Jean-Paul Sartre, Cours de philosophie de terminale pris sous la dictée par son élève Maurice Mermet. Lycée Condorcet, 1942-1943, ed. Jean-François Louette, Paris: Gallimard, September 2026

Jean-Paul Sartre, Cours de philosophie de terminale pris sous la dictée par son élève Maurice Mermet. Lycée Condorcet, 1942-1943, ed. Jean-François Louette, Paris: Gallimard, September 2026

Maurice Mermet a seize ans à la rentrée scolaire de 1942. Venu de Lyon, il intègre la classe de terminale math élém du lycée Condorcet. Son professeur de philosophie est « M. Sartre », Jean-Paul Sartre — dont c’est également la première année dans l’établissement parisien. Aujourd’hui centenaire, Maurice Mermet garde un souvenir net de cette année de découverte de la discipline et surtout de cet enseignant passionnant, déjà auteur d’une Esquisse d’une théorie des émotions, de La Nausée et des nouvelles du Mur, qui invita ses quarante-quatre élèves, en juin 1943, à la première des Mouches, au Théâtre de la Cité.
Maurice Mermet était non seulement un très bon élément, mais aussi un élève consciencieux. Il a pris le cours sous la dictée de son professeur avec une application rare — en témoignent aujourd’hui les quatre cahiers qu’il a conservés, dont ce volume donne la transcription intégrale, enrichie de copies corrigées. Jean-Paul Sartre a déjà plusieurs années d’enseignement derrière lui quand il prend la suite de Ferdinand Alquié à Condorcet. C’est un professeur expérimenté et précis qui se révèle dans ce document exceptionnel et touchant — une année de cours qui éclaire la façon dont on pouvait enseigner la philosophie sous l’Occupation, mais également la culture et les intentions philosophiques de l’écrivain qui achevait alors l’écriture de L’Être et le Néant (1943).
Il faut ainsi se faire élève de terminale, et écouter Sartre nous brosser à grands traits, comme il était recommandé de le faire, une histoire de la philosophie, en nous parlant de vérité, de science, de beauté, de morale, d’émotion… et de liberté : « Une décision peut donc être considérée non comme une conséquence de faits antérieurs, mais comme un commencement premier. »

Imagine having something like this, and waiting until you are 100 years old to share it…

Posted in Jean-Paul Sartre, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Giulia Bernard, Bojana Jovicevic and Karen Koch eds. Hegel and Feminism – Bloomsbury, October 2026

Giulia Bernard, Bojana Jovicevic and Karen Koch eds. Hegel and Feminism – Bloomsbury, October 2026

Whilst much previous writing on Hegel has focused on his social and political philosophy, this volume makes it clear that feminist issues are relevant to many, if not all, aspects of Hegel’s system.

With innovative close readings that place Hegel’s philosophy in dialogue with contemporary feminist debates and relevant issues such as: reproductive work, sexism, prejudice and discrimination against women, the essays in this collections reveal the gendered nature of Hegel’s oeuvre. Beginning with three sections that analyse the theoretical and abstract parts of his philosophy, the authors explore sexual difference and its implications in Hegel’s epistemology and logic, its relation to his mythology and aesthetics, as well as to social and political philosophy. Including examinations that focus, for example, on crime and punishment, and the notion of piety and the figure of the monarch, these articles delve into topics that have yet to be deeply discussed with regard to sexual difference. Concluding with a chapter that also outlines the practical ways in which this knowledge can be applied, Hegel and Feminism highlights the relevance of Hegel’s conception of sexual difference to contemporary issues, including its implications for other feminist-related, but transdisciplinary fields such as politics, education, and activism.

Posted in Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Books received – Bagnato, Mandrou, Ginzburg, Puaud, Favret-Saada, Wilson

Andrea Bagnato, Terra Infecta: Disease and the Italian Landscape; Robert Mandrou, From Humanism to Science 1480-1700; Carlo Ginzburg, Fear Reverence Terror; David Puaud, Foucault avant Foucault: Archéologie d’une jeunesse, Jeanne Favret-Saada, L’impossible famille Rivière: Retour sur un triple meutre en 1835 and Richard Wilson, Shakespeare’s Fascist Followers.

