Two questions on Heidegger translation conventions

Two questions, and some interesting discussion in the comments, about Heidegger translations. I think Dasein should be kept, and all the nuances teased out in a translator note; and I dislike the capitalisation of nouns in English since it tends to reify or deify them. Nouns in German are capitalised anyway, so that’s a different convention. The biggest problem though, isn’t with the ones Adam Kotsko highlights, it’s Sein as ‘Being’… when it really should simply be ‘being’.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Foucault’s Boomerang: the New Military Urbanism (2013)

Stephen Graham’s “Foucault’s Boomerang” reposted.

Clare O'Farrell's avatarFoucault News

Stephen Graham, Foucault’s Boomerang: the New Military Urbanism
OpenDemocracy, 14 February 2013.

According to Stephen Graham, a new set of ‘Foucauldian boomerang effects’ are shaping how states apply ‘tactics of control’ over everyday urban life. Today, he traces the emergence of what he calls a new military urbanism, which applies to cities both in the Global North and South.

On 4 February 1976, Michel Foucault, the eminent French social theorist, stepped gingerly down to the podium in a packed lecture at the Collège de France in the Latin Quarter on Paris’s South Bank. Delivering the fifth in a series of 11 lectures under the title ‘Il faut défendre la société’ (‘Society must be defended’), for once Foucault focused his attention on the relationships between western societies and those elsewhere in the world. Moving beyond his legendary re-theorisations of how knowledge, power, technology and geographical space were combined to underpin…

View original post 184 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Making Human Geography: New book by Kevin Cox

Clive Barnett discusses Kevin Cox’s Making Human Geography – a book that is probably sitting waiting for me back in the UK. Looking forward to reading it – sounds intriguing.

Admin's avatarPop Theory

KCOX

I have just read Kevin Cox’s new book, Making Human Geography. It tells the story, as he sees it, of how over the last 50 years or so, human geography has become a field of sophisticated theoretical and methodological inquiry. He starts by admitting this is a ‘personal understanding’, and it has a strong ‘interpretative’ line that reflects is own convictions, not least about the continuing saliency not just of Marxism, but of geography’s Marxism, of ‘historical-geographical materialism’ as an explanatory framework. I guess this won’t be to everyone’s tastes (there is plenty to disagree with about Kevin’s account of all sorts of things). But one of the things that I liked about the book was its tone. He worries about the ‘eclecticism’ associated with contemporary human geography, especially in its self-consciously ‘critical’ varieties; but does not complain about fragmentation nor indulge in nostalgia for lost coherence. Above all…

View original post 690 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

‘Territory and Transgression: A Conversation with Stuart Elden’ @thepolisblog

topographyofmemoryA long interview with me, conducted by Peter Sigrist, has just been published at Polis. It covers most of my current and past interests, including territory, Lefebvre, Foucault, Sloterdijk, Heidegger, politics,  my time in Israel/Palestine, publishing, literature and film… Many thanks to Peter for inviting me to do this, sending the interesting questions and finding the striking illustrations.

Posted in Bruno Latour, Foucault's Last Decade, Mapping the Present, Michel Foucault, My Publications, Peter Sloterdijk, Politics, Publishing, Ray Brassier, Society and Space, Speaking Against Number, Territory, Terror and Territory, The Birth of Territory, Travel, Universities, urban/urbanisation, Writing | 1 Comment

State, Power, Freedom: European Political Theory – outline for teaching next year

One of the things I was looking forward to, now back in a Politics department, was to teach some political theory. So, this is the outline of a planned module for either final year undergraduates or MA students. It revolves around the themes of state, power and freedom, though responsibility, resistance, capitalism, punishment, sovereignty and governance are all in there too.

1. Existentialism, Freedom and Responsibility

2. Ideology and State Apparatuses

3. State, Production, Capitalism

4. The Punitive Society

5. ‘Society Must Be Defended’

6. The State and the State Mode of Production

7. The State and Self-Governance

8. Sovereign Power and Exclusion

9. The State of Exception

Week 1 is background, using Sartre. Weeks 2 and 3 are on Althusser and especially using the forthcoming translation of On the Reproduction of Capitalism; weeks 4 and 5 on Foucault from Discipline and Punish to governmentality; weeks 6 and 7 on Lefebvre (mainly using State, Space World) and weeks 8 and 9 on Agamben, with, inevitably, a bit of Schmitt. It’s only one term, but the idea is to provide an introductory set of readings in a department where most of the political theory is Anglo-American debates around ethics and justice. The idea is that all the texts can be situated in contexts relevant to their writing – so Sartre in relation to the French resistance and the Nuremberg trials; Althusser in relation to Stalin and the French left; Foucault in the work on prisons and other political activism; Lefebvre’s attitude to the modern world, the PCF and the state mode of production; Agamben in relation to Nazism, the camp and the war on terror. Some of this is close to my own previous research; some is related to current work; some other stuff is newer – I’ve never taught Althusser or Agamben before. Of course, huge amounts are left out, and its both French and male-centric, but I think it would give a reasonable sense of some of the key figures and debates.

