Foucault’s 1972 visit to Attica prison

Entrance of the Attica Correctional Facility, by Jayu from Harrisburg, PA, U.S.A.,  Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic 

In April 1972, during his second teaching visit to SUNY Buffalo, Michel Foucault visited Attica prison. The two visits to Buffalo are important for his teaching, which I discuss briefly here and in more detail in a piece in Foucault Studies. Leonhard Riep discusses Foucault’s 1972 Buffalo course in detail in an essay in that same issue. The course has now been published as Histoire de la vérité, edited by Henri-Paul Fruchaud and Orazio Irrera.

In the course Foucault cuts the session of 20 April a bit short, saying that he has to get up early the next day to drive to Attica for a 7am visit. His trip there was less than a year after the September 1971 revolt and its brutal suppression. John K. Simon, chair of the Buffalo French department and Foucault’s main contact at Buffalo, and Herman Schwartz, a law professor there, accompanied Foucault to Attica. Schwartz had been an important mediator during the uprising, one of the few people to enter the prison during this time, and represented prisoners after it. He seems to have acted as guide on the visit. Given this was so soon after the revolt, and criminal cases were still ongoing, it seems remarkable this visit was allowed.

Heather Ann Thompson’s Blood in the Water is very good on the uprising and its aftermath, making use of a range of previously inaccessible official documents and first-hand testimony. Thompson’s book has some valuable discussion of Schwartz’s legal work for the prisoners, during and after the events. I’ve not yet read Orisanmi Burton’s Tip of the Spear: Black Radicalism, Prison Repression, and the Long Attica Revolt, which makes use of more prisoner accounts of the revolt.

Simon had interviewed Foucault during his 1970 visit to Buffalo, and later interviewed him about what he saw in Attica. The interview was published in Telos, and then reprinted in Social Justice and Foucault: Live. (The journal links take you to accessible versions; a French translation is here.) Foucault says that it was his first time inside a prison, but we know that his psychiatric work of the early 1950s meant that he regularly visited the Fresnes prison outside Paris (see my The Early Foucault, pp. 47-48; building on Didier Eribon and David Macey’s biographies). 

1972 was in the middle of Foucault’s time with the Groupe d’Information sur les prisons, which has left an extensive legacy of interviews and reports, and his work with them informed both his 1972-73 course The Punitive Society and his book Surveiller et punir/Discipline and Punish. Jean Genet and Catherine von Bülow were crucial in mediating the links between the GIP and the Black Panthers, although it is reported Foucault was reading work by this group from 1968, when he was teaching in Tunisia. One of the GIP pamphlets was about the assassination of George Jackson in the San Quentin prison in California on 21 August 1971, which was one of the events behind the Attica uprising.

I discuss the visit and interview in Foucault: The Birth of Power (especially pp. 136-37) and Chapter 5 is partly about how Foucault’s work with GIP was important to the writing of Discipline and Punish. An English translation of GIP material appeared in 2021, edited by Kevin Thompson and Perry Zurn, building on earlier French collections of documents, Archives d’une lutte 1970–1972 and Intolérable. The English volume also includes a reprint of the Simon and Foucault interview about Attica. The secondary literature on Foucault’s prison activism in France is extensive (see, for example, an essay by Cecile Brich, Marcelo Hoffman’s Foucault and Power and the edited collection by Perry Zurn and Andrew Dilts, Active Intolerance). There are also some articles on Foucault’s links to the Black Panthers (see essays by Jason Demers and Brady Thomas Heiner). 

I returned to the story of the visits to Buffalo and added a bit more detail in The Archaeology of Foucault (pp. 207-8), in the light of archival material I hadn’t previously seen. In particular, I mentioned how Schwartz introduced Foucault to the case of the prison activist Martin Sostre, who had been imprisoned on narcotics and assault charges, later proved to be fabricated. Despite promising the US embassy that he would lecture only on literature and avoid politics, Foucault spoke at a press conference in support of Sostre. (On the difficulties of getting permission to enter the USA, Marcelo Hoffman’s piece on Foucault’s FBI file is valuable, as are archival documents in Paris and Buffalo.)