Andrea kindly sent a copy of his book, and Shakespeare’s Fascist Followers was in recompense for review work. The rest were bought new or second-hand. I write briefly about Mandrou in relation to Foucault here, and about Ginzburg here and here. Richard Wilson’s book was the topic of a roundtable at the Shakespeare and British Inter-war Philosophy (1918-1939) event held at Garrick’s Temple to Shakespeare on 27 June 2026. My opening comments are here.

Posted in Carlo Ginzburg, Michel Foucault, William Shakespeare | 1 Comment

Bill Angus and Lisa Hopkins eds. Reading the Coastline in Shakespeare’s Britain – Edinburgh University Press, October 2026

Bill Angus and Lisa Hopkins eds. Reading the Coastline in Shakespeare’s Britain – Edinburgh University Press, October 2026

Examines early modern English literary representations of ports, shorelines and littorals at home and abroad

  • Discusses plays set in ports ranging from Dover to Milan and Tunis
  • Is alert to ecological issues
  • Attends to questions of race and slavery

When Regan in King Lear asks ‘Wherefore to Dover?’ she mobilises a number of early modern anxieties. Shores and coastlines are liminal spaces, subject to erosion, invasion and tidal flux. With their metaphorical mouths and their subjection to wind, wave and tide, ports were emblematic of instability, especially in the cases of once-thriving harbours which had silted up (Winchelsea) or coastal settlements claimed by the sea (Dunwich). Early modern plays and poems are drawn to such areas both within Britain (Southampton and Harfleur in Henry V, Scarborough and Bristol in Edward II, Harlech in Richard II) and further afield in Tunis, Alexandria, Algiers, Malta and other sites where cultures clashed, slaves were traded, and people of different faiths mingled. This edited collection draws together new research on early modern British representations of the lived environment of the coast at home and abroad.

Posted in William Shakespeare | Leave a comment

Aristotle Kallis, Iconic Fascism: The Excess of Destruction and Creation in Interwar Radical Right-wing Politics – Bloomsbury, February 2026 and New Books discussion

Aristotle Kallis, Iconic Fascism: The Excess of Destruction and Creation in Interwar Radical Right-wing Politics – Bloomsbury, February 2026

In Iconic Fascism, Aristotle Kallis uncovers the paradox at the heart of fascist politics: the simultaneous obsession with destroying and creating powerful symbols. This book demonstrates how fascists were simultaneously some of history’s most passionate icon-lovers and most ruthless icon-breakers, wielding symbolic excess as both weapon and worship in their revolutionary project. Through a sweeping comparative analysis, Kallis reveals how fascist movements and later regimes were driven by a relentless battle of absolutes, seeking not only to eradicate the icons and reclaim the spaces of their enemies, but to saturate public life with their own emblems, rituals, and myths; and to make the political visceral. Kallis demonstrates that fascist violence was never merely blind or indiscriminate. Instead, it was a meticulously choreographed struggle for symbolic dominance, in which the destruction of enemy ‘false’ icons was inseparable from the performative creation of new, sacred icons of fascist power. He traces how this constant pursuit of “destructive creation” evolved from street-level partisan warfare to state-sponsored spectacles of monumental architecture and mass liturgies. Kallis argues that fascism’s ‘iconic compulsion’ – its need to condense moral absolutes into visible, emotionally potent symbols – remained constant whether fascists operated as fringe insurgents or totalitarian regimes, fuelling its cycles of rupture and rebirth. Spanning street-level violence, mass spectacle, and monumental urban planning, Iconic Fascism challenges us to rethink the role of symbols in the making-and unmaking-of political communities.

New Books Network discussion with Joe Williams – thanks to dmf for the link

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Sander Verhaegh, Logical Positivism: An American History – Oxford University Press, September 2026

Sander Verhaegh, Logical Positivism: An American History – Oxford University Press, September 2026

Logical Positivism: An American History tells the remarkable story of a group of European philosophers and scientists who fled fascism and reshaped American philosophy. Drawing on extensive archival materials, it traces the conflicted reception of their ideas—at once hailed as a model of scientific clarity and yet condemned as a sterile and reductive approach to philosophy.

Rather than treating logical positivism as a purely European export, this book argues that it was a product of transatlantic exchange. It reconstructs the rise of an American network of scientists and philosophers whose ideas were defined by twentieth-century revolutions in logic and modern physics; and it shows how their encounters with European émigrés helped shape a new ‘analytic’ style of philosophy that has dominated the field ever since. 

