Kaspar Villadsen, Foucault’s Technologies – Oxford University Press, November 2024
Shame about the prohibitive price…
Michel Foucault is rarely viewed as a philosopher of technology, yet academics and students routinely refer to his terms ‘technologies of power’, ‘governmental technologies’, and ‘technologies of the self’. This book is a response to the contradiction between the paucity of research into Foucault’s technological thought and the abundancy of technological vocabulary and metaphors in his own writings as well as in the commentary literature; it provides the most extensive examination of the role of technology in Foucault’s work so far.
Villadsen argues that technology serves neither as an object of Foucault’s analysis nor as a convenient metaphor for making arguments, but as rather integral to his thinking and writing. As the book’s title, Foucault’s Technologies indicates, it explores not Foucault and modern technology understood as technical devices like television, smartphones, or industrial machines, but rather Foucault’s approach to the theme of technology and his use of technological terms. The book provides an extensive exploration of Foucault’s technological thought, arguing that he offers a distinct framework that confronts commonsensical understanding and other scientific approaches to technology. The reader will travel a route paved with discussions of how Foucault’s work intersects with that of other key thinkers, particularly Heidegger, Althusser, Nietzsche, and Deleuze.
While presenting efforts in intellectual history, the book ultimately focusses on the analytical implications for ‘users’, showing how researchers can benefit from Foucault’s technological approach. As such, the book offers an analytical framework effective for the study of problems in present-day welfare states and the emergent world of data-capitalism.
Discover more from Progressive Geographies
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


So this is a book about Foucault, but about something that Foucault did not actually write about almost at all, but used in metaphorical French to interrogate phenomena, like power. So what is the point, when other scholars have written a lot on the topic of actual technologies? And adding in ‘particularly Heidegger, Althusser, Nietzsche, and Deleuze. ‘, none of whom saw the dawn of AI or any tech that is changing the fate of humanity, does not sound like it will help us much to understand contemporary technologies that are utterly different from even 30 years ago. Deleuze caught the dawn of the internet, but only by a couple of years, when it did not do very much. I call for an end to ‘Foucault studies’ – too many!