
Also at NDPR, Michel Foucault, Language, Madness, and Desire: On Literature, is reviewed by Mark Olssen.
I have a review of this collection, written some time ago, which is still forthcoming.

Also at NDPR, Michel Foucault, Language, Madness, and Desire: On Literature, is reviewed by Mark Olssen.
I have a review of this collection, written some time ago, which is still forthcoming.
Peter Gratton, Speculative Realism: Problems and Prospects, is reviewed by Rick Dolphijn, at Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews (open access).
“Interpreting Non-Violence” will be the theme of the 2016 Tanner Lectures on Human Values, which will be delivered by Judith Butler, a noted philosopher and gender theorist.
Her first talk — “Why Preserve the Life of the Other?” — will be on Wednesday, March 30, at 5 p.m. The second, “Legal Violence: An Ethical and Political Critique” takes place March 31 at 5:30 p.m. Both talks will be held in the Whitney Humanities Center (WHC) auditorium, 53 Wall St. Karuna Mantena, associate professor of political science, will introduce Butler on Wednesday and deliver a response after her second lecture. Butler will be joined by Yale scholars Paul North, professor of Germanic language and literature, and Jason Stanley, the Urowsky Professor of Philosophy, for further discussion on Friday, April 1, at 10:30 a.m. at the WHC.
Full details here. I have no details, but these lectures are usually recorded and made available online after the event. I’ll share a link if/when I see it.
University of Westminster 10 March 2016 – New Materialism: Politics, Aesthetics, Science event video
New Materialism is currently having a profound effect across disciplines. Rooted in post-marxist thinking, but spreading out on the flat ontology of networks, objects and bodies, New Materialism is an interdisciplinary discussion on the properties of matter in terms of agency, ethical responsibility and immanence. Along with post-humanism, the Anthropocene, non-representational theories and post-Deleuzian thought, New Materialism asks us to reconsider the nature of the human and the non-human, the difference between actual and virtual, the emergence of politics and law in the face of ubiquitous materiality, and above all, the new responsibilities that come with it all.
PANEL SPEAKERS
Westminster School of Media, Art & Design
Mercedes Bunz, Senior Lecturer Things are not to blame: Technical Agency in Times of High Capitalism
Christian Fuchs, Professor of Social Media
New Cultural Materialism
Mirko Nikolic, Doctoral Candidate Unhuman Love: A Post-Capitalist Politics Of DesireWestminster Faculty of Social Sciences & Humanities
Elisabetta Brighi, Lecturer Invisible Matters and the Illusions of Security
David Chandler, Professor of International Relations, From Humanising the World to “Worlding” the Human
Ben Pitcher, Senior Lecturer Isis iconoclasm and rocks and stones in material culture
A very interesting discussion of the process of turning a PhD thesis into a book.
Following the publication of my monographa few months ago, I recently spoke to Tee at Stylish Academic about the process of writing and getting publishedas an early career researcher. We talked about my journey from PhD thesis through to publication, and some of the things I learnt along the way, including approaching a publisher, rewriting the thesis into book form, and balancing the book with the rest of your career development.
Stylish Academic has some excellent features for early career academics, so do take a look at the rest of the blog if you’re not already following.
A very interesting discussion of Foucault’s analysis of the political party.
Marcelo Hoffman, Foucault and the Political Party
20th March 2015 | 11:00 – 11:45
Audio, podcast on the Voice Republic site
Marcelo Hoffman holds a PhD from the University of Denver, and has taught at Earlham College and Marian University. His research focuses on contemporary political theory, with a particular emphasis on the contributions of Michel Foucault. He is the author of Foucault and Power: The Influence of Political Engagement on Theories of Power (Bloomsbury Academic, 2014). His writings have been published in New Political Science, Telos, Philosophy & Social Criticism and Michel Foucault: Key Concepts.
This looks an invaluable resource for readers of Michel Serres.
Over the past few weeks I have been working my way through Michel Serres’s 1980 Le Parasite: a dense, poetic, brilliant text that seeks to tear down and rebuild the way we think about everything. In reading the book I kept a running list of intertexts to which Serres refers, a document that runs to some 148 pages. I have decided to make this Reader’s Guide available to download so that those seeking to grapple with Serres’s forbidding erudition and the proliferation of references and allusions in Le Parasite can have a slightly easier time of it than I did. The document is available here.
Here is an extract from the Introduction:
Michel Serres’s Le Parasite is a foundational text not only for the understanding of Serres’s own imposing and timely thought but also for key debates in contemporary posthumanism, object oriented thought, new materialisms, ecology, ontology and politics.
However…
View original post 302 more words
Call for papers for a conference in Kent in June 2016.
The Gentrification of the Political
‘The Gentrification of the Political’
A Workshop at the University of Kent
School of Politics & International Relations
6th & 7th June 2016
Gentrification, as an urban phenomenon, is one of the central issues around which contemporary political struggles are organised. This workshop seeks to contribute to understanding the ways in which the process of gentrification occurs, by seeing it as a political problem at the level of conceptualisation itself. It seeks to investigate how academic and intellectual practice can be ‘gentrified’, what the effects of this process are, and how it can be prevented. By taking a transdisciplinary approach to these questions, we seek to explore the valences of the concept of ‘gentrification’ when applied to ‘the political’, beyond the immediate process of urban development. In other words, how can the logic of gentrification be applied and resisted at the level of thought itself, and to what extent is…
View original post 315 more words
I will be giving the London Review of International Law annual lecture in 2017. As the invitation said:
Just to put this in some kind of context, the previous Annual Lectures have been delivered by Judith Butler (‘Human Shields’), Sheila Jasanoff (‘Subjects of Reason: Goods, Markets and Imaginaries of the Global Future’) and Gerry Simpson (‘The Sentimental Life of International Law’).
No pressure then… The lecture will be given in London sometime early in 2017, probably late April. Further details when they are fixed. The intention is that the lecture later appears in the journal. Given that this is probably over a year away, I’m not entirely sure what the topic will be, but expect that it will be on the relation between law, territory and terrain – a topic that I will be exploring with colleagues at Durham and elsewhere as part of the ICE-LAW Project (Project on Indeterminate and Changing Environments: Law, the Anthropocene, and the World –http://icelawproject.org/), funded by the Leverhulme Trust.
Derek Gregory has written a very nice tribute to John Urry on his Geographical Imaginations site. There is also a tribute by Mimi Sheller on Facebook.