Koyré in Cairo

Update May 2025: A revised and expanded version of this post is here, as part of the ‘Sunday Histories’ series.

There are many things I find interesting in the life and work of Alexandre Koyré, and I’ve already published on one of these – his unsuccessful attempt to get elected to a chair at the Collège de France (open access in History of European Ideas). I have also been writing a piece on Georges Canguilhem and Koyré for a workshop, and that paper opens up a wider discussion of his situation within a French tradition in the history of sciences, and beyond. I am also interested in his time in the United States during and after the war, and hope that when I am in the US next year I will be able to uncover a bit more of the story in archives there.

His teaching in Paris before and after the war is also important, and there are various archives which would add detail to what I already know. After the war he often taught in both the US and Paris each academic year, as well as spending regular time at the IAS in Princeton. There is more to be said about all this, I think.

But before he went to the US he also had visiting posts in Cairo, at what was originally the Egyptian University, then the King Fuad University and is now the University of Cairo. Paola Zambelli’s biography of Koyré gives the dates as 1933-34, 1936-37, February to June 1940 and 1940-41. In 1941 he joined the Free French and from there went on to New York. His work there as the first general secretary of the École Libre des Hautes Études has been discussed in some histories of French intellectuals in New York, particularly by Emmanuelle Loyer.

But I think we know less about his work in Cairo. His Trois leçons sur Descartes, later republished as Entretiens sur Descartes, contains three lectures first given there. The first publication was French/Arabic in 1937, the second in French alone in 1944. The first version maintains the spoken form more, which is edited out of the reprint. The lectures are later included in re-editions of his Introduction à Platon, but though the first part of the book has been translated as Discovering Plato, I don’t think the Descartes material is in English. The copy of the Trois leçons I saw in Paris was the one Koyré gave to Alexandre Kojève, with a very brief dedication.

In Cairo Koyré lived in Zamalek, and I’ve seen some letters he sent from there, in particular to Henry Corbin – the Islamic scholar and, among other things, Heidegger translator. But other letters I’ve seen are from earlier or later periods of his life. The letters to Edmund Husserl are much earlier, while his surviving letters to Hannah Arendt, for example, are all later than this period.

Koyré was following in the footsteps of André Lalande, and among their students was Abdul Rahman Badawi. Some online sources suggest Koyré supervised Badawi’s doctoral thesis, but a more reliable obituary says Lalande initially, and then Koyré, supervised Badawi’s master’s level thesis on the problem of death in existentialist philosophy, written in French. It was published only in 1964, but it’s not easy to find. Badawi went on to write a doctoral thesis, Le temps existentiel, in Arabic. Given the importance of Badawi’s work in Arabic philosophy, this is quite significant. Sevinç Yasargil has an interesting piece on Badawi in the Heidegger in the Islamicate World collection. Koyré was therefore an important figure in introducing both France to phenomenology and Egypt to existentialism.

I think Louis Massignon was also teaching in Cairo still too, which perhaps gives another connection. Koyré’s work in Cairo is briefly discussed in Yoav Di-Capua’s work on Arab existentialism, but on this point doesn’t seem to add much beyond other sources.

Zambelli’s biography equally doesn’t have much information about this part of his career. She actually spends much of the section on this discussing the courses on Hegel in Paris for which Koyré had to find teaching cover for in his absence. That is certainly an interesting story since his replacement was Kojève, and those lectures are very famous. The historian and philosopher of chemistry, Hélène Metzger also covered some of his teaching, and on this and much else about Metzger, Cristina Chimisso’s book is an invaluable guide. But the period seems interesting not just for who took over from him in Paris, but what Koyré himself did in Cairo.

And beyond what I outline above, I’ve not found much.

I say a bit more about his role in a European network of ideas here, with some reading suggestions. I also have said something some of the archival links to Georges Canguilhem and Jean Gottmann.

The French publication of three lectures on Descartes, first given in Cairo
Posted in Alexandre Kojève, Alexandre Koyré, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, Georges Canguilhem, Martin Heidegger, René Descartes, Uncategorized | 7 Comments

Antipode book series moves to University of California Press

Antipode book series moves to University of California Press

Rooted in the long and heterodox history of Antipode: A Radical Journal of Geography, the Antipode Book Series publishes innovative monographs which push at the boundaries of radical geographical thinking, and which are rigorous and substantive in theoretical and empirical terms. Authors are encouraged to critique and challenge settled orthodoxies and to rearticulate frameworks for understanding, while engaging the context of intellectual traditions and their particular trajectories. Books should put new research or critical analyses to work to contribute to strengthening a Left politics broadly defined. This includes, but is not limited to, attention to how politics of class, gender, race, colonialism, sexuality, ability are a core part of radical theory and politics.

