Adam David Morton on Victor Serge at Progress in Political Economy

Adam David Morton on Victor Serge – a Progress in Political Economy blogpost linked to a new article.

One of the most striking features of Victor Serge’s writings has to be the way he captures spatial arbiters that shape the practices of empowerment and containment within the territorial form of the city. As argued in my latest journal article published here in Annals of the American Association of Geographers, flowing across his documentary or witness novels, his political writings, his poetry, or his memoirs as a revolutionary is a sense of the political processes shaping urban society, the space of the city, and the possibilities of revolution rising up from the streets. My argument in the article, drawing from Henri Lefebvre, is that this is nowhere more evident than in his novels Conquered City [1932] and The Case of Comrade Tulayev [1942]. [continues here]

Posted in Adam David Morton, Henri Lefebvre, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Future work and summer plans – Shakespeare, Canguilhem, Lefebvre and back to Foucault

Although the Shakespeare Territories book is coming out in a few months, I’ve been back working on Shakespeare. Initially this was for a summary article of the book’s argument for a short article for Territory, Politics, Governance, which should be published fairly soon. Then it has been for the third in what is becoming a sequence of pieces on Foucault and Shakespeare – the others were on ceremony (open access) and madness (forthcoming). This new piece is on contagion, for a conference organised by the Kingston Shakespeare seminar on 23 June. I’ve enjoyed returning to Shakespeare again for this new piece, which has a long discussion of Troilus and Cressida, and a shorter one of All’s Well That Ends Well – two plays I only mentioned briefly in Shakespearean Territories. I’ll also be a speaking about Shakespeare at an event organised by Warwick and RADA for sixth-form students on 29 June. I’ll be presenting about four scenes with a territorial focus, and then the students will work on the scenes and perform them. The plan is to do the opening scenes of King Lear and Hamlet, the map division scene from Henry IV, Part 1 and the Venetian Council scene from Othello.

The main task for the first part of the summer will be revising the Canguilhem manuscript. This was a challenging book to write, and there is still work to do. I need to resubmit in mid-July with a view to the book being published in 2019. The Lefebvre work is also now back in progress, after long being stalled due to things outside my control.

The aim then will be to return to The Early Foucault, as there is certainly a lot I still want to do. But the Lille and ENS courses from the early 1950s are planned for publication and I think it makes sense to wait for this, although I have read them in manuscript. They are dense and difficult texts, and the editors will doubtless provide a lot of value in their work. I’m imagining that my work will run ahead of the publishing schedule, with a least one volume of 1960s material likely to appear first in the new sequence of courses. So I will likely have to leave a near-complete manuscript until the publishing catches up. I also want to have an extended period of time in Uppsala, working with the Bibliotheca Walleriana which Foucault used in the mid-late 1950s, and I’m thinking of ways to do that.

I have few talks scheduled for the next academic year, though the ones that will require new material are not for a while. As well as a proper holiday this summer, I also have a couple of weeks away where I plan to combine work with cycling in a more interesting area. I’m hoping some of that time can be spent reading – and reading where I am not intending that to be immediately useful. In recent years the time for reading generally and widely seems to be continually shrinking – everything seems to be instrumental for what I am working on at that time. I’m hoping to break that pattern and make time to read important but non-essential things.

I’ve also been conscious that this blog has been much less active in recent months, and that what I have posted has been largely notices. Perhaps I will have some time to do something about this, although I’m noticing lots of the blogs I follow have become less active and that other platforms, notably Twitter, seem to be taking over some of this work for academics.

Posted in Canguilhem (book), Conferences, Cycling, Georges Canguilhem, Henri Lefebvre, Michel Foucault, Shakespearean Territories, The Early Foucault, Uncategorized, William Shakespeare | 4 Comments

Books received – Logistical Worlds, Bachelard, Serres, Cremonesi et al, de Beistegui, Strang et al

IMG_3396

Logistical Worlds (sent by the publisher), Gaston Bachelard, The Dialectic of Duration, Michel Serres, The Birth of Physics, Laura Cremonesi et al eds, Foucault and the Making of Subjects (all recompense for review work), Miguel de Beistegui, The Government of DesireA Genealogy of the Liberal Subject (from Miguel), and Veronica Strang et al. eds., From the Lighthouse: Interdisciplinary Reflections on Light (which I endorsed).

Posted in Gaston Bachelard, Michel Foucault, Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Kingston Shakespeare Series Conference: Shakespeare and Foucault – Garrick’s Temple, Hampton, 23 June 2018

garricks-temple-sept-3-2016A reminder of the Kingston Shakespeare Series Conference: Shakespeare and Foucault – to be held at Garrick’s Temple, Hampton, on Saturday 23 June 2018. Full details here and programme here. Booking is essential (£20 registration fee).

David Garrick built his Shakespeare Temple beside the Thames at Hampton in 1755 as a place where ‘the thinkers of the world’ would meet to reflect on the plays. He hoped Voltaire would come. Now the Kingston Shakespeare Seminar is realising the great actor’s vision, with a series of symposia on Shakespeare in Philosophy.

This event, open to all, will include talks by leading philosophers and Shakespeare scholars, coffee and tea in the riverside garden designed by Capability Brown, and lunch at the historic Bell Inn.

At this conference we are excited to welcome speakers Tom Brockelman, Jonathan Dollimore, Stuart Elden, Kelina Gotman, Jennifer Rust, Duncan Salkeld and Richard Wilson.

I’ll be speaking about contagion, mainly in Troilus and Cressida, but also with a bit on All’s Well That Ends Well – two plays I only briefly touch on in Shakespearean Territories. My piece is the third in an occasional series of pieces on Foucault and Shakespeare together.

 

Posted in Conferences, Michel Foucault, Shakespearean Territories, Uncategorized, William Shakespeare | Leave a comment

Foucault, Les aveux de la chair reviewed in Spanish (plus links to other news/reviews)

Foucault, Les aveux de la chair is reviewed in Spanish by Agustín Colombo (open access)

A roundup of news stories and other pieces – mostly in French and some in English is here. My review essay is on the Theory, Culture and Society blog (open access), and is forthcoming in the journal.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Call for Papers – Special Issue of the Canadian Journal of Development Studies on ‘Law, Governance and Development: Critical and Heterodox Approaches’

Call for Papers – Special Issue of the Canadian Journal of Development Studies on ‘Law, Governance and Development: Critical and Heterodox Approaches’, co-edited by Mark Toufayan and Siobhán Airey.

The myriad legal and policy instruments in the governance of development have shifted and evolved in significant ways in recent years, posing challenges to scholars, policy-makers and practitioners on how to effectively map, analyse and critique their nature and effects.
Contributions are being sought (in French and English) for a bilingual Special Issue of the Canadian Journal of Development Studies to explore these questions from heterodox and critical perspectives. The aim of this Special Issue is to critically examine the role of law and legality in specific initiatives focused on ‘development’, and its implications for the evolving nature and governance of the relationship between states, markets, peoples, communities and the natural environment at levels and scales that transcend that of the nation state. We invite submissions on engagements between law, governance and development from a wide range of critical perspectives, including feminism, TWAIL and postcolonial scholarship, history and ethnography, critical geography, critical IR and political economy, Marxist and materialist perspectives, etc., and that focus on developments both within and between the Global North and South, and on particular scales and sites of governance.

Proposals of 500-750 words, as well as a short CV, should be sent to mark.toufayan@uqo.ca  and siobhan.airey@ucd.ie by July 20, 2018. For the full text of the call, please see here

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Pod Save Austria – English version of talk and discussion on ‘Terror and the State of Territory’

I shared the German version of this last week, but the English version is now available online.

Pod Save Austria – ‘Terror and the State of Territory’

It begins with a 15 minute talk by me, and then a discussion with Gudrun Harrer and Saskia Stachowitsch. The rest of the series is here – English and German. The pieces are also available on SoundCloud and iTunes

We think of the relation between a state and its territory as fixed, with the world divided up by boundaries that are clear and unmovable. Those state boundaries seemingly mark a clear line between domestic and foreign politics. After World War II the international community tried to fix those boundaries, and outlaw intervention within the territory of a sovereign state. The post-Cold War world has seen a progressive weakening of the links between these ideas – among others the intervention in Kosovo, and then a sequence of interventions following George W. Bush’s declaration of a ‘war on terror’ in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and most recently in Syria. These interventions challenge the sovereignty of states within their boundaries, within their territory, though most are attempts to preserve their territorial status. This talk will provide some historical background, and open up the question of whether the state-territory relation is being challenge more fundamentally by these interventions.

Speaker STUART ELDEN, professor for political theory and geography at the University of Warwick
Respondents GUDRUN HARRER, journalist and Middle East expert and SASKIA STACHOWITSCH, professor for international politics at the University of Vienna

STUART ELDEN is Professor of Political Theory and Geography, Politics and International Studies at the University of Warwick (GB). He published the award-winning books Terror and Territory: The Spatial Extent of Sovereignty in 2009 and The Birth of Territory in 2013. His new book Shakespearean Territories is forthcoming in late 2018.

GUDRUN HARRER is leading editor for the daily newspaper ‘Der Standard’, where she headed the Foreign Policy editorial department for years. She studied Arabian and Islamic Culture as well as Political Sciences ant teaches Modern Arabic History at the University of Vienna and at the Diplomatic Academy Vienna.

SASKIA STACHOWITSCH is Professor of International Policy at University Vienna und head of Austrian Institute of International Affairs (oiip). She works on critical security and military studies, feminst and post-colonial theories of International Relations and transnational actors (eg. ‚Frontex’).

Posted in Politics, Territory, Terror and Territory, Uncategorized | 1 Comment

The Socialist State: Philosophical Foundations

Roland Boer with an outline of a book on The Socialist State

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Kleinberg, Scott, Wilder, ‘Theses on Theory and History’

Ethan Kleinberg, Joan Wallach Scott, Gary Wilder, ‘Theses on Theory and History

Available online or to download as booklet

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Sam Halvorsen, Decolonising Territory at the Progress in Political Economy blog

Sam Halvorsen, ‘Decolonising Territory‘ at the Progress in Political Economy blog

In a recent paper I argue that Anglophone research on territory, particularly in human geography, has been too constrained to ideas and practices based on the experiences of the modern, Eurocentric state. In contrast, Latin America provides an alternative starting point for understanding territory rooted in grassroots struggles and ongoing strategies to rework, resist and “re-invent”, as Carlos Walter Porto-Gonçalves puts it, Eurocentric and Anglophone ideas of territory. From this perspective the paper seeks to open up greater dialogue between Anglophone and Latin American ideas/practices of territory while acknowledging the colonial power relations that have structured the unequal geographies of knowledge production around territory.

Posted in Territory, Uncategorized | Leave a comment