Petition against AHRC/’Big Society’

You can sign it here (set up by Thom Brooks).

Two interesting commentaries on this issue here and here (via Clive at Pop Theory).

Posted in Politics, Universities | Leave a comment

Kris Olds on the Bill Cronon situation

From Kris Olds, originally posted to crit-geog-forum but reposted here with updated links with his permission. (And the links have now been fixed)

Dear colleagues,

If you wish to register your symbolic support for Bill Cronon, here is a Facebook page to do so:

Support Professor William Cronon: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Support-Professor-William-Cronon/112819782132021

Many lessons to be learned via this issue…an updated list of links to coverage has been pasted in below.  If this is news to you, here is a good summary of the issues:

‘Wisconsin gets weirder,‘ Inside Higher Ed, 26 March.

and it is worth looking at Paul Krugman’s op-ed in the NY Times:

‘Paul Krugman: American Thought Police,‘ New York Times, 28 March.

Bill’s original blog entry, his first (!) and the one that inspired the request, is here:

‘Who’s Really Behind Recent Republican Legislation in Wisconsin and Elsewhere? (Hint: It Didn’t Start Here),’ Scholar as Citizen, 15 March.

while this NY Times op-ed is also worth a read:

‘Wisconsin’s Radical Break,’ New York Times, 21 March.

Thanks for your support.  Kris Olds

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

The William Cronon/Republican Email Affair

‘Paul Krugman: American Thought Police,‘ New York Times, 28 March.

‘William Cronon did his job, what more do you want to know?,’ Sustainable Cities & Transport, 27 March.

‘Wineke: By Going After Prof., GOP Takes Aim At UW Tradition,‘ Channel 3000, 27 March.

‘An Open Letter to Governor Walker and Stephan Thompson from a Loyal Republican,’ Scholar Citizen, 28 March.

‘Professor Cronon’s Weak Cases,’ National Review Online, 28 March.

‘The professor’s political entomology runs into the left’s own rules,’ Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 28 March.

‘Open records law used to muzzle critics,’ Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 28 March.

‘Wisconsin: The Cronon Affair,’ The New Yorker, 28 March.

‘Wisconsin’s Cronon Affair: The Power of a Simple Fact,’ The Nation, 28 March.

‘NY Times slams GOP’s “petty and medieval” strategy to intimidate academics like Cronon and Mann,’ Climate Progress, 28 March.

‘Next Prey in Gov. Walker’s Corporatist Sights: University of Wisconsin-Madison,’ In These Times, 28 March.

‘Kill the Professors First!,’ Chronicle of Higher Education, 28 March.

‘Just Say “No” to the Republican Party of Wisconsin: Academic Freedom in the Public Sector vs. State FOIA Request for Prof’s Emails,’ Law Librarian Blog, 28 March.

‘Controversy Flares Over GOP Probe of Professor’s Emails,’ Slate, 28 March.

‘Obvious Assault on Academic Freedom,’ AAUP, 28 March.

AAUP letter to Chancellor Biddy Martin (PDF)

‘Cronon’s politics,’ Sapping Attention, 28 March.

‘Wis. Republican Party Assails Prof. Cronon Again,’ The Progressive, 28 March.

‘The Cronon Affair and the Political Culture of the GOP,’ U.S. Intellectual History, 28 March.

‘Academic Groups Denounce Wisconsin GOP’s Demand for Professor’s E-Mails,’ Chronicle of Higher Education, 28 March.

‘Krugman and the Smears of the Cracked Teapot Party,’ Daily Kos, 28 March.

‘William Cronon vs. Wisconsin Republicans,’ Wall Street Journal, 28 March.

‘William Cronon, University Of Wisconsin Professor, Targeted By State Republicans,’ Huffington Post, 28 March.

‘Paul Krugman: American Thought Police,’ New York Times, 28 March.

‘AHA Deplores Effort to Intimidate William Cronon,’ AHA Today, 27 March.

