18 Responses to Agamben – Homo Sacer structure

1. Adam Kotsko says:

   January 31, 2012 at 10:25 pm

   Why do you think Opus Dei is II.5? My impression was that it was IV.2.

   Reply
   • stuartelden says:

     January 31, 2012 at 11:15 pm

     You may be right, but II, 5 is on the cover of the French translation.

     Reply
     • Adam Kotsko says:

       January 31, 2012 at 11:17 pm

       I doubt they would get that wrong. So strange.
     • stuartelden says:

       January 31, 2012 at 11:30 pm

       Amazon.it has it as II, 5 too. What made you think it wasn’t?
2. Adam Kotsko says:

   January 31, 2012 at 11:32 pm

   I have the galleys on my desk, and they have no indication of where it fits in the structure — so since it came out after 4.1, I figured it made sense that it’d be 4.2. I haven’t seen the cover.

   Reply
3. Nicholas Dahmann says:

   February 1, 2012 at 1:14 am

   When I put this together, I relied upon my French printing. Looking now to the Bollati Boringhieri Edition website, the Italian cover also reads II, 5.
   http://www.bollatiboringhieri.it/scheda.php?codice=9788833922478

   The Italian edition is a handsome lavender color that matches perfectly Agamben’s sweater in an image accompanying a Portuguese translation of the Preface at the Brazilian blog TRADUZIRFANTASMAS (translate ghosts): http://traduzirfantasmas.wordpress.com/2012/01/17/giorgio-agambenopus-dei-archeologia-dellufficio-homo-sacer-ii-5-prefacio-2012/

   Reply
   • Adam Kotsko says:

     February 1, 2012 at 12:46 pm

     Well, I stand corrected. Very strange.

     Reply
4. Paolo Davoli says:

   February 1, 2012 at 1:35 pm

   We confirm you that Opus Dei by Giorgio Agamben is Homo Sacer II, 5.
   http://variazionifoucaultiane.blogspot.com/2012/01/giorgio-agamben-opus-dei-archeologia.html

   Reply

5. Pingback: Homo Sacer « Dorel Curtescu

6. André Dias says:

   February 18, 2012 at 2:43 pm

   Any guesses on what II, 4 and IV, 2 will amount to? Agamben’s latest research presented in seminars concerns an «archeology of command and will» (Paris 8, EGS), and «the use of the body» (Paris 8).

   Reply
   • stuartelden says:

     February 18, 2012 at 11:03 pm

     No, I have no idea. Those projects sound interesting though.

     Reply

7. Pingback: Agamben – The Highest Poverty | Progressive Geographies

8. just a reader says:

   February 9, 2013 at 4:30 pm

   I think that the quote at the end is from “The Kingdom and the Glory” not from the “Sacrament of Language”

   Reply
9. Clootz says:

   February 6, 2015 at 11:06 pm

   In turn, Agamben’s newest book, on the concept of “stasis,” is indexed as HS II,2 (rather than The Kingdom and the Glory): http://www.amazon.it/Stasis-guerra-civile-paradigma-politico/dp/8833925870/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1423263789&sr=1-1&keywords=stasis+agamben

   Reply
   • stuartelden says:

     February 6, 2015 at 11:44 pm

     Thanks, yes – this was noted in the updated version, but appreciate the link.

     Reply
10. Kino says:

    May 18, 2015 at 4:50 pm

    Following Clootz’s comment: so there are now two books indexed as HS II, 2 — Stasis and Il regno e la gloria…?

    Reply
    • Adam Kotsko says:

      May 18, 2015 at 5:51 pm

      Sources close to Agamben indicate that this is a “retcon” — K&G has been renumbered as 2.4, with Stasis now assuming the place of 2.2. This results in a completely filled-out structure.

      Reply
11. Kino says:

    May 18, 2015 at 10:43 pm

    Thanks, Adam!

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Enter your comment here...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Email (required) (Address never made public)

Name (required)

Website

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Google+ account. ( Log Out / Change )

Cancel

Connecting to %s

Notify me of new comments via email.

Notify me of new posts via email.