Combining narrative reconstruction with innovative digital humanities methods, this book illuminates the intellectual, institutional, and cultural conditions that enabled logical positivism’s ascent. It offers a fresh perspective on the history of U.S. philosophy, showing how a movement defined by global crises and intellectual controversy became engrained in American thought and philosophical practice.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Michel Foucault, Apologie de René Clément (2026)

It’s worth noting that the letter from Foucault is only one page, with an introduction by Ange Pierraggi on the other side of the two-page spread. The Instagram picture and another of Foucault at Münsterlingen are on these pages.

On the visit Foucault, Jacqueline and Georges Verdeaux made to Münsterlingen in 1954, see the remarkable book Foucault à Münsterlingen, edited by Elisabetta Basso and Jean-François Bert (EHESS 2015).

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Élisée Reclus, Un anarchiste en géographie – ed. Joël Cornuault, L’Échappée, September 2026

Élisée Reclus, Un anarchiste en géographie – ed. Joël Cornuault, L’Échappée, September 2026

Élisée Reclus (1830-1905) ne fut pas seulement le « géographe le plus prolifique de tous les temps », il fut sans doute aussi le plus sensible.
Loin de réserver jalousement sa discipline aux spécialistes, cet anarchiste en géographie invitait à l’aborder comme l’occupation privilégiée d’un homme complet : selon lui, un homme doué de l’appétit du concret, actif, animé du désir ardent de refaire la terre et qui, de sa place, se sent lié aux forces du cosmos.
La terre, la science, l’art et l’humanité forment la matière des textes rassemblés dans cette nouvelle édition au format de poche. Depuis la préservation de la nature jusqu’à la rénovation urbaine, de la refonte du calendrier à la géographie comparée, de la condition animale à la critique de la divinisation de Marx par ses sectateurs mêmes, ils expriment la recherche de la totalité à conquérir par l’homme. Une totalité ouverte sur la vie, sur l’avenir et sur les autres.

Thanks to John Raimo for the link.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Working with the Michel Foucault archives – a brief guide to what is in Paris, Normandy, Berkeley and elsewhere

I am sometimes contacted by people who want advice about working with Michel Foucault’s archives. Although I’m generally happy to try to help, and there are others who are better placed to advise on specifics, I thought it might be useful to set out some basic information in one place.

[Photographs of the IMEC abbey building; the Beinecke library at Yale; and the Bibliothèque nationale]

The most substantial archive of Foucault’s papers is at the Bibliothèque nationale de France, in the Archives et manuscrits department which is at the Richelieu site in central Paris, not the modern Mitterrand site a few miles to the southeast. The main fonds is the collection of papers from Foucault’s apartment, deposited in 2013, in 117 boxes. This has the code NAF 28730. (NAF stands for Nouvelles acquisitions françaises, though it’s not commonly spelt out anymore.) This collection was sold by Daniel Defert after the French government had declared it a national treasure to avoid it going outside France. It comprises the notes from Foucault’s lecture courses, reading notes from the 1960s to his death, manuscripts of some of his books, works he did not publish himself, including Les Aveux de la chair, lectures and other talks. Much of this collection has been edited and published in the past couple of decades. The inventory online is not very detailed – there is a much more detailed inventory which can be accessed in the reading room.

Foucault rarely dated things. He filed his notes thematically rather than chronologically, so material from quite different periods can sometimes be found in one place. Many of Foucault’s reading notes from this fonds, which were often written in the Richelieu reading rooms, have been digitised. They are available at the Fiches de Lecture site, which is searchable. 

There are several other collections of Foucault papers at the Bibliothèque nationale. NAF 28824 has the first material deposited, in 1994. It has five boxes which include a manuscript of an early version of L’Archéologie du savoir, and multiple draft versions of the second and third volumes of the Histoire de la sexualité.

A collection of papers which were in Foucault’s mother’s house were deposited by Foucault’s nephew, Henri-Paul Fruchaud in 2015. It has the code NAF 28803. This has 14 boxes and comprises papers from the 1940s and 1950s, and includes his diploma thesis on Hegel, now published. 