Published by the University of California Press, the Antipode Book Series offers some of the best and most provocative geographical work available today—work from both geographers and fellow travellers in adjacent disciplines, from scholars both eminent and emerging. It welcomes submissions from all places, including the global South and/or from those traditionally marginalised in the academy (historically under-represented groups, regions, countries, and institutions). We’re also open to work rooted in a range of Left intellectual and political traditions, as well as work that crosses the boundaries between them and that puts them in conversation. In this respect the Antipode Book Series seeks to both represent the full breadth of radical geographical scholarship and to push at its limits in generative ways.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Taylor Knight, Merleau-Ponty and the Essence of Nature: A Return to Elemental Symbolism – Edinburgh University Press, 2024

Taylor Knight, Merleau-Ponty and the Essence of Nature: A Return to Elemental Symbolism – Edinburgh University Press, 2024

Reconfigures our concept of nature through the concept of the element

  • Evaluates and builds upon Merleau-Ponty’s contribution to the twentieth century return to the Greek idea of nature as a dynamic principle
  • Utilizes the phenomenological tradition to offer a new interpretation of the relationship between philosophy and its origin in mythological modes of thought
  • Integrates Merleau-Ponty into the history of philosophy
  • Articulates a new ontology for the ecological age
  • Presents the first book-length study of a key concept in Merleau-Ponty’s late thought: the idea of being as element

Taylor Knight reveals the way in which phenomenology initiates a return to ontology construed through a dialectical relationship between being and element. Within phenomenology’s return to the elemental, Merleau-Ponty’s late philosophy is a key locus, opening critical paths forward into an ontology for the ecological age. With reference to his phenomenological forebears – Heidegger, Husserl, Levinas – his non-phenomenological influences – Bachelard, Schelling, Freud – and his dialogue with Greek thought – Heraclitus, Plato, Aristotle – Knight shows what is authentically new in Merleau-Ponty’s late ontology.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Engin Isin, Citizenship: New Trajectories in Law (Routledge, May 2024) – London book launch October 3, 2024

Engin Isin, Citizenship: New Trajectories in Law – Routledge, May 2024

What comes after citizenship? 
A discussion with Gargi Bhattacharyya, Rachel Humphris Jef Huysmans, Engin Isin, and Nivi Manchanda, Sivamohan Valluvan as part of (B)OrderS Book Forum at Queen Mary University of London. 

Thursday, October 3,  5 – 7pm GMT+1
Room 313, Third Floor, School of Law
Queen Mary University of London Mile End Road London E1 4NS

Register here

This book outlines a critical theory of citizenship, with an emphasis on how citizenship institutes power relations and organises the rights and obligations of those who become its subjects.

Whether it is the question of the rights of animals, children, migrants, minorities, mothers, or mountains, and whether such rights are protected or guaranteed by national law, international law, or human rights law, the issue of citizenship has already indelibly marked the 21st century. As an institution, citizenship governs the relationship between a polity and its peoples by dividing them into citizens and noncitizens, with differentiated rights and obligations. So necessarily, this book argues, citizenship is an institution of domination and emancipation that brings into play the struggles of those who want to protect certain privileges and the struggles of those who are against being caught in either second-class or noncitizen categories. Deconstructing dominant theories and practices of citizenship, a critical theory of citizenship must, therefore, not only analyse intersecting rights, but also connect citizenship to these broader social struggles. For it is these struggles, the book maintains, that give meaning to citizenship itself.

The book will be of interest to scholars and students in sociolegal studies, sociology, politics, and as well as those working in citizenship, migration, and refugee studies.

Posted in Engin Isin, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Interviews with Paul North and Paul Reitter on the new edition of Karl Marx’s Capital, Vol. 1

I posted about one of these interviews a couple of days ago, but there are a couple more now available:

The Regime of Capital: An Interview with Paul North and Paul Reitter on the new edition of Karl Marx’s Capital, Vol. 1 – Journal of the History of Ideas blog

Wendy Brown has a piece in The Nation on Capital’s enduring influence.

Brown interviews North and Reitter for Jacobin.

There is a New Books interview here.

Details of the new translation from Princeton University Press are here.

Posted in Karl Marx, Uncategorized, Wendy Brown | Leave a comment

Ege Selin Islekel, Nightmare Remains: The Politics of Mourning and Epistemologies of Disappearance – Northwestern University Press, September 2024

Ege Selin Islekel, Nightmare Remains: The Politics of Mourning and Epistemologies of Disappearance – Northwestern University Press, September 2024

Offering a political epistemology of collective mourning

Focusing on forms of improper burial in Turkey and Latin America, Ege Selin Islekel argues that a political technology of mourning is fundamental to contemporary politics. This technology of necrosovereignty shapes not only individuals’ and populations’ lives but also their epistemic and political afterlives. Local practices of mourning, however, contain resistant capacities, opening alternative ways of knowing, remembering, and assembling. “Nightmare knowledges,” Islekel posits, are resistant modes of knowing tied up with grief that challenge the contemporary politics of death and those politics’ archival boundaries. Seen in mothers’ movements across the globe, from the Mothers of the Plaza de Mayo of Argentina to the Saturday Mothers of Turkey, nightmare knowledges produce counterarchives that mobilize traditionally ignored epistemic categories.

