve written on this topic were early versions of parts of the books I did write on territory, but not all. I began to work seriously on territory around 2000, initially thinking I would write a history of the concept of territory in Western political thought. That book was eventually published as The Birth of Territory (University of Chicago Press, 2013), but I put it aside for a couple of years to write a much more contemporary study, Terror and Territory: The Spatial Extent of Sovereignty (University of Minnesota Press, 2009). After I completed The Birth of Territory, I began to write a book on Shakespeare, but the beginning of the Foucault project delayed the completion of that study, which was published as Shakespearean Territories (University of Chicago Press, 2018).
Terror and Territory and The Birth of Territory were career-changing books for me, helping with promotions at Durham and a move to Warwick. Both won prizes and were quite widely reviewed, generally positively though of course with some exceptions. I still think The Birth of Territory is the best book I’ve written. Shakespearean Territories is the least read of these three books, but it’s one I was pleased to have completed. It was intended both to be an examination of territory and more broadly geographical questions in Shakespeare, but also to use Shakespeare to develop my theorisation of territory, and to push me to address some of the things I’d neglected in previous work, as some reviewers pointed out. In particular, that book looks at corporeal, colonial and material aspects of territory, as well as the political, geographical, economic, legal, technical aspects I’d stressed before.



In my earliest writings on territory, I was developing a conceptualisation of territory in relation to contemporary issues – such as debates about globalisation, the European Union’s constitution (with Luiza Bialasiewicz and Joe Painter), and the ‘war on terror’, which all fed into Terror and Territory. A lot of this work was done while I was working with the International Boundaries Research Unit at Durham University, with Martin Pratt, John Donaldson and Alison Williams, among others. Some of the work I edited with Jeremy Crampton around calculation was important in my thinking too. My 2010 article “Land, Terrain, Territory” was an early version of the introduction to The Birth of Territory, but elaborates on some points more than the book version. In particular, I challenged the relation between territory and territoriality in that piece, as I did in some detail in a piece that discussed Deleuze and Guattari, and Hardt and Negri: “The State of Territory Under Globalization”.
Shortly after I’d completed The Birth of Territory, I gave a lecture in Kentucky and later in Edinburgh which has received a lot of attention compared to my other articles. “Secure the Volume: Vertical Geopolitics and the Depth of Power” was the beginning of my attempt to take the dimensionality and materiality of territory much more seriously. In that piece I was building on work by Eyal Weizman and Stephen Graham, and urban exploration work such as that by Bradley Garrett, and trying to link this together through the architectural work of Paul Virilio and others. This developed into my work on terrain, particularly in two articles “Legal Terrain: The Political Materiality of Territory” and “Terrain, Politics, History”. There have been some other related pieces, but those three articles have most of the key claims I’ve made. Some of this work was in dialogue with Phil Steinberg and others connected to the ICE-LAW project he directed, and with Gastón Gordillo and the contributors to conference sessions we organised. I debated for a long time about writing a book about “the political materiality of territory”, and applied for a fellowship for that project. I was shortlisted but ultimately unsuccessful, and a couple of planned talks on the idea were cancelled in the early days of the pandemic. The Foucault work developed a lot more, I began thinking about other things, and I never returned to that project. Although these circumstances were part of the reason, I felt I was running out of new things to say, in part because work in that register was being done well by so many other people.
Alongside these pieces, there had been occasional articles or chapters which thought about territory in relation to some of the theorists I had an interest in but generally in other registers. At one point I considered doing something more systematic on territory’s theorists, but what I did write covered only some of the key names. “Governmentality, Calculation, Territory” and, a while later, “How Should We Do the History of Territory?” addressed these questions in relation to Michel Foucault, as did a book chapter on “Foucault and Geometrics”, which particularly relates to the terrain interest. Neil Brenner and I wrote a piece on “Henri Lefebvre on State, Space, Territory” which developed from our editorial work for the State, Space, World collection of Lefebvre’s writings. If I was to do more on Lefebvre, it might be to develop some ideas around land, which relate to the On the Rural collection I co-edited with Adam David Morton. I wrote a piece on Carl Schmitt too, in part because I was fed up with the continual references to Nomos of the Earth after its English translation. In my reading Schmitt is not very insightful and politically dangerous. I also wrote shorter pieces on Jean Gottmann and Grégoire Chamayou. Some of the editorial introductions I wrote for collections to essays on Peter Sloterdijk, one of which was with Eduardo Mendieta, talked about his spatial work, but were less directly on territory.
Some of these pieces were written in response to particular invitations, either to speak or contribute to something, but there was also a piece on Boko Haram which was written about some of what I learned in visits to Nigeria. A piece on “Territory/Territoriality” situated these issues in relation to debates in urban theory. There are a couple of review essays, some book reviews, prefaces or other shorter contributions which are not listed here, and themes cross between different pieces.
Not all of this work would be worth revisiting, but there are some arguments in these which are not in the books on territory I wrote. A loose grouping of some of these articles and chapters might look something like this.
(I’ve linked to the publisher sites below, since some pieces are open access. Many of these pieces are available elsewhere on this site or Researchgate. But if something isn’t accessible to you, email me.)
Political and Conceptual
“The Constitution of EU Territory”, with Luiza Bialasiewicz and Joe Painter, Comparative European Politics 3 (3), 2005, pp. 333-63.
“Missing the Point: Globalisation, Deterritorialisation and the Space of the World”, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 30 (1), March 2005, pp. 8-19.
“The State of Territory Under Globalization: Empire and the Politics of Reterritorialization”, in Maria Margaroni and Effie Yiannopoulou eds. Metaphoricity and the Politics of Mobility: Figures of Displacement in Contemporary Literature, Arts and Politics, Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2006, 47-66, reprinted with new afterword in Mattias Kärrholm and Andrea Mubi Brighenti eds. Territories, Environments, Governance: Explorations in Territoriology, London: Routledge, 2022, 15-36.
“Land, Terrain, Territory”, Progress in Human Geography 34 (6), 2010, 799-817 (although, as noted above, most of this is in The Birth of Territory).
“Territory/Territoriality” in Anthony Orum (ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Studies, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2019.
“The Geopolitics of Boko Haram and Nigeria’s War on Terror”, The Geographical Journal 180 (4), 2014, 414-25.
Volume and Terrain
“Secure the Volume: Vertical Geopolitics and the Depth of Power”, Political Geography 32 (2), 2013, 35-51, with responses by Peter Adey and Gavin Bridge, and my reply, “Bodies, Books, Beneath”, 58-59.
“Legal Terrain: The Political Materiality of Territory”, London Review of International Law, 5 (2), 2017, 199-224.
“The Instability of Terrain”, in Andrea Bagnato, Marco Ferrari and Elisa Pasqual (eds.), A Moving Border – Alpine Cartographies of Climate Change, New York and Karlsruhe: Columbia Books on Architecture and the City/ZKM, 2019, 51-61.
“Terrain, Politics, History”, Dialogues in Human Geography 11 (2), 2021, 170-89, with responses by Gastón Gordillo, Kimberley Peters, Bruno Latour, Deborah P. Dixon and Rachael Squire, and my reply, “The Limits of Territory and Terrain”, 213-17.
Territory’s Theorists (Chamayou, Foucault, Gottmann, Lefebvre, Leibniz, Schmitt, Shakespeare)
“Governmentality, Calculation, Territory”, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 25 (3), 2007, 562-80.
“Henri Lefebvre on State, Space, Territory”, with Neil Brenner, International Political Sociology 3 (4), 2009, 353–77.
“How Should we Do the History of Territory?” Territory, Politics, Governance 1 (1), 2013, 5-20.
“Jean Gottmann, The Significance of Territory”, Geographica Helvetica 68 (1), 2013, 65-68.
“Leibniz and Geography: Geologist, Paleontologist, Biologist, Historian, Political Theorist and Geopolitician”, Geographica Helvetica 68 (2), 2013, 81-93.
“Reading Schmitt Geopolitically: Nomos, Territory and Großraum”, Radical Philosophy 161, May/June 2010, 18-26.
“Grégoire Chamayou’s Manhunts: From Territory to Space?” in Léopold Lambert (ed.), The Funambulist Papers 2, Punctum Books, 2015, 46-53.
“Terricide: Lefebvre, Geopolitics and the Killing of the Earth”, unpublished (destined for an edited book which was abandoned).
“Foucault and Geometrics”, in Philippe Bonditti, Didier Bigo and Frédéric Gros (eds.), Foucault and the Modern International: Silences and Legacies for the Study of World Politics, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017, 295-311.
“Why Should People Interested in Territory read William Shakespeare?”, Territory, Politics, Governance 7 (3), 2019, 289-96.
This is the 63rd post of a weekly series, posted every Sunday throughout 2025, and now entering a second year. The posts are short essays with indications of further reading and sources. They are not as formal as something I’d try to publish more conventionally, but are hopefully worthwhile as short sketches of histories and ideas. They are usually tangential to my main writing focus, a home for spare parts, asides, dead-ends and possible futures. I hope there is some interest in them. They are provisional and suggestions are welcome. A few, usually shorter, pieces in a similar style have been posted mid-week. I’m not sure I’ll keep to a weekly rhythm in 2026, but there will be at least a few more pieces.
The full chronological list of ‘Sunday histories’ is here, with a thematic organisation here.
Posted in Adam David Morton, Antonio Negri, Carl Schmitt, Felix Guattari, Gaston Gordillo, Gilles Deleuze, Grégoire Chamayou, Henri Lefebvre, Jean Gottmann, Jeremy Crampton, Luiza Bialasiewicz, Michael Hardt, Michel Foucault, My Publications, Neil Brenner, Paul Virilio, Peter Sloterdijk, Philip Steinberg, Shakespearean Territories, Sunday Histories, terrain, Territory, Terror and Territory, The Birth of Territory, Uncategorized
Leave a comment







