The book I mentioned last week, Margaret Moore, A Political Theory of Territory, is reviewed by Tamar Meisels at NDPR.

I’ve yet to read Moore’s book, but it seems striking from the review that the work is conducted as an internal debate within the relatively little work in political theory that has discussed territory, as opposed to the much wider body of work on the topic in political geography. I’ve made related points in two review essays of other books on territory – one in Political Geography in 2010 and one in Society and Space in 2015. Geographers should be reading and engaging with these books; but it would be nice if the reverse was also true.