Nightmare Remains forges a new dialogue between post-Foucauldian political theory and decolonial thought and brings a fresh critical perspective to the theoretical discourse of enforced disappearances.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Paul Simpson, Coexistence: Spacings, Dis-positions, and Being-with Others – Routledge, December 2024

Paul Simpson, Coexistence: Spacings, Dis-positions, and Being-with Others – Routledge, December 2024

very expensive hardback only unfortunately

This book aims to develop an account of living together with difference which recognises the tension that we are inescapably with others – both human and non-human – but at the same time are always differing from and with those with whom we find ourselves.

A concern for coexistence and questions over how we might live together have been raised and approached from a host of conceptual starting points in recent times, including via calls for a rethinking of communism today, the articulation of forms of ‘cosmopolitics’ or ‘pluralism’, the re-figuring of understandings of ecology as dark or feminist, amongst others. This book responds to such questions of coexistence by developing what it calls a ‘co-existential analytic’. In doing so, this book introduces a range of post-phenomenological thought which offers means for thinking about such questions of living together with difference. The thought of Emanuel Levinas on the face of the other, Jean-Luc Nancy on being as being-with, Roberto Esposito on the munis, and Michel Henry on pathic auto-affection are introduced and critically reflected upon in terms of what they offer for thinking about such coexistence. Alongside these conceptual starting points, a series of encounters – with cinema, everyday life, politics, and literature – are used to animate and illustration the discussion.  Ultimately, the book argues for a ‘spacing’ of subjectivities with that world and those encountered within it.

This book is intended primarily for researchers and postgraduate students interested in questions of identity, difference, and subjectivity. It will be of interest to those in the fields of social and cultural geography, sociology, social theory, and cultural studies.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Jeremy F. Lane, Rancière’s Counter-sociology. Politics, History, Education – Palgrave, September 2024

Jeremy F. Lane, Rancière’s Counter-sociology. Politics, History, Education – Palgrave, September 2024

Jacques Rancière is almost unique amongst contemporary thinkers in his consistent hostility to sociologically informed modes of interpretation. This hostility is not limited to his detailed critiques of Pierre Bourdieu—it characterises his thinking about politics, emancipation, democracy, history, aesthetics, and social class; it extends into a rejection of Marxist or marxisant modes of analysis. For Rancière’s harshest critics, this hostility to sociology reflects an interpretative negligence on his part, an intellectual, political, or moral flaw. Even his more favorable commentators typically upbraid him for failing to specify the historical conditions of possibility of democratic emancipation.

This book argues that such reactions are fundamentally mistaken and fail to grasp what is at stake in Rancière’s rejection of sociological modes of enquiry. This rejection is attributable neither to his negligence nor to some moral flaw, and nor is it merely incidental to his thought. On the contrary, Rancière understands sociology to constitute a problematic, a set of assumptions and interpretative procedures whose blind spots must be identified and thought through in order that the possibility of intellectual and political emancipation, of democracy, and of history can be thought at all. Rancière’s thought thus represents a counter-sociology and his rejection of the sociological problematic serves as the positive condition of possibility of his theory of democracy, equality, and emancipation. This new study both clarifies the nature of Rancière’s critique of the sociological problematic and shows what his counter-sociology allows him to think in the domains of politics, history, and education.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

A dialogue between Bernard Geoghegan and Jussi Parikka (video)

“A dialogue between Bernard Geoghegan and Jussi Parikka”


Thanks to dmf for the link.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Yuk Hui, Machine and Sovereignty: For a Planetary Thinking – University of Minnesota Press, October 2024

Yuk Hui, Machine and Sovereignty: For a Planetary Thinking – University of Minnesota Press, October 2024

Developing a new political thought to address today’s planetary crises

What is “planetary thinking” today? Arguing that a new approach is urgently needed, Yuk Hui develops a future-oriented mode of political thought that encompasses the unprecedented global challenges we are confronting: the rise of artificial intelligence, the ecological crisis, and intensifying geopolitical conflicts. 

Machine and Sovereignty starts with three premises. The first affirms the necessity of developing a new language of coexistence that surpasses the limits of nation-states and their variations; the second recognizes that political forms, including the polis, empire, and the state, are technological phenomena, which Lewis Mumford terms “megamachines.” The third suggests that a particular political form is legitimated and rationalized by a corresponding political epistemology. The planetary thinking that this book sketches departs from the opposition between mechanism and organism, which characterized modern thought, to understand the epistemological foundations of Hegel’s political state and Schmitt’s Großraum and their particular ways of conceiving the question of sovereignty. Through this reconstruction, Hui exposes the limits of the state and reflects on a new theoretical matrix based on the interrelated concepts of biodiversity, noodiversity, and technodiversity. 

Arguing that we are facing the limit of modernity, of the eschatological view of history, of globalization, and of the human, Hui conceives necessary new epistemological and technological frameworks for understanding and rising to the crises of our present and our future.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment