Two posts on Urban Africa

Just back from Abuja, a rapidly developing city, I was struck by two posts at Urban Cultural Studies. Both are reblogged, so the following links take you to the original source. One looks at Demographics and Urbanization; the other at maps of urban West Africa.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Du Gouvernement des vivants – more details

Foucault’s 1979-80 course is forthcoming in a little over a month – the date has been put back a couple of weeks. Seuil now has a page up, which Clare O’Farrell’s Foucault News blog has just linked to. Both Clare and Seuil have the text I assume will be on the backcover. There are some interesting claims there relating this course to his entire series of lectures in terms of truth; revealing that there is another reading of Oedipus in the course (he features heavily in the still-untranslated 1970-71 course); and previewing the material on ethics and Christianity that many of us have really been looking forward to.

There is a different blurb on Amazon.fr which reads:

Prenant ses distances avec la problématique du pouvoir-savoir, développée dans les années 1970, Michel Foucault se propose d’étudier ici la question du gouvernement par la vérité. Nouveau déplacement à l’intérieur du champ de la « gouvernementalité » ouvert en 1978, la question n’est plus seulement de retracer l’essor, dans la culture occidentale, d’un art de « conduire la conduite » des hommes, mais d’examiner la façon dont se constitue le sujet dans le jeu du pouvoir et de la vérité. Comment se noue le rapport du sujet à l’obligation de dire vrai sur lui-même ? Ce projet conduit Michel Foucault d’une relecture de l’Œdipe-roi de Sophocle à l’analyse des « actes de vérité » propres au christianisme primitif, à travers les pratiques du baptême, de la pénitence et de la direction de conscience. Foucault choisit de s’intéresser aux actes par lesquels le croyant est conduit à manifester la vérité de ce qu’il est lui-même, en tant qu’être indéfiniment faillible. De l’expression publique de sa condition de pécheur, dans le rituel de la pénitence à la verbalisation minutieuse de ses pensées les plus intimes, dans l’examen de conscience, c’est l’organisation d’une économie pastorale centrée sur l’aveu que l’on voit se dessiner. Ce cours, lié au projet de l’Histoire de la sexualité, ne constitue pas seulement une étape essentielle, jusqu’à présent méconnue, de l’ « histoire du sujet » poursuivie par Foucault jusqu’à ses derniers travaux ; il révèle un visage insolite du philosophe, dans l’attention rigoureuse qu’il porte aux écrits des premiers Pères de l’Église.

There are some slightly different claims here – suggesting it is part of a distancing from the power-knowledge problematic; stressing truth as an new element within the analysis of governmentality; and indicating that Foucault’s interest with the church is not just around sin, penitence and confession but also baptism and general moral and spiritual conduct.

Posted in Michel Foucault | Leave a comment

Poster and Website for Warwick ‘Shakespearean Territories’ lecture

The abstract for my lecture at University of Warwick has been posted online. They’ve also produced this poster.  It will be ten years almost to the day that I left the department, though I’ve been back a few times to give talks or be part of workshops since then.

Posted in Conferences, Shakespearean Territories, William Shakespeare | 1 Comment

Chasing Dragons on Peer Review; and ReviewmyReview

At Chasing Dragons, some more thoughts on peer review. It also links to ReviewmyReview, a site compiling data on average review times and acceptance rates for key journals in Political Science. Interesting reading, though I’d have liked to have seen number of manuscripts submitted for each journal too. The post at Chasing Dragons raises some sensible concerns about how this data might be interpreted.

Posted in Publishing | Leave a comment

Teo Ballvé – ‘Territories of Life and Death on a Colombian Frontier’

Congratulations to Teo Ballvé for the award of the Antipode Graduate Student Scholarship for his work on ‘Territories of Life and Death on a Colombian Frontier’. Teo is behind the excellent Territorial Masquerades blog and is doing really interesting work. I met him last year when I gave a talk at UC Berkeley, and he also organised a small seminar on some of my previous work. He had a paper in Society and Space earlier this year – “Everyday state formation: territory, decentralization, and the narco landgrab in Colombia” (requires subscription). Will look forward to the paper forthcoming in Antipode.  Brief video explaining this work below:

Posted in Boundaries, Politics, Territory | Tagged | 2 Comments

The Far Right in Europe – workshop at Queen Mary

The Longue Duree of the Far-Right: Ideology, Organisation, State Formation and International Relations

October 25-26 2012, Queen Mary University of London

The (re)emergence of far-right parties and social movements in various parts of the world ­– and particularly in Europe – in recent years has been widely discussed in the press and in academic commentary. In contrast to their ‘revolutionary’ bedfellows on the communist left, since the end of the Cold War far-right parties have come to form a significant and disturbing part of the political geography in a number of countries. Whilst their influence has been uneven – from participating in governing coalitions in Western Europe (the Austrian Freedom Party and the Italian Lega Nord) and in India (the Bharatiya Janata Party) – to spawning a violent Islamophobic street movement (the English Defence League in the UK), to forming a major component of anti-imperialist movements across much of the Islamic world, their general appearance across time and space suggests that the current era is comparable to the earlier historical conjunctures of far-right mobilization in the late nineteenth century and inter-war periods. The varied forms of far-right have combined with their contrasting ideological dimensions, which has made the taxonomy of far-right something of an academic industry in itself. In particular, the far-right has come to be divided over its ‘post-fascist’ rhetorical commitment to (liberal) democracy as opposed to an authoritarian and demagogic populism and also between a neo-fascist commitment to a statist and protectionist model of capitalism and an embrace of much of the policy formulas of neo-liberalism by some strands of the contemporary far-right.

These developments raise a number of analytical and political questions. How distinct are these contemporary manifestations of the far-right compared to the previous historical forms of the far-right? How analytically useful is the concept of fascism in describing the generic far-right? What are the social bases of the far-right – past and present? Which methodological framework provides the most useful analytical tool to examine and understand the far-right? What of the relationship between the evolving dynamics of uneven capitalist development and geopolitical order on the determination of far-right movements – historical and contemporary?

The aim of this workshop is to promote an inter-disciplinary engagement with these issues through bringing together scholars from a range of different subject areas (IR, IPE, Geography, History, Sociology, Comparative Politics and Political Theory) to re-think the linkages between the historical, sociological and international dimensions of the far-right – as ideology, movement and state – over the longue durée from its emergence as a distinct and modern form of politics in the late nineteenth century to its more recent re-emergence in their intertwining local, national and international contexts.

Programme and Registration details here.

Posted in Conferences, Politics | Leave a comment

Foucault – The Mesh of Power

Foucault’s 1976 lecture ‘The Mesh of Power’ is available online in English (with a link to the French) at Viewpoint Magazine. This lecture was previously translated by Gerald Moore for the Space, Knowledge and Power: Foucault and Geography collection Jeremy Crampton and I edited. But this version includes the discussion that followed Foucault’s lecture. Thanks to Peter Gratton for the link.

Posted in Jeremy Crampton, Michel Foucault | 9 Comments

Two pieces on peer review

One in The Times Higher Education; the other in the Arizona Journal of Hispanic Cultural Studies (requires subscription). The second is a wide-ranging piece with a lot of interesting points that go far beyond the specialist field the journal serves. I certainly support the claim that an editorial vision for a journal is important and that editors are not just neutral functionaries. The first piece, from a philosopher, raises a number of flaws in the existing system, particularly focusing on the risk of ‘cartels’ supporting their own work, and preventing paradigm-challenging work getting through. It ends with a suggestion:

And if public funding really is to be determined by the decisions of the journals, let us make them transparent. Let us see with each published paper a date of submission, date of acceptance and names of the referees. Let authors know in advance the average decision time. Let us know if asked to revise and resubmit whether it will go back to the same referees or to different ones.

All of these are done with Society and Space, with the exception of publishing referee names. (Average decision time is difficult to estimate, but I’ll give as much of an indication as I can to any author who asks.) I’m not sure about publishing referee names. How would referees react if they knew that their names would be published, and that they would be in some sense be held accountable for the quality of papers published. A paper that gets published is generally, but not always, supported by all referees – to make this a condition means you end up giving each referee a veto on a paper. All editors know that referees rarely agree with each other entirely. So publishing names would allow authors to work out who all their referees were, and identify a potentially critical referee. The difficulty of getting referees to do reports, promptly and professionally, means I am wary of anything that makes people less willing to do it. Referees are already publicly thanked in the end of year referee list, so publishing names next to papers would do nothing additional to recognise their work.

Posted in Publishing, Society and Space | Leave a comment

Luke Bennett on bunkers and verticality

Luke Bennett has an interesting discussion here of above ground air-raid bunkers and questions of verticality.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Graham Harman – Latour’s political philosophy

Graham Harman is to write a book on Bruno Latour’s political philosophy. He has some details here.

Posted in Bruno Latour, Graham Harman | 1 Comment