Jonathan Rée reviews Sloterdijk, You Must Change Your Life

Peter Sloterdijk’s You Must Change Your Life is reviewed by Jonathan Rée at New Humanist (via ANTHEM).

Posted in Peter Sloterdijk | Leave a comment

Foucault News on a talk by Miguel de Beistegui at Goldsmiths.

Clare O'Farrell's avatarFoucault News

Workshop “Foucault and the critique of our present: Reworking the Foucauldian tool-box” Part 2

organized at Goldsmiths College (London) by Yari Lanci, Amedeo Policante and Martina Tazzioli,
with the support of the Department of Politics and of mf / materiali foucaultiani

Thursday, November 22, 5-7 pm
Richard Hoggart Building (RHB) 2107
Goldsmiths, University of London
New Cross, London, SE14 6NW

Miguel de Beistegui (University of Warwick)
“Desire within and beyond biopolitics”
pdf flyer

View original post

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

David Beer on choosing book titles, with links to earlier discussions by Graham Harman and me – back when The Birth of Territory still had the title The Geometry of the Political.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Graham Harman on his forthcoming book of essays.

doctorzamalek's avatarObject-Oriented Philosophy

The title is Bells and Whistles: More Speculative Realism, and you can expect to see it out towards the fall of 2013. It will be of the same style as Towards Speculative Realism, with a collection of unpublished essays and lectures prefaced by italicized descriptions of the conditions under which they were written (a feature that proved especially popular with younger readers).

It will include, among other things, my keynote lecture from the Transmediale festival in Berlin last February, the talk I gave at the New School in September 2011 on the 4 basic objections that are made to OOO, along with other talks from Goldsmiths, Brazil, and Russia.

It will also contain an English version of my defense of OOO against William James’ radical empiricism (commissioned by Kronos and published so far only in Polish translation). A few other essays will be written to order just for…

View original post 119 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

‘What The 2012 Election Would Have Looked Like Without Universal Suffrage’

Buzzfeed has some interesting projections of how the election would have gone if only white men, only men, only whites, and only over 24 year olds had had the vote. What they have done is chosen the voting rules for the years 1850, 1870, 1920 and 1970 and using the 2012 electoral map, worked out who would have won each state. The map below is the one using the 1850 rules. 

I was pointed to this site by Graham Harman (and I’ve clarified the post above following a message from Graham – my original wording was indeed confusing).

Posted in Politics | Leave a comment

Peter Gratton on resistance to open access publishing – some real ignorance on display here.

Peter Gratton's avatarPHILOSOPHY IN A TIME OF ERROR

Yesterday, we had a meeting of Faculty Council for the Arts (I have to go as chair of our undergrad studies committee). This poor librarian starts us off with a 15-minute presentation about open access publishing, and it was excellent: all the global justice and other reasons for opting, if one can, for open access. Then she finishes, and this guy lights into her like I haven’t seen. So he goes on and she asks, “Can you tell me what you think is wrong with open access?” And he says, “One word: crud.” And then he says something about it being “pay to publish.” Then our new dean pipes up and said she had “no idea” open access publishing included peer review.

So it was left to me to explain this thing called the internet and how Society and Space does as much open access as possible and how peer…

View original post 64 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Books received

Chris Butler’s book on Lefebvre; Conley’s Spatial Ecologies; Kaplan’s The Revenge of Geography (can’t quite believe I actually bought this); Campe’s The Game of Probability; first edition of Lindberg, The Beginning of Western Science (thanks Nick); a second-hand copy of Isin’s Cities without Citizens; the new issue of RP and an architecture thesis to examine.

Posted in Books, Engin Isin, Henri Lefebvre | Leave a comment

Romney’s Project for a New American Century

Romney’s team prepared a website to launch if he’d won the election. I don’t blame him for being prepared, though rather embarassing that it leaked. Political Wire has some images.

Interesting to see the idea of the ‘American century’ coming up again. I discuss the Project for a New American Century in Terror and Territory.

Posted in Politics, Terror and Territory | Leave a comment

Mapping the US election

In my opening lecture in the level 2 module Political Geography, I regularly use US presidential election maps. I generally start with 2000, 2004, and 2008 and talk about the swing states and geographical areas that seem clearly demarcated. But then I jump back to 1970 and work through all the elections which complicates this story and shows the emergence of a relatively recent trend. I then play around with maps where the size of states are adjusted for population or electoral college votes; ones with graded shadings instead of just red or blue; and ones with county divides instead of the whole state. I then use three-dimensional maps by population, and a map of electoral districts in Ohio and Columbus. There are loads of maps online to help with this. It’s only an introductory lecture, and only an illustrative example, so I don’t go into huge detail. Doing the rounds on facebook are these two images of the 2012 election. The first is adjusted for population.

 

The second pairs 2012 with 1846.

You could begin some good discussions with this, and the distortions of both maps.

Posted in Politics | Leave a comment

GURU ‘Justice and the City’ conference

Newcastle University, 15-16 November, “Justice and the City”. Speakers include Jean Hillier, Patsy Healey, Stephen Graham, Don Mitchell and Matthew Gandy. Full details here.

Posted in Conferences, Stephen Graham | Leave a comment