Email triage

I’ve written about how I handle email before. Jo van Every has an interesting post here, suggesting dealing with email as a whole is not a task on your to do list; but sorting your email is. I think this is absolutely right – my email is always sorted, but some things that come by email cannot be dealt with immediately. Say I receive a request to review. Given most journals now work by automatic software, I click on the link to say I will do this. I get another email back with a link to the paper and the online form to complete. I file that mail, marked as unread, in my ‘Action (to review)’ folder. It’s not done, but it is sorted. Then I plan the time I need to do that task, and do it. Only then does the email get marked as read and filed.

I’ve long called what I do ’email triage’. There is now a tool under that very title that Jo van Every links to. I’m not sure that I need to spend $10 to learn how to do what I already do, but some people might find it helpful.

Posted in Uncategorized, Universities | Leave a comment

Critical Inquiry new website

The Critical Inquiry journal has a new website and a blog. Thanks to Clive at Pop Theory for the link.

Posted in Publishing | Leave a comment

Shapiro on Foucault

Recording of an interview with Stephen Shapiro – co-author of new book How to Read Foucault’s Discipline and Punish – is available here. Interesting discussion of what Foucault is doing, and links to contemporary events and questions. The discussion of higher education towards the end is particularly good. Thanks to Clare at Foucault News for the link.

Posted in Michel Foucault, Politics, Universities | Leave a comment

Harman and Morton in Continent

Online (open access) essays. Graham’s piece is a particularly good introduction to his work. Details here.

Posted in Graham Harman, Timothy Morton | Leave a comment

Merrifield on Lefebvre in London

Reposted from crit-geog-forum. I’m speaking in Newcastle that night so will unfortunately miss it. 

UCL Urban Laboratory/CITY Journal Annual Lecture with the support of Bartlett School of Planning

Henri Lefebvre and Planetary Urbanization

Lecture by Andy Merrifield

05 October 2011

Christopher Ingold Auditorium

University College London

20 Gordon Street London WC1H 0AJ

6.15pm

In Le droit a la ville and La revolution urbaine, Henri Lefebvre projected the urban trajectory of his day into the sci-fi imaginary of Isaac Asimov’s remarkable Foundation saga. Lefebvre had already begun hinting at a new reality: not just of expanding cities, nor even of a new urban reality, but something vaster and more immense again: planetary urbanization.

Today, four decades on, Asimov’s extraterrestrial universe seems closer than ever to home: planetary urbanization is creating a whole new spatial world (dis)order. But how to reclaim the shapeless, formless, and apparently boundless metropolis as a theoretical object and political object of progressive struggle?

The  template for Andy Merrifeld’s forthcoming book is his essay, ‘The right to the city and beyond: Notes on a Lefebvrian re-conceptualization‘, recently published in CITY (15.3-4, 2011). Merrifield’s use of Asimov’s fiction is another example of how he likes to use literature to frame certain ideas, as he did with Marquez and Joyce’s Finnegans Wake in Magical Marxism, for thinking about the politics of encounter. Dr Andy Merrifield’s recent publications have included  Metromarxism: A Marxist Tale of the City (2002), Guy Debord (2005),  Henri Lefebvre : A Critical Introduction (2006) and  Magical Marxism: Subversive Politics and the Imagination (2011).

This public lecture will be the third in a series jointly organised by thejournal CITY in conjuction with UCL Urban Laboratory and the support of the Bartlett School of Planning.

No reservation required; seating will be available on a first-come, first-served basis. Please see www.ucl.ac.uk/maps for directions.

Posted in Conferences, Henri Lefebvre | Leave a comment

Two Heidegger Reviews

NDPR has reviews of two new Heidegger translations – Introduction to Philosophy — Thinking and Poetizing and Country Path Conversations. In the first, Katherine Withy rightly notes the slender volume and its meager rewards – the English translation is less than the German volume of the Gesamtausgabe (Vol 50) because some of the materials were translated elsewhere. But as Withy notes – and I tried to unpick in more detail in an earlier post – it’s not simple.

In the second, Iain Thomson provides some interesting biographical and political details to situate the conversations:

As soon as Heidegger was discharged from the Volkssturm in December (for the recurrent “heart problems” that now look like psychosomatic symptoms of severe anxiety), he fled on his son’s bicycle from the city of Freiburg (where he lived and taught) to his hometown of Messkirch (some 75 miles away!) so as to stay out of the grasp of the French Army. Heidegger spent the next few months writing in Messkirch and teaching at the nearby Wildenstein Castle (an idyllic site high in the hills above Beuron, with a panoramic view of the Danube river valley below), where has was soon joined by what remained of Freiburg University’s philosophy department. The philosophy faculty taught joint seminars to about 30 women students and also helped the local farmers bring in their hay harvest in order to earn their own keep (food and other necessities being extremely scarce).

Heidegger felt truly in his element here, and even planned to have one of the towers of Wildenstein Castle restored with hopes of working there in close proximity to the Princess. (He paid a year’s rent on the tower but the shortage of laborers and materials made the project impossible to complete at the time).

Posted in Martin Heidegger | Leave a comment

Shakespeare in New York

While in New York for the AAG, I’ll also be speaking at a Shakespeare conference at NYU. It’s organised by the people who put on a conference on Shakespeare and Philosophy earlier this year. More details when they are official, but the list of other speakers is amazing.

This invitation came about because of the blog. The organiser reads it; knew I’d said something sometime back about my interest in King Lear; and then when he saw I was going to be at the AAG and the dates were compatible, extended this invitation.

Posted in William Shakespeare | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Schmitt in New York

Rory Rowan will be the fifth speaker in the ‘German Philosophy and Geography’ session, speaking on Carl Schmitt. He dropped me a line after yesterday’s post and we all welcomed it enthusiastically. As Rory well knows I think Schmitt is a terrible philosopher and a rotten geographer… but this doesn’t mean you can’t do interesting things with him or say important things about him.

Posted in Carl Schmitt | Leave a comment

Sloterdijk Now endorsements

I mentioned the Sloterdijk Now endorsees before, but here are the actual endorsements:

‘A superb introduction to the most formidable (and fun) philosopher of our time. Indispensable.’

Sylvère Lotringer, Columbia University

‘Sloterdijk is finally coming to the fore as one of the most thought-provoking thinkers of the twenty-first century. These original and insightful essays not only present a persuasive case for the significance of Sloterdijk’s unique position on a range of important issues, they also confront the curious resistance of Sloterdijk’s thought. Why, given the profound range and depth of this magisterial theorist, have we not yet come to terms with the problems he poses? Elden’s introduction and the authoritative contributions that follow would be of value for anyone new to Sloterdijk’s work as well as already committed readers who seek to enrich their understanding.’

Claire Colebrook, Penn State University

Posted in My Publications, Peter Sloterdijk | Leave a comment

Reading Kant’s Geography paperback

Despite the paperback not being on Amazon.co.uk or Amazon.com, the paperback is definitely available. The SUNY Press website is selling it, but will chase them to try to make this more widely available. Even though the initial hardback price was steep, that was only for three months and the paperback is – for an academic book of 390 pages – pretty reasonable.

Posted in Eduardo Mendieta, Immanuel Kant, My Publications | Leave a comment