Territory book update

Last week felt like a really important step forward with The Birth of Territory manuscript. This week has been less dramatic, but good progress again. The discussion of Grotius and Selden now forms a brief coda to Chapter Seven which is on the rediscovery of Roman law. Thematically it fits well, though it’s not chronologically so comfortable. But in a way the discussion of De jure belli ac pacis the mare liberum/mare clausum debate leads nicely into Chapter Eight, which begins with the Treaty of Tordesillas and then reads Renaissance thought against the backdrop of colonisation.

A lot of the rest of the week has been spent chasing down as many references as possible before I leave London. The resources here are so terrific for the kind of research I’m doing. I know that there will be stray references that will come up when I’m away, but I’m trying to keep these to a minimum.

So it’s been things like Servius’ commentary on Virgil’s Aeneid; Nicolas of Cusa’s scientific treatises; Galileo’s book on the compass; some papal bulls; Tyrell’s response to Filmer that slightly predates Locke; a range of original language texts to check quotations. I’ve consolidated into one list all the things to check, find, track down, etc. from the individual chapters. There are lots of minor things that I want to get sorted out – a couple of texts in the Monumenta Germaniae Historica; an obscure reference to Plutarch cited by Lipsius; a minor check to the Decretum Gratiani; the original of a text by Aelius Aristides; the original text of the Treaty of Tordesillas (Spanish? Latin? Portuguese?); Montaigne and Voltaire in French… I’m hoping one day each in the British Library, Warburg Institute, Senate House Library and the Institute of Historical Research will tidy up the majority of these.

In terms of the chapters as a whole, Chapter One on Ancient Greece needs the most work – it was drafted nine years ago – but the others are in reasonable shape. The discussions of feudalism, the crusades, and Luther need work though.

And I also wrote a proposal for the book as a whole. I’ve never left that so late in a writing project before, and never written so much without a contract. But this book is, or at least has felt, different, so I’ve done things another way this time. Even though I am planning on about three more months work to complete the book, I’m definitely in the end stages. I think that is why Benjamin’s writing suggestions resonated so much.

Posted in Hugo Grotius, John Locke, Martin Luther, Nicholas of Cusa, Robert Filmer, Territory, The Birth of Territory, Walter Benjamin | 2 Comments

British Higher Education

Nina Power does a helpful job of linking to/summarising the anticipation of the Browne review of British Higher Education, and particularly funding, here.

Posted in Universities | Leave a comment

Walter Benjamin on writing

This is wonderful – Walter Benjamin’s writing rules, taken from Sean Sturm’s blog. I’ve read this before, but only now does it really resonate. I may say more about why in a bit.

I. Anyone intending to embark on a major work should be lenient with themselves and, having completed a stint, deny themselves nothing that will not prejudice the next.

II. Talk about what you have written, by all means, but do not read from it while the work is in progress. Every gratification procured in this way will slacken your tempo. If this régime is followed, the growing desire to communicate will become in the end a motor for completion.

III. In your working conditions avoid everyday mediocrity. Semi-relaxation, to a background of insipid sounds, is degrading. On the other hand, accompaniment by an etude or a cacophony of voices can become as significant for work as the perceptible silence of the night. If the latter sharpens the inner ear, the former acts as a touchstone for a diction ample enough to bury even the most wayward sounds.

IV. Avoid haphazard writing materials. A pedantic adherence to certain papers, pens, inks is beneficial. No luxury, but an abundance of these utensils is indispensable.

V. Let no thought pass incognito, and keep your notebook as strictly as the authorities keep their register of aliens.

VI. Keep your pen aloof from inspiration, which it will then attract with magnetic power. The more circumspectly you delay writing down an idea, the more maturely developed it will be on surrendering itself. Speech conquers thought, but writing commands it.

VII. Never stop writing because you have run out of ideas. Literary honour requires that one break off only at an appointed moment (a mealtime, a meeting) or at the end of the work.

VIII. Fill the lacunae of inspiration by tidily copying out what is already written. Intuition will awaken in the process.

IX. Nulla dies sine linea [“no day without a line” (Apelles ex Pliny)] — but there may well be weeks.

X. Consider no work perfect over which you have not once sat from evening to broad daylight.

XI. Do not write the conclusion of a work in your familiar study. You would not find the necessary courage there.

XII. Stages of composition: idea — style — writing. The value of the fair copy is that in producing it you confine attention to calligraphy. The idea kills inspiration, style fetters the idea, writing pays off style.

XIII. The work is the death mask of its conception.

From “One-Way Street” (1955; slightly ed.), Reflections:Essays, Aphorisms, Autobiographical Writings, ed. Peter Demetz, trans. Edmund Jephcott (New York: Schocken, 1978) 80-81.

Posted in Publishing, Walter Benjamin, Writing | 3 Comments

Reading Kant’s Geography – cover and endorsement

It’s been a busy few days with the Reading Kant’s Geography book. Eduardo and I have been working on the copy-edited text, we have the cover design and a very generous endorsement from Chris Philo:

This volume of impeccable scholarship and sustained critical inquiry performs an invaluable service. It is a major contribution to writings on the history of geography, but it also shows that Kant’s geography was far from incidental to the whole outworking of his philosophy, nor to what he claimed about the potentialities and pitfalls in shared human occupation of the planet. As such, this volume needs to be read by anyone concerned with Enlightenment, modernity, and issues such as cosmopolitanism and transnationalism.

Posted in Eduardo Mendieta, Immanuel Kant, My Publications | Leave a comment

Sloterdijk in English

I get lots of requests for what of Sloterdijk’s work is available in English. This is a really helpful resource for this – http://seansturm.wordpress.com/2010/01/01/sloterdijk-in-english/

I knew of most of these, but worth especially noting that Semiotext(e) have a translation of his dialogues with Hans-Jürgen Heinrichs, Neither Sun Nor Death, coming out next month. And his next  book in German – Die nehmende Hand und die gebende Seite– is already listed on Amazon.de. That’s going to really stir things up. The title would translate as something like ‘The hand that takes and the side that gives’ – it looks like a development of the arguments he had recently with Axel Honneth.

Posted in Peter Sloterdijk | 1 Comment

Harman and Bryant cover images

Speaking of cover images, Levi Bryant posts some wonderful artwork that will be used for his and Graham Harman’s new books here.

Posted in Graham Harman, Levi Bryant | Leave a comment

Bush-Obama

Tariq Ali has written a short piece on the continuities between Bush and Obama’s foreign policies for The Age. (Via the Verso blog.)

It’s to plug his new book The Obama Syndrome: Surrender at Home, War Abroad – details here. That book has an okay cover, though not nearly as good as the previous one done for his The Clash of Fundamentalisms.

But this one, done by Matt Davidson for The Age, is probably the best of all…

 

Posted in Politics, Tariq Ali | Leave a comment

Larval Subjects on Spatio-Temporal Cartographies

Levi Bryant gives a hint of where his work might go next here. From the post it’s clear his book The Democracy of Objects is just about done, and he’s now thinking about space and time. He mentions a few geographers he’s been reading, and clearly there is a lot of overlap in terms of interest. The session at the 2011 Association of American Geographers I publicised last week is a good example of this. You should read Levi’s whole post, but here’s a taster…

Insofar as OOO is committed to the thesis that at its most basic level being is composed of substances, it follows that time and space can no longer be conceived as milieus or containers in which objects exist, but rather that time and space, or spatio-temporality must be seen as arising from relations between and among objects. Second, insofar as all objects are operationally closed such that they only possess selective relations to the world, it follows that what we ordinary think of as a spatial relation– for example a relation of proximity –is not sufficient to establish that there is, indeed, a spatio-temporal relation between two entities. In other words, two entities might appear to share a spatio-temporal relation to one another, but it is not evident that there truly is a spatial relation between these two entities.

While the first is close to where some of the work in critical/theoretical geography has been for a while; the second is, I think, the more significant challenge. That – to me – is not yet worked through in the post; rather the examples reinforce the first claim. My sense is that the plural, relational notions of spatial-temporal connections work, but the doubt that “there truly is a spatial relation” in some cases remains to be demonstrated. It seems that the relation may be complicated, remote, not what we thought, etc. but that doesn’t mean that its not there in some form. I should also stress that on the first, the relational notion of time is particularly interesting. Levi says there are early thoughts and I’m curious where this will go.

Posted in Levi Bryant | Leave a comment

New French Thought

Very interesting set of seminars at The Public School in New York later this month. They focus on new French thought – that is outside of the 1960s/70s generation – and the thinkers covered are Catherine Malabou, Bernard Stiegler, Mehdi Belhaj Kacem, Quentin Meillassoux and François Laruelle. Of these, Stiegler and Meillassoux are probably the best known; Laruelle and Malabou are beginning to be translated, but Kacem is probably the unknown quantity. I’ve not read any of his work, but his L’esprit du nihilisme: Une ontologique de l’Histoire has been sitting in the Amazon.fr basket for a while…

You can find the official details here; thanks to Speculative Heresy for the info.

Update 2nd November: audio for the lectures here.

Posted in Bernard Stiegler, Mehdi Belhaj Kacem, Quentin Meillassoux | 1 Comment

Middlesex Philosophy Seminars

Despite CRMEP being moved to Kingston, and the closure of the undergraduate programme for new entrants, Middlesex philosophy has some very impressive people coming to give seminars next year. Christian Kerslake posts the details here.

Posted in Conferences | Leave a comment