Bambach reviews Heidegger’s 1933-34 seminars, Nature, History, State

9781441133250Charles Bambach reviews Heidegger’s 1933-34 seminars, Nature, History, State – translated and edited by Gregory Fried and Richard Polt – at NDPR. The volume in question comprises student protocols of the seminars, plus interpretative essays by Robert Bernasconi, Peter Eli Gordon, Marion Heinz, Theodore Kisiel and Slavoj Žižek. The seminars were published in German in the Heidegger Jahrbuch vols 4 and 5.

Posted in Martin Heidegger, Slavoj Zizek | Leave a comment

Foucault’s lectures on Subjectivity and Truth, I.1.

Barry Stocker begins a reading of Foucault’s most recently published course, Subjectivité et vérité.

Barry Stocker's avatarStockerblog

I will be summarising and commenting on the most recently published of Michel Foucault’s lecture series at the Collège de France, on subjectivity and truth (Subjectivité et Vérité. Cours au Collège de France, 1980-1981. Eds. François Ewald, Allesandro Fontana and Frédéric Gros. Paris: Seuil/Gallimard, 2014). As with the series I’ve just finished on the punitive society, I will proceed lecture by lecture, with two posts for lectures I find stimulate the most elucidation and commentary. That is the case for the first lecture.

Lecture of 7th January 1981
Foucault begins with a discussion of texts with passages on elephants, which refer to their supposed sexual restraint and marital devotion. At this point he does seem like a thinker invented by Borges, the French philosopher who introduces discussion of truth, subjectivity and is it turns out sexuality and desire, with elephant fables. This may not be an accident, Foucault brings Borges…

View original post 671 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Editors vs Publishers – The Times Higher story on Prometheus and Taylor & Francis

The Times Higher has an interesting and worrying piece about the clash between the editors of a journal and their publisher Taylor & Francis. Here’s the opening few lines:

A journal’s editorial board has been left on the brink of resignation after an eight-month standoff with its publisher Taylor & Francis over the publication of a debate on academic publishing and the profits made by major firms.

The debate, in the journal Prometheus: Critical Studies in Innovation, was due to appear last September, but was delayed by Taylor & Francis and published only at the end of last month.

Its “proposition” paper, “Publisher, be damned! from price gouging to the open road”, by four academics from the University of Leicester’s School of Management, criticises the large profits made by commercial publishers on the back of academics’ labours, and the failure of the Finch report on open access to address them.

The paper compares academic publishing with the music industry, which, it says, has “booming” sales after lowering prices in the face of widespread piracy. It suggests that “doing nothing to prevent the trading of electronic copies of our academic work” could also force prices down in publishing.

Posted in Publishing | 5 Comments

Steve Mentz on Kenneth Branagh’s Macbeth

Steve Mentz has a good piece about Kenneth Branagh’s Macbeth at his blog. You can read my take here.

Posted in William Shakespeare | Leave a comment

Georg Lukács questions – did Existentialismus oder Marxismus? or ‘Heidegger Redivivus’ ever get translated into English?

Did Georg Lukács’s 1954 book Existentialismus oder Marxismus? ever get translated into English? And did his ‘Heidegger Redivivus’ ever get translated? My searching has turned up nothing so I am assuming not. I know both are available in French and German.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Interview about the ‘Governing Academic Life’ conference

In advance of the ‘Governing Academic Life’ conference later this month, to commemorate the thirtieth anniversary of Foucault’s death, an interview with the organisers.

Posted in Conferences, Michel Foucault, Politics | Leave a comment

Bradley Garrett in The Times Higher on protection for researchers

“Place-hacker Bradley Garrett: research at the edge of the law” in The Times Higher. It’s good to see some people like Danny Dorling publicly supporting him, especially given the weak statement from Royal Holloway, University of London, where he did the PhD research. Here’s the first paragraph:

man_standing_on_city_crane_at_nigh_450

In 2008, I began a four-year doctoral research project with urban explorers in London. Urban explorers are groups of people interested in sneaking into, and often photographing, off-limits architecture, trespassing into abandoned buildings, infrastructure systems and under-construction skyscrapers. Given the nature of what they do, conducting research with them was always going to require a level of deep participation; passive “observers” are swiftly identified, censured and disregarded in this community. I chose to undertake ethnographic work in the tradition of the Chicago School of Sociology. What followed over the next few years was, by any stretch of the imagination, an incredible series of events that concluded two weeks ago with a qualified victory for me and eight of my project participants after beating a charge of “conspiracy to commit criminal damage”, which carries with it a 10-year maximum jail sentence. Elated as we were to be out of the dock, this was a victory with sombre caveats for me as a researcher.

Posted in urban/urbanisation | Leave a comment

Cryptologic geographies

An interesting piece from Jeremy Crampton looking at what he calls ‘cryptologic geographies’…

Jeremy's avatarOpen Geography

In 2011, a 29-year-old grad student at the University of Münster in Germany made some coding alterations to OpenSSL, the secure sockets layer used on half a million websites around the world, including banks, financial institutions and even Silicon Valley companies such as Yahoo, Tumblr, and Pinterest.

Unfortunately the code contained a security flaw. At one hour before midnight on New Year’s Eve 2011, a British computer consultant approved the new code and submitted it into the release stream, failing to notice the bug. The vulnerable code went into wide release in March 2012 as OpenSSL Version 1.0.1.

So began the “Heartbleed” vulnerability. For two years until it was noticed in April 2014 any attacker could exploit the vulnerability to obtain the “crown jewels” of the server itself, that is, the master key or password that would unlock all the accounts and enable access to everything coming or going from the server…

View original post 813 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The work of editing – adding references to translations

deskOver the past few weeks, around other things, I’ve been editing a translation of a book for a new press. I’ll post details of the book when the website is available. A lot of the work has been checking the translation to the original, and making alterations in keeping with other translations of this thinker, but also, more importantly, those he is in dialogue with. When all this is done I’ll be writing an introduction. Another part of the role though is important, undervalued and enormously time-consuming. This is the task of updating the references and providing indications of English language versions. This was a book published in the 1960s, based on lectures from the 1950s. One of the key interlocutors was Heidegger. The references to Heidegger are to old editions of his texts. Some are to early editions of collections like Holzwege (Off the Beaten Path) and Vorträge und Aufsätze. Others are to originally separately published texts – the ‘Letter on Humanism’, ‘What is Metaphysics?’, ‘The Essence of Truth’ etc. – that were later gathered into the collection Wegmarken (Pathmarks), or other pieces that ended up in other volumes.

The easiest option, of course, would be to simply keep the original references, perhaps translating the title – that’s what the translator did. The second option would be to indicate the bibliographic details of the English translation of the relevant text but not the specific page number. The third, which is the one I am taking – and did for all the Lefebvre texts I edited or co-edited – is to provide full references. But there is a necessary step in between. Few research libraries continue to shelve the earlier editions of the texts – older ones are put in the store, or worse, if they stock the Gesamtausgabe (collected edition). I only have a few Heidegger texts in German other than this edition. So before I can find the English passage in question, I need to find the German in the Gesamtausgabe. With a very few this is relatively easy – the new editions of Holzwege and Vorträge und Aufsätze have marginal pagination which refers to the old, though these are not always consistent with the references I have. With others there is either no indication of a page at all – all-too-frequent – or the pagination is to a different edition. So quite a lot of hunting around – few Heidegger books have indexes. The internet and digital editions of some texts makes this a little easier, but not that much. The old pirate site of digital editions of the Gesamtausgabe has been closed. It doesn’t help that in more than a few instances the page number in the source text is wrong – the worst and most time-consuming error was p. 56 when it should have been pp. 5-6. With ‘What is Metaphysics?’ the Introduction, main text, and Afterword are provided in sequential order in the standalone text, referenced without distinction,but in chronological order of writing in Wegmarken and Pathmarks – main text, Afterword, Introduction.

Once I’ve located the German in the modern edition, then I find the English translation. Almost all of the texts referenced do exist in an English translation, and I do have most of these. But while some books are translated entire – Holzwege (Off the Beaten Path) and Wegmarken (Pathmarks), for instance – others have their contents scattered through multiple collections – Vorträge und Aufsätze ends up in five or six different English books (a new translation of this is overdue). The English Nietzsche does not include all of the German, but adds a related essay. In long essays with no or few section divisions, finding a specific passage can take a while.

So the majority of the notes in this translation have three references – the original; a modern German version; and a modern English version. That won’t solve things for everyone as there are multiple English translations of some key essays, but I’ve referenced what I think is the best or most recent. But it is a lot more helpful to readers than the alternatives. Once I’m done with the Heidegger, I need to turn to the references to Marx, Hegel, Nietzsche, Jaspers, Heraclitus and Lenin…

Posted in Books, Martin Heidegger, Publishing, Writing | 7 Comments

Volume 32, Issue 3 now out

New issue of Society and Space out.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment