Books received – Indiana University press sale

IUP booksThree books by or about Heidegger, and Colin Koopman’s Genealogy as Critique.

Posted in Martin Heidegger, Michel Foucault | 1 Comment

Sloterdijk’s Nietzsche Apostle forthcoming

9781584350996Forthcoming with Semiotext(e), translated by Steve Corcoran, Sloterdijk’s Nietzsche Apostle.

For Peter Sloterdijk, Friedrich Nietzsche represents nothing short of a “catastrophe in the history of language”—a new evangelist for a linguistics of narcissistic jubilation. Nietzsche offered a philosophical declaration of independence from humility, a meeting-point of sobriety and megalomania that for Sloterdijk has come to define the very project of philosophy.

Yet for all the significance of this language-event named Nietzsche, Nietzsche’s contributions have too often been elided and the contradictions at the root of his philosophy too often edited out. As Sloterdijk observes, “Never has an author so insisted on distinction and yet attracted such vulgarity.”

Posted in Friedrich Nietzsche, Peter Sloterdijk | 2 Comments

From Geo-metrics to Geo-politics – Waterloo to Zurich

I’ll be giving a version of the talk I recently gave at the Balsillie School of International Affairs at the University of Zurich tomorrow. (I note that William Walters, who I met for the first time at the Balsillie School, is giving a lecture there later in the term.) The Balsillie talk was for a workshop on ‘ Regimes of Calculation and Global Governance‘, and was entitled ‘Geo-metrics’. The Zurich talk reuses substantial parts of that, but is pitched slightly more generally as ‘Earth: Regrounding Geo-politics’. In particular the Zurich talk will drop the material about calculation in Heidegger, and adds a bit more on some recent books that I think are doing something similar to what I intend with this work. There were a couple of good passages in William Connolly’s new The Fragility of Things that will be particularly useful.

I recorded the Balsillie talk and will post the audio recording here later this week. I think there are plans to record the Zurich one too for their website – I certainly don’t suggest listening to both, given the substantial overlaps.

And while we’re on the topic of recordings, the Jane Bennett workshop I was at was recorded, and should be available soon on Backdoor Broadcasting. (Not sure the lecture the previous day was recorded though.)

Posted in Conferences, Jane Bennett, William E Connolly | 5 Comments

CFP – Asia on the move: unpacking cross-border mobilities

Call for Papers: Inaugural Association of Asian Studies-in-ASIA Conference. July 17-19 2014. Singapore

Session Title Asia on the move: unpacking cross-border mobilities

Cross-border mobilities are proliferating in Asia. From Hong Kong to Shenzhen, from Beijing to Tokyo, the region now includes many of the world’s busiest air routes, and land and sea border crossings. Yet, at the same time, multiple borders and territories remain unsettled. Even inscription devices that facilitate and regulate transnational mobility have themselves become weapons in what TIME Asia magazine has termed a “Passport War”, in which rival states use passports and visas to performatively claim national territory, as in the case of China and India’s contest in the Himalayas. Such a phenomenon signals a threat to the region’s semblance of fluidity and unfettered movement.

This session seeks both theoretical and empirical accounts of a wide variety of cross-border mobilities, for tourism, for migration, or for other ends. These accounts may focus on the embodied, corporeal aspects of border crossing, at airports or land or sea transit points. They may also focus on the role of border performativity in the construction of the nation-state. We are particularly interested in the role of devices such as passports and visas, and persons such as travelers and border guards in the production of the border. Likewise, following Anssi Paasi and Étienne Balibar, we are open to the argument that “borders are everywhere”—that they are processes rather than places—and welcome papers that evaluate borders as themselves unfixed and mobile.

Participants who are interested to present a paper in this session are invited to submit the following (as required by the AAS) to Ian Rowen (ian.rowen@colorado.edu) and J.J. Zhang (j.j.zhang@nus.edu.sg) before 21 October 2013:

250 word abstract
Full name
Complete mailing address
Affiliation
Rank
Email address

Posted in Boundaries, Conferences | 1 Comment

On Deleuze and Zapatismo: An Interview with Thomas Nail at critical-theory.com

returning-to-revolution-thomas-nail

Thomas Nail is an assistant professor of philosophy at the University of Denver. His most recent book is Returning to Revolution: Deleuze, Guattari and Zapatismo from Edinburgh University Press. You can read the first fifty pages of that book here. Nail spoke with Critical-Theory.com to discuss his recent book and the role of academics today.

 

Posted in Felix Guattari, Gilles Deleuze | 1 Comment

A composite translation of a section of Chapter 2 of Foucault’s History of Madness

Madness and Civilization: An Anthology of Historical Texts has made available

A selection from the second chapter La grand renfermement (‘The Great Confinement’) of Histoire de la folie by Michel Foucault (1961) which blends together both existing English translations (privileging Howard’s earlier translation of the abridged text over Kalfa’s recent one of the complete text, using the latter to fill in the gaps– and occasionally supply the deficiencies– of the former).

For a selection from the opening chapter, Stultifera Navis (‘The Ship of Fools’), see here.

For a selection from the chapter ‘The Great Fear’, see here.

Posted in Michel Foucault | 2 Comments

Mark Neocleous, War Power, Police Power

NeocleousMark Neocleous’s book War Power, Police Power is due for publication in February 2014.

From waste to drones and no-fly zones

  • Why is liberalism so obsessed with waste?
  • Is there a drone above you now?
  • Are you living in a no-fly zone?
  • What is the role of masculinity in the ‘war on terror’?
  • And why do so many liberals say they love of peace while finding new ways to justify slaughter in the name of security?

In this, the first book to deal with the concepts of war power and police power together, Mark Neocleous deals with these questions and many more by using critical theory to radically rethink war power.

Neocleous generates a provocative set of claims about state power and capital accumulation, the role of violence in the making of liberal order, the police wars at the heart of this violence, and the ways in which these processes come to be called ‘peace’. And he takes the reader down some unexpected paths: the ‘war on waste’, debates about effeminacy, the proliferation of resilience and trauma-talk, drones as the culmination of colonial bombing campaigns, and no-fly zones as the perfect accompaniment for drones.

The result is a compelling book that articulates a vision of war/police power beyond the military and the police.

Posted in Mark Neocleous | 1 Comment

From Above reviewed in Nature

From Above reviewed in Nature – and good to see the other blurbs on the back cover, including an ex-colleague and my PhD supervisor.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

An almost unknown summary of a 1972 lecture by Foucault

On 7th April 1972, Foucault delivered a lecture under the title of “Cérémonie, théâtre et politique au XVIIe siècle”, in Minneapolis. This was published only in a brief English summary, written by Stephen Davidson, in Acta: Proceedings of the fourth annual conference of XVIIth century French Literature, pp. 22-3. I’ve finally managed to get hold of a copy of this. [update 10/10/13 – the summary is available here].

It’s an interesting topic, especially given what we know about Foucault’s lectures at the Collège de France, Théories et institutions pénales, earlier that year. Foucault suggests in the course summary that the course was the second of a three-part analysis, on the inquiry and the formation of the state. The first part was on measure and the Greek city-state (discussed in Lectures on the Will to Know) and the third would be on the examination, “as a form of power-knowledge linked to systems of control, exclusion, and punishment characteristic of industrial societies” (this was to be the focus of La société punitive). The lecture presented here could easily fit into the second of the analyses, and indeed may well be derived in whole or part from Collège de France lectures in 1972. But there are some discrepancies: the Collège de France course supposedly concentrated on the formation of the medieval state, whereas this lecture treats the 17th century, specifically a political ceremony from 1639-40 following the peasant and urban revolutions in Normandy, known as La révolte des Nu-pieds (The revolt of the barefoot).

Foucault presented the analysis in a theatrical form, in five acts. The summary outlines these five stages of the ceremony, but it also provides a fascinating glimpse into what Foucault thought his first few courses at the Collège de France would yield: a plan that is clearly related to what would become Discipline and Punish, but differs in some fundamental aspects. It may well be that the imminent publication of the 1972-73 lectures, La société punitive, will shed substantial light on how and why Foucault came to revise his plans. Here’s the key paragraph:

Before attempting the specific analysis, Mr. Foucault explained that this analysis of the political ceremony in the Seventeenth Century would ultimately become part of a larger study of the ceremonial manifestations of political power from the debates in the Greek and Roman agoras to the ceremonies at the end of the Eighteenth Century. This will be a study of how political power takes on visible or theatrical forms and imprints itself on the imagination or behaviour of a people. It would really be an ethnology of the manifestations of political power, a study of the system of demarcation of power within a society (p. 22).

I’d like to make the whole text of the summary available here, since it is hard to get hold of, and should be of more general interest. But I’d like to at least try to ask the author of the summary if that is okay. This may be a fool’s errand given 41 years have elapsed, but if anyone has contact details for Stephen Davidson, who in 1972 was at the University of Minnesota, I’d be grateful.

Posted in Michel Foucault | 5 Comments

The Daily Habits of Highly Productive Philosophers: Nietzsche, Marx & Kant

At Open Culture – drawing together descriptions of the work habits of Nietzsche, Marx and Kant.

Posted in Friedrich Nietzsche, Immanuel Kant, Karl Marx, Writing | 1 Comment