Critchley on Hamlet

Thomas posted this as a comment to an earlier post, but since many people read this in ways where comments don’t show up, I’m reposting here, and have embedded the video below.

You can see Critchley’s lecture on Hamlet at the EGS this summer here. I had the pleasure of taking Critchley’s class on tragedy’s relationship to philosophy at the EGS. It’s really fascinating stuff. What really gets Critchley going is the question of moral ambiguity which keeps decision open. Philosophy tries to close this off and answer the question “what should I do” whereas tragedy keeps this question open. When confronted with a true ethical question we don’t know what to do. Certainly you can see this play out in all of Shakespeare’s tragedies, but what makes Hamlet stand out for Critchley’s purposes is the indecisiveness of Hamlet. Hamlet is too much of the philosopher,  too much theory, too much trying to interpret the world, not enough action. Hamlet is a kind of miss-cast character, a philosopher who doesn’t want to reject the role of sovereign, an indecisive sovereign or a non-sovereign.

This entry was posted in Simon Critchley, William Shakespeare and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Critchley on Hamlet

  1. Pingback: Critchley on Hamlet in London | Progressive Geographies

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s