David Farrell Krell on reading, translating and citing

A note in one of David Farrell Krell’s books:

I will cite Derrida’s texts throughout the book by a code letter (here, G), with the page numbers of the French and English editions. I have not used the available translations for my own work, but have translated Derrida’s texts afresh; this is not because I dream of improving on the work of expert translators, but because such close work with the texts–commencing with the effort to translate–is the only way I am able to proceed. A final checking of my own efforts against the published translations (when available) has saved me from many crimes and abominations, and I am grateful to Derrida’s translators for that, and for more than that.

David Farrell Krell, Of Memory, Reminiscence and Writing: On the Verge, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990, p. 315 n. 2.

I’ve said a little about Krell before, but reading this book – I think the only one of his books I’d not read before – reminded me of this suggestion, which I’m sure he makes elsewhere. I like the recognition of others’ labour; the help to readers in providing dual-language referencing; and the rationale for why this approach is necessary. It’s almost exactly the model I use when working on Foucault and, as much as I am able, other thinkers. Close reading demands it.

Posted in David Farrell Krell, Jacques Derrida, Michel Foucault, Writing | 1 Comment

What Does It Mean To Start An Open Access Journal?

Some very interesting discussion – both from a Sociology journal in the main part of the post; and some reflections from an international relations perspective at the end.

Pablo K's avatarThe Disorder Of Things

Following earlier interviews with Editors at Ethics & Global Politics and the newly open Cultural Anthropology, we present yet another insight into how to do open access, this time with Professor Kim Weeden of Cornell, a Deputy Editor of the new open access journal Sociological Science, which launched earlier this year. As the name suggests, this is a sociology journal (and a ‘general interest’ one at that), indicating yet another field in which open access is being taken seriously whilst International Relations languishes (not withstanding para-IR examples like Ethics & Global Politics and our friends at the Journal of Critical Globalisation Studies). So what can we learn from the Sociological Science model? As usual, I’ve stuck some thoughts on at the end.


Sociological Science

1. Who initiated Sociological Science, and why?

Dissatisfaction with the traditional publication process, and in particular the peer review system, has been festering in…

View original post 2,958 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Birth of Territory – audio recording of lecture at RMIT

12 The Birth of TerritoryThe audio recording of my lecture on The Birth of Territory in February at RMIT is available here. I gave a version of the same talk at Monash University the day before but didn’t manage to record it. I say a very little about my work on Shakespeare and on urban territory at the end.

The introductions are by Hartmut Fünfgeld and Jean Hillier. Thanks to both, and to Anne McNevin for organising the Monash one.

Posted in Conferences, Shakespearean Territories, The Birth of Territory, urban/urbanisation | 1 Comment

Is there a need for a news site for Geography appointments?

At My Desiring Machines, a call from Keith Harris for a news site for Geography and Urban Studies appointments:

Who is getting hired in the urban studies/geog world?

Posted on March 13, 2014 by

I came across these open threads at New APPS and Leiter Reports where new philosophy PhDs can report where they’ve been hired, and thought something similar would be a great addition to the urban studies/geog blogosphere. I obviously don’t have the traffic here to glean any useful information, but think a site like Stuart Elden’s Progressive Geographies would be an excellent location. Any other ideas?

I’m not sure about this, especially if the Leiter Reports model is followed. It’s one thing to say that Professor X has been appointed at the University of Y. It’s another to do what Brian Leiter frequently does, which is to say something along these lines: “Professor X of University 1 has a senior offer from University 2.  Students thinking about either program will want to keep an eye on what happens”. What I dislike about that is twofold. First, that any job offer should be a confidential matter between the offering department, the candidate, and, if the latter choses, their current department. Does it really help any decision process, or negotiation, to broadcast it this widely? Second, that it puts undue emphasis on a single person in the overall assessment of which department to join as a student. Perhaps this is more important in some fields, and in small departments, but it still seems an unhealthy way to consider which department to join as a (post-)graduate student.

I’d be pleased to see some kind of news site reporting news that is cleared by all sides – perhaps only when a department has made the news public. But I’m not sure any individual’s site should be the home for this – it seems to me, for reasons both of workload and exposure, it should be on a collective site. This is one of the reasons why I welcomed the Daily Nous and New APPS taking on these roles in Philosophy.

 

Posted in Universities | 1 Comment

Three new pieces on Heidegger’s Black Notebooks

Three new pieces on Heidegger’s ‘Black Notebooks’ – Critical Theory; The Guardian; Jonathan Rée in Prospect. Given that these have now been published – at least, Klostermann have charged me for them, so I expect they are on their way – it will be good to start seeing discussions by people who have actually read them.

Update: this from Adam Kotsko is one of the more sensible assessments.

Posted in Martin Heidegger | 3 Comments

Guy Debord’s Society of the Spectacle – new, annotated translation online and forthcoming in print

Cover: Society of the Spectacle

Guy Debord: The Society of the Spectacle

Newly translated and annotated by Ken Knabb Bureau of Public Secrets, 2014 ISBN 978-0-939682-06-5 150 pages. $15.00

The Society of the Spectacle, originally published in Paris in 1967, has been translated into more than twenty other languages and is arguably the most important radical book of  the twentieth century. This  is the first edition in  any language  to include extensive annotations, clarifying the historical allusions and  revealing the sources  of Debord’s “détournements.” Contrary to popular misconceptions,  Debord’s book is neither an ivory tower “philosophical” discourse nor a mere expression of “protest.”   It is a carefully considered effort to clarify the most fundamental  tendencies and contradictions of the society in which we find ourselves. This  makes it more of a challenge, but it is also why it remains so pertinent nearly  half a century after its original publication while countless other social  theories and intellectual fads have come and gone. It has, in fact, become even more pertinent than ever, because the spectacle  has become more all-pervading than ever — to the  point that it is almost universally taken for granted. Most people today have scarcely any awareness of pre-spectacle  history, let alone of anti-spectacle possibilities. As Debord noted  in his follow-up work, Comments on the Society of the Spectacle (1988), “spectacular domination has succeeded in raising an entire generation molded to its laws.”

This new annotated edition is now at the printer’s. It will be available  around March 20, 2014. If you order it now directly from AK Distribution,  they will ship it the moment it comes in.

[Table of Contents and online text]

Posted in Books, Guy Debord | 1 Comment

Rafael Khachaturian in Dissent on Althusser

1394554075althusser_by_Artie_666_2In Dissent, Rafael Khachaturian examines Althusser’s legacy.

Posted in Louis Althusser | Leave a comment

Semiotext(e) – Whitney publications

WEBHOMEPAGE

Semiotexte has produced twenty-eight pamphlets as part of its contribution to the Whitney Biennial by philosophers, writers and critics associated with the press. The series includes new, commissioned works by Franco “Bifo” Berardi, Veronica Gonzalez-Peña, Sergio Gonzalez-Rodriguez, Gary Indiana, John Kelsey, Chris Kraus, Maurizio Lazzarato, Eileen Myles, Ariana Reines, Abdellah Taïa, Lynne Tillman and Mark von Schlegell, and previously unpublished texts such influential 20th century figures as Simone Weil, Julio Cortazar and Jean Baudrillard.

Available here.

Posted in Books, Publishing | Leave a comment

The Malaysian Airlines tragedy and South China Sea geopolitics

A good piece by Phil Steinberg on the wider geopolitical issues around the missing Malaysian Airlines plane.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Common Place reviewed by Andrés Núñez

A new review at the Society and Space open site.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment