The Waste of the World exhibition

Some of my Durham colleagues have been involved in a large ESRC-funded project, The Waste of the World. The project has come to an end, and an exhibition is being held in London at the Bargehouse on the South Bank, 20 – 22 January. Details here.

Posted in Events | Leave a comment

Antipode new website

here

Posted in Publishing | Leave a comment

Moving house, unpacking my library

Right after the holiday, I moved house. This explains the irregular posts here, and the backlog of emails, especially for the journal.

No matter how clear I made it on the phone to the removal company, they still didn’t seem to comprehend what a lot of books actually meant. I tried it in a couple of different ways – “it’s about 10 six foot tall bookshelves, plus some three foot ones, all full”. “This is not a small job”. “You need to bring a seven and a half ton lorry; it will not fit in a Luton van”. All to no avail. They turned up at midday, expecting a half-day job, with a Luton van. “F**k me mate, you have got a lot of books!” They ended up sending for the lorry, with another team, to help complete the job. The last box was unloaded in the new house at 10.30pm.  There was then the task of unpacking.

Many of my books are at work in the office. though I do have a lot at home. I’ve talked about the system for books before, and the new place is going to be similar. I think I will move a lot of the history of philosophy and history of political thought books from the office to home, and because the study here is smaller than the one in the old place I will only have academic books in it. But this place has a spare room, which the last didn’t, and that will be shelved with novels, cds, dvds etc.

So, the study, which I suspect will be spending a great deal of time in. It has a view, which is a plus – there is a small wood behind us, with a little stream, and then farmland and hills behind. It’s a new housing development on the edge of an ex-pit village, but despite being very close to the A1, and not exactly isolated, this feels like being in the country. The natural light is best in the afternoon, which isn’t ideal, but it feels good at the moment. My large desk (actually a dining room table) fits easily. There is a room for a chair too, for reading. Three of the walls have shelves up; the other has fitted wardrobes which I’ve also filled with shelves to put files, papers, etc. on – accessible but out of sight.

The wall behind me will have all the pre-modern theory, philosophy, etc. The one to the left the Germans – Leibniz, Kant, Hegel, Marx, Nietzsche, Husserl, Heidegger, Fink, Sloterdijk – and the last one Lefebvre, Axelos and Foucault. (Other recent theorists are all at work.) I’ve organised much of the last two of these already, though the packing logic of the removal firm escapes me. As with previous moves at times it feels like they’ve shuffled them like a pack of cards. I know I’m missing stuff – most of Hegel, for instance – and guess that must be in one of the boxes of novels or somewhere. I eventually found my computer after opening just about every box – they’d put it in the same kind of box as the books, and not labelled it.

I was sorry to leave my last study, as I’d done a lot of good writing there – the final version of Terror and Territory, and (hopefully) the penultimate version of The Birth of Territory – but I think this one will be good too. Getting this room right for writing is a key priority – being much closer to work means I should be able to divide space and time more clearly: work office for teaching and admin; home study for writing.

(You can find Walter Benjamin’s wonderful essay “Unpacking my library“, in the Illuminations collection).

Posted in Books | 5 Comments

Pierre Macherey – where to start?

I was sent the following query as a followup to the recent post on the review of Macherey’s Hegel or Spinoza:

With all the recent notices over the new translation of Pierre
Macherey’s Hegel or Spinoza, I was thinking of taking a look at it, but as a complete newcomer, I’m not sure if it’s the best work to start with. Would you know of any good starter primer’s or
introductory texts on Macherey available in English? Specifically texts by Macherey himself?

I’m posting this here because I am definitely not the right person to answer it – and perhaps someone reading this blog is. My tentative answer would be to say that the In a Materialist Way collection, edited by Warren Montag, would be a good place to go, along with Montag’s essay in that, and Ruddick’s intro to Hegel or Spinoza. His work on literary theory is translated, but I suspect that is not the best way in. As far as I know, Macherey’s contribution to the Althusser led collection Lire le Capital is not in English – the English Reading Capital (online here) only includes Althusser and Balibar’s contributions. Rancière, Macherey and Establet’s pieces did not make it into the English version. But I suspect reading even what is in English would be helpful to see where Macherey was coming from. Macherey has a website here which may be helpful for those who read French. Any other suggestions?