There are letters in three main fonds. Two are entirely comprised of correspondence,  NAF 28804 (one box) and NAF 29070 (two boxes), deposited in 2015 and 2022. The archivist now in charge of the collections, Philippe Chevallier, has done valuable work in cataloguing them. NAF 29005 is the “Archives personnelles et professionnelles Michel Foucault-Daniel Defert”, and contains more correspondence, some material collected by Daniel Defert after Foucault’s death, and photographs, across 18 boxes.

To use these collections you need a BnF reader card, and I always try to request boxes about a week in advance.

Before this huge amount of material became available, researchers often worked at IMEC and in Berkeley. Some of the materials there are now in Paris too but these collections retain value. IMEC (Institut Mémoires de l’Edition Contemporaine) used to be based in Paris, but has been located at a residential site in Normandy for many years – a converted abbey, with a magnificent reading room. It holds the papers of the Centre Michel Foucault. For many years these papers were crucial source of information and while much of its material is now published or at the BNF, not all of it. IMEC also has a lot of material relating to the Groupe information sur les prisons and some of Foucault’s other political activism, including the Groupe Information Santé, and papers relating to his collaborative research with Félix Guattari’s CERFI group. IMEC also has recordings of many Foucault lecture courses – now transcribed and published. IMEC has the archives of many other interesting French theorists including Jacques Derrida and Louis Althusser, and of journals and publishers. It’s a wonderful place to stay, board includes great food and it is always filled with interesting people. You can order things in advance, but material is stored on site so is usually brought quickly if you order while there.

UC Berkeley’s Bancroft library has a smaller collection of Foucault materials, relating to Foucault’s time not just in California but elsewhere in North America. Much of it was deposited by Paul Rabinow. There are a lot of recordings of lectures and discussions, and some texts. There is a valuable guide written by Alain Beaulieu, “The Foucault Archives at Berkeley”, published in Foucault Studies (open access), which I found very helpful when I was working there.

A lot of Foucault’s personal library was sold to Yale University’s Beinecke library, Michel Foucault library of presentation copies – these were books with dedications by their authors to Foucault. Books are stored off-site and have to be ordered in advance.

More recently, the pre-1984 books in the Foucault-Defert apartment have been catalogued and the inventory can be searched at La bibliothèque de M. Foucault et de D. Defert. This is a really fascinating insight into the books they owned.

Foucault’s correspondence archives generally contain only the letters he received, with very few drafts of the letters he sent. Some people in this period kept copies; Foucault didn’t. The other side can often be found in the archives of his correspondents. To reconstruct correspondence generally requires work in at least two archives, but many letters must be presumed lost or in private hands. I made an attempt at a chronological listing of the Foucault-Georges Dumézil correspondence, for example. 

Foucault’s dossier personnel at the Collège de France is restricted until 2046, but you can apply for a dérogation to see it. 

A recent discovery was copies of the typescripts of Foucault two doctoral theses – on madness and Kant. They are accessible at the BU Henri-Piéron of Université Paris Cité, and have been scanned and are available online – Folie et déraison. Histoire de l’expérience de la folie à l’âge classique (3 volumes) and Introduction à l’Anthropologie de Kant (2 volumes). Emmanuel le Doeff discusses these theses and the work they make possible in two articles – “À la découverte des thèses annotées de Michel Foucault” and “Les thèses annotées de Michel Foucault sont désormais en ligne sur Numerabilis” (both open access).

The University at Buffalo hosted Foucault as a visiting professor in 1970 and 1972, and their Special Collections have some really valuable materials relating to these visits, mainly due to the deposit of papers from his host John K. Simon. They also have audio recordings of Foucault’s 1972 course and part of his 1970 one, which are now available online. The 1972 course has recently been transcribed as Histoire de la vérité, edited by Henri-Paul Fruchaud and Orazio Irrera. I discuss what the Buffalo archives reveal briefly here and in more detail in a piece in Foucault Studies. Leonhard Riep discusses Foucault’s 1972 Buffalo course in detail in an essay in that same issue of Foucault Studies.

With the notable exception of Berkeley, I’ve not found a comparable collection for Foucault’s other North American visits – there appear to be no archives at Cornell or McGill. I discuss the 1972 Cornell visit here and Marcelo Hoffman and I discuss the 1971 Montreal visit here. There are some things relating to Foucault’s time in Sweden in the Carolina Rediviva library at the University of Uppsala, and his time in Germany in the Archiv Institut Français de Hambourg at the Staatsarchiv Hamburg. Simeon Wade’s papers are at ONE Archives at the USC Libraries.