One of the things that comes through strongly in the Attica interview is the importance of class struggle. This theme is muted in Discipline and Punish, but much stronger in The Punitive Society. Foucault was exposed to the racial politics of US incarceration through this visit to Attica, and briefly mentions it in the interview with Simon, but that theme is much less developed in his academic work on prisons and punishment.

Acknowledgments

This is an expanded and revised version of a post from January 2018. Thanks to Laleh Khalili and Sebastian Budgen for prompting that original piece, and to Marcelo Hoffman for his work on and interest in Foucault and prisons.

References

Cecile Brich, “The Groupe d’information sur les prisons: The Voice of Prisoners? Or Foucault’s?” Foucault Studies 5, 2008, 26–47.

Orisanmi Burton, Tip of the Spear: Black Radicalism, Prison Repression, and the Long Attica Revolt, Oakland, CA: University of California Press, 2023.

Stuart Elden, Foucault: The Birth of Power, Cambridge: Polity, 2017.

Stuart Elden, The Early Foucault, Cambridge: Polity, 2021.

Stuart Elden, The Archaeology of Foucault, Cambridge: Polity, 2023.

Stuart Elden, “Foucault at Buffalo in 1970 and 1972: The Desire for Knowledge; The Criminal in Literature; and The History of Truth”Foucault Studies 38, 2025, 129-40.

Michel Foucault, Surveiller et punir – Naissance de la prison, Paris: Gallimard/Tel, 1975; Discipline and Punish – The Birth of the Prison, trans. Alan Sheridan, London: Penguin, 1976. 

Michel Foucault, La société punitive: Cours au Collège de France (1972-73), ed. Bernard E. Harcourt, Paris: Gallimard/Seuil, 2013; The Punitive Society: Lectures at the Collège de France 1972-73, trans. Graham Burchell, London: Palgrave, 2015. 

Michel Foucault, Histoire de la verité: Cours au département de français de l’Université d’État de New York à Buffalo Mars et avril 1972, ed. Henri-Paul Fruchaud and Orazio Irrera, Paris: Vrin, 2025.

Michel Foucault, Catharine von Bülow and Daniel Defert, “The Masked Assassination of George Jackson”, in Joy James ed., Warfare in the American Homeland: Policing and Prison in a Penal Democracy, Durham: Duke University Press, 2007, 140-58.

Groupe d’information sur les prisons, Archives d’une lutte 1970–1972, eds. Philippe Artières, Laurent Quéro and Michelle Zancarini-Fournel, Paris: Édition de l’IMEC, 2003.

Groupe d’information sur les prisons, Intolérable, ed. Philippe Artières, Paris: Éditions Verticales, 2013.

Brady Thomas Heiner, “Foucault and the Black Panthers”, City 11 (3), 2007, 313-56.

Marcelo Hoffman, Foucault and Power: The Influence of Political Engagement on Theories of Power, London: Bloomsbury, 2013.

Marcelo Hoffman, “The FBI File on Foucault”, Viewpoint Magazine, 8 November 2021, https://viewpointmag.com/2021/11/08/the-fbi-file-on-foucault/

Leonhard Riep, “‘The History of Truth’—Foucault in Buffalo, 1972”Foucault Studies 38, 2025, 141-56

John K. Simon, “A Conversation with Michel Foucault”, Partisan Review 38 (2), 1971, 192-201.

John K. Simon, “Michel Foucault on Attica: An Interview”, Telos 19, 1974, 154-61; reprinted in Social Justice 18 (3), 26-34; Foucault: Live (Interviews, 1961-1984), New York: Semiotext(e), 1996, 113-21.

Heather Ann Thompson, Blood in the Water: The Attica Prison Uprising of 1971 and its Legacy, New York: Pantheon, 2016.

Kevin Thompson and Perry Zurn eds. Intolerable: Writings from Michel Foucault and the Prisons Information Group (1970-1980), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2021.

Perry Zurn and Andrew Dilts eds., Active Intolerance: Michel Foucault, The Prisons Information Group, and the Future of Abolition, London: Palgrave, 2015.