‘William Cronon did his job, what more do you want to know?,’ Sustainable Cities & Transport, 27 March.

‘Warning to parents about ALEC and its draft education legislation,’ Parents Across America, 27 March.

‘Wineke: By Going After Prof., GOP Takes Aim At UW Tradition,’ Channel 3000, 27 March.

‘FOIA “request” in Wisconsin could be violation of whistleblower protection law’, Millard Fillmore’s Bathtub, 27 March.

‘On Cronon: History, Law, and the Public, 2 of 2,’ AmericanScience: A Team Blog, 27 March.

‘On Cronon: History, Law, and the Public, 1 of 2,’ AmericanScience: A Team Blog, 26 March.

‘Wisconsin gets weirder,‘ Inside Higher Ed, 26 March.

‘Un chercheur intimidé par un politicien qui veut l’accès à ses courriels,‘ Agence-Science-Presse, 26 March.

‘How Wisconsin Republicans Respond to Their Critics,’ Big Think, 26 March.

‘Hi, Joe!,‘ Pharyngula, 26 March.

‘A Shabby Crusade in Wisconsin,’ New York Times, 26 March.

‘Because We Are All Bill Cronon: An Open Letter To Our Colleague In Madison,’ Tenured Radical, 26 March.

‘Publish and perish?,’ Halfway There, 26 March.

‘Surely ALEC wouldn’t be purging e-mails that are now evidence, would they?,‘ Millard Fillmore’s Bathtub, 26 March.

‘More on Professor Cronon and ALEC,’ Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 26 March.

‘Republican Party of Wisconsin attacks UW professor’s right to speak — but can’t spell his name right,’ Madison.com, 26 March.

‘NYT Editorial and Other Coverage of Cronon Open Records Case’, Scholar as Citizen, 26 March.

‘Wisconsin GOP official files request for access to UW professor’s e-mail,’ Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 26 March.

‘Republican Party demands access to Wisconsin academic’s emails,’ Times Higher Education, 26 March.

‘Wisconsin Professor’s E-Mails Are Target of G.O.P. Records Request,’ New York Times, 26 March.

‘GOP’s Radical Breakage Continues,’ Obsidian Wings, 25 March.

‘Reading Bill Cronon’s emails,‘ Sustainable Cities & Transport, 25 March.

‘Political Warfare in WI,’ Outside the Beltway, 25 March.

‘So, What Gives When FOI Meets Academic Freedom? On FOI As A Partisan Tool….,‘ The Art of Access, 25 March.

‘The Wisconsin Republican Party uses Open Records Law to get emails written by the Wisconsin professor William Cronon,’ Althouse, 25 March.

‘Demand for Emails of Wisconsin Professor Raises Legal Questions,’ FIRE, 25 March.

Chancellor Martin’s statement on open records, academic freedom, 25 March.

‘GOP won’t withdraw records request,’ Capital Times, 25 March.

‘There’s No Such Thing as a Bad FOIA Request,’ Slate, 25 March.

‘Wisconsin GOP Seeks E-Mails of a Madison Professor Who Criticized the Governor,’ Chronicle of Higher Education, 25 March

‘Wisconsin GOP: You’re friggin’ right we want that one friggin’ college professor’s friggin’ emails,‘ Daily Kos, 25 March.

‘Wisconsin GOP Seeks UW Professor’s Email After Critical Blog Post,’ Daily Kos, 25 March.

‘Wisconsin’s most dangerous professor,’ Salon, 25 March.

‘Bloggers Beware! (If You Work at a State University in Wisconsin),’ Econbrowser, 25 March.

‘WI Republican Party uses open records law to intimidate its most moderate critic,’ Crooked Timber, 25 March.

‘Academic Intimidation,’ New York Times, 25 March.

”Have You No Sense of Decency?’ The Wm. Cronon Story,‘ The Atlantic, 25 March.

‘Wisconsin Republican Party Seeks E-Mails of UW-Madison History Professor Critical of Governor Walker,’ Leiter Reports, 25 March.