[update: be sure to read the comments to this post – thanks Sue, Clive, Nicholas and David]

Posted in Etienne Balibar, Jacques Rancière, Louis Althusser, Pierre Macherey | 5 Comments

The Territorial Trap of the Territorial Trap

Nisha Shah‘s important paper “The Territorial Trap of the Territorial Trap: Global Transformation and the Problem of the State’s Two Territories” has recently been published in International Political Sociology (requires subscription). Here’s the abstract:

This paper argues that attempts by theories of globalization to overcome the “territorial trap” have failed. Describing how the modern state emerged with two interrelated territories—a political concept about bounded jurisdiction and public good that over time is effaced but reinforced as territory is defined as brute, physical terrain—it shows that the assumption in globalization theories that territory is the state’s physical area entrenches the normative defense of the territorial state as the framework of political order. The consequence is that overcoming the territorial trap not only requires uncovering how and why territory becomes an assumed political ideal, but also how and why this trap produces the subsequent trap of understanding territory primarily as the “physical substratum” of the sovereign state. Globalization theories’ analysis of political transformation must therefore focus not only on the “permeability” of territorial borders, but whether and how evolving notions of global space might be providing a different political theory. A preliminary discussion of efforts to uncover how an alternative global spatial principle is reassembling political authority suggests a possible means of escape and way forward.

Posted in Territory | Leave a comment

Jason Read on Pierre Macherey, Hegel or Spinoza

This is a good, detailed review of the recently published translation of Pierre Macherey, Hegel or Spinoza. You can read a brief interview I did with the translator, Susan Ruddick, here. Society and Space published a version of the introduction and first chapter of the book in advance – both open access.

Posted in Baruch Spinoza, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, Pierre Macherey, Society and Space | 1 Comment

On referees

Over at the Society and Space open site I offer some thoughts on referees and the refereeing process, building on an editorial by Felix Driver in Journal of Historical Geography.

Posted in Publishing, Society and Space | Leave a comment

A roundup

Here are lots of interesting things I came across while catching up with my Google reader feeds…

Some interesting advice on the PhD application process (for the UK) – here (think I got this via New APPS).

Also advice – Graham Harman has a nice post about multiple writing projects here.

A good event: Earth-Objects and the Politics of Ecology, at the Barbican Art Gallery, 21 January 2012 – speakers include Graham Harman and Eyal Weizman.

And via Graham, here’s a call for papers –The Relevance of the Human in Politics, April 27-28, 2012. University of Dundee. Todd May as keynote. Looks good.

In the Times Higher there is a review of Sloterdijk’s Spheres I (via Peter Gratton). It’s largely negative and doesn’t tell you a great deal about the book. Somewhat of a strange choice as reviewer. The funniest line is near the start, describing him as “a kind of Jonathan Ross for the intellectually curious”.

Roland Boer has been creating a ‘typology of scholars’. That first post has a long list of types, he has followed it up with some others such as the self-seller; the put-downer; the unnoticed genius; the snob; the colonialist…

Via the Verso blog: Stephen Graham was on Radio 4 Thinking Aloud recently – available on BBC iPlayer (until 11 Jan 2012 – begins about 13 minutes in). His Cities Under Siege was recently reviewed in The Guardian.

The International Boundaries Research Unit at Durham University has a facebook page.

And finally, Paul Ennis says he is closing his AHB blog. He did an interview with me back in 2009 (later collected in the book Post-Continental Voices) which was one of the first things that got me thinking of starting a blog. Thanks Paul, and good luck.

Posted in Conferences | 2 Comments

Lisa Jardine on books, internet and knowledge

If you can get past the Harry Potter bit, this is actually an interesting discussion of modes of knowledge organisation and retrieval.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Slavoj Žižek on Ralph Fiennes’s film of Coriolanus

Slavoj Žižek discusses Ralph Fiennes’s film of Coriolanus in the New Statesman (thanks to Paul Harrison for the link). Rather too much about 300, but some interesting comments. I am not convinced that Coriolanus is better than Hamlet. T.S. Eliot (who actually said it was a more assured artistic success, even if less ‘interesting’) partly liked it because of the reactionary potential (he wrote a pretty nasty poem version of it, which is often described as fascist). Nonetheless it is a great play and well worth a read before seeing the movie. There is a serviceable version free online here.

Posted in Slavoj Zizek, William Shakespeare | 1 Comment