Archives

Bibliothèque nationale de France – 

  • NAF 28730, Fonds Michel Foucault
  • NAF 29005, Archives personnelles et professionnelles Michel Foucault – Daniel Defert

Fonds Groupe d’Information sur les prisons, l’Institut Mémoires de l’édition contemporaine, l’abbaye d’Ardenne, Caen 

University at Buffalo special collections – 

  • 16-6-596: Department of Modern Languages Personnel Files, 1960-1980, box 2, Foucault, Michel, Spring 1970
  • 16-1-444: Faculty of Arts and Letters Personnel Files, 1972-1973, box 2, “Foucault, Michel, Visiting Professor 8/31/72”
  • Biographical File Collection, “Michel Foucault”
  • Audio recordings WBFOUK1010, four parts and WBFOUK1011, four parts

This is the 65th post of a weekly series, posted every Sunday throughout 2025, and continuing so far this year. The posts are short essays with indications of further reading and sources. They are not as formal as something I’d try to publish more conventionally, but are hopefully worthwhile as short sketches of histories and ideas. They are usually tangential to my main writing focus, a home for spare parts, asides, dead-ends and possible futures. I hope there is some interest in them. They are provisional and suggestions are welcome. A few, usually shorter, pieces in a similar style have been posted mid-week. I’m not sure manage one every week in 2026, but there will be at least a few more pieces.

The full chronological list of ‘Sunday histories’ is here, with a thematic organisation here.

Posted in Foucault: The Birth of Power, Michel Foucault, Sunday Histories, The Archaeology of Foucault, Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Seeing the cover of The Birth of Territory

Last weekend, I finally got to see the painting used for the cover of my book The Birth of Territory for the first time. It’s in the Palazzo d’Accursio in Bologna. The painting is by Luigi Serra, Irnerio che glossa le leggi, from 1886. Irnerius was a glossator on Roman law, and I discuss him and some of the other glossators in the book. It was originally on a ceiling but moved to a wall.

Update: I should have added that I briefly discuss the painting in the book (pp. 216-17). I shared that passage when I first was able to announce the cover – here.

Posted in My Publications, Territory, The Birth of Territory | Leave a comment

Quentin Deluermoz, The Paris Commune: A Global History – Verso, May 2026

Quentin Deluermoz, The Paris Commune: A Global History – Verso, May 2026

The Paris Commune as world revolutionary event and laboratory for republican and socialist ideas 

In 1871 and over the years to follow, the impact of the Paris Commune was felt the world over. Concepts and practices developed there were taken up in all corners of Europe and travelled as far afield as Mexico City and Algiers. Drawing on history, anthropology, and the sociology of crises and revolutions, Quentin Deluermoz follows the revolution from its origins on the Parisian street, capturing the perspective of ordinary men and women, to examine the delicate question of its legacy.

In recent decades, the Commune has been a touchstone for social and political struggles in France, the United States, Spain, Mexico, and the Syrian Kurdish region of Rojava. This resurgence is rooted in twentieth-century anarchist and communist history. It hearkens back to often forgotten meanings of socialism, federalism, and republicanism. Deluermoz recaptures the intensity of the ‘Commune moment’, helping readers grasp its enduring relevance for today.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Martin Jay, Magical Nominalism: The Historical Event, Aesthetic Reechantment, and the Photograph – University of Chicago Press, January 2025

Martin Jay, Magical Nominalism: The Historical Event, Aesthetic Reechantment, and the Photograph – University of Chicago Press, January 2025

A bold and wide-ranging study across centuries, examining the conflict between “conventional” and “magical” nominalism in philosophy, history, aesthetics, political theory, and photography.

In this magisterial new book, intellectual historian Martin Jay traces the long-standing competition between two versions of nominalism—the “conventional” and the “magical.” Since at least William of Ockham, according to Jay, the conventional form of nominalism has contributed to the disenchantment of the world, by viewing general terms as nothing more than mere names we use to group particular objects together, rejecting the idea that they refer to a further, “higher” reality. Magical nominalism, instead, performs a reenchanting function, by investing proper names, disruptive events, and singular objects with an auratic power of their own. Drawing in part on Jewish theology, it challenges the elevation of the constitutive subject resulting from Ockham’s reliance on divine will in his critique of real universals.

Starting with the fourteenth-century revolution of nominalism against Scholastic realism, Jay unpacks various “counterrevolutions” against nominalism itself, including a magical alternative to its conventional form. Focusing on fundamental debates over the relationship between language, thought, and reality, Jay illuminates connections across thinkers, disciplines, and vast realms of human experience. Ranging from theology and philosophy of history to aesthetics and political theory, this book engages with a range of artists and thinkers, including Adorno, Ankersmit, Badiou, Barthes, Bataille, Benjamin, Blumenberg, Derrida, Duchamp, Foucault, Kracauer, Kripke, and Lyotard. Ultimately, Magical Nominalism offers a strikingly original way to understand humanity’s intellectual path to modernity.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Stefania Achella, Bojana Jovićević, Francesca Iannelli, and Eleonora Caramelli eds. Against the “Law of the Father”: Hegel’s Disobedient Readings – Brill, February 2026

Stefania Achella, Bojana Jovićević, Francesca Iannelli, and Eleonora Caramelli eds. Against the “Law of the Father”: Hegel’s Disobedient Readings – Brill, February 2026

Why discuss disobedience in relation to Hegel? The answer lies in how his philosophy, particularly through his interpretation of Antigone, has sparked debates about the tension between individual choice and societal norms, and how feminist thought has challenged Hegelian traditions. Hegel’s recognition of Antigone’s disobedience as a necessary yet tragic act demonstrates his acknowledgement of the individual’s role in shaping history beyond societal laws. However, Hegel didn’t fully explore the conflict between nature (Antigone’s personal choice) and culture (the laws of the community), which was later emphasized by feminist scholars such as Irigaray and de Beauvoir, who argued against patriarchal interpretations of Hegel’s philosophy and promoted a critical re-reading. In doing so, they rejected the rigid universalism of Hegel’s system in favor of an understanding and practice of difference. This volume focuses on how disobedience to Hegel allows for new interpretation.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Caroline Kuzemko, Climate Politics: Can’t Live with It, Can’t Mitigate without It, Cambridge University Press, February 2026 (print and open access)

Caroline Kuzemko, Climate Politics: Can’t Live with It, Can’t Mitigate without It, Cambridge University Press, February 2026 (print and open access)

By exploring the dynamic relationships between politics, policymaking, and policy over time, this book aims to explain why climate change mitigation is so political, and why politics is also indispensable in enacting real change. It argues that politics is poorly understood and often sidelined in research and policy circles, which is an omission that must be rectified, because the policies that we rely on to drive down greenhouse gas emissions are deeply inter-connected with political and social contexts. Incorporating insights from political economy, socio-technical transitions, and public policy, this book provides a framework for understanding the role of specific ideas, interests, and institutions in shaping and driving sustainable change. The chapters present examples at global, national, and local scales, spanning from the 1990s to 2020s. This volume will prove valuable for graduate students, researchers, and policymakers interested in the politics and policy of climate change. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Working Knowledge: A Simon Schaffer Reader, eds. Charlotte Bigg, John Tresch, and Simon Werrett – University of Chicago Press, April 2026

Working Knowledge: A Simon Schaffer Reader, eds. Charlotte Bigg, John Tresch, and Simon Werrett – University of Chicago Press, April 2026

Collects key articles by Simon Schaffer, one of the most important historians of science working today.

Working Knowledge is the first English-language collection of essays by Simon Schaffer, coauthor of Leviathan and the Air-Pump, a landmark text in the history of science. Though the latter may be his most famous book, Schaffer is also renowned for seminal articles on Isaac Newton and the cultures of popular spectacle, nineteenth-century physics and its practices of labor discipline and standardization, the history of anthropology and collecting, and the globe-spanning cultural interactions that have shaped modern science. Working Knowledge compiles these well-known pieces alongside newer selections, making them accessible in a single place and representing the huge scope and impact of Schaffer’s oeuvre.

The Reader divides sixteen of Schaffer’s articles across five thematic sections, which take up timely issues like the turn toward global histories of science; the intersection of science and capitalism; the interaction between bodies and machines; and the connection between science, politics, and the environment. Eight new essays by notable historians such as Adrian Johns, Lissa Roberts, and Steven Shapin bring Schaffer’s pieces into discussion with current scholarship. Illustrations and brief commentaries by Schaffer and the artist Adam Lowe, a longtime collaborator, are included throughout the volume.

Bringing together essential articles that were previously scattered across several publications, Working Knowledge is an insightful introduction to Schaffer and his ever-relevant writing.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Zygmunt Bauman’s ‘living bibliography’ and Dave Beer’s thoughts on his book reviews

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Dror Yinon, Deleuze and the Problem of Experience: Transcendental Empiricism – Bloomsbury, July 2025 and NDPR review

Dror Yinon, Deleuze and the Problem of Experience: Transcendental Empiricism – Bloomsbury, July 2025

NDPR review by George Webster

This comprehensive reframing of Gilles Deleuze as a transcendental empiricist delves into his seminal Difference and Repetition to unearth a system that inverts the Kantian worldview. By focusing on Deleuze’s theory of the faculties, we can see how he builds a transcendental system of thought that defies the predictability of empirical experience.

The place of experience in the way we understand our relation to the world, to others and to ourselves, is a central theme of modern philosophy. Deleuze’s transcendental empiricism points to an unexplored direction in this major philosophical preoccupation. It is a road not taken that, against the tide of his times, rejected the possibility of an immediate contact with being and embraced the possibility of reaching a ‘real’ that lay beneath many layers of mediation. Unlike many of his contemporaries, Deleuze neither subscribed to a specific philosophical school nor did he try to establish one. This new understanding of him as a transcendental empiricist not only helps to situate his work in the constellation of twentieth century French philosophers but also helps us to understand a philosopher for whom difference and heterogeneity were central to his own philosophical corpus.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The limited copies of the 1940 edition of Georges Dumézil’s Mitra-Varuna

In 1943, the American librarian and Sanskrit scholar Horace Poleman wrote a review of Georges Dumézil’s 1940 book Mitra-Varuna: Essai sur deux représentations indo-européennes de la souveraineté for the Journal of the American Oriental Society. Interestingly, given the accusations made of Dumézil’s politics, Poleman sees the book as a “political diatribe against Nazism” (p. 80), particularly focusing on the discussion of “Totalitarian and Distributive Economies” in Chapter VIII.

That is not my concern here. I discuss these political issues in my introduction to the recent re-edition of the translation of Mitra-Varuna (open access), and in much more detail in my developing book manuscript on Émile Benveniste, Dumézil and Indo-European thought in twentieth century France. But Poleman links the political sense he perceives to the difficulty, even in 1943, of finding copies of the book.

The author sent this review copy, which he stated was one of the few copies he had been able to get out of Paris before the German occupation, to the Library of Congress via an attaché of the French Embassy at the Turkish capital. He fears that all but six copies rescued by himself have been destroyed by the Nazi Kultur purgers (p. 80).

The Gallimard website says the first edition was published in May 1940 – the very month France was invaded. After the war, Dumézil reedited the book, making several small changes and some more major ones. The original 1940 edition appeared with Presses Universitaires de France, under the Leroux imprint, and the revised 1948 edition was published by Gallimard. The original English translation by Derek Coltman for Zone books was of the second edition, and the recent reissue for Hau books adds an apparatus comparing the two editions and translating the parts of the 1940 text which were not in the 1948 version. 

Dumézil says in the 1948 preface that the original “printing was a very small one and soon exhausted” (p. 9; translation p. xxxiii). Publication at the time of the invasion would not have helped distribution, but the book does not appear in the 1940 Liste Otto of prohibited books (named about Hitler’s ambassador to Vichy, Otto Abetz), or the longer Ouvrages Littéraires non désirables en France of 1943. (I write about Henri Lefebvre’s books and this list here.)

What happened to the copies which did survive?

There are at least four copies in UK libraries. I have seen the ones held by the Warburg Institute, the Institute of Classical Studies, and the Bodleian library in Oxford. Cambridge University library also has a copy. The Oxford copy has a date stamp of 27 September 1945, suggesting it reached them after the liberation. The Bibliothèque nationale de France has a copy, and possibly two at different sites, but since they have also microfilmed and digitised the text, it is not available to order into a reading room. I’m sure there are other copies in other libraries, but sometimes library catalogues say they have the original edition but actually have the second edition, so remote searching is not always reliable as an indication. Hervé Coutau-Bégarie’s bibliography of Dumézil indicates that there were ten reviews of the original (p. 29), and in a pre-digital age I think it’s a reasonable assumption those reviewers had seen a physical copy of the book. These reviews appeared in issues of journals dated between 1941 and 1948, but many journal publishing schedules were disrupted by the war. Benveniste’s brief book note was written after his return from exile in Switzerland, as it also mentions the other books Dumézil had published in the war years.

Nonetheless copies of the 1940 edition are hard to find. To do the textual comparison of the 1940 and 1948 editions for my editorial work I took photographs of all the pages of the Warburg Institute copy, printed them, and annotated it by hand, though most of my markup was on a copy of the 1948 text. I had searched repeatedly on bookfinder.com and had a ‘want’ on abebooks.co.uk for years before I finally tracked down a copy. That copy isn’t in great shape, but it is at least complete.

Even Dumézil didn’t have copies to spare. In 1947 he wrote to the Uppsala professor Henrik Samuel Nyberg to say that he had located one other copy, which he sent to him. He was in the process of revising the text and was hoping for comments from Nyberg. Mircea Eliade sent Dumézil some detailed comments around this time, though I’m not sure if these were based on the original edition or a manuscript.

So, it’s a difficult book to find, even if Dumézil is too pessimistic in what he told Poleman. For this reason, in the new edition I provided the French text for all the 1940 passages which were not in the 1948 version, as well as a translation. This means that a French reader could use the new edition alongside the 1948 text to reconstruct what is in the original version.

References

Émile Benveniste, “Georges Dumézil. – Mitra-Varuna…”, Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 42 (2), 1942-45, 45-46.

Hervé Coutau-Bégarie, L’œuvre de Georges Dumézil: Catalogue raisonné, Paris: Economica, 1998.

Georges Dumézil, Mitra-Varuna: Essai sur deux représentations indo-européennes de la souveraineté, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1940.

Georges Dumézil, Mitra-Varuna: Essai sur deux représentations indo-européennes de la souveraineté, Paris: Gallimard, 1948.

Georges Dumézil, Mitra-Varuna: An Essay on Two Indo-European Representations of Sovereignty, trans. Derek Coltman, ed. Stuart Elden, Chicago: Hau, 2023, vii-xxvi (open access).

Horace I. Poleman, “Mitra-Varuna”, Journal of the American Oriental Society 63 (1), 1943, 79-80.

Liste Bernhard and Liste Otto versions

All reproduced in Pascal Fouché, L’Édition française sous l’Occupation 1940-1944, Paris: Bibliothèque de Littérature française contemporaine, two volumes, 1987, Vol I, 287-340.

  • Liste Bernhard, http://rlfsoa.wikidot.com/liste-bernhard
  • Liste Otto, Ouvrages retirés de la vente par les éditeurs ou interdits par les autorités allemands, September 1940 Gallica; with two page supplement
  • Unerwuenschte franzoesische Literatur/Ouvrages Littéraires Français non désirables, July 1942 Gallica
  • Unerwuenschte Literatur in Frankreich/Ouvrages littéraires non désirables en France, 10 May 1943 GallicaWikisource
  • Index par auteurs Gallica

Archives

Fonds Georges Dumézil, Collège de France

Henrik Samuel Nyberg archives, Carolina Rediviva library, Uppsala University


This is the 64th post of a weekly series, posted every Sunday throughout 2025, and continuing so far this year. The posts are short essays with indications of further reading and sources. They are not as formal as something I’d try to publish more conventionally, but are hopefully worthwhile as short sketches of histories and ideas. They are usually tangential to my main writing focus, a home for spare parts, asides, dead-ends and possible futures. I hope there is some interest in them. They are provisional and suggestions are welcome. A few, usually shorter, pieces in a similar style have been posted mid-week. I’m not sure manage one every week in 2026, but there will be at least a few more pieces.

The full chronological list of ‘Sunday histories’ is here, with a thematic organisation here.


Posted in Emile Benveniste, Georges Dumézil, Sunday Histories, Uncategorized | Leave a comment