The Early Foucault update 7: Canguilhem, Barraqué, von Weizsäcker, and a short trip to the Bibliothèque Nationale

28405100999350LMy focus for the last several weeks has been the work on Canguilhem, although as I’ve previously noted, I see these two projects as supporting each other. There have been lots of moments when I’ve thought ‘I know that because of my Foucault work’ or ‘that will come in useful when I return to Foucault’. Obviously the two thinkers are distinct, but the intellectual milieu they are within is shared for much of their careers. In terms of Canguilhem’s work, at the moment I think the biggest payoff will be if and when I turn explicitly to Foucault’s Birth of the Clinic and the work on natural history and biology In The Order of Things. But those books both develop out of work first done by Foucault in the 1950s, so I anticipate being able to set that work in a much deeper context.

Barraqué and Foucault

L to R: Barraqué, Marie-Claire-Piganeau, Claudette Fano, Michel Fano, Foucault

I have, however, been doing a bit of work which is explicitly on the Foucault project. One of the things I’ve been exploring is the intellectual relation between Foucault and Jean Barraqué. Barraqué was an important modernist composer, and he and Foucault had a relationship in the early 1950s, which was seemingly quite difficult and ended quite soon after Foucault moved to Uppsala. I’m not really interested in the biographical – if you are, there are indications in the Eribon and Macey biographies. There is also a good biography of Barraqué by Paul Griffiths called The Sea on Fire. But I am interested in the connection between their work. Foucault introduced Barraqué to some of the people he was reading, including Nietzsche, Heidegger and Binswanger, and also, crucially, Hermann Broch’s novel The Death of Virgil. Barraqué set one of Nietzsche’s poems to music, and his great unfinished work was a cycle of compositions around The Death of Virgil. As well as the musical works, which are relatively few – Barraqué died at 45, and the completed compositions fit on a three cd set – Barraqué also wrote quite a lot. He is perhaps best known for his book on Claude Debussy, and his unfinished study of Beethoven’s fifth symphony is also a major work, but there are some early essays which look interesting. Most are collected in ÉcritsFoucault only rarely mentions Barraqué, but suggests that the break that he and Boulez made with tonal music was significant – in the same way that modernist works in literature and art also were for him. Foucault wrote about the latter two art forms extensively, of course, but little about music. Yet it was clearly important to him, though his own tastes seemed to have been mainly Mozart and Bach.

I’ve also done a little bit more work on Foucault’s translation, with Daniel Rocher, of Viktor von Weizsäcker’s Der Gestaltkreis. The story of this translation continues to intrigue. I keep looking for a physical copy of this text – I have the German original but have only been able to read the French on microfilm so far. I may take a trip to Oxford in summer, since they seem to have the only library copy in the UK. Second-hand copies have so far proved impossible to find.

As a side-trip from Amsterdam, when the University was closed for a holiday, I had a few days in Paris. These were mainly spent in the manuscripts room at the Bibliothèque Nationale. I continued working through Foucault’s early reading notes on psychology, and also took a look at some writings on painting and literature. Much of what is here has been published – some by Foucault, and some posthumously – but there were a few surprises. Much of this material, as expected, dates from the 1960s, which is after the period I am currently working on. But, if and when I turn to that later period, I now know what is here, and where. Again from the 1960s, there is some interesting material around the theme of madness, developing from the History of Madness, much of which was developed into a sequence of short publications.

One thing that struck me was, on the one hand, how productive Foucault was, and how much material there was, even on themes which might seem familiar. He would frequently write out a new version of a previous talk for a new audience, keeping some of the content and formulations but revising others. But also striking was that he gave the same paper multiple times in different places, some several years apart. It’s long been clear that he took some of his Paris lectures from the Collège de France years on the road with him; but this is from a slightly earlier period. Today, I’d imagine that many of the talks of someone of his stature would be recorded in some form, and circulated online, so making repeating material harder to do. There are lots of questions about the arrangement of the material, little of which is dated or clearly related to the place. Defert’s handwriting is often found, providing indications of where this material was likely to have been presented.

I also had a couple of short evening visits to the Mitterand site of the BnF. This allowed me to sort out a few references in the Foucault and Canguilhem work that I can’t resolve in London.

Back in Amsterdam I gave a public lecture on this work on Foucault, in which I spent the first fifteen minutes talking about the various sources I’d used for the two published books, and the rest of the talk exploring some themes from the research on the early Foucault. There was a good audience and some helpful questions.

I leave Amsterdam this weekend, and head back to a busy month. June is always hard, but this year on top of exam marking, annual reviews, dissertation advising etc. I have two PhD theses to examine and two conferences. One of the conferences is in Stockholm, and I plan to have a couple of days in Uppsala doing a little Foucault research, and I have another trip to Paris in early July, but those may be the only work on Foucault or Canguilhem for a while. In the first part of the summer I have two short pieces to write on terrain, and then need to revise the Shakespeare manuscript.

The previous updates on this project are here; and Foucault’s Last Decade and Foucault: The Birth of Power are now both available from Polity. Several Foucault research resources such as bibliographies, short translations, textual comparisons and so on are available here. On the Canguilhem project, see this page.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Canguilhem, Georges Canguilhem, Michel Foucault, The Early Foucault. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to The Early Foucault update 7: Canguilhem, Barraqué, von Weizsäcker, and a short trip to the Bibliothèque Nationale

  1. Ingrid Muller Xavier says:

    Foucault quoted Canguilhem 134 times from 1961 to 1985. If you want these references send me an email and I gladly will send you an attachment with all of them.
    Kind regards, ingrid

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s