The Stockholm Appeal against Atomic weapons – Émile Benveniste, Frédéric Joliot-Curie, Jean Boulier and Cold War Politics

Émile Benveniste was one of the signatories of the Stockholm appeal on 19 March 1950, against nuclear weapons. The short text of the appeal reads: 

We demand the outlawing of atomic weapons as instruments of intimidation and mass murder of peoples. We demand strict international control to enforce this measure.

We believe that any government which first uses atomic weapons against any other country whatsoever will be committing a crime against humanity and should be dealt with as a war criminal.

We call on all men and women of good will throughout the world to sign this appeal.

French text of the Appeal and call for signatures, via Marx Memorial Library

Launched a few months before the start of the Korean War, this was about six months after the Soviet Union became a nuclear power. 

The appeal was organised by Benveniste’s Collège colleague Frédéric Joliot-Curie, Chair of Nuclear Physics, who had won the 1935 Nobel Prize for Chemistry, along with his wife Irène Curie, daughter of Marie. Joliot-Curie was a member of the French Communist Party (PCF), and had been an active resistant. He lost his position on the French Atomic Energy Commission because of his political views, shortly after the Stockholm appeal. He retained his Collège de France chair, and would go on to be one of the eleven signatories of the Russell-Einstein manifesto in 1955. Michel Pinault’s biography Frédéric Joliot-Curie discusses his activism especially in its fifth part.

The appeal was supported by the World Peace Council, created by Cominform in 1949. Joliot-Curie was president of the Council. Although many of the signatories were there because of individual choice, it was also ‘signed’ by every adult Soviet citizen. Because of its connections, the World Peace Council was dismissed by the United States as “a propaganda trick in the spurious ‘peace offensive’ of the Soviet Union”.

Soviet stamp, 1951, with the text of The Stockholm Appeal by the World Peace Council and the Soviet War Memorial in Berlin’s Treptower Park, via Wikipedia Commons

In the newspaper reports which include Benveniste’s name, they also note several of his Collège colleagues, including Marcel Bataillon, Jules Bloch, Alfred Ernout, Louis Massignon, Fernand Mossé, André Piganiol, and Henri Wallon. Wallon at least was a PCF member. Many other French writers, musicians, composers and actors also signed, including Louis Aragon, Sylvia Bataille, Marc Chagall, Maurice Chevalier, Henri Matisse, Pablo Picasso and Simone Signoret. While not everyone who signed the Stockholm appeal was on the left, it was often an indication of their politics. The young Jacques Chirac signed it, for example, when he was a member of the PCF. The activist Catholic priest Jean Boulier said he signed it “to reverse a situation which is intolerable for a Christian” (Pourquoi j’ai signé l’Appel de Stockholm, 1; see J’étais un prêtre rouge, pp. 170-71). He was later defrocked for his political views, supposedly too close to Communism.

The two places I’ve found Benveniste’s signature reported are Les lettres françaises which was supported by the PCF, and L’Humanité, which was a PCF paper. Benveniste’s political views were not something which he was explicit about. His 1925 signature of the Surrealist manifesto and of a petition in L’Humanité in opposition to the Rif war in Morocco are two things used by his biographers and commentators to indicate his affiliations. There are very few other indications of his political views, and he was not very forthcoming in the few interviews he gave late in his life. Given what happened to Joliot-Curie and Boulier in the Cold War this reticence is unsurprising. Benveniste’s signature of the Stockholm appeal is another little bit of evidence, and not one I have seen mentioned before. 

References

“15 professeurs au Collège de France de réputation Mondiale ont signé à ce jour l’appel de Stockholm”, l’Humanité, 7 June 1950, 1.

“Contre l’arme atomique se fait l’unanimité des intellectuels français”, Les Lettres françaises, 8 June 1950, 1-2.

Frédéric Joliot, Nobel Prize in Chemistry, 1935, https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/1935/joliot-fred/biographical/

J.D. Bernal, “The Threat of Nuclear War and the Stockholm Appeal”, excerpt from World Without War, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1958, https://www.marx-memorial-library.org.uk/project/jd-bernal/threat-nuclear-war-and-stockholm-appeal

Jean Boulier, Pourquoi j’ai signé l’Appel de Stockholm, typescript, 1950, Bibliothèque nationale de France, 16-LB60-75.

Jean Boulier, J’étais un prêtre rouge: souvenirs et témoinages, Paris: Éditions de l’Athanor, 1977.

