Kant’s Geography in Atlanta

I’ll be speaking about Kant’s Geography in Atlanta in December at the American Philosophical Association, Eastern Division. It’s a session on the Reading Kant’s Geography book with Robert Bernasconi and Robert Louden also speaking. Eduardo Mendieta will also be there, though he is on the programme committee so will not have a formal role. My talk will be close to the book’s introduction and the 2009 piece I published in Journal of Historical Geography – nothing new for those who know that work, but the point of the session is to open up the conversation among philosophers.

Immanuel Kant’s lectures on Physical Geography and the relation of his geographical and spatial concerns to his thought more generally are being reassessed. The lectures are finally about to be published in English translation, albeit in the problematic Rink edition. This will make these texts available to a much wider audience.

This talk will examine the history of the lectures and their publication; discuss Kant’s purpose in giving them; and look at the way in which he structured geographical knowledge and understood its relation to history and philosophy. It will open up some of the questions arising from the situation of the lectures in Kant’s work generally; raise some of the issues about the edition being translated; and discuss the position Kant occupies in the discipline of geography as a whole. It trades on the work in the 2012 volume Reading Kant’s Geography (SUNY Press 2012), edited by Stuart Elden and Eduardo Mendieta.

Posted in Conferences, Eduardo Mendieta, Immanuel Kant | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Beer on Sloterdijk

David Beer reviews Sloterdijk’s Bubbles: Spheres I at Berfrois. David also has a blog here.

Posted in Peter Sloterdijk | Leave a comment

Didn’t realise the whole thing was online.

Biblioklept's avatarBiblioklept

View original post

Posted in Jacques Derrida | 2 Comments

This is now down for June 2012. Graham Harman has just posted about it here.

stuartelden's avatarProgressive Geographies

This is really important news in Heidegger studies. The Beiträge zur Philosophie (Vom Ereignis) is coming out in a new translation. It will be out with Indiana University Press in April 2012, with the translation made by Richard Rojcewicz and Daniela Vallega-Neu. Indiana also published the 1999 translation by Parvis Emad and Kenneth Maly that was widely criticised, but which has still had a baleful effect on Anglophone work on Heidegger. For the two pieces I wrote on the Beiträge (here and here) and the analysis in Speaking Against NumberI fundamentally reworked all quotations.

Apparently the manuscript of the Emad and Maly translation had critical reviews, but the Heidegger estate and in particular Friedrich von Herrmann insisted this was the definitive English translation. So it was published. But in time people managed to convince von Herrmann that it was seriously defective, by the approach of translating sentences…

View original post 108 more words

Posted in Martin Heidegger, Publishing | Leave a comment

Peter Sloterdijk in conversation with Nigel Thrift at the Tate

On Saturday 16th June, at the Tate gallery in London – “Spaces of Transformation: Spatialised Immunity”.

Peter Sloterdijk’s philosophico-morphological theory is based on an understanding of the history of culture as spatialisations of forms. The world in which we live now requires us to design new types of ‘spatialised immunity’. More broadly, the concept of a spherical logic of space – a polymorphologic of form, order and thinking – is explicated in Spheres, his three-volume archaeology of the human attempt to dwell within spaces, from womb to globe. The Spheres project (Bubbles, Globe, Foam) is a significant topological turn in the field of contemporary philosophy, ‘a super-workout for communicative energies capable of finding contact throughout the entire world.’

Details here.

Posted in Events, Nigel Thrift, Peter Sloterdijk | 3 Comments

Historical Materialism conference – call for papers

‘Weighs Like a Nightmare’ – Ninth Annual Historical Materialism Conference Central London 8-11 November 2012. Call for papers – deadline 1 June 2012. I’ve been told they are particularly interested in papers from the ‘critical/radical/Marxist geography world’…

Has Marx been reanimated once again? From mainstream media to academia, this question hangs in the air. The old ghosts of revolution appear to be shaking off their shackles and getting agitated. What is this spirit? Who are the militants haunting this ramshackle capitalism? Are these new spectres – stalking the streets of Syria, Tunisia and Egypt, Athens, Spain and Wall Street and beyond – direct descendants of socialist and communist ones? How does the past haunt the present? How might the present spook the future?

Whatever answers crop up, the old questions refuse to go away: What type of organisation is needed to sharpen the conflicts, if any? Who is the agent of history and change? Is the scope of political action national or international? What is the political value of alliances and fronts? Does history cunningly work a progressive path through and around the contingencies of struggle? Are the same mistakes to be made, the same failures repeated?

The ninth HM annual conference focuses on the returns and the persistence of political forms and theoretical problems, on the uses and abuses of the history of Marxism in this turbulent present and on the ways and forms in which an inheritance of various Marxist traditions can help us to organise and to act in this turbulent present. [continues]

Posted in Conferences, Karl Marx | Leave a comment

doctorzamalek's avatarObject-Oriented Philosophy

If you’re interested, you can read about it in this essay (in English), HERE.

View original post

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

An editor’s plea

This is extremely familiar…

I frowned as I looked up from the computer. Yet another author complaining about the long turn-around. It had been six months since the author submitted his paper to the journal. That does seem like a long time. However, I didn’t quite know how to reply. I am not a lazy person. I don’t let submissions sit in the inbox for weeks. As soon as I receive them I start searching for qualified referees. But sometimes referees are hard to come by. I frequently invite 10 referees before finding two who will actually do it. At that point a couple of months have already passed. After yet another month I might receive the referee reports but sometimes the referees are late. In some of those cases, reminder letters help. At other times I am forced to uninvite the referees and find new people. After another couple of months, I may be able to make my decision… [continues]

Posted in Publishing | Leave a comment

David Harvey: ‘The financial crisis is an urban crisis’

Short video piece on The Guardian website.

Posted in David Harvey, Politics | Leave a comment

Designing Geopolitics conference

In San Diego this weekend, but with live stream.

D:GP is a think-tank focused on how planetary scale computation transforms political geography and models of sovereignty, as seen through the lens of speculative art and design. D:GP collaborates directly with scientists, engineers and researchers in a wide range of disciplines, and is supported by the research of its founding Director, Benjamin H. Bratton.

Designing Geopolitics 2 will extend our core critical questions. What is the territory of the Cloud Polis? What alien models of sovereignty require invention, revitalization or redesign? What does it mean to ‘see like a State’ in an age of ubiquitous networked optics? What is the role of speculative design thinking in prototyping real alternatives? What are the driving and determinant patterns of data-centric society for which we have an inadequate theoretical language? What are the boundaries of biopolitcs, and what comes next?

Full details here.

Posted in Boundaries, Conferences, Politics, Territory | 3 Comments