Meurs review Morin

Pieter Meurs reviews Marie-Eve Morin’s book on Jean-Luc Nancy.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Society and Space – from editor to one of the editors

Society and Space Vol 31 No 5 marks the formal end of my role as the editor of the journal, though I continue as one of the editors. Previously the journal has had an editor – initially Michael Dear, then Gerry Pratt, and I took over from Gerry in late 2006 – and a team of co-editors. In practice, the journal has always worked as something as a collective, and since I took over the co-editors and I have always discussed key strategic issues, and collectively looked at each paper, even if a single person was designated as the coordinating editor. But now we are much more formally working as cooperative team, with all duties shared between a team of five – Deborah Cowen, Peter Gratton, Natalie Oswin, Mary Thomas and me. You can read more about the changes in the editorial.

Posted in Publishing, Society and Space | Leave a comment

Issue 5 out

Issue 5 of Society and Space now out.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

CFP AAG 2014 – Borders Beyond Securitization: Rethinking the Lines that Bind Us

I’m not going to post many calls for AAG sessions, but this also looks very relevant to this blog’s concerns.

Annual Meeting of the Association of American Geographers, Tampa, April 8-11, 2014
CFP: Borders Beyond Securitization: Rethinking the Lines that Bind Us

Geopolitical boundaries are increasingly analyzed in relation to securitization, an approach that has come to dominate the way that many think about borders both in policy and in scholarship. A majority of studies tend to focus on the historical and contemporary characteristics of securitizing borders and the deeper implications of such actions.  From such work have emerged theories of how abstracted notions of security have shifted to material practices and how the reconfiguration of power has impacted identities and become part of daily state-making.  While useful, these securitization discourses are often narrowly conceived, leading to the neglect of the productive dimensions of borders, i.e. the elision of alternative understandings of borders as spaces of refuge, safety, opportunity and exchange.
For this session, we seek papers that explore alternative framings of borders.  For example, how can we explore borders beyond discourses and practices of securitization? What empirical lessons can be learned by comparing regional border contexts? How can communities become involved in border transformation? What is the role of knowledge transfer in border studies and political geography more generally? How does securitization as an object of analysis reproduce hegemonic conceptualizations of borders? What is the role of participatory geography in re-thinking border possibilities?
Possible topics addressed in this session include (but are not limited to) the following and may cover a wide geographical arena:
Participatory geographies and borders
Borders in regional context
Lived experiences of border communities
Lessons across space/place on borders
Material and symbolic dimensions of borderland life
Alternative mappings of border spaces
Political mobilizations and social movements at and along borders
The role of borders in knowledge production
The role of borders in transnational phenomena (human trafficking, migration, cultural flows, etc.)
Changing theoretical conceptualizations of borders
New epistemologies of security in a post-9/11 world

Organizers: Margath Walker (University of Louisville) and Jamie Winders (Syracuse University).

Please send expressions of interest or abstracts to Maggie Walker (margath.walker@louisville.edu ) by Friday, October 18.

Posted in Boundaries, Conferences, Politics, Territory | 1 Comment

Call for Papers AAG 2014 – (Re)imagining Territory as Political Ecological Process

Re-posted from crit-geog-forum.

Call for Papers AAG 2014: (Re)imagining Territory as Political Ecological Process

Territory is the basis for the political-juridical organization of the international state system.  It is one of the fundamental concepts upon which state sovereignty operates and is closely related to the control and management of natural resources, populations, and economic activities.  Yet, territory is also understood as the bundle of meanings, relationships, and histories of social groups to land and place (Rocheleau 2011).  Nevertheless, territory is dynamic and processes of re- and de- territorialization are constantly influencing the dynamics of natural resource management, social action, and economies.  Territory is fundamentally enmeshed in social, political, economic, and environmental relations between diverse human and non-human actors, epistemologies, and space(s).  

As a concept and analytic, debates around the formation, salience, and effects of “territory” are again emerging within geography (cf. Agnew 2013, Bryan 2012, Elden 2013, and Murphy 2013).  Much of the debate, however, is taking place in the realm of political geography and is closely tied to the state as the central scalar unit of analysis.  This panel seeks to explore concepts of territory beyond the bounds of the state through critical political ecology.  Political ecology has focused largely on power relations that cross scales, from the international and state level to, local social groups at risk of exclusion, eviction, and conflict, in addition to popular resistance in the form of social movements (cf. Forsyth 2003, Peet, Robbins, and Watts 2010).  While “the state” remains an essential component of the political ecology framework, a broader analysis of ecological processes and local communities distributes the focus beyond the bounds of the state, positioning it as one of many actors involved in social and ecological change.  Paradoxically, political ecologists have largely overlooked “territory.” 

Following Rocheleau (2011), this panel suggests that territory as a concept and analytic is underdeveloped within the field of political ecology.  Rather than directly engaging the concept of territory, many works in political ecology employ it as a given category or backdrop and write about the territory(ies) of resource conflicts, social movements, power struggles, and political economy.  What happens when we bring political ecology to bear on territory?  How can we understand and think with territory (as opposed to thinking about territory) as a central component of analyses in political ecology?  What does political ecology have to offer to the analysis and critique of territory, or vice versa?  How can a political ecological approach to territory change our understanding of territory as a process?  What does territory “do” in regards to political ecology?  This panel will explore these questions to critically assess how territory and political ecology “work” together.  We seek papers that engage, but are not limited to, these questions and the possible topics below through empirical case studies or from more theoretical approaches.  Ultimately we seek to start a conversation about (re)imagining territory as political ecological process.  Possible paper topics include:

Ecologies of territorial expansion and/or compression

Militarism, territory, and ecological processes

Epistemological and ontological ‘states’ of territory

Protest, trouble-making, and culture-jamming in reclaiming urban territory and ecology

Indigenous rights and territory

Processes of claiming territory via: conservation; social movements; legal, illegal, and/or extra-legal actions; extending the state and institutions into “marginal” or peripheral spaces

Tools of (re)territorialization (mapping, participatory methodologies, etc.)

Session organizers: Joel Correia and Eric Lovell, University of Colorado at Boulder Geography Department
Panel discussants: to be confirmed.

If you are interested in participating, please submit an abstract of no more than 250 words to Joel Correia (joel.correia@colorado.edu) or Eric Lovell (eric.lovell@colorado.edu) by 12 November 2013.  The discounted registration for the conference ends on 23 October 2013, although conference registration is open until 3 December 2013.  For more information please see http://www.aag.org/cs/annualmeeting.

Agnew, J. A. 2013. Territory, politics, governance. Territory, Politics, Governance, 1, no. 1: 1-4.

Bryan, J. 2012. Rethinking territory: Social justice and neoliberalism in Latin America’s territorial turn. Geography Compass, 6, no. 4: 215-226.

Elden, S. 2013.  The birth of territory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Forsyth, T. 2003. Critical political ecology: The politics of environmental science. London: Routledge.

Murphy, A. B. 2013. Territory’s continuing allure. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103, no. 5:1212-1226.

Peet, R. and Watts, M. 2004. Liberation ecologies: Environment, development, social movements. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.

Rocheleau, D. 2011. Rooted networks, webs of relation, and the power of situated science: Bringing the models back down to earth in Zmbrana. In Knowing nature: Conversations at the intersection of political ecology and science studies. ed. Mara J. Goldman, Paul Nadasdy, and Matthew D. Turner. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Posted in Conferences, Territory | Leave a comment

Foucault’s 1972 lecture at Minnesota – summary now available

Foucault - Ceremonie, Thêatre et politiqueIn a previous post, I discussed the summary of a 1972 lecture Foucault gave in Minneapolis, entitled “Cérémonie, théâtre et politique au XVIIe siècle”. As far as I am aware the text of the lecture remains in Foucault’s own papers and was never published. It was published in a brief English summary, written by Stephen Davidson, in Acta: Proceedings of the fourth annual conference of XVIIth century French Literature, pp. 22-3. Given the text is so hard to find, I wanted to ask Davidson for permission to put this summary on this site, but sadly I heard he died some years ago. 

I’ve therefore gone ahead with make the summary available – in pdf. If anyone knows of a way of making this more legitimate please let me know.

Thanks to Kai Bosworth, Gerald Moore, Arun Saldanha and Garnet Kindervater for detective work.

Incidentally, the question was raised as to why I’d labelled this lecture summary ‘almost unknown’. I appreciate that people who were there may have long memories of the event, and that the lecture is listed in some bibliographies – i.e. Daniel Defert’s ‘Chronology’. But the summary was difficult to get hold of – not a single UK institution appears to have the proceedings, so I had to request it from the Bibliotheque Nationale, who took six weeks to track it down and send it. So it is pretty obscure. Hopefully posting it here makes it more widely accessible.

Posted in Michel Foucault | 2 Comments

Geo-metrics – audio recording of lecture at Balsillie School

In late September I gave the keynote address to the workshop Regimes of Calculation and Global Governance at the Balsillie School of International Affairs in Waterloo, Ontario. The title of the talk was ‘Geo-metrics’ and you can listen to the audio recording here.

Posted in Bartolus of Sassoferrato, Conferences, Elizabeth Grosz, Martin Heidegger, Territory | 1 Comment

Korf and Raeymaekers (eds.), Violence on the Margins: States, Conflict, and Borderlands

20131010-103327.jpgWhile in Zurich I was given a copy of Benedikt Korf and Timothy Raeymaekers’s new edited book, Violence on the Margins: States, Conflict, and Borderlands. It’s in a series on African Borderlands Studies, but also has quite a lot of treatment of Asia, and looks to be of interest for those interested in borders, territory and politics much more generally.

This boldly multidisciplinary volume surveys African and Asian conflicts through individuals’ lived experiences of territorial borders, as well as the ways these experiences affect political configurations. The contributions gathered here depict borderlands not just as the objects of globalized or state-driven processes, but as actual political units that generate their own actions and outcomes. In particular, these studies demonstrate the explicit transboundary character of conflict and peace. In this way, they explore alternatives to the still-dominant model of contemporary state formation as a centrally guided, top-down process – a model that has led to a deep misunderstanding of borderlands as marginal spaces that either are fraught with savagery and rebellion or linger in dark oblivion.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Pedagogies of Disaster

Cover_Final_English_Web-216x324 (1)Newly published by Punctum books, Pedagogies of Disaster – authored by The Department of Eagles, edited by Vincent W.J. van Gerven Oei, Adam Staley Groves, Nico Jenkins.

We live in an era where the university system is undergoing great changes owing to developments in financing policies and research priorities, as well as changes in the society in which this system is embedded. This change toward a more market-oriented university, which also has immediate effects in academic peripheries such as the Balkans, the Middle East, or South-East Asia, is of great influence for the pedagogical practice of “less profitable” academic areas such as the Humanities: philosophy, languages, sociology, anthropology, history.

Because of the absence of a historically grounded establishment of the Humanities, academic peripheries, usually accompanied by a weak civil society infrastructure, seem to offer the most fertile ground for rethinking the Humanities, their pedagogical practice, and their politics, as well as the greatest threats, such as the ongoing capitalization of research, and profitability as the norm of educational achievement. The sprawling presence of for-profit universities and in academic peripheries such as Albania and Kosovo is indicative of this problematic, as are consistent underfunding of universities and the relentless budget cuts in American and English, and to a lesser extent European, universities. Motivations for this ongoing attack on the university are often driven by a political system or a politics with an aggressive stance to critical thought.

At the same time, such an absence of historical grounding may inspire a rejuvenation and reinvigoration of research in the Humanities, such as may be seen in academic centers around Asia, as many young scholars are attracted to an educational environment which is not yet completely petrified in bureaucratic procedures. In this case, a different set of questions appear concerning the place of the scholar in societies with semi-democratic or even authoritarian rule. For civil society to flourish, an educational system that reflects and interrogates the values and concepts that underlie a healthy social fabric are of crucial importance.

This volume comprises papers culled from continent. journal’s Pedagogies of Disaster conference held in Tirana, Albania, hosted by The Department of Eagles (Departamenti i Shqiponjave) in June 2013, and organized to address the fate of relation and the future of pedagogical practice in the University, and especially as it concerns the humanities. The papers gathered here seek to address the infrastructural or interpersonal changes in the modes of production as it relates to current academia, examining the elements and spaces of the rifts opening up in the polis of the University—its students, professors and administrators. The volume further addresses the pedagogical horizon at a critical limit, asking: for whom or for what are we teaching and from whom or from what are we learning?

Authored by The Department of Eagles
Edited by Vincent W.J. van Gerven Oei, Adam Staley Groves, Nico Jenkins

Posted in Books, Politics, Publishing, Universities | 1 Comment

Madeleine Fagan – Ethics and Politics after Poststructuralism Levinas, Derrida and Nancy

undefinedMy Warwick colleague Madeleine Fagan’s book Ethics and Politics after Poststructuralism: Levinas, Derrida and Nancy has now been released by Edinburgh University Press.

This groundbreaking book offers a fresh and innovative perspective on ethics and politics after poststructuralism. Madeleine Fagan argues that the ‘ethical’ should not be understood as a label; it does not mean ‘good’ or ‘right’, and is not an evaluation or guide. Rather, both the ethical and the political are descriptions of the context in which we find ourselves. Fagan offers an account of the inseparability of ethics and politics that challenges existing accounts of poststructuralist ethics and shows the need for a practice-based rethinking of the ethico-political. Drawing on the work of Emmanuel Levinas, Jacques Derrida and Jean-Luc Nancy, Ethics and Politics after Poststructuralism puts forward a radical and far-reaching critique of both foundational and non-foundational ethical theory.

Posted in Books, Emmanuel Levinas, Jacques Derrida, Jean-Luc Nancy | Leave a comment