Hannah Arendt and Theodor W. Adorno’s correspondence on the legacy of Walter Benjamin

Hannah Arendt and Theodor W. Adorno’s correspondence on the legacy of Walter Benjamin – in the Los Angeles Review of Books, edited and translated by Susan H. Gillespie and Samantha Rose Hill

THE 1967 CORRESPONDENCE between Hannah Arendt and Theodor W. Adorno followed Walter Benjamin’s death by nearly 30 years. The acrimony that grew between Arendt and Adorno during the intervening decades is present in these letters. Who had the right, ethically and intellectually, to edit and publish Benjamin’s work?

Samantha Rose Hill’s bio on the LARB site says she is writing a biography of Arendt.

Update: there is a fascinating piece on Benjamin’s last work and the feud between Arendt and Adorno over its editing by Samantha Rose Hill here.

Posted in Hannah Arendt, Walter Benjamin | Leave a comment

London Review of Books – new website and open access until 15 January 2020

The London Review of Books has a new website and content is open access for one month:

For a full calendar month, there won’t be a paywall of any kind anywhere on the site. This means that not only all 24 of this year’s issues, but also our entire archive, dating back to 25 October 1979 and containing almost 17,500 articles, will be free to read, for everyone, without limits, until midday on Wednesday 15 January. Merry Christmas!Where to start? Why not on our new subject hub pages, where you’ll find selections of some of the best pieces we’ve published, as well as other curated collections of brilliant articles linked by particular themes.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Jonathan Basile on  Derrida’s Seminars: Writing Before Writing Before the Letter in 3:AM Magazine

Jonathan Basile writes about at Derrida’s Seminars: Writing Before Writing Before the Letter in 3:AM Magazine.

Thanks to Peter Gratton at Philosophy in a Time of Error for the link.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Response to the Danny Dorling article by Alison Blunt, Martin Evans and others

In November, Danny Dorling published a piece in Emotion, Space and Society entitled ‘Kindness: A new kind of rigour for British Geographers‘ (open access), which was picked up by The Times Higher Education – “Geography seen as ‘soft option’ by ‘posh’ students, warns Dorling“. Now Alison Blunt, Martin Evans and many heads of Geography departments reply – “Geography degrees are preparing disadvantaged students for relevant careers.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Marcelo Hoffmann on Perry Anderson, Brazil Apart: 1964-2019

Marcelo Hoffmann reviews Perry Anderson, Brazil Apart: 1964-2019, at Berfrois: The Workers’ Party and the Rise of Bolsonaro

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Books received – a pile from the Verso sale

The Verso sale runs until the end of December 2019

Posted in Books, Georges Bataille, Jacques Derrida, Jacques Lacan, Karl Marx, Louis Althusser, Politics | Leave a comment

Books received – Dumézil, Sartre, Canguilhem, Baxstrom and Meyers

Two books by Dumézil, one by Sartre, the latest volume of the Canguilhem Oeuvres, and Richard Baxstrom and Todd Meyers, Realizing the Witch: Science, Cinema, and the Mastery of the Invisible.

Posted in Georges Canguilhem, Georges Dumézil, Jean-Paul Sartre | Leave a comment

The Routledge Handbook of Henri Lefebvre, The City and Urban Society

The Routledge Handbook of Henri Lefebvre, The City and Urban Society – edited by Michael E. Leary-Owhin and John P. McCarthy

The Routledge Handbook of Henri Lefebvre,The City and Urban Society is the first edited book to focus on Lefebvre’s urban theories and ideas from a global perspective, making use of recent theoretical and empirical developments, with contributions from eminent as well as emergent global scholars.

The book provides international comparison of Lefebvrian research and theoretical conjecture and aims; to engage with and critique Lefebvre’s ideas in the context of contemporary urban, social and environmental upheavals; to use Lefebvre’s spatial triad as a research tool as well as a point of departure for the adoption of ideas such as differential space; to reassess Lefebvre’s ideas in relation to nature and global environmental sustainability; and to highlight how a Lefebvrian approach might assist in mobilising resistance to the excesses of globalised neoliberal urbanism. The volume draws inspiration from Lefebvre’s key texts (The Production of Space; Critique of Everyday Life; and The Urban Revolution) and includes a comprehensive introduction and concluding chapter by the editors. The conclusions highlight implications in relation to increasing spatial inequalities; increasing diversity of needs including those of migrants; more authoritarian approaches; and asymmetries of access to urban space. Above all, the book illustrates the continuing relevance of Levebvre’s ideas for contemporary urban issues and shows – via global case studies – how resistance to spatial domination by powerful interests might be achieved.

The Handbook helps the reader navigate the complex terrain of spatial research inspired by Lefebvre. In particular the Handbook focuses on: the series of struggles globally for the ‘right to the city’ and the collision of debates around the urban age, ‘cityism’ and planetary urbanisation. It will be a guide for graduate and advanced undergraduate teaching, and a key reference for academics in the fields of Human Geography, Sociology, Political Science, Applied Philosophy, Planning, Urban Theory and Urban Studies. Practitioners and activists in the field will also find the book of relevance.

Posted in Henri Lefebvre | 3 Comments

A bibliographical curiosity – ‘Michel Foucault’ and a thesis on penicillin

Michael Clark’s Michel Foucault, an Annotated Bibliography: Tool Kit for a New Age includes a curious entry on p. 3:

Clark p 3.png

“Sur l’emploi de la pénicilline par voie buccale”, Paris: Université Faculté de médecine, 1952 [?], 56 pages. The title would translate as ‘On the use of penicillin by mouth’.

Clark indicates that this is “Brief account of the therapeutic use of penicillin. (The National Union Catalog lists this as published in 1949.) It’s not clear why Clark thinks 1952 is a possible date.

Clearly this text is not by the well-known Michel Foucault, given we know that his training was in philosophy and psychology, not medicine. Later people working on Foucault, and building their own bibliographies, do not mention it. But while I’ve yet to find anyone who follows Clark, I’ve also not found anyone who explains why it is there.

I’ve not found the National Union catalogue reference, but I did find it listed in Tables des thèses soutenant devant la Faculté de Médecine en 1949, Paris: Libraire Arnette, 1950, p. 24:

Tables des theses p 24.png

FOUCAULT (Michel – Jean-Pierre) Sur l’emploi de pénicilline par voie buccale, Paris, Impr. Foulon, 56 (10-12-49).

It is also listed on p. 100. A copy of this thesis is at the Bibliothèque nationale.

Foucault 1949 - Sur l'emploi de la penicilline 1.jpg

The famous Michel Foucault was named at birth ‘Paul Michel Foucault’, though he dropped the ‘Paul’ which was his father’s name (and also, apparently, because it gave him the same initials as Pierre Mendès France). This Foucault was born in 1925, one year before his famous namesake. Whatever became of Michel Jean-Pierre Foucault? Worldcat only lists this single thesis under his name.

Posted in Michel Foucault, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

A Time for Critique (2019)

A Time for Critique, Edited by Didier Fassin and Bernard E. Harcourt
Columbia University Press, 2019

Clare O'Farrell's avatarFoucault News

A Time for Critique, Edited by Didier Fassin and Bernard E. Harcourt
Columbia University Press, 2019

In a world of political upheaval, rising inequality, catastrophic climate change, and widespread doubt of even the most authoritative sources of information, is there a place for critique? This book calls for a systematic reappraisal of critical thinking—its assumptions, its practices, its genealogy, its predicament—following the principle that critique can only start with self-critique.

In A Time for Critique, Didier Fassin, Bernard E. Harcourt, and a group of eminent political theorists, anthropologists, sociologists, philosophers, and literary and legal scholars reflect on the multiplying contexts and forms of critical discourse and on the social actors and social movements engaged in them. How can one maintain sufficient distance from the eventful present without doing it an injustice? How can one address contemporary issues without repudiating the intellectual legacies of the past? How can one…

View original post 392 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment