Carl Schmitt symposium in Holland

Carl Schmitt and Space, 3 December 2010

Socio-spatial analysis chair group, Wageningen university

Room GAIA 1, Gaia Building, Wageningen University

Map and travel description: http://www.wur.nl/UK/contact/route/

In recent years there has been an explosion of literature and debate around the work of Carl Schmitt (1888-1985). Schmitt’s work has become a central reference point within contemporary Continental political thought. Whilst Schmitt’s initial reception focused on the powerful critique of liberalism and the conception of sovereignty  he developed in his early Weimar writings today his impact is felt in a wide range of debates from the critique of post-911 security regimes and the humanitarian wars to theories of biopolitics and the rise of right-wing fringe parties in Europe. Despite this widespread engagement with his work Schmitt remains a controversial figure whose thought retains the capacity to provoke as much as it forces his readers to face fundamental political questions. What has largely gone unremarked upon in these debates however is the spatial elements of Schmitt’s work and particularly his geopolitical writings. This symposium aims to turn critical attention toward  the role of space in Schmitt’s thought by examining the spatial concepts he deploys across his thought, his geopolitical theories and the traditions of though they emerge from and have been received within. Understanding the spatial element of Schmitt’s thought is crucial to getting a clearer grasp on this key thinker of Twentieth Century political thought and assessing the uses, limitations and dangers of his thought today. 

14.00 “On Carl Schmitt and Space”

Claudio Minca, the Socio-Spatial Analysis Chair Group, Wageningen University  

14.10 “Carl Schmitt’s Cultural and Political Milieu”

Christian Abrahamsson, the Socio-Spatial Analysis Chair Group, Wageningen University 

14.20 A panel discussion on Carl Schmitt’s “Forms of modern imperialism in international law” and “Großraum versus universalism” – “Volkerrechtliche formen des modernen Imperialismus” (1932) and “Großraum gegen Universalismus” (1939), translated by Matthew Hannah and forthcoming in Stephen Legg (ed.) Spatiality, Sovereignty and Carl Schmitt: Geographies of the Nomos, Routledge.

The texts will be distributed to those who sign up for the symposium.

15.20-15.40  Coffee break

15.40 “What’s so Spatial about Carl Schmitt?: Ontology, Space, Order”

Rory Rowan, Department of Geography, Royal Holloway, University of London

Discussant: James Sidaway, Department of Geography, Amsterdam University   

16.20 “A Spectre Haunts Carl Schmitt: The Deterritorialisation of the Political”  

Matthias Lievens, Centre for Ethics, Social and Political Philosophy, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

Discussant: Katja de Vries, Law Science Technology & Society, the Free University of Brussels  

17.00-18.15  Open discussion                                                         

To sign up for the symposium contact Christian Abrahamsson, Christian.abrahamsson@wur.nl

Posted in Carl Schmitt, Conferences | 1 Comment

Place Research Network

Posted on behalf of Jeff Malpas

The Place Research Network is now live and accessible at www.placenetwork.info

The Place Research Network is a website, built around social networking software adapted to academic needs, that aims to support, enable and encourage interdisciplinary discussion, engagement and networking around the idea of place (as well as associated concepts of space, time, and much more). Then fact that place is such a central and ubiquitous concept across so many disciplines is the main rationale for the Network – plus my own conviction that place is perhaps the key term for interdisciplinary research in the arts, humanities and social sciences in the twenty-first century.

The Network aims to overcome the difficulty, when working with such a widespread concept, in communicating across diverse disciplines and interests, and to enable new collaborations as well as opening communication between ideas and researchers otherwise separated from one another (and not just geographically). There is no irony in the fact that the Network deploys a technology that may be thought to overcome place in its efforts to further the focus on place. If place is as fundamental as I think it is, then the Place Research Network will only work through opening up new places and new possibilities even as these arise through new technologies.

In this respect, it is essential for the success of the Network that we get widespread participation across what might be thought as the ‘place research community’, so please pass on the details about this site to as many as you can. Whether the Network is successful will depend on whether we can generate content (which has to come from users) and encourage participation.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Two New Books out

Continuum have translated Francois Larruelle’s Future Christ – details here – and University of Minnesota Press have a new edited book by Sarah Whatmore and Bruce Braun on Political Matter. Details here.

Posted in Publishing | Leave a comment

Harman’s Meillassoux book

Graham reports on the final stages of his Quentin Meillassoux: Philosophy in the Making book here. Sounds terrific.

Posted in Graham Harman, Quentin Meillassoux | Leave a comment

Wu Ming 1 on Foucault in Iran

Find it here. Two excerpts…

In October 1978, Michel Foucault (hereafter cited as MF) visited Iran. The country was already shaken by street protests against the Shah. The regime was brutally repressing demonstrations, with the only result of strengthening the people’s determination. The overthrow of Reza Pahlavi looked imminent, many felt that a revolution was around the corner, but nobody knew what revolution it would be. In those autumn days the rallying cries were few, focused and clear; all political movements and social classes converged into a single, urgent request: «Down with the Shah!». There were already some who demanded an “Islamic government”, but the Ayatollah Khomeini was still in exile in Paris, and the movement was manifold and “in fusion”…

The period of MF’s enthusiasm for the Iranian revolution is the most notorious in his biography, and has attracted much criticism. Yet, in comparison with the way many European leftists described that event, always forcing it into pre-existing conceptual frameworks (Marxist-Leninist, anti-imperialist ones), MF’s “blunders” look almost negligible. In his articles (this should be noted: they were pieces written in the spur of the moment, not carefully reasoned essays), MF approached the Iranian revolution in its singularity, investigating its being different from any known revolutionary event…

Posted in Michel Foucault, Wu Ming | Leave a comment

Galloway on New French Thought

You can now download the audio of Alexander Galloway’s lectures on New French Thought here. I’d previously mentioned these lectures were taking place – on Catherine Malabou, Bernard Stiegler, Mehdi Belhaj Kacem, Quentin Meillassoux and François Laruelle – and good that they are more widely available. thanks to Nina Power at Infinite Thought for the tipoff.

Posted in Bernard Stiegler, Mehdi Belhaj Kacem, Quentin Meillassoux | 3 Comments

Man in a Suitcase

Barely back from Vancouver, which was a great trip and involved no work, and I’m getting ready to go to Columbus, Ohio tomorrow where I’m giving a lecture at Ohio State, plus an informal discussion over lunch and lots of meetings with faculty and grad students. I’m then back for a couple of days before I go to Eugene, Oregon to give a lecture and go to the Radical Philosophy Association conference. Then it’s only a few days before I’m off to Victoria and Vancouver again. It’s not helped by the place I’m staying in Seattle being flooded due to a blocked drain, so I’ve had to relocate to a motel here for two nights.

In between I am trying to fill in some references for the book, looking at potential covers for the Sloterdijk Now collection, and editing Society and Space. The book references involved a lot of fiddly things in the Patrologiae Cursus Completus – a huge comprehensive work but not exactly the most user-friendly collection – and the Monumenta Germaniae Historica. I’ve reread Chapter Four and think that the work required there is minor for the bulk of the chapter, but quite a lot of work is needed for two sections. With the Sloterdijk book the cover we have gone with is terrific, and we’re just working on the fonts. I’ll post it as soon as it is in final form. Polity have been great to work with. And issue 6 of Society and Space – a theme issue on Global Borders guest edited by Chris Rumford – should be available soon.

Posted in Conferences, Peter Sloterdijk, Society and Space, Travel | Leave a comment

A PhD in political science?

This is probably a bit too close to the bone… Yes, it’s another one of those animations.

Posted in Universities | Leave a comment

Urban Utopianism workshop

Call for Papers

An International Workshop on

Urban Utopianism

Organised by Department of Geography, Hong Kong Baptist University

in collaboration with Urban Research Plaza, Osaka City University

on 12-14 May, 2011

at Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong

The Objective

Today, while most of us have already lived in cities and towns, the world is still urbanising at an alarming rate. While most of the policy-makers are busy with mundane, daily life, they advocate the ‘end of utopia’. On many occasions, policies are merely old wine in the new bottle. They cannot merely tackle many burgeoning urban problems. Even worse, many policies, once implemented, create more problems than they were intended to resolve. In sum, without any utopian vision, it is difficult to debate about the way that our cities should proceed in the future.

The utopian perspective, according David Pinder, is one that involves “the expression of desire for a better way of being and living through the imagining of a different city and a different urban life”. David Harvey charts a course to construct the future, or what he calls a ‘dialectical or spatiotemporal utopianism’. This approach underscores a study of the historical geography of capitalism to provide clues as to how a dialectical utopian project can be grounded in both the present and the past. In particular, it requires us to unravel the internal contradictions and then consider how to develop the collective mechanisms and cultural forms necessary for the realisation of alternative urban visions based on these contradictions. For Henri Lefebvre, the world space has been colonised by commodity capitalism and state management and planning. Nevertheless, out of the isotopias in urban space, there are heterotopias developed out of contradictions. Heterotopic spaces can further be developed into utopia, as the May 1968 Movement in central Paris, a utopia, originated from the earlier heterotopia of Nanterre has illustrated. More specifically, for Lefebvre, our utopia is the differential space. This search can be achieved by his much-celebrated regressive-progressive method. For the non-West, the search for utopia must work harder to counteract the hegemony of current urbanisation in co-determination with the world. It is the objective of this international conference (1) to identify the spatial contradictions, (2) to argue conceptually different ways to imagine a different city, (3) to propose ways to build the collective mechanisms/autogestion/the reformed state, (4) to detail cases of experiment all over the world, and (5) in particular, compare and contrast experiments in the developed, developing and socialist worlds.

Call for Papers

This workshop is interested in papers that focus on one or more of the following sub-themes:

(1) Conceptual discussion of utopia by invoking theoreticians like Foucault, Lefebvre, Gramsci, Harvey, and others;

(2) Documentation of experiments around the world including examination and critique of the present, into the possibilities of imagining a future transformation;

(3) Compare and contrast more than one cases in different categories of city and in various types of society;

(4) Cases of experiment in East Asia, in general, and Hong Kong, in particular.

Please send abstracts to Wing-Shing Tang (wstang@hkbu.edu.hk) at the Department of Geography, Hong Kong Baptist University, before the 31st December, 2010.

Output

It is intended to publish some of the papers in a monograph.

Posted in Conferences | 5 Comments

Academic Roundup

Two professors of philosophy being recruited by Kingston University, to join the Centre for Research in Modern European Philosophy (ex-Middlesex). Details here (via Stella Sandford on PHILOS-L@liverpool.ac.uk).

Four posts in geography at the National University of Singapore. I spent a very happy three months at NUS on their visiting scholar programme. It’s a very good department and lovely place to live. Details here (via Tracey Skelton on CRIT-GEOG-FORUM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK).

Stefan Collin on the Browne Report in the London Review of Books here.

Posted in Universities | Leave a comment