Postmedieval Animals

Issue 2.1 of the interesting new journal Postmedieval, devoted to the question of animals, is available free-access until the end of March. Find it here. Thanks to ‘In the Middle’ for the link.

Posted in Medieval Studies | Leave a comment

Writing Advice

Here (via here). The last link takes you to Jo van Every’s advice blog, where she has been running a series on writing.

The point with these – as said before – is not that the same thing works for everyone, but that so many people seem stuck in habits that do not work well for them, that there is a benefit in hearing more about how others do it.

Posted in Publishing | 1 Comment

Scales of the Earth

New Geographies 4, Scales of the Earth, edited by El Hadi Jazairy, is now available.

The first Apollo images of the Earth have produced a perspective enabling humanity to act on Earth and its nature as if it controlled it from “outside.” The recent developments of satellite technologies have had a significant impact on the modes of representation as well as the conceptions of geography and space. This new “geography from above”—the home, the city, entire territories, the Earth itself, the Moon, Mars, and beyond—redefine our environment, subjectivities, and practices. With such tools at hand, architects conceive of the geographic as a possible scale, site of intervention, and design approach. The scale of vision, viewpoint, and qualification of space made possible by satellite imagery reframes contemporary debates on design, agency, and territory. In Volume 4 of New Geographies, we feature articles and projects that critically address the relationship of space with such modes of representation. What are the characteristics of such an integrated elevated vision, and what geographical knowledge does it bring forth? How is such an analytical space to be subsequently interpreted and experienced? What are the cultural, political, and environmental repercussions of a vision celebrated as objective and Universalist? What new global issues and debates do such scales of vision raise, and how do such visualizations of the Earth-as-home intersect with concerns of ecology and calls for global awareness?

Contributors: Robin Kelsey, Nicholas de Monchaux, Stuart Elden, Marc Angelil and Cary Siress, Stephen Graham, Nathalie Roseau, Frederic Pousin, Kelly Shannon, Bruno De Meulder and Annelies De Nijs, Nina Edwards Anker and Peder Anker, Alex Maclean, Hashim Sarkis, Adnan Morshed, Ola Soderstrom, Julien De Smedt and Ryan Neiheiser, MVRDV, Jack Dangermond and El Hadi Jazairy, Christophe Girot, Mark Dorrian, Paul Kingsbury and John Paul Jones, Theo Deutinger.

Harvard University Press 2011, 25.5cm x 20cm, 117 color & 118 halftones illustrations, 184pp. Paperback.

You can buy it here. As befits the Harvard Graduate School of Design, it is a beautiful object. There are some preview photographs here. My own piece, entitled ‘The Space of the World’, outlines some of the themes I plan to explore in the future book of that name.

Posted in My Publications, The Space of the World | Leave a comment

Translating Schmitt and Meillassoux

An interesting complaint about the packaging of Carl Schmitt translations here. The point is that these are slender volumes and could have been combined into something a little more worthwhile, which would also do away with the need for separate translator’s introduction and other apparatus. The initial focus of complaint is his Political Theology II, but that was at least a separate volume in German.

Perhaps as an antidote, there is a translation of an essay by Quentin Meillassoux, available free, here (via here).

Posted in Carl Schmitt, Quentin Meillassoux | Leave a comment

More Lefebvre translations?

Two publishers contact me on the same day about potential Lefebvre translations… I have some quite clear ideas of what of his so-far-untranslated work would be good, so hopefully this will lead to some new books in English.

Posted in Henri Lefebvre | 2 Comments

Not striking

It is now 24th March, and I’m supposed to be on strike. But I’m not. This is completely new for me – to be part of a union that has called a strike, and not to follow. Why? 

I’m on the other side of the world – a national day of action doesn’t mean a lot when I’d be the only person here doing anything. There are things on here, people to meet, etc. Do I cancel these? This would have precisely zero impact on Durham and UK higher education.

I’m on research leave. So I’d not read the book, referee the article, edit the journal, answer the email, write the paragraph today… but I would tomorrow. So instead of not doing some work, I’d simply do it later. Academics regularly defer things when they strike, but on research leave it seems particularly self-defeating.

We have a singularly inept trade union. At Durham, a mix-up in terms of a local dispute and a national one for Tuesday’s strike meant that we had conflicting advice from the branch and the national union as to whether the strike was legal. In addition, Tuesday was an open day at Durham and apparently people felt they could not strike when it might have negative effects. That’s part of the point, of course. So I’ve been getting conflicting emails on that day, and it’s tainted my view of the whole action. I also have an abiding memory of the ineptness of the union the last time we took industrial action.

If I was in the UK I would have been on strike. I’d probably have expressed strong reservations about the union’s handling of the whole thing in meetings. Last time round I wrote to the national union secretary but never received a reply. I care about the causes including pension rights, job security and what is being done to the sector by this awful government. But doing anything today seemed to be absolutely pointless. Perhaps I am wrong.

Posted in Politics, Universities | 2 Comments

Foucault’s Order of Things diagram

This is the diagram from Foucault’s The Order of Things. I couldn’t find it online, and wanted to use it in a talk. I’ve scanned it; cleaned it up a bit; and cut it in half so it is easier to read as two slides. Maybe someone else will find it useful to have. As clunky as the book can be, in the rather-too-convenient epistemic frames for the three registers examined, there are some remarkable analyses in there. The reading of Cuvier is, for my current purposes, extremely helpful.

Posted in Michel Foucault | 2 Comments

Roundup

Back in Canberra after a great few days in Tasmania. Will it be five years before I’m there again? Anyway, a post with a bunch of links…

More stuff on blogs, here, here and here.

More on the ‘Animal, Vegetable, Mineral’ conference over at In the Middle here and here. Some more audio files at the second link. I listened to the Jane Bennett lecture on the flight to Hobart; on the way back (via Sydney) I read William Connolly’s A World of Becoming. I need to write something on Bill’s book for the London event in late May, and I suspect it will be an issue of which of many themes to pick up on.

Good review of a book on Foucault and philosophy, here.

And a question for historians of philosophers, which links to some previous discussion here, with some interesting comments in response, here.

Posted in Jane Bennett, Medieval Studies, Michel Foucault, William E Connolly | 1 Comment

Talking about territory in Tasmania

I gave my seminar on The Birth of Territory at the University of Tasmania today. Seemed to go well, with a good audience and interesting questions.

The second event was a panel discussion with Jeff Malpas and Godfrey Baldacchino, chaired by Elaine Stratford on ‘Islands, Places, Territories’. After the historical lecture on territory I gave at lunchtime, this was a more conceptual and political discussion. I’d not met Godfrey before today, but know Jeff and Elaine well from my previous visit and other meetings.

Jeff and I were then on Annie Warburton’s show on ABC Hobart radio, talking about philosophy, territory and the war in Libya in the evening. A full, but interesting day.

Posted in Politics, Territory | Leave a comment

Weekend in Tasmania

Great weekend in Tasmania with Jeff and Margaret Malpas. Saturday at the Bream Creek Show, and then dinner with friends. Sunday to the terrific new Museum of Old and New Art (MONA) and then up to Myrtle Forest for a short walk. All great, but MONA is especially worth a trip from the mainland – interesting article about it here.

Posted in Travel | Leave a comment