A lot of audio and video recordings of Foucault, many coming from these archives, are now available online. I try to keep that page updated but things keep being moved and links break.

It is worth saying that Foucault’s handwriting can be a challenge. The Fiches de lecture site is a good way to get used to his style, and abbreviations. I found it useful to look at a few of the texts which have been reproduced in facsimile alongside a transcription – there are some in the first edition of the Foucault Cahier de l’Herne, for example. It’s worth bearing in mind that many of his texts were written for only him to read, and his draft manuscripts and letters can sometimes be a bit clearer. But he struggled to read his own handwriting at times, as some of the reference errors in Naissance de la clinique at least would attest.

I think that these are the main collections relating to Foucault, though his correspondence is in many more places, and some dedicated books are in different collections. The papers of Georges Canguilhem are at the Centre d’Archives en Philosophie, Histoire et Édition des Sciences, École Normale Supérieure; Roland Barthes at the Bibliothèque nationale; Georges Dumézil at the Collège de France; Jean Hyppolite at the École Normale Supérieure; Althusser and Derrida at IMEC, and some of Derrida’s papers at UC Irvine and his library at Princeton University; Roland Kuhn in Frauenfeld, Switzerland; Ludwig Binswanger in Tübingen, Germany… 

Comments or additions welcome. As the discovery of the theses or the Buffalo recordings shows, things continue to be found which fill in detail of Foucault’s life and career. I think it is likely there are still tape recordings and correspondence in basements or garages still to be discovered.

There are a lot of other Foucault resources on this site – bibliographies, audio and video files, some textual comparisons, some short translations, etc.


Although more of a research resource, this is the 91st post of a weekly series, posted every Sunday throughout 2025, and continuing into a second year. The posts are short essays with indications of further reading and sources. The pieces are not as formal as something I’d try to publish more conventionally, but are hopefully worthwhile as short sketches of histories and ideas. They are usually tangential to my main writing focus, a home for spare parts, asides, dead-ends and possible futures. I hope there is some interest in them. They are provisional and suggestions are welcome. A few, usually shorter, pieces in a similar style have been posted mid-week.

The full chronological list of ‘Sunday histories’ is here, with a thematic ordering here.

Posted in Michel Foucault, Sunday Histories | 1 Comment

Silvia Federici, The Development of Lukacs’ Realism – Minor Compositions, April 2027 (print and open access)

Silvia Federici, The Development of Lukacs’ Realism – Minor Compositions, April 2027 (print and open access)

Thanks to Adam David Morton for the link. Open access pdf available now.

An unpublished early text that shows Silvia Federici working through questions of realism, art, and aesthetics.

Written in 1980 and never published, The Development of Lukács’ Realism reveals a lesser known early chapter in the intellectual trajectory of Silvia Federici. Best known for her groundbreaking feminist analyses of capitalism, reproduction, and social struggle, Federici appears here as a young philosopher engaging deeply with the traditions of Marxism, German idealism, and aesthetic theory. Taking György Lukács as her central figure, Federici challenges the standard narrative that divides his work into sharply opposed phases: early idealism, revolutionary Marxism, and later aesthetic realism. Against this account, she argues for a striking continuity across Lukács’ career, tracing how his commitment to realism persists through shifting philosophical vocabularies and political commitments. What emerges is a rigorous and unsparing critique of Lukács’ realism as an unresolved attempt to reconcile absolute values, historical meaning, and the role of consciousness within modern capitalist society.

Moving from early literary essays to History and Class Consciousness and the late aesthetic writings, Federici situates Lukács within the broader crisis of bourgeois culture in the twentieth century: the fragmentation of life, the loss of totality, and the search for meaning in art, philosophy, and revolution. Her analysis foregrounds the metaphysical tensions that haunt Lukács’ thought – between subjectivity and objectivity, form and content, ethics and history – while raising broader questions about Marxist philosophy, aesthetics, and the legacy of Western Marxism itself. At once a study of Lukács and a diagnosis of a wider intellectual tradition, The Development of Lukács’ Realism invites readers to reconsider the foundations of Marxist aesthetics and the unresolved contradictions that continue to shape critical theory today.

Posted in Georg Lukács | Leave a comment