Farge and Foucault, Disorderly Families reviewed in the TLS (and discussed in podcast)

imageArlette Farge and Michel Foucault, Disorderly Families: Infamous letters from the Bastille archives (edited by Nancy Luxon, translated by Thomas Scott-Railton) reviewed in the TLS: ‘Would you mind imprisoning my wife?‘ by Biancamaria Fontana.

Update: it is also discussed in this TLS podcast.

As I’ve mentioned here before, there is a companion book of essays edited by Nancy Luxon, forthcoming from University of Minnesota Press. I have a piece in that collection (on urban spaces), and Nancy and I will be speaking about this work at the Institute of Historical Studies in London on June 16. More details when available.

Posted in Arlette Farge, Michel Foucault, Uncategorized, urban/urbanisation | 1 Comment

Simondon on Technics: On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects – audio recordings

image_miniThanks to dmf for pointing me to this – audio recordings of a recent event at Kingston:

Simondon on Technics: On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects

Speakers: Andrea Bardin (Brunel University), Giovanni Carrozzini (CIDES, MSH Paris-Nord), Xavier Guchet (Paris 1 Sorbonne), Cécile Malaspina (translator), Simon Mills (De Monfort University), Pablo Rodriguez (University of Buenos Aires)

The 2016 English translation of Gilbert Simondon’s 1958 On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects finally introduces the Anglophone reader to a complete version of the French philosopher’s great work: a complex crossover between ontology, epistemology, psycho-sociology and the philosophy of technology. With the participation of international specialists on Simondon’s writings, this workshop aims to explore the main themes of Simondon’s philosophy of technology, connecting them to the relational ontology of communication processes outlined in Individuation in the Light of the Notions of Form and Information.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

‘U Can’t Talk to Ur Professor Like This’ – academic etiquette in the New York Times

‘U Can’t Talk to Ur Professor Like This‘ – interesting piece on academic etiquette in the New York Times. Here’s the beginning of the piece:

Chapel Hill, N.C. — At the start of my teaching career, when I was fresh out of graduate school, I briefly considered trying to pass myself off as a cool professor. Luckily, I soon came to my senses and embraced my true identity as a young fogey.

After one too many students called me by my first name and sent me email that resembled a drunken late-night Facebook post, I took a very fogeyish step. I began attaching a page on etiquette to every syllabus: basic rules for how to address teachers and write polite, grammatically correct emails. [continues here]

There are cultural and generational norms here, and I certainly don’t want to push for deference, but above all I think these problems come from a lack of politeness. I think this guide – linked in the piece – is much too prescriptive. I think that the first line of the author’s own guide is almost enough on its own: “When in doubt about how you should speak, write, or act, always err on the side of formality. You will never offend or annoy someone by being overly formal and polite”.

I’m fine with ‘Stuart’ but not with ‘Stu’; I begin messages to people I don’t know with ‘Dear’ and not ‘Hi’ or ‘Yo’; and if you use a title, get it right. On that last point I’m continually surprised by the ‘Dear Mr Elden’ messages, especially – and these seems really puzzling – from potential PhD students…

The other one: if you want someone to do something for you, ask. 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized, Universities | Leave a comment

China Miéville, October: The Story of the Russian Revolution from Verso (currently 50% off with bundled e-book)

9781784782771-max_221-2f04eecf9c16cd7391cc2bda7e1c7899China Miéville, October: The Story of the Russian Revolution from Verso (currently 50% off with bundled e-book)

On the centenary of the Russian Revolution, China Miéville tells the extraordinary story of this pivotal moment in history.

In February of 1917 Russia was a backwards, autocratic monarchy, mired in an unpopular war; by October, after not one but two revolutions, it had become the world’s first workers’ state, straining to be at the vanguard of global revolution. How did this unimaginable transformation take place?

In a panoramic sweep, stretching from St Petersburg and Moscow to the remotest villages of a sprawling empire, Miéville uncovers the catastrophes, intrigues and inspirations of 1917, in all their passion, drama and strangeness. Intervening in long-standing historical debates, but told with the reader new to the topic especially in mind, here is a breathtaking story of humanity at its greatest and most desperate; of a turning point for civilisation that still resonates loudly today.

Posted in China Mieville, Politics, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Foucault, Oeuvres I and II reviewed in the TLS by Duncan Kelly

aff. Foucault.inddFoucault, Oeuvres I and II reviewed in the TLS by Duncan Kelly

In 1970, after various appointments in France, Germany, Poland, Sweden and Tunisia, the French philosopher and epistemologist Michel Foucault took a Chair at the Collège de France in Paris. His job title was Professor of the History of Systems of Thought, and his inaugural lecture offered a retrospect and prospect of what that meant to him. Yet only by the end of the 1970s, in a recap of a course given on the birth of modern “biopolitics”, published in English as “History of Systems of Thought” (1979), did Foucault explain what this meant more explicitly. Asking how, from the eighteenth century onwards, governmental practices had sought to rationalize the attention they paid to their subjects and citizens, he considered the range of policies and systems of thought that justified them, targeting the practical problems of governing a population (health, hygiene, care and welfare, births, deaths, diseases, etc). These were forms of “gov­ernmentality” and, he continued, they were “inseparable” as systems of thought from the dominant form of “political rationality” that overlay them, namely, modern “liberalism”. The history of systems of thought, it turns out, covers it all. [continues here]

Posted in Michel Foucault, Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Three steps for the UK general election – register, read, vote (with links)

Now updated with links to more manifestos. Remember to register by end of Monday 22nd May.

stuartelden's avatarProgressive Geographies

Three steps for the UK general election –

1. Register to vote

Simple to do, but crucial to do soon. Must be done by 22 May to vote on 8 June 2017. The official registration site is here. For students, you can register in both your term time and home address, and then vote in just one. If you want to know where you will make the most difference, take a look at this site.

2. Read the manifestos

Don’t just read what the newspapers say about them; read them.

  • Labour Party manifesto here
  • Conservative Party here.
  • Liberal Democrat here.
  • The Green Party manifesto page is here (signup to receive when launched).
  • Plaid Cymru here
  • SNP not yet available.

3. Vote

You can’t do this without being registered; and you shouldn’t do it without being informed.

There is a good discussion of tactical voting here; and…

View original post 38 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

‘Check your emails twice a day: six tips for a better organised life’

phd042817s
Check your emails twice a day: six tips for a better organised life‘ – good advice in The Guardian.

The links in the piece are also helpful – especially this piece on interruptions and how long it can take to refocus.

I think one of the key things with email is differentiating between things that need a quick reply and things that actually require work. For me, following various time-management plans I work along these lines.

  • If something can be done in a minute or two, just do it.
  • If it requires longer than that, then it goes onto a ‘to-do’ list that is separate from ‘doing email’.
  • If it requires a reasonable amount of time – say more than 30 minutes – then you need to schedule time for it.

I don’t always succeed in following that advice, but I still think it’s a good model to aspire to. All too often it’s easy to get sucked into email-triggered tasks that take so much time that you either lose focus on the key work at hand, or the flow of emails coming in overtakes the processing of them. I’m a complete convert to the ‘inbox zero’ rule – which does not mean that all emails are replied to, or associated tasks done, but that all emails are processed, and I only return to an email if I now intend to do the associated work.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Catherine Malabou Critical Inquiry interview (2017)

Recording of an interview with Catherine Malabou.

Clare O'Farrell's avatarFoucault News

Catherine Malabou Critical Inquiry interview, Podcast on Soundcloud, May 2017

Catherine Malabou stopped by the office of Critical Inquiry for a short and informal audio interview during her visit to the University of Chicago last week. We talked about her two CI essays, her new book (Before Tomorrow: Epigenesis and Rationality [2017]), and her work in progress.

View original post

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Ivan Krastev and Luiza Bialasiewicz on the future of the EU

Ivan Krastev and Luiza Bialasiewicz on the future of the EU – a discussion last week in Amsterdam:

Will the European Union survive 2017? What will the elections in countries crucial for Europe’s future bring? And why is it that of all people, Donald Trump might be Europe’s saviour?

On May 10, just after the French elections, Ivan Krastev, one of Europe’s most influential political scientists, will come to discuss with us the above mentioned questions.

‘The European Union is dead, but hasn’t realized this yet’, Marine le Pen, leader of Front National, recently commented. Although the media quickly refuted this verdict, it remains unresolved in the minds of many Europeans whether the EU will survive 2017. Can we counteract the rise of populism and nationalism? Which advice does Ivan Krastev give Europe in a year where the EU’s existence is at stake?

Krastev describes in his New York Times’ article How Trump Might Save the EU how the US could once again become Europe’s saviour. By adopting Donald Trump’s winning strategy and rhetoric, he argues that European populists are doing themselves harm.

Ivan Krastev presents a keynote on the questions above, and takes part in a discussion with Jean Monnet Professor Luiza Bialasiewicz and director of De Balie, Yoeri Albrecht.

Posted in Luiza Bialasiewicz, Politics, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Three steps for the UK general election – register, read, vote (with links)

Three steps for the UK general election –

1. Register to vote

Simple to do, but crucial to do soon. Must be done by 22 May to vote on 8 June 2017. The official registration site is here. For students, you can register in both your term time and home address, and then vote in just one. If you want to know where you will make the most difference, take a look at this site.

2. Read the manifestos

Don’t just read what the newspapers say about them; read them.

  • Labour Party manifesto here
  • Conservative Party here.
  • Liberal Democrat here.
  • The Green Party here.
  • Plaid Cymru here
  • SNP manifesto is not yet available; their website is here.

3. Vote

You can’t do this without being registered; and you shouldn’t do it without being informed.

There is a good discussion of tactical voting here; and a spreadsheet giving ‘stop Tories’ options here. If you want a postal vote, you can apply here.

Lots more election data at Electoral Calculus.

(Happy to add other useful links if people add them in comments.)

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment