MayDay Rooms

Radical archives for Radical Philosophy

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Some leftover thoughts on Derrida’s Death Penalty Lectures

Some very interesting discussion of Derrida’s The Death Penalty seminar, including some thoughts on his relation to Foucault.

Peter Gratton's avatarPHILOSOPHY IN A TIME OF ERROR

I submitted my review for Berfoison Derrida’s 1999-2000 lectures on the death penalty. For reasons of keeping the review as accessible as possible for a broader readership, I had to leave out certain discussions.

1. First, I wasn’t able to take up or challenge Derrida’s claim that no one “philosophically” has genuinely countered the death penalty. On the one hand this claim is straightforward: he thinks Western metaphysics is structured in part by a sacrificial politics and that even opponents of the death penalty use this logic. As such a truly philosophical answer to the death penalty would require—wait for it!–a deconstruction of this logic. But I find the claim off putting. One, it reveals a limitation of Derrida’s, taken over from Heidegger, that I’ll just call philosophical determinism: everything historical is reducible to a problem in Western philosophy. Moreover, Derrida himself would be the first to question–you…

View original post 915 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Life Penalty: Foucault, Derrida, Bamber – abstract for a possible conference

I have been asked if I’d be interested in speaking at a planned conference on ‘Cruel and Unusual Punishments’, which sounds intriguing, although somewhat outside of my usual research interests. At the moment it is not at all clear that the conference will get funding to go ahead, and if it does whether the timescale will work with my own travel and availability. It’s strange writing the abstract for a paper that may never actually be written, as the particular nature of the conference is such that I will almost certainly only write it if the conference takes place and I am able to attend. (While grant applications can be similar, most I’ve been involved with have been for work that will be done, to some degree, whether funding is given or not.) Here, then, is the abstract for a paper that may never be written.

The Life Penalty: Foucault, Derrida, Bamber

This paper will examine the work of Michel Foucault and Jacques Derrida on the death penalty. Derrida’s late seminars on this topic have recently been published; while Foucault’s book Discipline and Punish is supplemented by his lecture courses La société punitive and the forthcoming Théories et institutions pénales, as well as shorter interventions, including an unpublished lecture delivered in Montreal in March 1976. While the death penalty is the focus of Derrida’s interventions, Foucault is most interested in the move away from this to imprisonment as the universal punishment, graduated only in temporal and spatial terms – type of institution and duration of sentence. This paper will use their work to think about what might be called ‘the life penalty’; that is, imprisonment without end. The specific focus will be so-called ‘whole life’ tariffs in the United Kingdom, especially looking at the case of Jeremy Bamber. Bamber was sentenced to five life sentences for the murder of his father, mother, sister and nephews in 1985, and told by the Home Secretary in 1994 that he would never be released. Bamber is unique in that he is the only such prisoner in the UK who continues to maintain his innocence. Looking both at the complexities of the case, and at the principle itself, this contribution thinks about the absence of the death penalty in the UK, and its effective parallel, ‘the life penalty’.

A couple of years ago I wrote a piece on the execution of Troy Davis that also mentioned the Jeremy Bamber case. You can read that piece, which sketches some of the argument I might be making at more length, here.

Posted in Jacques Derrida, Jeremy Bamber, Michel Foucault, Politics | Leave a comment

Rethinking Marxism: Ideology, Interpellation and Subjectivation – open access virtual issue

A virtual theme issue from Rethinking Marxism on ‘Ideology, Interpellation and Subjectivation’ is available here, with contributions from Althusser, Montag, Krips, Macherey, etc.

Since its inception in 1988, Rethinking Marxism has been a major platform for extending key Althusserian themes, including the debates on ideology, ideological interpellation and subjectivation.  In the pages of the journal, we have published various interventions and contributions that deepened, developed and critiqued Louis Althusser’s initial attempts to forge an articulation between Marx and Freud.  In this virtual issue, we highlight a selection of ten articles, each developing the debate in a different direction, in order to alert potential readers to the rich diversity of perspectives in Marxian theory that appear regularly in the pages of our journal. This selection, of course, is not meant to be an exhaustive catalogue of articles published on the topic in the journal. We hope the readers will browse the archives of Rethinking Marxism to explore other valuable contributions to the debate.This virtual issue is the first of an ongoing series and will be free to access for until the end of May 2014. For the table of contents of all the past virtual issues, please visit rethinkingmarxism.org.

Posted in Louis Althusser, Pierre Macherey | Leave a comment

Some excellent advice on writing good emails – and the wonder of SaneBox

Any busy person, including academics, will probably tell you that email management is one of the biggest challenges they face. Many of the online resources for email management put all the onus on the recipient. These two put the focus back on those we send. The first is about how to write sensible emails, that is, ones that don’t waste people’s time; the second is how to go about making requests by email (both via here).

That said, while we can only hope more and more people get better at sending emails – read the email charter! – the chances are we are still going to have to plough through a wide range of messages. I’ve previously written about my method of handling email and a day in email.

But I’ve recently discovered SaneBox. It’s wonderful, and I’d strongly encourage people to try it out. It works in a number of ways, but the most basic is that it filters your messages for you, putting only some in your inbox, and separating out bulk emails, email lists, unimportant messages, auto-replies, etc. None of these are lost, just not put in your inbox. You can train it to recognise messages from certain people or lists. The point is that the @sanelater folder, which includes all filtered messages, should be checked less regularly when you can process such messages in bulk. When you receive something and you never want to see similar again, you can drop the message into @saneblackhole and it will do that for every such message. This is much better, and much quicker, than unsubscribing. You can drag and drop messages into @sanetomorrow or @sanenextweek and they will reappear in your inbox on those days. Another neat thing you can do is to cc yourself (through a simple code) in a message that requires a response by a certain day or time, and if you get the reply, fine; if you don’t you’ll get a reminder from sanebox with the original message. I think this is much better than making an appointment or task to trigger that action since you no longer need to find the email. I’m sure there are more tricks, but these are the ones I’m using. The key thing: no email is ever deleted (except if you’ve told it to black hole that sender); but only the most important ones appear in your inbox.

If you use this invitation URL, you will get a free 2 weeks trial and $5 in SaneBox credit: http://sanebox.com/t/50×43 – and I’ll get credit too, though i’ve already paid for a year’s subscription.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Memorylands: Cole on Macdonald

New review on the Society and Space open site.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Stuart Elden @UniMelb: Foucault’s ‘La société punitive’

Nice image announcing one of my Melbourne talks next week.

lukevanryn's avatarTechnology and Culture Reading Group

Photo Credit: duncan via Compfightcc

Stuart Elden is giving a lecture at the University of Melbourne on Tuesday, 4th March at 2pm.

This lecture provides an overview and critical discussion of Foucault’s 1973 lectures La société punitive. This was Foucault’s third course at the Collège de France, and links in important ways to the two previous ones, as well as looking forward to the 1975 book Surveiller et punir (translated as Discipline and Punish) […] This presentation will concentrate on four areas: the interlinked themes of measure, inquiry and examination; shifts in modes of punishment; the discussion of civil war and the social enemy; and the treatment of popular illegality in England and France.

Further details and registration are at this link. Stuart is speaking at RMIT and Monash University; his blog has all the details.

View original post

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Derek Gregory to talk at the University of Glasgow, Friday March 7, 3:30pm

Details of a Derek Gregory talk in Glasgow next month.

understandingempire's avatarUnderstanding Empire: Technology, Power, Politics

Seminar

View original post

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Retour à La société punitive (2014)

Another French event on the most recently published lecture course.

Clare O'Farrell's avatarFoucault News

View original post

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Fully-funded Ph.D. studentship on publication history of “The Geographical Journal”

This looks an interesting opportunity on the history of a key journal – details here.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment