G.W.F. Hegel was widely seen as the greatest philosopher of his age. Ever since, his work has shaped debates about issues as varied as religion, aesthetics and metaphysics. His most lasting contribution was his vision of history and politics. In Hegel’s World Revolutions, Richard Bourke returns to Hegel’s original arguments, clarifying their true import and illuminating their relevance to contemporary society. Bourke shows that central to Hegel’s thought was his anatomy of the modern world. On the one hand he claimed that modernity was a deliverance from subjection, but on the other he saw it as having unleashed the spirit of critical reflection. Bourke explores this predicament in terms of a series of world revolutions that Hegel believed had ushered in the rise of civil society and the emergence of the constitutional state.
Bourke interprets Hegel’s thought, with particular reference to his philosophy of history, placing it in the context of his own time. He then recounts the reception of Hegel’s political ideas, largely over the course of the twentieth century. Countering the postwar revolt against Hegel, Bourke argues that his disparagement by major philosophers has impoverished our approach to history and politics alike. Challenging the condescension of leading thinkers—from Heidegger and Popper to Lévi-Strauss and Foucault—the book revises prevailing views of the relationship between historical ideas and present circumstances.
This book deepens our understanding of humanity’s diverse relationships with water and the law, providing a critical assessment of this relationship, and charting the course towards a more sustainable and just water future.
By using legal geography, this book pays particular attention to the place-based inter-relationships between water, people, and law (both formal and informal) and to the ways that law both constitutes and is constituted by the relationship between people and place. Starting in the 1980s, Chapter 2 investigates the early commodification of water through the liberalisation of rural water markets in Chile and the urban water supply and sanitation systems of England and Wales. Chapter 3 then examines the global expansion of neoliberal water governance in the 1990s, starting with donor-driven reforms in the global south and particularly Manila in the Philippines. Chapters 4 and 5 document both the grassroots response to these neoliberal water reforms and the inherent tensions in the attempts of the early 2000s to reconcile the recognition of a human right to water with the ongoing rollout of market mechanisms, both in the domestic context of South Africa and within the United Nations human rights system. Moving forward again, Chapter 6 examines the recent intensification of neoliberal water governance through financialisation and considers its specific impacts in Detroit and Flint, Michigan. Chapter 7 then considers the renewed global emphasis on living waters and Indigenous ontologies of water by examining the new legislative arrangements for the Whanganui River in Aotearoa, New Zealand. The book concludes in Chapter 8 by highlighting the stories of hope that can be found in many of the case studies explored in the book and in emerging examples from around the world.
This book is essential reading for students and scholars interested in water law, security, and justice from across a wide range of disciplines, including environmental studies, law, geography, human rights, and political ecology.
The Lake Kivu region, which borders Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, has often been defined by scholars in terms of conflict, violence, and separation. In contrast, this innovative study explores histories of continuities and connections across the borderland. Gillian Mathys utilises an integrated historical perspective to trace long-term processes in the region, starting from the second half of the nineteenth century and reaching to the present day. Fractured Pasts in Lake Kivu’s Borderlands powerfully reshapes historical understandings of mobility, conflict, identity formation and historical narration in and across state and ecological borders. In doing so, Mathys deconstructs reductive historical myths that have continued to underpin justifications for violence in the region. Drawing on cross-border oral history research and a wealth of archival material, Fractured Pasts embraces a new and powerful perspective of the region’s history.
Provides a longue-durée perspective of socio-political processes in the Lake Kivu region
Offers an integrated analysis of processes that have shaped current relations between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo
Rejects a focus on separations and violence in the region, instead exploring histories of continuities and connections
Renews our understanding of Shakespeare through an interdisciplinary focus on hospitality
Offers innovative literary analysis of canonical plays including The Merchant of Venice, providing a fresh interpretation of the stranger question
Engages with different theoretical approaches to hospitality in order to read Shakespeare as a dramatist of ethical encounter
Reconsiders the early modern interest in limits, thresholds, and boundaries, showing the significance to guest and host relationships in the drama
Assembles a wide-ranging, interdisciplinary methodology by drawing on major thinkers such as Jacques Derrida, Anne Dufourmantelle, Gaston Bachelard and Michel Serres
In this critical analysis, Sophie E. Battell examines hospitality in Shakespeare’s plays. By drawing on literary theory, modern philosophy, and anthropology as well as early modern scientific and religious texts, the book advances our understanding of Shakespeare as a dramatist concerned with the ethical questions at stake in encounters between guests and hosts of various kinds.