‘UW Prof. Cronon: I Wish GOP ‘Could Have Spelled My Name Correctly’,‘ TPM, 25 March.

‘Republican Party Response to Cronon Critique of Open Records Request,‘ Scholar as Citizen, 25 March.

‘Wis. GOP: Attacks On Our Open-Records Request Against Professor Are ‘Chilling’‘, TPM, 25 March.

‘Wis. GOP FOIAs Emails of State University Prof Critical Of Gov. Walker,’ TPM, 25 March.

‘Wisconsin GOP: You’re damn right we requested Walker critic’s emails,’ Washington Post, 25 March.

‘Wisconsin GOP Seeks to Silence a Distinguished Dissenter. McCarthyism is Back,’ The Nation, 25 March.

‘GOP seeks e-mails of UW-Madison professor,’ Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 25 March.

‘Wisconsin GOP Blasts “Concerted Effort to Intimidate” Over Request for Professor’s E-mails,‘ Slate, 25 March.

‘Wisc. GOP defends request for professor’s emails,’ Yahoo.com, 25 March.

‘Professor’s Emails, Open Records, First Amendment: Wisconsin Professor William Cronon,’ Constitutional Law Prof Blog, 25 March.

‘UW history prof targeted for records request by Republican Party,’ Capital Times, 25 March.

‘An Open Letter to Chancellor Biddy Martin,’ Greg Bond/Facebook, 25 March.

‘Scott Walker’s Office Seeks Access to Critical Professor’s Email,’ Forbes.com, 25 March.

My Worlds Collide,’ TPM, 24 March.

‘Abusing Open Records to Attack Academic Freedom,’ Scholar as Citizen, 24 March.

‘William Cronon: Dissing Wisconsin’s traditions,‘ Madison.com, 24 March.

‘Wisconsin’s Radical Break,’ New York Times, 21 March.

‘Who’s Really Behind Recent Republican Legislation in Wisconsin and Elsewhere? (Hint: It Didn’t Start Here),’ Scholar as Citizen, 15 March.

Posted in Politics, Universities | 1 Comment

Brooks and Barnett on the AHRC and the ‘Big Society’

Both Thom Brooks and Clive Barnett comment on the story that the Arts and Humanities Research Council has been pressured into devoting funds to research Cameron and Willetts’s idea of the ‘Big Society’.

While it might be good to have some substance behind what appears to be a nebulous political idea, this is work for party apparatchiks, rather than university researchers. Let’s hope, as Clive suggests, that this call can be diverted and used to fund work on more progressive understandings of this idea. The events in London at the weekend demonstrate that Cameron does not have everyone with him, and that it may quickly get out of control.

Posted in Politics, Universities | Leave a comment

New from Urbanomic

Urbanomic, publishers of the very interesting new journal Collapse, have a range of new things out. They include Fanged Noumena by Nick Land; and François Laruelle’s The Concept of Non-Photography.

Posted in Publishing | Leave a comment

Agnew, Elden, Nelson review essay

In the International Studies Review, a thoughtful review essay by Thomas J. Rubeck of John Agnew’s Globalization and Sovereignty; my Terror and Territory; and Scott Nelson’s Sovereignty and the Limits of the Liberal Imagination. A few excerpts on Terror and Territory:

Although inspired by the war on terror, the book’s focus strays from the details of terrorism and counter-terrorism to a broader meditation on the role of geography in the contemporary security environment. The usual story—one of states trying to reassert a necessary connection between legitimate violence and sovereign territorial control against the threat of informal violence networks—is replaced with a more nuanced take… Elden’s text crystallizes a series of arguments that have too often been gestured toward without being made explicit.

One of the book’s great strengths is offering a fine-grained reading of the malleable relationship between sovereignty and territory… Some might bristle at the lack of a more definitive conclusion about the relationship between sovereignty and territory; nevertheless, it is Elden’s serious commitment to the problem that requires him to leave the reader in such ambiguous circumstances. Could it be that Elden, then, has found an altogether different way of speaking about sovereignty? 

It’s a generous and careful review. The book doesn’t provide easy answers, and the lack of clear definitions or typologies is deliberate. I don’t think that it’s a ‘altogether different’ way of speaking about sovereignty (or territory), but it is an attempt to suggest that these are terms that can only ever be understood historically, contextually, geographically. What I try to do in this book and elsewhere is both to trace the understanding and practice of such concepts in specific situations; and to try to open up the kinds of questions we would need to ask to grasp how they have been understood and practiced in different times and places.

Posted in My Publications, Territory, Terror and Territory | Leave a comment

Fossils talk, and revised abstract

Four weeks ago I posted the abstract of the talk I will be giving tomorrow at the Humanities Research Centre here at ANU. That abstract was written at time when I had a vague sense of what I was going to do, but only a vague one. Were I to write the abstract now, after four weeks of sustained reading and thinking on this topic, it would look a bit different.

This talk takes its provocation from Quentin Meillassoux’s remarkable book After Finitude. For Meillassoux, post-Kantian philosophy has been characterised by correlationism – that we have no access to the world except as it exists through our relation to it. Meillassoux articulates a radical problem with this: how to understand the problem of the arche-fossil, those radioactive traces that predate any life on earth. Correlationism is flawed, Meillassoux suggests, because arche-fossils show that there is a world of which we can have objective knowledge without there being any mediation between that and the observer. Meillassoux suggests that correlationism, in all its variants, is a convenient way to avoid having to account for the world as it is, outside of human access. Meillassoux is problematic because he ends up returning to a mathematical foundation for the ontology of the world—based in large part on the work of Alain Badiou. But the arche-fossil poses an important challenge to accounts of the world and its relations.

In this talk I suggest that fossils have always presented a fundamental challenge. Schematically tracing the story of fossils and accounts of them from Aristotle to Darwin, with specific mention of Steno and Cuvier, I suggest that three philosophers of the kind criticised by Meillassoux have come to terms with the relation of fossils to the world in different ways. These figures are Leibniz in the Protogaea; Kant in his Physical Geography lectures and related writings; and Foucault in The Order of Things.

I conclude by suggesting that fossils help us to pose general questions about the age of, and our relation to, the world. Heidegger might have claimed that the stone is without world, but what has become the merely mineral  has profound implications for our sense of the world.

Of course, the abstract can only touch on what I try to do. Even the talk itself is a distilled version of what has become about a 10,000 word manuscript. This will, I think, be the basis of the chapter on ‘fossils’ in The Space of the World. One key issue that remains, and it may well be the crucial point, is whether there is a qualitative difference between arche-fossils and fossils. If there is, then Meillassoux’s point would, I think, pose a greater challenge. But I’m not convinced that there is an important difference between fossils that precede human life and arche-fossils that precede any life on the earth. The pre-history and history of palaeontology seems to me to indicate that using this as an objective form of knowledge that provides a measure for philosophical accounts is not without difficulties.

Posted in Conferences, Fossils, Gottfried Leibniz, Immanuel Kant, Michel Foucault, The Space of the World | 1 Comment

Bill Cronon and the Republicans

This story has been linked to by several others, but since Bill Cronon is on the editorial board of the Journal of Historical Geography, it now gives me a more direct reason to link to his blog. Well worth a look.

I’ve not been following the events in Wisconscin in detail, but you can find some background to the Cronon part of the story here. Lots of issues about academic freedom, the politics of universities, and their place within the wider set of issues around public sector cuts.

[Update – another version of the story here and an op-ed piece in the New York Times; thanks to Adrian at Immanence for the links]

Posted in Politics, Universities | 1 Comment

Felix Driver on the History of Geography

In the comments to this earlier post of mine, some thoughts from Felix Driver. Since comments, especially to older posts, are not always noticed, I’m reposting here. Felix was, as my original post said, supportive of my piece. What he says below is very fair, though I guess what I had in mind was more the history of geographical thought, more than just the history of geography – but my list was of course partial, as some of the other comments pointed out.

Stuart’s rhetorical question about the Journal of Historical Geography seems to suggest that papers on the history of geography are difficult to place (“if not that journal, where else could you send something on the history of geography?”). For readers of this blog who may not be familiar with the journal, I’d like to say that as editor of the JHG I am delighted to publish papers on the history of geography, broadly defined; that there are lots of other journals (in various languages) which regularly publish work on the history of geography; and that the history of geography is a much broader field than the few names mentioned above. Just for interest, a list of papers covering the history of geography published in JHG since Stuart’s excellent Kant paper appeared in the JHG in 2009 follows below (full details may be found at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03057488)

French geography, cartography and colonialism: introduction
Hélène Blais, Florence Deprest, Pierre Singaravelou

We have tailored Africa: French colonialism and the ‘artificiality’ of Africa’s borders in the interwar period
Camille Lefebvre

The institutionalisation of ‘colonial geography’ in France, 1880–1940
Pierre Singaravelou

Using the concept of genre de vie: French geographers and colonial Algeria, c.1880–1949
Florence Deprest

The correspondence between Élisée Reclus and Pëtr Kropotkin as a source for the history of geography
Federico Ferretti

Modern observations: new ornithology and the science of ourselves, 1920–1940
M. Toogood

Piracy and the production of knowledge in the travels of William Dampier, c.1679–1688
William Hasty

Wandering scholars? Academic mobility and the British World, 1850–1940
Tamson Pietsch

Putting maps in place
Stephen Daniels

Counterfactual reasoning and method in historical geography
Mark Day

The Allison Commission and the national map: towards a Republic of Knowledge in late nineteenth-century America
Scott Kirsch

Narratives and counter-narratives of climate change: North Atlantic glaciology and meteorology, c.1930–1955
Sverker Sörlin

Voices from the sea ice: the reception of climate impact narratives
Michael T. Bravo

Conventions of climate change: constructions of danger and the dispossession of the atmosphere
Diana M. Liverman

The whistleblower and the canary: rhetorical constructions of climate change Original Research Article
Richard Hamblyn

‘Taken captive by the mystery of the Great River’: towards an historical geography of British geography and Atlantic slavery
David Lambert

Mapping the desert: Arthur Rimbaud, Charles de Foucauld, and the Société de Géographie, 1884–85
Rosemary A. Peters

Denis Cosgrove: historical geography unbound
Felix Driver

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

And more writing advice

This time from novelists, poets, etc. in The Guardian.

Posted in Publishing | Leave a comment

More writing advice

From the Chronicle here, via Dean Bond’s blog. Some choice snippets:

Writers sit at their desks for hours, wrestling with ideas. They ask questions, talk with other smart people over drinks or dinner, go on long walks. And then write a whole bunch more. Don’t worry that what you write is not very good and isn’t immediately usable. You get ideas when you write; you don’t just write down ideas…

Everyone’s unwritten work is brilliant. And the more unwritten it is, the more brilliant it is…

Write, then squeeze the other things in. Put your writing ahead of your other work. I happen to be a “morning person,” so I write early in the day. Then I spend the rest of my day teaching, having meetings, or doing paperwork. You may be a “night person” or something in between. Just make sure you get in the habit of reserving your most productive time for writing. Don’t do it as an afterthought or tell yourself you will write when you get a big block of time. Squeeze the other things in; the writing comes first…

I always laugh to myself when new graduate students think they know what they want to work on and what they will write about for their dissertations. Nearly all of the best scholars are profoundly changed by their experiences in doing research and writing about it. They learn by doing, and sometimes what they learn is that they were wrong.

Dean adds some thoughts of his own which are worth a look.

Posted in Publishing | Leave a comment