Michael Byers, International Law and the Arctic

9781107042759I’ve just been sent a copy of Michael Byers, International Law and the Arctic by the author. I’ll be on a panel with Michael and others at the ArcticNet conference in December, in Halifax, so this is essential background reading.

Posted in Boundaries, Politics, Territory | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Theory, Culture and Society – new webpage

theoryculturesociety.org – looks very good and a wealth of interesting things to follow up.

Posted in Publishing, Theory, Culture and Society | 1 Comment

Intervention – ‘“A remarkable disconnect”: On violence, military research, and the AAG’ by Joel Wainwright

Challenging piece by Joel Wainwright at the Antipode blog.

Antipode Editorial Office's avatarAntipodeFoundation.org

Joel WainwrightJoel Wainwright – Ohio State University geographer, author of Geopiracy: Oaxaca, Militant Empiricism, and Geographical Thought (2012, Palgrave Macmillan), Decolonizing Development: Colonial Power and the Maya (Blackwell, 2008) and Antipode papers on the Grundrisse, the political implications of climate change, and transnational resistance to neoliberalism – here presents the second part of his latest essay on the growing involvement of the U.S. military in human geography (the first part ‘Misunderstanding, militarized‘ is available at the excellent Public Political Ecology Lab website)…

————————————————————————————————————————

Over the past year I have published several pieces on the growing involvement of the US military into human geography (of which the Bowman Expeditions to Central America are only one element). In response, many have asked: what about the Association of American Geographers (AAG)? What are they doing about all this? These are questions worth asking.

Until recently, the answer was simple: the…

View original post 1,282 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Shakespeare on the Road – a workshop in Stratford-upon-Avon

Shakespeare CentreA really interesting day in Stratford-upon-Avon, at the launch workshop of the ‘Shakespeare on the Road’ project. The event was held at the Shakespeare Centre of the Shakespeare Birthplace Trust. I spoke briefly about my ‘Shakespearean Territories’ project. Many thanks to Susan Brock, Paul Prescott and Paul Edmondson for the invitation to be part of this. Lots of interesting people and papers – especially nice to meet Stanley Wells, whose work I’ve known for a while.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Meurs review Morin

Pieter Meurs reviews Marie-Eve Morin’s book on Jean-Luc Nancy.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Society and Space – from editor to one of the editors

Society and Space Vol 31 No 5 marks the formal end of my role as the editor of the journal, though I continue as one of the editors. Previously the journal has had an editor – initially Michael Dear, then Gerry Pratt, and I took over from Gerry in late 2006 – and a team of co-editors. In practice, the journal has always worked as something as a collective, and since I took over the co-editors and I have always discussed key strategic issues, and collectively looked at each paper, even if a single person was designated as the coordinating editor. But now we are much more formally working as cooperative team, with all duties shared between a team of five – Deborah Cowen, Peter Gratton, Natalie Oswin, Mary Thomas and me. You can read more about the changes in the editorial.

Posted in Publishing, Society and Space | Leave a comment

Issue 5 out

Issue 5 of Society and Space now out.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

CFP AAG 2014 – Borders Beyond Securitization: Rethinking the Lines that Bind Us

I’m not going to post many calls for AAG sessions, but this also looks very relevant to this blog’s concerns.

Annual Meeting of the Association of American Geographers, Tampa, April 8-11, 2014
CFP: Borders Beyond Securitization: Rethinking the Lines that Bind Us

Geopolitical boundaries are increasingly analyzed in relation to securitization, an approach that has come to dominate the way that many think about borders both in policy and in scholarship. A majority of studies tend to focus on the historical and contemporary characteristics of securitizing borders and the deeper implications of such actions.  From such work have emerged theories of how abstracted notions of security have shifted to material practices and how the reconfiguration of power has impacted identities and become part of daily state-making.  While useful, these securitization discourses are often narrowly conceived, leading to the neglect of the productive dimensions of borders, i.e. the elision of alternative understandings of borders as spaces of refuge, safety, opportunity and exchange.
For this session, we seek papers that explore alternative framings of borders.  For example, how can we explore borders beyond discourses and practices of securitization? What empirical lessons can be learned by comparing regional border contexts? How can communities become involved in border transformation? What is the role of knowledge transfer in border studies and political geography more generally? How does securitization as an object of analysis reproduce hegemonic conceptualizations of borders? What is the role of participatory geography in re-thinking border possibilities?
Possible topics addressed in this session include (but are not limited to) the following and may cover a wide geographical arena:
Participatory geographies and borders
Borders in regional context
Lived experiences of border communities
Lessons across space/place on borders
Material and symbolic dimensions of borderland life
Alternative mappings of border spaces
Political mobilizations and social movements at and along borders
The role of borders in knowledge production
The role of borders in transnational phenomena (human trafficking, migration, cultural flows, etc.)
Changing theoretical conceptualizations of borders
New epistemologies of security in a post-9/11 world

Organizers: Margath Walker (University of Louisville) and Jamie Winders (Syracuse University).

Please send expressions of interest or abstracts to Maggie Walker (margath.walker@louisville.edu ) by Friday, October 18.

Posted in Boundaries, Conferences, Politics, Territory | 1 Comment

Call for Papers AAG 2014 – (Re)imagining Territory as Political Ecological Process

Re-posted from crit-geog-forum.

