Foucault’s I, Pierre Rivière – Emotion, Space and Society special issue

manuscrit_Pierre_Riviere-bigFoucault’s I, Pierre Rivière collection is the subject of a special issue of Emotion, Space and Society (requires subscription).

Posted in Michel Foucault | Leave a comment

David Wood on The Lure of the Writer’s Cabin

Philosopher David Wood in The New York Times:

Much has been written about the writer’s cabin. Among the most notable recent books on the topic are “Heidegger’s Hut” by Adam Sharr and “A Place of My Own: The Architecture of Daydreams,” Michael Pollan’s account of  imagining and then actually constructing his own writing space. A standard Internet search can quickly yield images of the writing rooms (cabins, huts, sheds) of legendary scriveners: Dylan Thomas, Virginia Woolf, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Roald Dahl, Carl Jung, Henry Thoreau and — a writer of a markedly different sort —Ted Kaczynski, to name a few. And Jill Krementz’s 1999 collection of photographs “The Writer’s Desk” gives us tantalizing glimpses of writers sitting at their desks. But why the interest? Have these places somehow become secular sites of the sacred?

Posted in Martin Heidegger, Writing | 2 Comments

Interview with Gary Gutting

MFAOSRAt 3am magazine – Gutting’s Michel Foucault’s Archaeology of Scientific Reason was one of the first books on Foucault I read, in the first year of my PhD.

3:AM: You are well known as an expert on various French intellectuals and philosophers. Michel Foucault has been a thinker that you have found important and interesting. You’ve written extensively about him. So firstly, can you sketch out what you understand Foucault’s central contributions to philosophy to have been, in particular his ideas of ‘discourse’, of an ‘archeology of knowledge’ and a ‘genealogical method’?

GG: I see Foucault as more a philosophically informed and oriented historian than as a philosopher in any traditional sense. He typically writes what he calls “histories of the present”, meaning that he starts from what he sees as an ethically intolerable practice of contemporary life (e.g., the treatment of the mad or the system of imprisoning criminals) that, despite its obvious flaws, we tend to see as necessary given certain general views our society holds (e.g., that madness is a medical condition, that prison is the only humane form of punishment). His histories are genealogies showing that the view allegedly justifying the practice is a contingent feature of our society that does not impose a genuinely normative limit on what we think and do. (A genealogy is a diachronic causal story, usually also accompanied by synchronic archeological analyses of the conceptual structure at various key temporal points.) Foucault’s histories are philosophical in that they require critical discussion of philosophical views, but he does not put forward his own philosophical views in any traditional sense. At most, he sometimes constructs an ad hoc theoretical apparatus (e.g., a “theory” of power) designed to expose the limitations of a view he is criticising. But once the critical points are made, he is happy to abandon the apparatus, which functions like a scaffolding that’s removed when the work is done. Toward the end of his life, Foucault did move toward a conception — akin to that of the ancients — of philosophy as a way of life. But he does not seek a body of theoretical truth.

Posted in Michel Foucault | 2 Comments

Deleuze Cinema

Useful website with a lot of resources on Deleuze and Cinema – deleuzecinema.com.

Posted in Gilles Deleuze | Tagged | 1 Comment

Digital Humanities conference

DH13LogoGeorge Washington University, Friday January 25 – Saturday January 26, 2013 – details here.

Digital humanities is a vibrant field that uses digital technologies to study the interactions between cultural artifacts and the society. In our second decade of the twenty-first century, we face a number of questions about the values, methods, and goals of humanistic inquiries at the intersection of digital media and theory.

Posted in Conferences | Leave a comment

Gastón Gordillo on World War Z

WWZGastón Gordillo provides a good analysis of the forthcoming movie World War Z, which is especially interesting concerning the spatial and territorial issues.

Posted in Gaston Gordillo, Territory | Tagged | Leave a comment

Interview with Michel Sennelart on Du gouvernement des vivants.

Clare O'Farrell's avatarFoucault News

Interview on Radio France Culture, 24 Nov 2012.
Cours de Michel Foucault (édition de Michel Senellart)

Update: August 2025. Link is no longer available

Invité : Michel Senellart, Professeur de Philosophie politique à l’ENS de Lyon à propos de l’édition du Cours de Michel Foucault “Du gouvernement des vivants“, cours  au Collège de France en 1979-1980 – sous la direction de François Ewald, Alessandro Fontana – Edition établie par Michel Senellart – ( Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales / Editions du Seuil, / Editions Gallimard –  8 nov 2012).

“Prenant ses distances, dans ce cours, avec la problématique du pouvoir-savoir, développée dans les années 70, Michel Foucault se propose d’étudier la question du gouvernement par la vérité. Comment se constitue le sujet dans le jeu du pouvoir et de la vérité ? Et, plus précisément, comme se noue, dans la culture occidentale, le rapport…

View original post 86 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Mapping the 2012 Gaza attacks

range-israeli-rockets1nyt-gaza-mapRather late linking to these, but Derek Gregory has a good discussion of the mapping of the 2012 Gaza attacks here.

Craig Jones has been producing an excellent sequence of posts on this conflict. See, especially, one on the range of the weapons; Gaza in Perspective I and II; and Where is Palestine?palestine-islands

Un monde à l'enversThe last post reproduces the remarkable image created by Le monde diplomatique of the Palestinian archipelago, from their alternative atlas Un monde à l’envers. There are a number of other maps available online here (French) and here (English).

Posted in Politics, Territory | Leave a comment

Mapping the London Blitz

website_screenshot_Fascinating website on the London Blitz – an interactive map and photos, plus an Android app.

The Bomb Sight project is mapping the London WW2 bomb census between 7/10/1940 and 06/06/1941. Previously available only by viewing in the Reading Room at The National Archives, Bomb Sight is making the maps available to citizen researchers, academics and students. They will be able to explore where the bombs fell and to discover memories and photographs from the period.

The project has scanned original 1940s bomb census maps , geo-referenced the maps and digitally captured the geographical locations of all the falling bombs recorded on the original map…

Various people linked to this; but there is a detailed discussion by Derek Gregory at Geographical Imaginations. Derek links to this video demonstrating what the site is capable of showing.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Call for Papers – ‘Urban Theory: States of the Art’

Urban — New Series, 6

Call for Papers — ‘Urban Theory: States of the Art’

There will never be good urban planning without a consistent urban theory. This controversial aphorism could serve to open the debate proposed by the journal in a forthcoming special issue. Urban theory (the theory of the city and urbanisation processes) has had a complex historic relationship with planning practice and urban policies: anticipation of more or less happy worlds, expert dissection of already materialised urban phenomena, critical interpretation that re-imagines the past and the present of cities and territories, opening up a new horizon for them… The state of theoretical work is without a doubt an effective index of the health and the perspectives of the planning field, but could it also be a weapon loaded with future? Can we still devise theories that are able to change the facts of an increasingly complex and variegated urban world, oblivious to any hint of rationality? Or on the other hand, should theory be satisfied with a ‘modest witness’ attitude, and look for productions of meaning in the fissures of prevailing urban discourses? What theoretical perspectives should we pursue, using what conceptual tools and within what intellectual frameworks? How should theory be articulated with practice? What sort of theory is our urban world asking for in the context of the global crisis? To what extent can attempts to understand the crisis help to broaden the theoretical field of the urban phenomenon?

This special issue of Urban aims to highlight international contributions that systematically and critically explore the state of the art in the various fields of urban theory, and link them to the broader trends of contemporary social theory — from planning to geography, from sociology to history and beyond, in the general perspective of technical knowledge, social sciences and humanities. Contributions that analyse current ideas about the intersections of the city, the economy, society, politics, culture, technology, nature, environment, design, institutions, etc. are especially welcome. Authors are expected to consider and problematise the link between planning theory and practice, remembering that ‘experience without theory is blind, but theory without experience is mere intellectual play’. Ultimately, how can urban theory contribute to bring about change not only in knowledge and discourse about the city, but also in the actual processes that sustain and transform it? Is urbanism faced with a panorama doomed to a generalised ‘poverty of theory’ or on the contrary, can we imagine a flourishing future in which urban theory occupies a place of its own in the broader field of social theory?

Deadline for submissions: 15 March 2013

More information: http://www.aq.upm.es/Departamentos/Urbanismo/publicaciones/urban.html

Posted in Publishing, urban/urbanisation | 2 Comments