Posted in Giorgio Agamben, Henri Lefebvre, Jean-Paul Sartre, Louis Althusser, Michel Foucault, teaching | 1 Comment

Goldsmiths’ Sociology and Warwick’s Politics departments discuss books

Goldsmiths’ Sociology on the books they’re reading – plus Warwick’s Politics as linked from here before.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Peter Adey lectures at Durham – IAS and Geography

Peter Adey of Royal Holloway is a fellow of the Institute of Advanced Studies at Durham this term – these are his lectures during his time there (via rhulgeopolitics).

First, on Monday 27 January, there’s ‘Light and Levitation: Vertical Critique‘. Then, in the afternoon of the 28th, Pete guest lectures on Neocleous and no-fly zones to a seminar on Geopolitics & Territory, co-taught by ex-RHULers Phil Steinberg & Noam Leshem. And then, on Tuesday 4 February, Pete will deliver his Institute of Advanced Study public lecture, ‘The Levitators: Trespassing the Air‘.

Posted in Mark Neocleous, Politics, Territory | Leave a comment

Bailing on Detroit

Jamie Peck on Detroit at the cities@manchester blog

citiesmcr's avatarcities@manchester

Jamie Peck, Department of Geograpy, UBC and Honorary Professor at SEED, University of Manchester, continues his analysis of the on-going restructuring of Detroit and its wider significance for the future of US cities.

Detroit is about to enter a new phase, in its protracted state of financial emergency.  The city’s Emergency Manager, Kevyn Orr—who was appointed by Michigan’s Republican Governor in March 2013, following the breakdown of a so-called “consent agreement” with the state, en route to a long-anticipated declaration of municipal bankruptcy—will soon publish his “plan of adjustment.”  This will spell out the details of what will be tantamount to a court-administered structural adjustment of Detroit, implemented by an unelected financial technocrat whose far-reaching powers trump practically all of those of the city’s elected officials, including the Mayor.  It will set the Motor City on a new path, doubtless based on some inventive (but at the same time…

View original post 1,226 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

CFP 12th Aberystwyth Lancaster Graduate Colloquium – Warwick, 4-6 June 2014

CALL FOR PAPERS

12th Aberystwyth Lancaster Graduate Colloquium

CRITICAL APPROACHES TO INTERNATIONAL STUDIES

4-6 June 2014, University of Warwick

Organised by

Department of Politics and International Studies, University of Warwick

Social Sciences Doctoral Training Centre, University of Warwick

—

CONFIRMED PARTICIPANTS:

Gurminder Bhambra, University of Warwick

Jenny Edkins, Aberystwyth University

Jef Huysmans, Open University

Malcolm MacDonald, University of Warwick

Louiza Odysseos, University of Sussex

Sue Wharton, University of Warwick

—

Founded in 2002, the Aberystwyth Lancaster Graduate Colloquium (ALGC) established itself as the UK’s leading forum in which graduate researchers can explore and discuss critical approaches to global politics. ALGC brings together students and leading scholars in various strands of international theory; from constructivist to poststructuralist, Marxist, feminist and postcolonial approaches. Our aim is to facilitate inclusive and open conversations across different topics and traditions. We wish to encourage all researchers working from a critical perspective to apply.

We are inviting abstracts of no more than 200 words, to be submitted by 28 February 2014 via the online form at www.warwick.ac.uk/algc2014. There will be no registration fees and successful applicants will be able to apply for bursaries to cover travel expenses.

For more information please see the poster and our website at www.warwick.ac.uk/algc2014, or get in touch with us at algc2014@warwick.ac.uk

Rogan Collins & Jakub Eberle

Aberystwyth Lancaster Graduate Colloquium 2014

E-mail: algc2014@warwick.ac.uk

www.warwick.ac.uk/algc2014

Department of Politics and International Studies

University of Warwick

 

Posted in Conferences | Leave a comment

If a man wants to read good books, he must make a point of avoiding bad ones (Schopenhauer)

Schopenhauer’s advice on reading…

Biblioklept's avatarBiblioklept

As regards reading, to require that a man shall retain everything he has ever read, is like asking him to carry about with him all he has ever eaten. The one kind of food has given him bodily, and the other mental, nourishment; and it is through these two means that he has grown to be what he is. The body assimilates only that which is like it; and so a man retains in his mind only that which interests him, in other words, that which suits his system of thought or his purposes in life.

If a man wants to read good books, he must make a point of avoiding bad ones; for life is short, and time and energy limited.

Repetitio est mater studiorum. Any book that is at all important ought to be at once read through twice; partly because, on a second reading, the…

View original post 203 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment