Foucault’s Last Decade Update 26: advanced copy received and some final reflections

IMG_1357This is the 26th and probably final update on the writing and production of Foucault’s Last Decade, as I received an advanced copy of the physical book a couple of days ago. Copies should be available in online stores and elsewhere in the next few weeks. A short post on the book is on the Polity blog. Here’s the backcover description.

On 26 August 1974, Michel Foucault completed work on Discipline and Punish, and on that very same day began writing the first volume of The History of Sexuality. A little under ten years later, on 25 June 1984, shortly after the second and third volumes were published, he was dead.

This decade is one of the most fascinating of his career. It begins with the initiation of the sexuality project, and ends with its enforced and premature closure. Yet in 1974 he had something very different in mind for The History of Sexuality than the way things were left in 1984. Foucault originally planned a thematically organised series of six volumes, but wrote little of what he promised and published none of them. Instead over the course of the next decade he took his work in very different directions, studying, lecturing and writing about historical periods stretching back to antiquity.

This book offers a detailed intellectual history of both the abandoned thematic project and the more properly historical version left incomplete at his death. It draws on all Foucault s writings in this period, his courses at the Collège de France and lectures elsewhere, as well as material archived in France and California to provide a comprehensive overview and synthetic account of Foucault’s last decade.

The book comes with generous endorsements from Eduardo Mendieta and Paul Bové. Eduardo was the first person to read a complete draft of the book; and Paul in an important way initiated the project, as he asked me to write a review essay on Foucault’s Les Anormaux when it was first published in 1999, and invited me to the University of Pittsburgh the following year when I also spoke about Foucault’s lectures. That began a process of my working on most of Foucault’s courses as and when they were published, with a long-term view of a book when they were all available.

The research in this book took me to Caen, Paris, Berkeley and New York to consult archival material, and also involved some correspondence and conversations with people who knew Foucault. One of the highlights for me was a long discussion with Daniel Defert in Foucault’s old apartment.

As people who have followed the updates I’ve been posting on the writing will know, this project eventually developed into two books – this one treating the period 1974-84, and Foucault: The Birth of Power which looks at the period 1969-74. That second book, while chronologically the first, was written second, drawing on material originally intended for the opening chapters of Foucault’s Last Decade, but substantially developing it. It was written second in part because the earliest lecture courses were some of the last to be published. It also made use of newly available archival material in Paris. The Birth of Power is under review, and will hopefully appear in early 2017.

In time I may return to the earliest works of Foucault, the few from the 1950s and the substantial writings of the 1960s, to write a third book completing this study of his work. But this will be dependent on pre-Collège de France courses being published, and/or the archive being completely opened up. But given that it took 18 years for the 13 Collège de France courses to be published, this may take some time. I may begin this work with studies of the new courses, as and when they appear.

The immediate Foucault-related task will be the revisions for The Birth of Power, and a return to a late and neglected book by Foucault for a chapter in an edited book. The main focus now concerns Shakespeare. But for now, it’s great to have a physical copy of the book. Being sent a pdf or e-book just wouldn’t be the same…

 

For more information on these two books, see the descriptions here. Audio and video recordings relating to them are here; and a full list of the updates I’ve been posting on the process of writing here.

Some translations, bibliographies, scans and links are available at Foucault Resources.

Posted in Foucault's Last Decade, Foucault: The Birth of Power, Michel Foucault, Writing | 4 Comments

Terry Eagleton’s introduction to Victor Kiernan’s Eight Tragedies of Shakespeare

Terry Ea9781783606887gleton’s introduction to Victor Kiernan’s Eight Tragedies of Shakespeare is available to read on the Zed books blog.

The seventeenth century saw the brief flowering of tragic drama across Western Europe. And in the plays of William Shakespeare, this form of drama found its greatest exponent. These Tragedies, Kiernan argues, represented the artistic expression of a new social and political consciousness which permeated every aspect of life in this period. In this book, Kiernan sets out to rescue the Tragedies from the reductionist interpretations of mainstream literary criticism, by uncovering the wider historical context which shaped Shakespeare’s writings. Opening with an overview of contemporary England, the development of the theatre, and a portrait of Shakespeare as a writer, Kiernan goes on to provide an in-depth analysis of eight of his Tragedies – from Julius Caesar to Coriolanus – drawing out their contrasts and recurring themes, and exploring their attitudes to monarchy, war, religion, philosophy, and changing relations between men and women. Featuring a new introduction by Terry Eagleton, this is an invaluable resource for those looking for a new perspective on Shakespeare’s writings.

Posted in Terry Eagleton, William Shakespeare | Leave a comment

What counts as academic writing?

22330777640_7aec2a8230 (1)Raul Pacheco-Vega has another interesting post about writing, this time asking ‘What counts as academic writing?‘ He begins by talking of his daily practice:

Because I need the peace of mind of having accomplished something every day, I write every day, instead of spending extended periods of time cranking out text (what often is called “binge-writing“, though I hasten to add that binging has a very negative connotation associated with eating disorders, and we may need to change the language around that). I write every day because I’ve made writing my priority. Everything can wait but not writing. I can’t leave my house without doing some writing.

