Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Insuring War

Interesting looking book on the relation between finance, war, risk and security. The author’s earlier book Insuring Security: Biopolitics, security and risk is now in paperback.

Clare O'Farrell's avatarFoucault News

Luis Lobo-Guerrero, Insuring War: Sovereignty, Security and Risk, Routledge (Interventions Series), 2012, ISBN: 978-0-415-61772-7

Publisher’s web page

Description
Insurance is a central, if until now ignored, instrument of war in the modern period. Ever since the eighteenth century, interaction between governments and insurers in Western countries has materialised in the form of war risk schemes that have contributed to the waging of war and the preservation of peace. The operation of those schemes has given rise to a curious, if not innocent, association between practices of statehood and practices of risk, which are theorised here under the label of ‘insurantial sovereignty’.

The book draws on the British experience of using maritime insurance as an instrument of war during the Napoleonic Wars, the two World Wars, and the early twenty-first century. It asks, what happens, when, under conditions of war, the sovereign adopts insurantial imaginaries and practices into its rationalities…

View original post 287 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Security Dialogue new issue

Full details here – papers by Maja Zehfuss, Ben Anderson, Peter Adey and others. Themes include preemption, emergency, photography and the human terrain system.

Posted in Politics, Publishing | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Secure the Volume – Kentucky video

The video of my presentation at the University of Kentucky. [Update: the higher resolution version has replaced the earlier one] The slides are somewhat blurred and the audience questions quiet, but may be of interest.

Posted in Boundaries, Conferences, Eyal Weizman, Jeremy Crampton, Michel Foucault, My Publications, Paul Virilio, Peter Sloterdijk, Politics, Stephen Graham, Territory, Terror and Territory | 13 Comments

Luce Irigaray seminar

An amazing opportunity for Irigaray scholars:

Invitation to the Seminar of

LUCE IRIGARAY

10 – 16 June 2012

University of Bristol

Since 2003, Luce Irigaray holds a seminar with researchers doing their PhD on her work. This way, they have the opportunity to receive personal teaching from Luce Irigaray and to exchange ideas, methods and experiences between them. The seminar has been welcomed by the University of Nottingham during the first three years (see Luce Irigaray: Teaching edited by Luce Irigaray with Mary Green, and published by Continuum, London & New York, 2008), by the University of Liverpool the fourth year, by Queen Mary, University of London, the fifth year, by the Goodenough College of London the sixth year, by the University of Nottingham the seventh year, and has been co-hosted by the University of the West of England and the University of Bristol the eighth year. The seminar will take place at the University of Bristol in 2012.

The framework of the seminar is this: A group of at most fifteen researchers, doing their PhD on the work of Luce Irigaray, stay one week on the university campus. The timetable includes a presentation by each researcher of the aspect of their PhD which most focuses on the work of Luce Irigaray, the discussion of this presentation by the group, the comments of Luce Irigaray herself and her answers to the questions asked by each one, and also sessions devoted to an explanation of some key-words or key-thoughts chosen by the participants. Personal meetings with Luce Irigaray are organized on the last day. The participants pay for their travel, but receive, at least in part, hospitality from the university. The language of the seminar is English.

The participants in the seminar come from different regions of the world, they belong to different cultures, traditions and fields of research – Philosophy, Gender Studies, Religious Studies, Literature, Arts, Critical and Cultural Studies, etc. The themes of their research include, for example: the treatment of personal or cultural traumatic experience; the resources that various arts can offer for dwelling in oneself and with the other(s); the maternal order and feminine genealogy; the interpretation and embodiment of the divine today; the contribution of sexuate difference to personal and social development; new perspectives in philosophy etc. In each of these fields, diverse domains, approaches and methods are represented. To date, the participants came from Australia, Vietnam, Korea, China, India, Sri Lanka, South Africa, New Zealand, Canada, Latvia, Spain, Italy, Ireland and from different regions and universities of the U.S.A. and of the U.K. Beyond the multicultural teaching which results from such a gathering, the participants learn to live together and to share in difference during the time devoted to the work, and during meals, walks, personal meetings etc. The atmosphere of the seminar is intense but friendly and joyful, and its outcome highly successful for both the research and the life of each participant.

If you are interested and would like to participate in such a seminar please send as soon as possible a CV, a PhD abstract (1 page) and a presentation of the issues and arguments of your PhD that most focus on the work of Luce Irigaray (5 – 6 pages) to Luce Irigaray (by mail: 15, rue Lakanal, 75015 Paris, France). After receiving this material, Luce Irigaray will tell you if you can participate in the seminar of 2012. You will be in contact, for further practical information, with an office of secretary in the Spring after the selection of the candidates.

Posted in Conferences, Luce Irigaray | Leave a comment

Society and Space new issue out

New issue of Society and Space out, including an open access set of responses to the 22 July 2011 events in Norway; papers by Jeff Malpas, Mustafa Dikeç, Adrian Evans & Mara Miele and others; and a theme section on Mathematics edited by Christian Abrahamsson with papers by Quentin Meillassoux and Michel Serres. (full contents list here)

Posted in Quentin Meillassoux, Society and Space | Leave a comment

Matter Matters

Really interesting looking conference in Lund, 15-16 October 2012. Keynotes by Diana Coole, Samantha Frost, Graham Harman, Hans Ruin, and Nick Srnicek. I’m really sorry I can’t attend this – the busiest time of teaching for me.

Posted in Conferences | Leave a comment

Yale conference and homeward bound

The Yale conference was good, with a wide range of perspectives. Though there was a clear clash of perspectives between the historians and geographies on the one hand, and the political scientists on the other, this was not unpleasant. The political scientists, especially those doing normative political theory, seemed broadly to be operating in a very abstract register, and it reminded me of what I liked (the rigor and precision) and disliked (the detachment, the terminological but ahistorical analytics, the lack of spatial interrogation) about my time in that discipline. The same thing that has struck me with reading political theory on borders, territory, etc. was apparent here: there will be a great deal of critical interrogation of rights, justice, etc. but territory, borders and place are seemingly unproblematic or unworthy of conceptual discussion. In the discussions – which were very long after each set of three papers – there was a lot of ‘let me try to put this in my language; are you saying…’ type comments. Interdisciplinary work often comes up against these barriers, but this conference at least attempted to work through some of those difficulties.

Being in an Ivy league institution was interesting, especially given that I was representing Geography (there were only two other Geographers there – Joshua Hagen and Alex Diener). The other Brit – David Miller from Oxford – wasn’t a geographer. On more than one occasion I had to correct people who said that ‘well, of course, the US doesn’t have any good Geography departments’ (really). A few people expressed surprise that I would give the talk I did with a Geography background, and then looked comfortably reassured when I said I had a degree in Politics & Modern History and a PhD in Political Theory.

I’m now on the train back to Boston to catch a flight home. It’s been a long time on the road, with some excellent conversations and hospitality, but I’ll be glad to be back. The next two talks are in Paris and Nottingham in early May, and then nothing until Edinburgh in early July. Between there is an examination mountain to climb.

Posted in Boundaries, Conferences, Politics, Territory, Travel | 5 Comments

Barnett on Harvey

Some thoughts on Rebel Cities (and baby vomit) here.

Posted in David Harvey | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Simon Critchley interview

Interview with Simon Critchley here (via Verso blog). Among many other topics (love, death, Occupy, literature) one thing it reveals is that he is co-writing a book on Hamlet with his wife.

What’s the Hamlet book about, if you don’t mind me asking?

Well, it’s about the play. The play’s the thing to catch the consciousness of the king, and all that. It’s a very intense and weird scrutiny of the text. We’re using a whole series of outsider interpretations of Hamlet, like Carl Schmidt, Walter Benjamin, Lacan, Nietzsche, Adorno, and other figures. All of whom have things to say about Hamlet, but for none of them is Hamlet central; it’s a peripheral concern. We look at what light they can shed on the play, and then we mess with their interpretations. The way it ends up is that Hamlet is a play of desire. Hamlet is incapable of love, incapable of articulating his desire, it is always displaced onto something else (the ghost, his mother, etc.).

We’re finishing it now. We’re trying to look at Joyce and Melville and Goethe. Melville says somewhere that there is such an interior gloom in Hamlet which we can’t bear, and for that reason we try to turn Shakespeare into some sort of moralist. He invented humanity according to Harold Bloom, or whatever. We pour an awful lot of cold water on that idea. Hamlet is a sort of awful farce; there’s no reconciliation.

Posted in Simon Critchley, William Shakespeare | Leave a comment