The close readings and scholarly interventions presented here reconceive the plays in terms of a poetics of hospitality while arguing for an expansive, far-reaching vision of what it means to be open to the world and welcoming of others. Moving from the levels of subjectivity, the body, and the senses to architecture, economics, legal discourse, and the natural environment, On the Threshold not only makes important contributions to Shakespeare studies but forges new connections between Renaissance literary scholarship and contemporary debates on the politics of migrants and refugees.
Philippe Chevallier, Henri-Paul Fruchaud and colleagues have catalogued much of Foucault and Defert’s personal library, which will soon become available online at the Foucault fiches de lecture site. Thanks to Niki Kasumi Clements, who helped with the cataloguing, for the link. Some other parts of Foucault’s collection – books with dedications from their authors – are at Yale’s Beinecke library, which I visited in 2018.
Foucault and his cat, apparently called ‘Insanity’
Michel Foucault s’est installé avec Daniel Defert au 285 rue de Vaugirard (Paris 15e) début 1971 ; il y resta jusqu’à sa mort en 1984.
L’inventaire de la bibliothèque conservée dans cet appartement est le fruit d’un travail collectif réalisé de mai à juillet 2024 grâce à l’accueil bienveillant d’Antoine Jabre, mari de Daniel Defert. Henri-Paul Fruchaud et moi-même avons été aidés dans notre tâche par deux stagiaires de la Bibliothèque nationale de France, Cecilia Drago et Annabelle de Traversay, ainsi que par François Ewald, Laurence Le Bras et Niki Kasumi Clements. L’opération a reçu le soutien de la Bibliothèque nationale de France et du Centre Michel Foucault.
Le fichier produit en 2024 a ensuite été intégralement corrigé et édité par Carolina Verlengia (Triangle – UMR 5206), en juin et juillet 2025, avec le soutien du Centre Michel Foucault et du Centre d’archives en philosophie, histoire et édition des sciences (CAPHÉS, UMS 2267)…
The shelves in different rooms of the apartment are in lots of photos of Foucault at home (i.e. here or here), and were still there when I visited Defert in 2015. He’s signing a copy of Un Vie Politique for me.
A photograph of Daniel Defert signing a book in Foucault’s old apartment
The Politics of Preventing Violent Extremism explores how counter-radicalization policies have come to dominate European counterterrorism and security. Using interviews with practitioners across seven European nations, it documents how national security policies have been repurposed to identify individuals deemed ‘vulnerable’ to extremism and radicalization, and to provide targeted preventative interventions from welfare state agencies. Crucially, however, the methods (and limits) of preventing violent extremism (PVE) policies vary between nations. The Politics of Preventing Violent Extremism explores how political culture, the welfare state, and the conception of civil society in each nation shapes the type of counter-radicalization employed. While some European states have designed extensive pre-crime surveillance networks to identify those ‘radicalizing’ others, other states in Europe are bound by constitutional commitments to liberty of thought and speech which restrain them from using any type of pre-crime intervention. Accordingly, while PVE policies have been heralded as a novel solution to the problem of radicalization, they remain rooted in, and limited by, the political and social traditions of European democracies.
The 18-21 October 1966 Baltimore conference on structuralism has long been recognised as important for the reception of French theory in the United States. Roland Barthes, Jacques Derrida, Lucien Goldmann, Jean Hyppolite, Jacques Lacan and Jean-Pierre Vernant were some of the French theorists brought to Johns Hopkins University for the event. Fernand Braudel and Claude Lévi-Strauss were involved in the planning but did not attend. Peter Caws, Paul de Man, Tzvetan Todorov, and Edward Said attended. Roman Jakobson was in Europe at the time, so could not be there. Michel Foucault was apparently invited, but didn’t attend. Derrida’s closing paper, “Structure, Sign, and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences”, is the most famous talk, not least for being a fundamental disruption of structuralism, almost as soon as it had arrived. He was a late addition to the lineup.
The conference was organised by René Girard, Richard Macksey, and Eugenio Donato. The story of the event is well told in Chapter 8 of Cynthia L. Haven’s biography of Girard, Evolution of Desire, based on conversations with Macksey and Girard. That’s worth a read just for a sense of Lacan’s prima-donna behaviour – his laundry demands, his underprepared paper, and his huge hotel phone bill.The editors of the proceedings remark that Lacan “chose to deliver his communication alternately in English and French (and at points in a composite of the two languages), this text represents an edited transcription and paraphrase of his address” (The Structuralist Controversy,p. 186 n. 1). Macksey recalls that Anthony Wilden had “the challenging role of serving night and day as Dr. Lacan’s cicerone, valet, and amanuensis” (“Anniversary Reflections”, p. xiv). Presumably because of jetlag, Lacan was awake at dawn, and incorporated this into his paper:
When I prepared this little talk for you, it was early in the morning. I could see Baltimore through the window and it was a very interesting moment because it was not quite daylight and a neon sign indicated to me every minute the change of time, and naturally there was heavy traffic and I remarked to myself that exactly all that I could see, except for some trees in the distance, was the result of thoughts actively thinking thoughts, where the function played by the subjects was not completely obvious. In any case the so-called Dasein as a definition of the subject, was there in this rather intermittent or fading spectator. The best image to sum up the unconscious is Baltimore in the early morning (The Structuralist Controversy,p. 189).
The event was generously funded by the Ford Foundation – “just enough gunpowder to make the cannon go off” (Macksey, quoted by Haven, Evolution of Desire,p. 123) – and led to seminars over a two-year period. After the event, Girard left the editing work to his younger colleagues: only Donato and Macksey appear as editors of 1970 book The Languages of Criticism and the Sciences of Man, though Girard’s paper and concluding remarks to the conference are included. The book was dedicated to “the memory of Jean Hyppolite—scholar, teacher and friend of scholars” (p. v), who died in 1968. The paperback edition of 1972 has its better-known title of The Structuralist Controversy, the original book’s subtitle. (That edition has a brief new preface, and a bibliographical note, but removes the French texts of Goldman, Hyppolite and Vernant in the appendix.) A fortieth-anniversary edition appeared in 2017, which is quite funny, because it shows how academics always miss deadlines: a fortieth anniversary of the book would have been 2010. Perhaps they should have commemorated fifty years of the event, and only been late by a year. The editors thank Sally Donato and Catherine Macksey, and Nancy Gallienne of The Johns Hopkins University Press, but they are the only women who seem to have been involved in the event or book (p. xix).
Girard is well-known, and Macksay had a profile in Literary Hub, while images of his crammed personal library regularly circulate online (see here and here). The third name has not had the same attention. Haven describes him as “that brilliant figure who has been somewhat overlooked in American intellectual history—the restless, quicksilver Eugenio Donato” (p. 122). Donato had received his doctorate in 1965 from Johns Hopkins University, where he was advised by Girard. He taught at Cornell University (1963-64), Johns Hopkins (1964-68), State University of New York at Buffalo (1968-76) and ended his career at the University of California, Irvine (1976-83). He was Professor of French and Comparative Literature at Buffalo when Foucault visited in 1970 and 1972, a visit mediated by Girard. Donato had followed Girard to Buffalo, part of what Haven calls a “long and tempestuous relationship” (p. 144).
Richard Macksey’s personal library
Donato died at the age of just 46 in 1983. Macksey wrote a short tribute for MLN, a journal in which Donato had published much of his work. The following year, Donato’s former PhD researcher, Josué Harari, on whom I’ve written before in relation to Foucault and Sade, led a tribute issue of MLN for him. It appeared as the French Issue, Vol 99 No 4. As well as Harari’s brief tribute and a longer essay by him, it included pieces by Derrida, Girard, Macksey and Said. The issue was bookended by two essays by Donato, “Who Signs Flaubert?” and “The Writ of the Eye”. The first was an English version of a text he had published in the journal in French shortly before he died; the second an unpublished text discovered after Donato’s death.
In the fortieth anniversary reflections of The Structuralist Controversy, Macksey says:
This is also an opportunity to salute the memory of Eugenio Donato (1937-83). One of the youngest participants in the symposium (two years younger than Edward Said, among the colloquists), the vector of his career was already established by the time of these meetings. He had instituted seminars on Lévi-Strauss, Lacan, Barthes, and other players in the structuralist drama; had stimulated colleagues; and inspired students. With his too-early death we lost a generous friend, a vital animator of debates, and a pioneer in critical exchange. Here as elsewhere he was instrumental in bringing Continental theory and American critical practice into an active dialogue. The force of his personality played a vital role in teaching many on this side of the Atlantic how to read critically and in showing their European colleagues how to listen sympathetically (p. xiii).
Donato knew Foucault’s 1970 lectures at Buffalo, which included a discussion of Flaubert. The notes for that lecture are included in Madness, Language, Literature. Like Harari and Sade, Donato and Flaubert is another indication of the interest Foucault’s lectures would have had for his audience. Although Donato does not reference Foucault in “Who Signs Flaubert?”, the essay develops two themes from his visit. First, it situates Flaubert’s work between The Temptation of St Antony and the unfinished Bouvard and Pécuchet, the two books Foucault had concentrated on in his Buffalo lecture, rather than the more famous Madame Bovary or Sentimental Education. Second, it has a sustained analysis of the authorial status of ‘Flaubert’ – Foucault had given a version of “What is an Author?” in Buffalo.
A decade after his death, Donato’s work was compiled into The Script of Decadence: Essays on the Fictions of Flaubert and the Poetics of Romanticism, published by Oxford University Press. This text includes “Who Signs Flaubert?” The other essays reference Foucault in several places, both his essay on Flaubert and The Order of Things. The book contains detailed discussions of Bouvard and Pécuchet and The Temptation of St Anthony(Chs. 3 and 4), which he privileges, suggesting they challenge the idea of Flaubert as a realist (pp. 36, 103). He reads Bouvard and Pécuchet in relation to the encyclopaedic aspirations of the protagonists, and Flaubert’s own comments about the way he composed the work. It is a book made from fragments of other books, “the metaphor of the Encyclopedia-Library”.In this reading Donato stresses that Foucault and Hugh Kenner were following Jean Seznec, “but without acknowledging him” (p. 57), and he recognises the limitations of this approach to the novel (pp. 59-60). Donato also criticises the archaeological metaphors of Foucault’s work of the late 1960s (p. 66). Unlike Foucault, he also discusses Salammbô in detail (Ch. 2). This chapter, first published in 1976, predates Edward Said’s discussion of this text in Orientalism, and forms an interesting complement to that reading.
In 2023, recordings of the 1966 Baltimore conference were made available online, with transcriptions of some of the talks, including the ones by Jean-Pierre Vernant and Jacques Derrida. In the preface, the editors had noted that the book had been edited from “some thirty hours of tapes” (p. xvii). The tapes were eventually found in Macksey’s home library. Johns Hopkins librarian Liz Mengel describes the discovery: “They were hidden in a cabinet behind a bookshelf behind a couch” (quoted by Dwyer). Derrida’s lecture differs from the published version, and includes more of the discussion after his lecture. Lacan’s “Of Structure as an Inmixing of an Otherness Prerequisite to Any Subject Whatever” paper is more amusing as a recording than on the page.
As early as 1973 Donato was suggesting that:
Structuralism as a critical concept has outlived its usefulness. It should not be long before it finds its rightful place in textbooks of philosophy or cultural history. Few will miss its disappearance. If the works of Foucault and Derrida are a sign of things to come, a new problematic remains to be developed with Nietzsche at the center, occupying the place that Hegel occupied when existentialism and structuralism ran their course (p. 25).
This was just a year after the paperback of The Structuralist Controversy, and two years after Josué Harari’s reading guide, Structuralists and Structuralisms: A Selected Bibliography of French Contemporary Thought (1960-1970), dedicated to Donato and Girard. As I’ve noted before, following Jonathan Culler, many of the figures included in this bibliography reappear in Harari’s 1979 collection Textual Strategies, whose subtitle is Perspectives in Post-Structuralist Criticism. As has often been suggested, Derrida’s closing lecture to the 1966 conference is one moment in the shift from structuralism to what is sometimes called post-structuralism. Given that this designation is an American label, Harari and Donato are significant figures in its shaping.
Another important moment would be the 1978 boundary 2 conference published in 1982 as The Question of Textuality: Strategies of Reading in Contemporary American Criticism, edited by William V. Spanos, Daniel O’Hara and Paul Bové. Several key figures from this set of debates presented, including Said and Donato, who also had an exchange after their papers, as well as David Allison, Jonathan Arac, Joseph Buttigieg, David Couzens Hoy, Jonathan Culler, Stanley Fish, Murray Krieger, Marie-Rose Logan and Mark Poster. Again, it’s a very male line-up, with the exception of Logan. Perhaps that collection deserves a separate post.
References
Jonathan Culler, “1980: Structuralism and Poststructuralism”, Ex-position 40, 2018, 79-94.
Jacques Derrida, “An Idea of Flaubert: ‘Plato’s Letter’”, trans. Peter Starr, MLN 99 (4), 1984, 748-68.
Eugenio Donato, “Structuralism: The Aftermath”, SubStance 3 (7), 1973, 9-26.
Eugenio Donato, “Flaubert and the Question of History: Notes for a Critical Anthology”, MLN 91 (5), 1976, 850-70; reprinted in The Script of Decadence: Essays on the Fictions of Flaubert and the Poetics of Romanticism, New York: Oxford University Press, 1993, Ch. 2.
Eugenio Donato, “Qui Signe ‘Flaubert’?”, MLN 98 (4), 1983, 579-93; “Who Signs Flaubert?” MLN 99 (4), 1984, 711-26; English reprinted in The Script of Decadence: Essays on the Fictions of Flaubert and the Poetics of Romanticism, New York: Oxford University Press, 1993, Ch. 5.
Eugenio Donato, “The Writ of the Eye: Notes on the Relationship of Language to Vision in Critical Theory”, MLN 99 (4), 1984, 959-78.
Eugenio Donato, The Script of Decadence: Essays on the Fictions of Flaubert and the Poetics of Romanticism, New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.
Stuart Elden, The Archaeology of Foucault, Cambridge: Polity, 2023.
Michel Foucault, “Postface à Flaubert (G.) Die Versuchung des Heiligen Antonius (La Tentation de saint Antoine)”, Dits et écrits 1954-1988, eds. Daniel Defert and François Ewald, Paris: Gallimard, four volumes, 1994, Vol I,293-325 (comparative edition of the 1967 and 1970 French texts); “Afterword to The Temptation of Saint Anthony”, Essential Works Volume Two: Aesthetics, Method and Epistemology, ed. James D. Faubion, New York: The New Press, 1998, 103-22 (translation of the 1967 text).
Michel Foucault, Folie, langage, littérature, ed. Henri-Paul Fruchaud, Daniele Lorenzini and Judith Revel, Paris: Vrin, 2019; Madness, Language, Literature, trans. Robert Bononno, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2023.
René Girard, “Dionysus versus the Crucified”, MLN 99 (4), 1984, 816-35.
Josué V. Harari, Structuralists and Structuralisms: A Selected Bibliography of French Contemporary Thought (1960-1970), Ithaca: Diacritics, 1971.
J.V. Harari ed., Textual Strategies: Perspectives in Post-Structuralist Criticism, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1979.
Richard Macksey, “In Memorium: Eugenio Donato (1937-1983)”, MLN 98 (5), 1983, 1381-82.
Richard Macksey, “Keats and the Poetics of Extremity”, MLN 99 (4), 1984, 845-84.
Richard Macksey and Eugenio Donato (eds.), The Languages of Criticism and the Sciences of Man: The Structuralist Controversy, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1970.
Richard Macksey and Eugenio Donato (eds.), The Structuralist Controversy: The Languages of Criticism and the Sciences of Man, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1972; 40th anniversary edition 2017.
Richard Macksey, “Anniversary Reflections”, in Richard Macksey and Eugenio Donato (eds.), The Structuralist Controversy: The Languages of Criticism and the Sciences of Man, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2017, ix-xiv.
Edward W. Said, “The Future of Criticism”, MLN 99 (4), 1984, 951-58; reprinted in Reflections on Exile and Other Literary and Cultural Essays, London: Granta, 2000, Ch. 16.
William V. Spanos, Paul A. Bové and Daniel O’Hara (eds.), The Question of Textuality: Strategies of Reading in Contemporary American Criticism, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1982.
This is the twenty-seventh post of a weekly series, where I post short essays with some indications of further reading and sources, but which are not as formal as something I’d try to publish more conventionally. They are usually tangential to my main writing focus, a home for spare ideas, asides, dead-ends and possible futures. I hope there is some interest in them. They are provisional and suggestions are welcome.
This book concerns the elemental geographies and lives and deaths of the drowned to confront enduring forms of oppression. Elaine Stratford documents with penetrating compassion and acumen how human and more-than-human bodies lose personhood in acts of violence, exploitation, marginalisation, cultural imperialism, and powerlessness. This work is both a scholarly and deeply personal call to rethink how we live with, remember, and honour the drowned. It offers profound insights to all those interested in human geography and allied disciplines.