It moves onto a discussion about breaking down the difference between generative text and non-generative text – that is, words that go into a publishable document, and words that are notes, emails to co-authors, plans, tables, etc.

I think this a helpful way to think about things, for a number of reasons. Most important, it breaks from this idea that ‘writing’ is some perfect state where words become phrases, sentences, paragraphs, sections and so on. It allows thinking about the messy accumulation of material for projects as productive, and getting to the point of recognising what has been achieved on a project in a day, week or more.

There is a bit in the Zizek! movie where he discusses writing. His point is that when reading and thinking he puts down notes and thoughts, convincing himself that he is merely doing that. His notes though are quite extensive and detailed. At some point he reaches a point when he has so much material that he edits it. ‘Writing’ disappears.

Now whatever you think of Žižek’s own work, this is an interesting approach because it collapses the distinction between doing ‘research’ and writing ‘it’ up. In a different area of work from mine, I’ve always found it odd when someone quotes a passage from their own field-notes, as if it’s a secondary source, keeping the idiosyncratic original punctuation and phrasing. Why not use that as text to form a basis for the published text, but capture some of its voice and style in your published work? For me, that standard model creates a distinction between types of writing and, indeed, ‘research’ and ‘writing’, that is problematic. Another division is the strange thing that so many social science papers have, where two-thirds of the way through there is suddenly a section entitled ‘discussion’. It pretends to a distinction between the ‘objective’ design, presentation and results of the research, and then a more personal analysis of that material. That is, I think problematic in general terms, but also because of this distinction created between research and writing.

Raul’s writing posts are always worth reading, and I’ve shared and discussed a few before. This one is no exception.

Posted in Publishing, Uncategorized, Writing | 4 Comments

Books received – Butler, Gillies, Iovino, GeoHumanities, New Perspectives, The Funambulist

IMG_1345Books received – Judith Butler’s Notes toward a Performative Theory of Assembly, John Gillies, Shakespeare and the Geography of Difference, Serenella Iovino, Ecocriticism and Italy (sent by the publisher), and recent issues of GeoHumanities, New Perspectives, and The Funambulist.

Posted in Judith Butler, Uncategorized, William Shakespeare | 1 Comment

Tributes to Doreen Massey updated

Links to tributes to Doreen Massey updated – including the obituary at the AAG website and Hilary Wainwright at Open Democracy.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Shakespeare, Richard II query

I’m trying to decipher a hand-written bibliography of books on Shakespeare, and one entry reads: “Sprich, Shakespeare, Richard II (1970)”.

I can’t find such a book, so am assuming that ‘Sprich’ is not correct. The handwriting is poor, so it could be something else entirely. Unfortunately I can’t provide an image of the bibliography. ‘Sprich’ is a German word, so internet searches just turn up German translations of the play. Worldcat isn’t helping.

Any ideas for what book this might be referring to? My best guess so far is that it is a reference to a translation of the play, there are a couple of German ones which did have a 1970 edition, but that’s only a guess. Any help gratefully received.

Update: there are some suggestions in Comments below which are helpful. The most likely seems to be that it is a reference to Richard III, not Richard II, and the editor is Pierre Spriet.

Update 2: I now have a copy of the Spriet book, which is a study of Richard III, not a translation. I was convinced that this was correct, but just to make sure, when back in Paris reordered this box and rechecked. It does say Richard III, not II, which is my mistake; and while the writing is difficult for the name, it does says ‘ Spriet’.

Posted in Uncategorized, William Shakespeare | 7 Comments

Doreen Massey

Society and Space papers by Doreen Massey available open access.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Doreen Massey, 1944-2016

Doreen Massey tributes at the OU Geography site, and her essays in Antipode available open access.

Antipode Editorial Office's avatarAntipodeFoundation.org

The Open University has an online space for remembering Doreen Massey, who died on 11 March. There are some lovely messages, and you can leave your own here.

Doreen Massey

We’ve made Doreen’s Antipode papers freely available, including:

Towards a critique of industrial location theory (1973);

Nicaragua: Some reflections on socio-spatial issues in a society in transition (1986); and

When theory meets politics (2008).

Radical theory, critical praxis – this is geography at its very best.

View original post

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Tributes to Doreen Massey

I’ve added three new tributes since first posting, plus a link to a number of Doreen’s essay on Open Democracy.

stuartelden's avatarProgressive Geographies

doreen-masseyTributes to Doreen Massey:

Rob Kitchin at Ireland after NAMA

Gillian Rose at Visual/Method/Culture

Álvaro Sevilla Buitrago at Multipliciudades (in Spanish)

Nicky Gardner and Susanne Kries at Hidden Europe

Jo Littler and Jeremy Gilbert at Open Democracy

Andreas Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos at Critical Legal Thinking

I’ll add more as I see them (please feel free to post in comments).

A number of Doreen’s pieces from Open Democracy are here.

My own, very brief, thoughts from yesterday are here.

View original post

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Figure/Ground interview with Miguel de Beistegui

Figure/Ground interview with Miguel de Beistegui – covers his work on Heidegger, Foucault, Proust and others.

Posted in Martin Heidegger, Michel Foucault, Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment