A question on norms around honoraria

A message from a North American academic:

I have professional question for you. I ask because you have shared a lot on your blog about this kinds of issues: How does one determine one’s honorarium fee? Should one determine or request a flat amount? If so, how do you value and change the value of your honorarium as you are in more demand?

This seems like another one of those things one only figures out by asking around, but because it can be a private matter, not many talk about it. In any case, I seem to be invited to more and more paid lectures these days and am seeking your advise on how to navigate this issue. I have seen some scholars even post statements about speaking fees on their website, but I feel a bit weird about that…

From my reply:

On the honorarium question – this isn’t something that is really an issue in the UK, as very few places offer them, and some are not even allowed to pay them. The partial exception is usually professional schools… If I do things in continental Europe or North America that pay then I usually treat it as a nice bonus, thinking that I am on a good salary which includes the need to present my work. I’ve never tried to increase a fee offered. I’d say that $200 for a lecture rising to $500 for a full day – maybe a lecture and giving feedback on student presentations – was about normal, but I may be off here. After tax, this really isn’t a huge amount, and given travel time and preparation you’d need to do a lot to make an appreciable difference to salary. I tend to use the money to fund research trips to archives etc.
I do hear, anecdotally, about the kind of demands some people make. I wouldn’t want to be in that group, so unless you are asked for a quote, I’d suggest being careful. But as you suggest, asking around is a good idea – I suspect North American academics would have a better sense than me. I could open up a discussion on the blog, anonymised of course, if you’d like.


So, with their permission, I’m opening this up for comments. I’m aware that there is a slight contradiction in the request, in that an honorarium is traditionally payment without a set rate, as opposed to a fee. Anonymous comments are fine, but keep it pleasant, please.

Posted in Uncategorized, Universities | 4 Comments

Trevor Paglen: art in the age of mass surveillance

untitledTrevor Paglen: art in the age of mass surveillance in The Guardian.

Trevor Paglen describes himself as a landscape artist, but he is no John Constable. The landscapes Paglen frames extend to the bottom of the ocean and beyond the blurred edges of the Earth’s atmosphere. For the last two decades, the artist, a cheerful and fervent man of 43, has been on a mission to photograph the unseen political geography of our times. His art tries to capture places that are not on any map – the secret air bases and offshore prisons from which the war on terror has been fought – as well as the networks of data collection and surveillance that now shape our democracies, the cables, spy satellites and artificial intelligences of the digital world.

 

Posted in Trevor Paglen, Uncategorized | 1 Comment

BOOK: ‘Terror and Territory’ by Stuart Elden

A generous review of my 2009 book Terror and Territory, at the Geopolitics, Territory and Security blog by George Thomson. I finished writing the book almost exactly ten years ago, in December 2007, while in a visiting post at NYU. Hard to believe it’s been a decade.

GT's avatarGeopolitics, Territory and Security

Terror and Territory: The Spatial Extent of Sovereignty 

Geographer and political theorist Stuart Elden’s Terror and Territory: The Spatial Extent of Sovereignty (2009) is a landmark contribution to literature dealing with the spatialities of the ‘War on Terror’. Terror and Territory is a departure from a preoccupation with globalisation that has marked academic geography since the end of the Cold War at the turn of the millennium, stressing the significance of territory today despite suggestions or declarations of a global shift towards a “borderless world”.

View original post 892 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

How I write and why I write – series of posts at A Trumpet of Sedition

How I write and why I write – series of posts by historians at A Trumpet of Sedition. Posts by Simone Hanebaum, John Rees, Marcus Rediker, Alison Stuart, Gaby Mahlberg, etc.

There are lots more posts about writing and publishing archived here.

Posted in Uncategorized, Writing | Leave a comment

La pensée politique de Foucault (2017)

New collection on Foucault and political thought

Clare O'Farrell's avatarFoucault News

La pensée politique de Foucault
sous la direction d’Orazio IRRERA et Salvo VACCARO
Paris, Editions Kimé (coll. “Philosophie en cours”), 2017, p. 248.

Loin d’être considérée comme une simple notion appartenant au vocabulaire de la théorie politique, l’idée foucaldienne de la politique renvoie plutôt à une attitude généalogique fournissant un diagnostic du présent et restituant des relations complexes et contingentes qui nouent des domaines de savoir, des types de normativité et des formes de subjectivité. Par ce biais cette idée touche tout un ensemble de questions qui ont été cruciales pour l’itinéraire intellectuel de Foucault. En premier lieu celles de la gouvernementalité et de la biopolitique, des savoirs et des pouvoirs qui les constituent, des pressions normalisantes avec leurs effets spécifiques d’assujettissement, mais aussi des résistances et des contre-conduites que la gouvernementalité et la biopolitique rencontrent et produisent dans leur exercice. Au cœur de l’idée foucaldienne de la politique on…

View original post 443 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Say ‘Yes!’ to peer review: Open Access publishing and the need for mutual aid in academia

Simon Springer et al (2017). Say ‘Yes!’ to peer review: Open Access publishing and the
need for mutual aid in academia. Fennia 195: 2, pp. xx–xx. ISSN 1798-5617 [pdf, or scroll down list of forthcoming papers]

Scholars are increasingly declining to offer their services in the peer review process. There are myriad reasons for this refusal, most notably the ever-increasing pressure placed on academics to publish within the neoliberal university. Yet if you are publishing yourself then you necessarily expect someone else to review your work, which begs the question as to why this service is not being reciprocated. There is something to be said about withholding one’s labour when journals are under corporate control, but when it comes to Open Access journals such denial is effectively unacceptable. Make time for it, as others have made time for you. As editors of the independent, Open Access, non-corporate journal ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, we reflect on the struggles facing our daily operations, where scholars declining to participate in peer review is the biggest obstacle we face. We argue that peer review should be considered as a form of mutual aid, which is rooted in an ethics of cooperation. The system only works if you say ‘Yes’!

I made similar arguments – though for a (then) not-for-much-profit journal, rather than an open access one – a decade ago: The Exchange Economy of Peer ReviewEnvironment and Planning D: Society and Space, 2008, 26.6, 911-3.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Navigating Marx in the Age of Trump: An Interview With David Harvey

Navigating Marx in the Age of Trump: An Interview With David Harvey in The Observer

This fall marks the 150th anniversary since the publication of Karl Marx’s Capital. In his groundbreaking series, Marx famously defined capital as value in motion, architecting an entire field of study for understanding economics, social relations, and the institutions structuring massive inequality. Set against the backdrop of Europe’s factory system and the relationship between capitalist and laborer, Marx’s ideas spawned revolution and tyrannical regime alike. In writing Capital, the theorist forever altered our perception toward the system’s volatile nature.

Though factories have mostly been replaced by markets, banking systems and credit, capital rules the world over. Following the rise of the international monetary system in the 1970s, interest-bearing capital was cemented as the driving force behind governments, markets, and industries. As capital has grown more powerful and unstable, expanding and plunging into crises when its inherent contradictions are realized, Marx’s theories are even more relevant today.

Navigating Marx in the age of Trump is social theorist David Harvey. A professor of anthropology at the Graduate Center of the City University of New York, Harvey pioneered modern geography as a discipline while putting Marx’s theories into contemporary context. His newest book, Marx, Capital, and the Madness of Economic Reason, examines Capital alongside recent advancements in technology and credit systems. To get an in-depth analysis on the state of global capitalism, we spoke with Harvey about populism, Goldman-Sachs, and Silicon Valley’s elite.

Posted in David Harvey, Karl Marx, Politics, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The disintegration has already begun: Austerity politics at the end of Europe.

Economist and former Finance Minister of Greece, Yanis Varoufakis connects the Western establishment’s authoritarian, incompetent financial policies to the rise of the far right and the splintering of Europe, and sees a much larger crisis – of capitalism’s contradictions and the political class’s ideological bankruptcy – on the horizon, drawing closer.

dmf's avatarsynthetic zerØ

View original post

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

In Dread of Derrida – discussion of Ethan Kleinberg’s new book, Haunting History: For a Deconstructive Approach to the Past

An interesting discussion of Ethan Kleinberg’s new book, Haunting History: For a Deconstructive Approach to the Past, with a link to a panel discussion of the book with Kleinberg, Joan Wallach Scott, Carol Gluck and Stefanos Geroulanos.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Nigel Thrift reviews David Willetts, A University Education

9780198767268Nigel Thrift reviews David Willetts, A University Education in The Times Higher Education.

Posted in Uncategorized, Universities | Leave a comment