Call for Papers AAG 2014: (Re)imagining Territory as Political Ecological Process

Territory is the basis for the political-juridical organization of the international state system.  It is one of the fundamental concepts upon which state sovereignty operates and is closely related to the control and management of natural resources, populations, and economic activities.  Yet, territory is also understood as the bundle of meanings, relationships, and histories of social groups to land and place (Rocheleau 2011).  Nevertheless, territory is dynamic and processes of re- and de- territorialization are constantly influencing the dynamics of natural resource management, social action, and economies.  Territory is fundamentally enmeshed in social, political, economic, and environmental relations between diverse human and non-human actors, epistemologies, and space(s).  

As a concept and analytic, debates around the formation, salience, and effects of “territory” are again emerging within geography (cf. Agnew 2013, Bryan 2012, Elden 2013, and Murphy 2013).  Much of the debate, however, is taking place in the realm of political geography and is closely tied to the state as the central scalar unit of analysis.  This panel seeks to explore concepts of territory beyond the bounds of the state through critical political ecology.  Political ecology has focused largely on power relations that cross scales, from the international and state level to, local social groups at risk of exclusion, eviction, and conflict, in addition to popular resistance in the form of social movements (cf. Forsyth 2003, Peet, Robbins, and Watts 2010).  While “the state” remains an essential component of the political ecology framework, a broader analysis of ecological processes and local communities distributes the focus beyond the bounds of the state, positioning it as one of many actors involved in social and ecological change.  Paradoxically, political ecologists have largely overlooked “territory.” 

Following Rocheleau (2011), this panel suggests that territory as a concept and analytic is underdeveloped within the field of political ecology.  Rather than directly engaging the concept of territory, many works in political ecology employ it as a given category or backdrop and write about the territory(ies) of resource conflicts, social movements, power struggles, and political economy.  What happens when we bring political ecology to bear on territory?  How can we understand and think with territory (as opposed to thinking about territory) as a central component of analyses in political ecology?  What does political ecology have to offer to the analysis and critique of territory, or vice versa?  How can a political ecological approach to territory change our understanding of territory as a process?  What does territory “do” in regards to political ecology?  This panel will explore these questions to critically assess how territory and political ecology “work” together.  We seek papers that engage, but are not limited to, these questions and the possible topics below through empirical case studies or from more theoretical approaches.  Ultimately we seek to start a conversation about (re)imagining territory as political ecological process.  Possible paper topics include:

Ecologies of territorial expansion and/or compression

Militarism, territory, and ecological processes

Epistemological and ontological ‘states’ of territory

Protest, trouble-making, and culture-jamming in reclaiming urban territory and ecology

Indigenous rights and territory

Processes of claiming territory via: conservation; social movements; legal, illegal, and/or extra-legal actions; extending the state and institutions into “marginal” or peripheral spaces

Tools of (re)territorialization (mapping, participatory methodologies, etc.)

Session organizers: Joel Correia and Eric Lovell, University of Colorado at Boulder Geography Department
Panel discussants: to be confirmed.

If you are interested in participating, please submit an abstract of no more than 250 words to Joel Correia (joel.correia@colorado.edu) or Eric Lovell (eric.lovell@colorado.edu) by 12 November 2013.  The discounted registration for the conference ends on 23 October 2013, although conference registration is open until 3 December 2013.  For more information please see http://www.aag.org/cs/annualmeeting.

Agnew, J. A. 2013. Territory, politics, governance. Territory, Politics, Governance, 1, no. 1: 1-4.

Bryan, J. 2012. Rethinking territory: Social justice and neoliberalism in Latin America’s territorial turn. Geography Compass, 6, no. 4: 215-226.

Elden, S. 2013.  The birth of territory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Forsyth, T. 2003. Critical political ecology: The politics of environmental science. London: Routledge.

Murphy, A. B. 2013. Territory’s continuing allure. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103, no. 5:1212-1226.

Peet, R. and Watts, M. 2004. Liberation ecologies: Environment, development, social movements. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.

Rocheleau, D. 2011. Rooted networks, webs of relation, and the power of situated science: Bringing the models back down to earth in Zmbrana. In Knowing nature: Conversations at the intersection of political ecology and science studies. ed. Mara J. Goldman, Paul Nadasdy, and Matthew D. Turner. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Posted in Conferences, Territory | Leave a comment

Foucault’s 1972 lecture at Minnesota – summary now available

Foucault - Ceremonie, Thêatre et politiqueIn a previous post, I discussed the summary of a 1972 lecture Foucault gave in Minneapolis, entitled “Cérémonie, théâtre et politique au XVIIe siècle”. As far as I am aware the text of the lecture remains in Foucault’s own papers and was never published. It was published in a brief English summary, written by Stephen Davidson, in Acta: Proceedings of the fourth annual conference of XVIIth century French Literature, pp. 22-3. Given the text is so hard to find, I wanted to ask Davidson for permission to put this summary on this site, but sadly I heard he died some years ago. 

I’ve therefore gone ahead with make the summary available – in pdf. If anyone knows of a way of making this more legitimate please let me know.

Thanks to Kai Bosworth, Gerald Moore, Arun Saldanha and Garnet Kindervater for detective work.

Incidentally, the question was raised as to why I’d labelled this lecture summary ‘almost unknown’. I appreciate that people who were there may have long memories of the event, and that the lecture is listed in some bibliographies – i.e. Daniel Defert’s ‘Chronology’. But the summary was difficult to get hold of – not a single UK institution appears to have the proceedings, so I had to request it from the Bibliotheque Nationale, who took six weeks to track it down and send it. So it is pretty obscure. Hopefully posting it here makes it more widely accessible.

Posted in Michel Foucault | 2 Comments