Michel Pinault, Frédéric Joliot-Curie, Paris: Odile Jacob, 2000.


This is the 80th post of a weekly series, posted every Sunday throughout 2025, and continuing into a second year. The posts are short essays with indications of further reading and sources. They are not as formal as something I’d try to publish more conventionally, but are hopefully worthwhile as short sketches of histories and ideas. They are usually tangential to my main writing focus, a home for spare parts, asides, dead-ends and possible futures. I hope there is some interest in them. They are provisional and suggestions are welcome. A few, usually shorter, pieces in a similar style have been posted mid-week. I’m not sure I’ll keep to a weekly rhythm throughout 2026, but there will be at least a few more pieces.

The full chronological list of ‘Sunday histories’ is here, with a thematic ordering here.

Posted in Emile Benveniste, Sunday Histories | Leave a comment

Susana Caló & Godofredo Enes Pereira, CERFI – Analysis Everywhere. Militancy, Research, Architecture and Psychiatry – Minor Compositions, May 2026 (print and open access)

Susana Caló & Godofredo Enes Pereira, CERFI – Analysis Everywhere. Militancy, Research, Architecture and Psychiatry – Minor Compositions, May 2026

Between the radical energies of the 1960s and the shifting terrains of the 1980s, a group in France quietly detonated the boundaries of politics, psychiatry, and collective life. CERFI – the Centre for Institutional Study, Research, and Training – wasn’t your typical think tank. Co-founded by Félix Guattari, it set out to bring the disruptive insights of institutional psychotherapy into the heart of militant and professional organizing. Their wager? That every collective needs a form of analytic militancy: a way to navigate the unconscious forces that shape power, desire, and resistance from within.

This was the birth of schizoanalysis outside of the clinical setting: a practice that shifts focus from the individual psyche
to the collective assemblages that compose our lives. What are the deeper machinic drives shaping our actions? What forms of desire power our institutions? CERFI’s work took these questions seriously, designing communal infrastructures, building popular research teams, and launching Recherches, a journal that amplified voices from revolutionary struggles, childcare centres, classrooms, psychiatric wards, and beyond. Analysis Everywhere dives into the rich archive of CERFI’s radical experiments: conceptual, editorial, and lived. It invites us to imagine a practice where the unconscious isn’t repressed but mobilized. Where analysis isn’t an afterthought but a vital tool for political transformation.

Posted in Felix Guattari | Leave a comment

Georgina Lucas, Massacres in Early Modern Drama – Manchester University Press, May 2026

Georgina Lucas, Massacres in Early Modern Drama – Manchester University Press, May 2026

Massacres in Early Modern Drama analyses the dynamically ambivalent meanings constructed by the language and action of massacre on the early modern stage. Informed by theories drawn from massacre studies, the monograph challenges orthodoxies about senseless violence, illuminates archaic forms of massacres, and attests to their brutally diverse stage representations.

Anchored by the contention that the St Bartholomew’s Day Massacre in Paris (1572) was instrumental to early modern understandings of massacre, the book uses this atrocity, and its most famous dramatic depiction – Christopher Marlowe’s The Massacre at Paris – as a hook to explore larger concerns about massacre in plays by Robert Greene, George Chapman, John Fletcher, and William Shakespeare.

Thus, Massacres in Early Modern Drama considers how early modern drama forms part of a continual cultural process of trying to piece together the contentious and traumatic phenomenon of massacre.

Posted in William Shakespeare | Leave a comment

Perry Zurn, Cisgender: Disorienting a Category – Duke University Press, August 2026

Perry Zurn, Cisgender: Disorienting a Category – Duke University Press, August 2026

Introduction open access at the above link

Interview at the Duke University Press blog

In Cisgender, Perry Zurn turns an incisive yet playful eye toward the “norm” against which transgender gets defined. A cisgender person is informally understood as someone who doctors called male or female at birth, became a boy or girl, and finally lived as a man or woman—without fuss. It’s this “without fuss” that anchors the cis/trans binary as it has come to be understood and belies the complex relationship all people have with gender. How did this category arise? And what else might it do? Cisgender is the first book to trace the story of how cis entered contemporary gender lexicons. Utilizing unplumbed archives and fresh interviews, Zurn offers a critical history of the term from the 1990s to the present, deftly defamiliarizing and reimagining cis at the same time. This unique examination of cisgender is a must-read for all readers invested in trans life and the futures of gender.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Scott Sundvall, Caddie Alford, Ira J. Allen eds. Rhetoric Before and Beyond Post-Truth – University of Pittsburgh Press, December 2026

Scott Sundvall, Caddie Alford, Ira J. Allen eds. Rhetoric Before and Beyond Post-Truth – University of Pittsburgh Press, December 2026

Rhetoric has long had a contentious relationship with the idea of truth, and the field of contemporary rhetorical studies has often been skeptical of easy understandings of truth. Meanwhile, hostility to truth is doing a lot of real-world damage, even if truth itself may never have been completely reliable. The idea of post-truth poses systemic problems for rhetoric’s traditional concerns. Active obfuscation, negation of truth, and even truth-indifference are certainly not new. But the past couple of decades have seen a proliferation and pervasiveness of falsities, rendering the term “post-truth” an identifiable marker of the contemporary moment. Public life regularly provides examples of both post-truth in action and efforts to combat it by invoking truth. In Rhetoric Before and Beyond Post-Truth, a range of English, communications, philosophy, and political science scholars draw on the resources of rhetoric to understand this moment, how truth has functioned in the past, and how it may continue to function when it is no longer accepted.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Frederic Jameson, After Year Zero: On Postwar German Thought – ed. Carson Welch, Verso, September 2026

Frederic Jameson, After Year Zero: On Postwar German Thought – ed. Carson Welch, Verso, September 2026

Jameson’s Legendary Lectures on German thought, together in one volume for the first time.

In this series of accessible lectures, Fredric Jameson explores German philosophy and critical theory as it de­veloped in the wake of World War Two. Focusing on key thinkers — Horkheimer, Adorno, Heidegger, Habermas, Marcuse, Beuys, Enzensberger, Kluge, and Sloterdijk — Jameson weaves close readings of texts with anecdotes and aperçus to craft a narrative about the uses of the­ory. He delves into world-historical phenomena, such as the legacy of Nazism and the formation of the European Union, in a story that stretches from the postwar division of Germany to its reunification at the end of the Cold War.

After Year Zero is a vital account of the German critical tradition, as understood by the “most significant Marxist thinker in American culture.”

Posted in Fredric Jameson, Herbert Marcuse, Jürgen Habermas, Martin Heidegger, Peter Sloterdijk, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Foucault. Une aventure intellectuelle au Collège de France – exhibition and lectures, 30 September 2026-15 January 2027

Foucault. Une aventure intellectuelle au Collège de France – 30 September 2026-15 January 2027

L’exposition « Foucault. Une aventure intellectuelle au Collège de France » explore le parcours de Michel Foucault dans l’institution où il enseigna de 1970 à 1984. À l’occasion du centenaire de sa naissance, des manuscrits inédits, archives et témoignages audio et vidéo esquissent le mouvement d’une pensée toujours profondément actuelle.

Exposition organisée par le Collège de France en partenariat avec la Bibliothèque nationale de France.

Thanks to Foucault News for the information on the related lectures:

Grand événement. Cycle de conférences: Michel Foucault au Collège de France

du Mardi 22 septembre au Mardi 15 décembre 2026

Cycle de conférences autour de l’exposition « Foucault. Une aventure intellectuelle au Collège de France ».

Du 30 septembre 2026 au 15 janvier 2027, l’exposition du Collège de France, en partenariat avec la Bibliothèque nationale de France, « Foucault. Une aventure intellectuelle au Collège de France » invite à traverser le passage de Michel Foucault au sein d’une institution qu’il a profondément marquée. 

Le cycle de conférences organisé par Aurèle Méthivier (Collège de France) en collaboration avec Philippe Chevallier (Bibliothèque nationale de France) se propose de prolonger cette découverte en faisant intervenir à la fois des témoins de l’époque, qui ont travaillé au côté de Michel Foucault, et des spécialistes de son œuvre et de la vie intellectuelle des années 1970-1980.

Programme
Élire Foucault au Collège de France : enjeux scientifiques et politiques
Orazio Irrera & Céline Surprenant

Foucault et la vie du Collège : dialogue avec les pairs, création de chaires
Aurèle Méthivier & Sandra Boehringer

Foucault enseignant : cohérence d’une trajectoire et place dans l’œuvre
Philippe Sabot & Elisabetta Basso

Travailler avec Foucault : les séminaires du Collège
Pasquale Pasquino & Carolina Verlengia

Histoire et postérité d’une leçon : « Qu’est-ce que les Lumières ? »
Antoine Lilti

Posted in Michel Foucault, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

James Clay Moltz, The Politics of Space Security: Strategic Restraint and the Pursuit of National Interests – Stanford University Press, fourth edition, June 2026 

James Clay Moltz, The Politics of Space Security: Strategic Restraint and the Pursuit of National Interests – Stanford University Press, fourth edition, June 2026 

As space becomes more crowded with over 12,000 active satellites operated by over sixty countries and hundreds of private companies, preventing conflict in this strategic environment has become increasingly important. The Politics of Space Security examines the history of the space age from its origins in national rocket programs of the 1920s and 1930s to the present day, focusing in particular on the political, military, and diplomatic challenges affecting space security. James Clay Moltz analyzes the competing demands of national interests in space against the shared interests of all spacefarers in preserving the safe use of space in the face of emerging threats, such as man-made orbital debris.

Since the publication of the first edition in 2008, this book has become recognized as a key source on the political history of the space age. The fourth edition updates the book’s coverage to include the period from 2019 to 2025. Major commercial developments in these years are examined—such as the orbiting of SpaceX’s Starlink mega-constellation—as well as initiatives in space diplomacy and threats posed by growing military counterspace programs. Additionally, Moltz updates the academic literature to include significant works on space security published since the first edition.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Eduardo A. Escobar, Kiersten Neumann and C. Jay Crisostomo eds. Scribal Worlds: Scholarship and Classification in Cuneiform Cultures – UCL Press, June 2026 (print and open access)

Eduardo A. Escobar, Kiersten Neumann and C. Jay Crisostomo eds. Scribal Worlds: Scholarship and Classification in Cuneiform Cultures – UCL Press, June 2026 (print and open access)

Scribal Worlds: Scholarship and classification in cuneiform cultures delves into the history of the earliest writing cultures of the ancient Middle East, bridging disciplines that include ancient history, philology, semiotics, material culture studies and philosophy of science. Bringing together scholars in the fields of Assyriology, History of Science and Art History, the collection examines how language, ontology, classification and scribal learning shaped cuneiform traditions. Through focused textual and material case studies, contributors employ diverse heuristic tools to reconstruct the intellectual frameworks of scribal cultures and the transmission of knowledge. Inspired by and in appreciation of the work of Niek Veldhuis, this collaborative and timely exploration highlights the interwoven nature of classification and scholarship within cuneiform studies, demonstrating how specific texts, object groups and practices can be interpreted within their cultural contexts. By critically analysing and reframing these sources, the volume exemplifies how scholars extract meaning from even the most fragmentary evidence – truly ‘squeezing juice out of stones’.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Andrea Brondino, Narrative and History in the Works of Umberto Eco, Carlo Ginzburg, and Wu Ming: Untangling the Strands – Bloomsbury, December 2026

Andrea Brondino, Narrative and History in the Works of Umberto Eco, Carlo Ginzburg, and Wu Ming: Untangling the Strands – Bloomsbury, December 2026

Using the works of prominent Italian authors of both fiction and nonfiction, this book challenges the established critical accounts of hybrid narratives and examines the shared influence in terms of style, content, and ambition.

Focused on recent (1980s-present) historical novels by Umberto Eco and Wu Ming (a collective of Italian writers), as well as on the historiographic essays by Carlo Ginzburg, the book covers three globally influential cases that prove to be seminal for the transdisciplinary understanding of key words such as ‘fiction’, ‘history’, and ‘narrative’. However differently, these authors write extensively about history, and the methods of tracking and transcribing that history. Be it fiction or non-fiction, their works share a formal tendency to challenge the established boundaries of the genres they belong to, as well as influence fields and writings across borders. The main argument is that blurring the boundaries between fictional and historical writing raises problematic ethical and political questions, especially in a world where facts and reality are constantly manipulated. Amongst other topics, the book analyses how Eco’s novels provide an oblique commentary on his own theory, how Eco and Ginzburg’s works can be compared, how Ginzburg’s essays influence contemporary literature and fiction on a transnational scale, and how Wu Ming inherit their legacy while devising their own, deeply politicized way of writing about history.

Posted in Carlo Ginzburg, Umberto Eco, Wu Ming | Leave a comment