NDPR reviews – Foucault/Derrida, Heidegger on Nietzsche and Nail’s Theory of the Border

9780231171953Three interesting reviews at NDPR

Olivia Custer, Penelope Deutscher, and Samir Haddad (eds.), Foucault/Derrida Fifty Years Later: The Futures of Genealogy, Deconstruction, and Politics by Christopher Penfield – here

Thomas Nail, Theory of the Border by Avery Kolers – here

Martin Heidegger, Interpretation of Nietzsche’s Second Untimely Meditation by Tracy Colony – here

Advertisements
Posted in Boundaries, Friedrich Nietzsche, Jacques Derrida, Martin Heidegger, Michel Foucault, Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Hubert Dreyfus obituary by Sean Kelly

Hubert Dreyfus obituary by Sean Kelly at Daily Nous.

Update: The Berkeley obituary is here.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Can you have too much writing time? – some discussion at Explorations of Style

Can You Have Too Much Writing Time?

A few weeks ago, I received an email from a former student, asking for some advice about managing a summer of writing. With her permission, I am sharing her email and my reflections on our conversation.

Some good advice and discussion at the Explorations of Style blog, which continues into the comments. I shared ‘my sabbatical rules for writing‘ back in September 2015, and they worked quite well for me then. Of course, more time and less time are relative, and small amounts of time can add up to something larger. With any amount of time, the questions are what could be achieved realistically, and how could it be achieved.

The key line for me in this piece is “A generous block of writing time is an opportunity, not a solution.” Of course, it’s a great opportunity, but without some thought, planning and discipline, it may not be what you expect it to be. Much to think about here.

 

Posted in Publishing, Uncategorized, Writing | Leave a comment

Todd S. Mei, Land and the Given Economy: The Hermeneutics and Phenomenology of Dwelling

land-and-the-given-economyTodd S. Mei, Land and the Given Economy: The Hermeneutics and Phenomenology of Dwelling. Here’s the publisher description:

Alarming environmental degradation makes ever more urgent the reconciliation of political economy and sustainability. Land and the Given Economy examines how the landed basis of human existence converges with economics, and it offers a persuasive new conception of land that transcends the flawed and inadequate accounts in classical and neoclassical economics.

Todd S. Mei grounds this work in a rigorous review of problematic economic conceptions of land in the work of John Locke, Adam Smith, David Ricardo, John Stuart Mill, Karl Marx, Henry George, Alfred Marshall, and Thorstein Veblen.

Mei then draws on the thought of Martin Heidegger to posit a philosophical clarification of the meaning of land—its ontological nature. He argues that central to rethinking land is recognizing its unique manner of being, described as its “givenness.” Concluding with a discussion of ground rent, Mei reflects on specific strategies for incorporating the philosophical account of land into contemporary economic policies.

Revivifying economic frameworks that fail to resolve the impasse between economic development and sustainability, Land and the Given Economy offers much of interest to scholars and readers of philosophy, environmentalism, and the full spectrum of political economy.

The book is reviewed at NDPR by Casey Rentmeester.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Simon Reid-Henry on Arturo Escobar in The Guardian

MDG--Arturo-Escobar-009.jpgSimon Reid-Henry discusses the work of and influences on Arturo Escobar in The Guardian

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Social Morphogenesis: Five Years of Inquiring Into Social Change – British Library, May 30 2017

Social Morphogenesis: Five Years of Inquiring Into Social Change

Postmodernity. Second modernity. Network Society. Late modernity. Liquid modernity. Such concepts have dominated social thought in recent decades, with a bewildering array of claims about social change and its implications. But what do we mean by ‘social change’? How do we establish that such change is taking place? What does it mean to say that it is intensifying? These are some of the questions which the Social Morphogenesis project has sought to answer in the last five years, through an inquiry orientated around the speculative notion of ‘morphogenic society’.

In this launch event, contributors to the project discuss their work over the last five years and the questions it has addressed concerning social change. The day begins with an introductory lecture by the convenor of the project, Margaret S. Archer, before a series of thematic panels presenting different stands of the project. It concludes with a closing session in which participants share three issues the project raised for them, as well as a general discussion.

At the end of the day, there will be a wine reception to which all participants are invited. There will also be an opportunity to purchase discounted copies of the books from Springer.

Participants:
Ismael Al-Amoudi
Margaret S. Archer
Mark Carrigan
Pierpaolo Donati
Emmanuel Lazega
Andrea M. Maccarini
Jamie Morgan
Graham Scambler (Chair)

More speakers to be confirmed.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Chronicle Vitae – The Art of ‘No’

This is some good advice on the need to, and how to, say ‘no’ to some of the requests that come your way.

Early in my career, I struggled to say no. I was asked to serve on committee after committee, to evaluate fistfuls of manuscripts and grants, and to perform dozens of other tasks, large and small. I said yes willy-nilly — often because of genuine interest, but other times out of a sense of guilt or obligation, and sometimes out of fear of reprisal if I refused. But as I advanced in my career, the requests snowballed. Agreeing to do all of them — or even half of them — became impossible. I needed to figure out when to say no, and how to do it artfully. Five principles have helped me learn what to say, and what not to say.

The article is worth reading, but the five key points, which apply in different situations are:

  • Volunteer someone else — strategically
  • Don’t explain
  • Do explain
  • Set your own policies
  • Just hit ‘delete’

I’ve written on this topic before – The challenge of saying ‘no’ to academic requests There is some good advice in this post. But to pre-empt the comments on avoiding work, or transferring to others, here’s the conclusion:

Academe could not function if every scholar refused to serve on committees, evaluate manuscripts and grants, write recommendations, and perform many other uncompensated and often undervalued tasks. We need to say yes — and to do so often. Ultimately, that’s why saying no is so important. Saying no to some requests enables us to say yes to others. Each productive yes depends on many an artful no.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Christopher Watkin’s research hacks on conference presentations

Research hacks #14: 15 tips on planning and writing a conference paper

Research hacks #15: Tips on delivering a conference paper

Research hacks #16: 20 tips on timekeeping and technology for your conference presentation

Research hacks #17: 15 tips on fielding questions after a conference paper

The rest of this useful series are here.

Posted in Conferences, Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Hubert Dreyfus (1929-2017)

dreyfus_car.jpgI heard the news yesterday that Hubert Dreyfus had died at the age of 87. While it was shared on social media, it took a while for an official notification. Dreyfus’s Twitter account simply said ‘Reports of my demise are not exaggerated’.

Dreyfus was a Professor of Philosophy at University of California, Berkeley, and was still teaching a class a semester. He is known for his work on Husserl, Merleau-Ponty, Heidegger and Foucault, and on artificial intelligence, among other themes. His lectures on Heidegger were very influential, and led to the book Being-in-the-World, and his co-authored book on Foucault with Paul Rabinow was very important. Neither of these books were uncontroversial, of course, but his role in introducing continental theorists to the US and Anglophone world was considerable.

I met him only once, almost twenty years ago, at a conference at the University of Essex when I was a PhD student. I gave a talk on Heidegger and Hölderlin, which became my first journal publication (read it here). I don’t think he was in the audience for that session, but we had a talk about Heidegger, Foucault and space in one of the breaks, and he was very generous with his time. In particular he suggested that I talk more to Béatrice Han-Pile, whom I met at that conference, and to get in contact with Jeff Malpas. Both were excellent people to talk to, and I am still in touch with both, and I’m extremely grateful for that. He kindly answered some questions by email following this event. I’d hoped to speak to him when I visited Berkeley in 2015 to do work on the Foucault papers archived there, but it didn’t work out. I did spot his beautiful car parked on campus though – immortalised in the covers of the collections on Dreyfus’s work edited by Malpas and Mark Wrathall.

The interview below gives a sense of the breadth of his interests.

Posted in Uncategorized, Martin Heidegger, Jeff Malpas | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The ICE LAW Project comes out from the cold

Phil Steinberg with an update on activities in the ICE-LAW project, including the workshop I’m organising next month in Amsterdam –

logo copyThe ICE LAW Project is close to concluding its first full year of funding and we’re in the midst of a particularly active few months. We’ve been providing regular updates on the ICE LAW Project’s website and Twitter feed. However, with so much happening in April-May-June, I’m taking this opportunity to highlight events to followers of this blog who are not ICE LAW regulars.

View original post 494 more words

Posted in terrain, Territory, Uncategorized | Leave a comment