Critical Theory on five forthcoming books

critical-theory.com lists five forthcoming books to get excited about from William V Spanos, Etienne Balibar, Jasbir Puar, Dirk Johnston… and me. The last is flattering, if somewhat premature – the book isn’t due out until 2016. Thanks to Verso Books for the link.

Posted in Books, Etienne Balibar, Foucault's Last Decade | Leave a comment

Foucault and heredity

In 1969 Foucault gave two lecture courses at Vincennes, one on ‘Sexuality and Individuality’ and one on ‘Nietzsche and Genealogy’. Some time back there was talk that the second would be published, but this has not come to pass. Daniel Defert lists both in his helpful ‘Chronology’ (in Dits et écrits and A Companion to Foucault) and notes that the first ‘covers the history of heredity and of racial hygiene’. The question of heredity seems to have been a real interest of Foucault’s at this time – he discusses it in some detail in his submission to the Collège de France (‘Titres et Travaux’/’Candidacy Presentation’) in 1970, and again in his inaugural lecture in relation to botany. Traces of it here and there appear in other lectures – from the way he discusses it, it is clear Foucault had some quite specialised knowledge already, and obviously there is the link back to the discussions of biology in The Order of Things. Further ahead there are related inquiries in the first volume of the History of Sexuality and in the race analyses of lecture course ‘Society must be Defended‘.

But Foucault never gives it the sustained treatment he promises. There is a good reason for this. In the inaugural lecture, given on 2nd December 1970, he mentions the topic only to say that “this is the work that has just been done by François Jacob with a brilliance and an erudition which could not be equalled”. The reference is to Jacob’s book La logique du vivant: Une histoire de l’hérédité, published earlier that year. Indeed, Foucault had written a glowing review of the book for Le monde the previous month (Dits et écrits text 81). There he describes it as too modest in its subtitle, and as the “most remarkable history of biology ever written” . Did Foucault really believe that such work could ‘not be equalled’, and therefore put his own inquiry to one side, to concentrate on other things? But it is clear from the near-contemporaneous essay ‘Nietzsche, Genealogy, History’ that Foucault did not just envisage heredity as a topic of study, but as providing a model for the kind of work he wanted to undertake.

Posted in Foucault's Last Decade, Michel Foucault | 3 Comments

Modes of Existence Now Available

Latour’s new book out in English – via ANTHEM.

Posted in Bruno Latour | Leave a comment

In defence of edited collections

At the LSE Impact of Social Sciences blog, three people offer defences of edited collections.

Posted in Books, Publishing, Writing | Leave a comment

Warwick news story on FBA

Warwick have a brief news story on my election as a Fellow of the British Academy last week.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Stuart Elden reviews Maha Samman

My review of Maha Samman’s Trans-Colonial Urban Space in Palestine has just been published on the Society and Space open site.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Ordinary/Everyday/Quotidian – conference in York, September 2013

OEQ_banner

The ordinary and the everyday are intuitively self-evident, yet notoriously elusive. Efforts to define “ordinary language” or “everyday practice” have preoccupied thinkers across many disciplines: philosophers, historians, sociologists, political theorists, geographers and critics of literature and the visual arts. And these subjects demand more attention from scholars working on race, class, gender and sexuality, as well as food studies and the digital and medical humanities. Yet existing efforts have rarely engaged in dialogue with their counterparts in other disciplines. We call for papers from scholars in all these fields to join in a spirited dialogue at an international, two-day conference to be held at the University of York, 26 and 27 September 2013.

Scholars in all disciplines are invited to to ponder, celebrate, and critique the quotidian, ranging from the furtive pleasures of pop to the dubious delights of junk: “Does it glow at the core with personal heat, with signs of one’s deepest nature, clues to secret yearnings, humiliating flaws? What habits, fetishes, addictions, inclinations? What solitary acts, behavioral ruts?”

Call for papers and more details here.

 

 

Posted in Conferences | 1 Comment

Foucault’s Last Decade – initial work

FoucaultI thought I’d begin writing something each week or so on what I’ve done on this project. I know that this book is going to take some time to come together, and that I may need to set it aside for a while due to other commitments or unavailability of materials.

In the first week, I did draft some opening sections of the introductory chapter, both in terms of clarification of the project (drawing from the proposal) and also sketching out an opening flourish, though I am not sure if this will work. I also did quite a bit of preparatory work. I put together a working file for the book’s front matter – table of contents, abbreviations, etc.; begun to pull together resources files; and I have a spreadsheet for word counts so I can keep track of where I am with different bits of the project.

The main preparatory task was beginning something I’ve wanted to do for a while – pulling together a timeline from late 1969 to Foucault’s death. (While the book concentrates on 1974-84, the opening chapter treats the earlier period.) This timeline draws extensively on the ‘Chronology’ Daniel Defert wrote for Dits et écrits (now translated in A Companion to Foucault).  Dits et écrits itself provides some information on the publication dates and composition dates of Foucault’s works; and the lecture courses are useful too. I don’t intend to publish this, but the idea is that I have this to hand as a reference tool. While the sequence of his lecture courses at the Collège de France is well known, various shorter lectures, seminars etc. he gave elsewhere are now fitted into this list. Defert also gives some good indications of what Foucault was reading at different times, the dates he finished various drafts of books, and what he was doing that can be fitted into this. I still have to go through the Eribon, Macey and Miller biographies again with this in mind too.

I’ve also added in the dates of various collaborative projects Foucault was involved in at the Collège and elsewhere, and the topics of his Collège seminars. The collaborative projects, many of which draw on work done in the seminars, are very important to the story I want to tell. Although Foucault did not publish single-authored books in the period between The History of Sexuality volume 1 in 1976 and volumes 2 and 3 in 1984, he did publish several books that he edited or co-edited, or contributed to, including Les équipements du pouvoir (a reissue of a journal special issue from 1973 in 1976); Les machines à guérir (1976 and reissued with variant texts in 1979); Politiques de l’habitat (1977); Herculine Barbin dite Alexina B (1978) and Le désordre des familles (1982). Of these, Foucault’s contributions to the first two are translated, along with the Barbin book, but not the others or the work of other contributors to the first two. There are also a number of other collaborative projects he was involved with that were either published without Foucault’s name attached, or which remain only in the archives.

While in London last week I had half a day in the British Library, and used that to look at a few references that had come up already which I knew would be hard to find. Two of these were to look at texts by Foucault in their original context (rather than as anthologised in collections) and one was for a report on a conference on Foucault’s work from 1981. The latter was quite funny, as the writer of the piece clearly doesn’t like Foucault-influenced work and is rude about, among others, Ian Hacking, Paul Rabinow, and Michel de Certeau. Of Foucault’s own contribution, he has this to say:

A few of the cognoscenti complained afterwards that Foucault had directed his remarks to the great unwashed. And, in fact, Foucault did opt for a less esoteric paper when he learned the size of the crowd he was to address – a sort of outline of what he sees as the trajectory of his own theoretical and political project over the last 15 years or so. Be that as it may, the talk had the virtue of relative clarity, free of the maddening jargon that had characterized a few of the earlier talks (William R. Hackman, “The Foucault Conference”, Telos, No 51, Spring 1982, pp. 191-6, p. 195).

The other thing I did was to look at the IMEC edition of reviews of Surveiller et punir, as part of their ‘Regards Critiques’ series. There are volumes on Les mots et les choses, Histoire de la folie and La volonte de savoir as well; the last of which I will certainly look at for this project.

So, a reasonable start to a long process. Although I’ve wanted to write this book for several years, and wrote some of the individual pieces on Foucault or lectures with this larger project in mind, this was the first week where I really felt I was writing a book.

Posted in Books, Foucault's Last Decade, Michel Foucault, Writing | 4 Comments

How Machiavellian was Machiavelli? Quentin Skinner answers

Quentin Skinner on Machiavelli.

Jeremy Schmidt's avatarJeremy J Schmidt

This is an interesting lecture some 500 years after Machiavelli wrote The Prince.

View original post

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Marx Reloaded film

The whole thing, with English subtitles – thanks to Marijn Nieuwenhuis for the link.

Posted in Karl Marx | 3 Comments