‘Shakespearean Territories’ – abstract for Warwick

This is my abstract for the Critical International and Political Studies annual lecture, University of Warwick, October 3rd 2012.

This lecture shows how Shakespeare’s plays can help us to think about the multi-faceted nature of territory as word, concept and practice, and to shed light on the way we understand territory and territorial disputes today. Shakespeare only uses the word ‘territory’ twice, in King Lear and As You Like It, and the plural ‘territories’ twelve times in seven separate plays. It might thus appear that the idea was marginal to his work. Yet a number of his plays are structured around related issues of exile, banishment, land politics, spatial division, contestation, conquest and succession.

Drawing on the political and historical analyses of territory in Terror and Territory and the forthcoming The Birth of Territory, this lecture will examine the way that territorial concerns run through Shakespeare’s plays. While other parts of the larger project discuss legal, economic, corporeal, colonial, technical, and exiled aspects of territory, here the focus is on the question of vulnerability and external relations. Both Hamlet and Macbeth concern the court politics of a usurping monarch and the consequences of their actions and the wish for revenge, but they are also structured by external threats to the integrity of the state. In Hamlet this is the long running dispute between Denmark and Norway, where King Hamlet killed King Fortinbras on the day young Hamlet was born. While often dropped in stage and film adaptations, the role of the young Fortinbras and Norway more generally is a crucial geopolitical and territorial element of the play.

In Macbeth, the title character gains his initial prominence through a victory over Norway, Ireland and the traitors within Scotland. When Macbeth kills the king, and takes the throne, the rightful heir, Malcolm, flees to England, from which he later leads the invasion that deposes Macbeth. As in Hamlet, the geopolitical struggles and the ambitions of external forces are crucial to the plot, and relate to contests at the time between Scandinavian and British powers. Shakespeare was writing at the end of the sixteenth and beginning of the seventeenth century: a time when the modern conception of sovereign territory was emerging. He therefore helps us understand its variant aspects, tensions, ambiguities and limits.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Politics, Shakespearean Territories, Territory, Terror and Territory, The Birth of Territory, William Shakespeare and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to ‘Shakespearean Territories’ – abstract for Warwick

  1. Pingback: ‘Shakespearean Territories’ – abstract for Warwick | Progressive Geographies « PHILOSOPHY IN A TIME OF ERROR

  2. Pingback: Forthcoming talks | Progressive Geographies

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s